Want this question answered?
Part of the difference lies in the fact that the Japanese hierarchy had a greater number of roles particularily for the peasants. Wherase the European peasants were not necessarily divided into actual roles, the Japanese were. As well the addition of a Shogun is different from any role preseted within European feudalism. Since within European feudalism the monarch would fufill both the role of the emperor and the shogun in one.
Feudalism was the basis of European civilization during the Medieval Times. It impacted the rights of citizens, government, and overall society. Feudalism had a hierarchy where citizens were largely separated, and was also extremely religious.
is wasnt
Feudalism was based on a hierarchy of needs, where serfs and peasants were at the bottom, and the Pope and highest leaders were at the top.
Healthy relationships, unity and virtue!
European feudalism emerged when the Roman empire fell during the 5th century. During the 10th century, it was in France and Germany that the first elements of feudalism appeared.
Both the European and Japanese feudal systems developed as a result of a weak central government.
Medieval European society consisted of a hierarchy. In order of decreasing levels the hierarchy listed kings, nobles, knights, merchants/farmers/craftsmen, and then peasants/serfs.
Feudalism in japan was similar to European feudalism as they both involved the same heirachy and therefore was quite simialr apart from the class definitions.
The European feudalism worked by bringing social stability in medieval Europe.
decentralized government
NO