the correct amino acids won't be transfered to the ribosomes and the protein synthesis would fail. PLATO says so.
There would be no protein synthesis.
Some organisms population would decrease
Its capability and capacity to manufacture proteins would be reduced.
No, ribosomes are in prokaryote cells and doing the job of synthesizing proteins.
Cell division would not take place and genetic material would not pass on to the next generation.
Ribosomes are responsible for protein synthesis.If they are absent it affects the protein synthesis,which indirectly effects health.Therefore victims suffer from malnutririon such as Marasmus,Kwashiorkor.
I'm answering this as 'What would happen to an animal that does not have ribosomes?' Ribosomes are the main site for DNA translation, where the genetic code (held in DNA) is translated into a sequence of amino acids. Three 'bases' or segments in the DNA molecule code for one amino acid. The amino acids then join together to form proteins, the building blocks of life. Therefore, if there were no ribosomes, no proteins would be produced and, therefore, the animal would quickly die. I'm not sure if there are any animals which do not have ribosomes, and have worked out another way to synthesise DNA...
This cannot possibly happen, so asking what would happen if it did happen is an exercise in stupidity.
you will need a cast
There would be no protein synthesis.
the synthesis of enzymes would stop
Protein production would cease and death would occur.
Some organisms population would decrease
Its capability and capacity to manufacture proteins would be reduced.
There would be a good chance that you would get food or drink in your lungs when you eat and/or drink.
Ribosomes are a cell structure that makes protein
No, ribosomes are in prokaryote cells and doing the job of synthesizing proteins.