Want this question answered?
Gandhian era marked an impeccable period in the indian national movement , which gave an inspiration for the people to get the freedom. Mahatma with his new forms of struggle like ahimsa , satyagraha , and non cooperation almost shook base of the imperial british. He consolidated india as a nation , with his outstanding oratory skills he sparked the minds of each and every indian including men , women ,and youth . With his efforts national movement had reached to the grass root level and became a mass movement. National movement has been speed up and many movements with a large scale participation through out india, like ncm , cdm , qim became a reality. Finally we got the independence in 1947.later this mode of struggle got the world reputation , and became modal for many national movements through the world.
nonviolence
Gandhiji converted national movement to mass movement by taking up issues that affect the masses like the salt law, Khilafat issue, Rowlatt act etc.
well... :) First, Bus boycott, civil rights act, NAACP..etc
mass movement
A slump mass movement is faster because a creep mass movement is the slowest kind of mass movement.it is slow because the mass movement involve gradual downhill movement of soil and regolith.
A mass movement is caused by Gravity.
a slump is a type of mass movement
Many social scientists and historians believe that before a national mass movement can succeed requires one essential element. That concerns the powers or the government that is seen as the establishment. If the current power structure is discredited, that is one key for the success of a mass movement.
What are two examples of slow mass movement? What are two examples of slow mass movement?
Mass movement is the movement in which Earth's surface changes.
The difference between the movement of Nepal and Bolivia are as follows:- a)The movement in Nepal was to establish democracy, while the struggle in Bolivia involved claims on an elected, democratic government. b) The popular struggle in Bolivia was about one specific policy, while the struggle in Nepal was about the foundations of the country's politics. Both these struggles were successful but their impact was at different levels. c) The popular struggle in Nepal was against Constitutional Monarchy and to establish a Democratic Government. The popular struggle in Bolivia was against a Government policy, i.e. privatization of water supply.