0
What was the Romans attitude like towards marriage and adoption?
Wiki User
∙ 8y ago
They felt that everyone needed a family!
Darrion Blick
Wiki User
∙ 8y agoMarriage was important for the Romans. Augustus, the first Roman emperor made adultery illegal. In ancient Rome, adoption of boys was a fairly common practice with upper class men, especially if they had no male heir. Roman inheritance laws demanding that the heir be legitimate. Therefore, adoption solved this problem. Adoption could also serve to cement ties and alliances between families, thus could occur even if the adopter had male issue. Adoption of girls was much less common.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why was Jupiter so important to the Romans?
The Roman attitude to their gods was that of a compact - if they honoured the gods, they would look after Rome. Jupiter was their high god and so he was most important to looking after their interests.
What contributions did Romans make to laws?
The Roman contribution to laws are that they founded the basis for our laws. The Romans crafted the Twelve Tables which hold the foundations for law systems. These laws promoted equal treatment, presumption of innocence, and fairness. Their laws covered inheritance, marriage, and courtroom procedures.
Who were the roman slaves called?
The Romans called their slaves by their names.The Romans called their slaves by their names.The Romans called their slaves by their names.The Romans called their slaves by their names.The Romans called their slaves by their names.The Romans called their slaves by their names.The Romans called their slaves by their names.The Romans called their slaves by their names.The Romans called their slaves by their names.
How did the Romans with the Scots?
how did the romans cope with the scots
How were the Inca and Romans alike?
becaues INCAwon and the Romans lost
What do aqueduct tell you about the Romans attitude towards there health?
the Romans built aqueducts to rpovide their town with clean and fresh water , which improved public health.
What was the Roman attitude towards religion?
The Romans had a liberal attitude towards the religions of the conquered peoples.respected and tolerate. With respect to their own religion, their attitude was to respect their gods and to offer sacrifices in their honour to placate them. Not to do so would show disrespect and cause the wrath of the gods. The observance of religious cults, festivals, rituals and rules was also important. The Romans were very religious.
Why was adoption so important to Romans?
Adoption was a way of making family alliances. Heirless emperors also adopted someone to designate him as his heir.
What did most Romans believe when it came to gods?
The prevailing belief among the Romans in regard to the gods was that the gods favored Rome and they would continue to favor Rome as long as the Romans respected and worshiped them with the proper sacrifices and rituals. This attitude toward the gods was not only for the state gods, but it trickled down into the attitudes towards the family gods and even an individual's personal god.
How did the Romans attitude towards the etruscans change over time?
The Romans respected theEtruscans even though some Etruscan cities fought against Rome and Etruscan civilisation begun to fade whenEtruriabecame an economic backwater asRomebecame the hub of trade ofItaly. There were men who reached high positions in theofficesof state and in the army of Rome who were of Etruscan origin and were proud of it. The Romans saw them ashonorablemen.
How did the attitude of Romans towards the Etruscans change over time?
The Romans respected theEtruscans even though some Etruscan cities fought against Rome and Etruscan civilisation begun to fade whenEtruriabecame an economic backwater asRomebecame the hub of trade ofItaly. There were men who reached high positions in theofficesof state and in the army of Rome who were of Etruscan origin and were proud of it. The Romans saw them ashonorablemen.
Why Did the Romans use coins rather than notes?
Among other reasons, they didn't have printing presses! In addition their economy was based on actual values of precious metals, whereas notes are promises of value based on the faith of the citizens in their government. Not that the Romans lacked faith in their leaders, but they just didn't have any experience with that attitude towards money.
What were Roman policies?
