answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer
A:In the debate over the nature of God, the popular Libyan priest Arius led the view that the Son was a divine being, created by the Father at some point in time, and therefore inferior to him.

Around 318, Alexander, bishop of Alexandria, declared heretical the views of Arius and had him, and the clergy who supported him, excommunicated. In order to fully exclude Arius, Alexander had the wording that Christ was "of one being with God" adopted at Nicaea. This was the formal foundation of the doctrine of the Holy Trinity.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
A:In the debate over the nature of God, the popular Libyan priest Arius led the view that the Son was a divine being, created by the Father at some point in time, and therefore inferior to him.

There was no organised opposition to this view, but the eastern Church provided most of the opposition that Arius faced, with the Latin Church either supportive or neutral on the issue. Around 318, Alexander, bishop of Alexandria, declared heretical the views of Arius and had him, and the clergy who supported him, excommunicated. In order to fully exclude Arius, Alexander had the wording that Christ was "of one being with God" adopted at Nicaea. This was the formal foundation of the doctrine of the Holy Trinity.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Who opposed the doctrine of Arius in the fourth century CE?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Who were the chief opponents to the doctrine of Arius in the fourth century CE?

A:In the debate over the nature of God, the popular Libyan priest Arius led the view that the Son was a divine being, created by the Father at some point in time, and therefore inferior to him. There was no organised opposition to this view, but most of the opposition Arius did face came from those within the eastern Church. Around 318, Alexander, bishop of Alexandria, declared heretical the views of Arius and had him, and the clergy who supported him, excommunicated. In order to fully exclude Arius, Alexander had the wording that Christ was "of one being with God" adopted at Nicaea. This was the formal foundation of the doctrine of the Holy Trinity.


What is Arius known for?

Arianism; Arianism refers to the theological positions made famous by the theologian Arius (c. 250-336 CE), who lived and taught in Alexandria, Egypt, in the early 4th century. The controversial teachings of Arius dealt with the relationship between God the Father and the person of Jesus Christ, a relationship known as the doctrine of the Trinity. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arianism


What was the heresy called arianism?

It is the doctrine of the Greek Christian theologian Arius (?250-336 ad), pronounced heretical at the Council of Nicaea, which asserted that Christ was not of one substance with the Father, but a creature raised by the Father to the dignity of Son of God. courtesy of thefreedicitonary.com


Who was the first Catholic priest to start his own church?

Roman Catholic AnswerThe first one that gained a lot of followers and notoriety was Arius in the early fourth century. Probably the most famous in recent history was Martin Luther.


How did the bishops respond to the arian heresy?

A:The late third century and early part of the fourth were a period in which members of the Church were trying to define the divinity of Jesus. Trinitarianism, the doctrine that would ultimately triumph, held that God the Father, Jesus and the Holy Spirit were three persons in one God, equally divine. Arius, a popular Libyan priest, declared that Christ, while divine, was not divine in the same way as God the Father. Around 318, Alexander, bishop of Alexandria, declared heretical the views of Arius and had him, and the clergy who supported him, excommunicated. In order to fully exclude Arius, Alexander had the wording that Christ was "of one being with God" adopted at the Council of Nicaea.The Church Father Origen held somewhat similar views to those of Arius, and some later theologians condemned Origen's views by association with those of Arius. Eusebius wrote to Alexander in support of the Arians, and a copy of this letter was cited at the second Council of Nicæa, to prove that Eusebius was a heretic.The conflict between Arianism and the Trinitarianism was the first important doctrinal difficulty in the Church after the legalisation of Christianity by Emperor Constantine I. At one point in the conflict, Arianism held sway in the family of the Emperor and this could have resulted in it becoming the eventual truth, with the doctrine of the Holy Trinity relegated to heresy. It was not until the end of the fourth century that Emperor Theodosius finally declared Arianism illegal.


The Son or Word was so subordinate to the Father that the Son was not God but a creature of God?

AnswerThis was the position of the Arian Christians, who were prominent in the late third to fourth centuries. Some of the Christian emperors of the fourth century seem to have followed Arius and, had their views prevailed, Christians would no doubt hold the same views today.


When was Arius born?

Arius was born in 256.


When did Arius die?

Arius died in 336.


When did Battle of the Arius happen?

Battle of the Arius happened in -208.


Who forced the calling of the Council of Nicaea?

A:Emperor Constantine called the Council of Nicaea, meeting in 325 CE, to discuss and resolve various differences among the Christian bishops. Bishop Alexander of Alexandria had, around 318, already declared heretical the views of Arius and had him, and the clergy who supported him, excommunicated. In order to fully exclude Arius, Alexander introduced a motion opposed to what had become known as Arianism and had the wording that Christ was "of one being with God" adopted at Nicaea.


Why did Arius reject the Nicene Creed?

In St. Athanasius' own words: "What is at stake is not just a theological theory but people's salvation." Simply put, he meant that if Jesus were not God, as Arius asserted, then people were not saved by his coming, death, and resurrection.


What did arius believe?

Arius did believe that the Son of God was a subordinate entity to God the father. Arius was a Christian presbyter in Alexandria, Egypt.