You would have to be more specific as to what Roman policies you mean. The Romans had policies for taxation, class, trade, marriage, the army---the list goes on.You would have to be more specific as to what Roman policies you mean. The Romans had policies for taxation, class, trade, marriage, the army---the list goes on.You would have to be more specific as to what Roman policies you mean. The Romans had policies for taxation, class, trade, marriage, the army---the list goes on.You would have to be more specific as to what Roman policies you mean. The Romans had policies for taxation, class, trade, marriage, the army---the list goes on.You would have to be more specific as to what Roman policies you mean. The Romans had policies for taxation, class, trade, marriage, the army---the list goes on.You would have to be more specific as to what Roman policies you mean. The Romans had policies for taxation, class, trade, marriage, the army---the list goes on.You would have to be more specific as to what Roman policies you mean. The Romans had policies for taxation, class, trade, marriage, the army---the list goes on.You would have to be more specific as to what Roman policies you mean. The Romans had policies for taxation, class, trade, marriage, the army---the list goes on.You would have to be more specific as to what Roman policies you mean. The Romans had policies for taxation, class, trade, marriage, the army---the list goes on.
Why were the Romans so violent towards Britain?
The Romans were not particularly violent towards Britain. They did fight insurrections in Britain just as they did in their other provinces, but overall, they were no more harsher in Britain than in any other province.
Did Romans like Sadducee's?
The Romans were neutral towards he Sadducces as they were also neutral towards the Pharisees and the Essenes. As long as the Sadducees kept order and did not promote rebellion against Rome, they were left alone. The Romans preferred to let the Jews (or any conquered peoples) handle their own socio-religious differences.The Romans were neutral towards he Sadducces as they were also neutral towards the Pharisees and the Essenes. As long as the Sadducees kept order and did not promote rebellion against Rome, they were left alone. The Romans preferred to let the Jews (or any conquered peoples) handle their own socio-religious differences.The Romans were neutral towards he Sadducces as they were also neutral towards the Pharisees and the Essenes. As long as the Sadducees kept order and did not promote rebellion against Rome, they were left alone. The Romans preferred to let the Jews (or any conquered peoples) handle their own socio-religious differences.The Romans were neutral towards he Sadducces as they were also neutral towards the Pharisees and the Essenes. As long as the Sadducees kept order and did not promote rebellion against Rome, they were left alone. The Romans preferred to let the Jews (or any conquered peoples) handle their own socio-religious differences.The Romans were neutral towards he Sadducces as they were also neutral towards the Pharisees and the Essenes. As long as the Sadducees kept order and did not promote rebellion against Rome, they were left alone. The Romans preferred to let the Jews (or any conquered peoples) handle their own socio-religious differences.The Romans were neutral towards he Sadducces as they were also neutral towards the Pharisees and the Essenes. As long as the Sadducees kept order and did not promote rebellion against Rome, they were left alone. The Romans preferred to let the Jews (or any conquered peoples) handle their own socio-religious differences.The Romans were neutral towards he Sadducces as they were also neutral towards the Pharisees and the Essenes. As long as the Sadducees kept order and did not promote rebellion against Rome, they were left alone. The Romans preferred to let the Jews (or any conquered peoples) handle their own socio-religious differences.The Romans were neutral towards he Sadducces as they were also neutral towards the Pharisees and the Essenes. As long as the Sadducees kept order and did not promote rebellion against Rome, they were left alone. The Romans preferred to let the Jews (or any conquered peoples) handle their own socio-religious differences.The Romans were neutral towards he Sadducces as they were also neutral towards the Pharisees and the Essenes. As long as the Sadducees kept order and did not promote rebellion against Rome, they were left alone. The Romans preferred to let the Jews (or any conquered peoples) handle their own socio-religious differences.
How the roman's attitude changed over time?
The ancient Romans eventually became Christians under Emperor Constantine
What statement describes Rome's attitude towards people of different religions in the empire?
Ancient Romans let people to keep their own religions when they conquered new lands. That made the conquered people easier to adapt to the Roman culture. Romans built temples for their own gods in the provinces, but they let people to worship their original gods as well. Only after Christianity became the state religion, they started to keep other religions pagan and finally forbid them. Christianity was more intolerant than other religions before it.
