answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer
A:We do not really know who wrote any of the four New Testament gospels or where, since they were anonymous until assigned to Mattew, Mark, Luke and John later in the second century, on the assumption that perhaps these were the most likely authors. However, modern scholars say there is no good reason to accept those attributions. Thus, we can not locate the places of authorship by locating the likely locations of the authors.

However, we can perhaps identify the region in which they were written by the language in which they were written, since they were written to be read by people in their own language. All four were written in Greek Koine, the lingua franca of the ancient Near East, but somewhat different to the classical Greek dialects used in Greece itself. Mark's Gospel was the first gospel to be written, and this clue suggests it was written in the Near East for a Near Eastern audience, although a widely accepted tradition is that it was written in Rome, where the most widely used language was Latin.

Matthew and Luke were substantially based on Mark, so it can not be reliably assumed that they were also written in the Near East, although this region was still the most likely region of authorship. Alternatively, it might have been most convenient to have copied in the same language, Greek Koine, even if written to be read by people more familiar with classical Greek. Although Matthew was written well before Luke and John, this gospel seems to have been entirely unknown to the two later evangelists, suggesting a geographical separation.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago

The synoptic (which simply means "the same") gospels are Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. They all tell the same story, just from a different view point.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Where are the synoptic gospels today?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Which gospel was written to inspire faith in Jesus but is not a synoptic gospel?

The gospel of John is not part of the Synoptic Gospels.The gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke are referred to as the Synoptic Gospels.


Which one of the gospels is not synoptic?

john


Should the Synoptic Gospels be capitalized?

Yes.


Of the four evanglists which was not part of the synoptic writers?

Saint John (he wrote the gospel of john in the bible) is the evangelist who was not part of the synoptic writers. The Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke were known as the synoptic writers because they had many of the same stories in their gospels.


What are 3 Gospels that are alike?

Matthew, Mark and Luke are referred to as the 'synoptic gospels' in that they tell of similar stories and in similar sequences.


What language does the word synoptic gospels come from?

A:The word 'synoptic' is derived from the Greek language (synoptikos) and means 'with the same eye'. It was used for the synoptic gospels (Matthew, Mark and Luke) because when lain in parallel and read synoptically in the original Greek language, it becomes clear that much of the material in two of the gospels, Matthew and Luke, was copied from the Gospel of Mark.


What do you call the books that talk about the life and deeds of christ?

They're usually referred to as the Gospels. Sometimes, in academia, they're called the "Synoptic Gospels."


What type of gospels are the first three gospels?

A:The first three New Testament gospels are known as the synoptic gospels. The word 'synoptic' means 'seen with the same eye' and is used to describe them because, when laid in parallel and 'seen with the same eye' in the original Greek language, it can be demonstrated that one gospel (Mark) must have been the original from which the other two were copied.


Which one of the four gospels is not synoptic?

A:Among the New Testament gospels, Matthew, Mark and Luke are known as synoptic ('seen with the same eye') gospels, because when laid sise by side in the original Greek language and seen with the same eye, it can be shown that two of these gospels must have been based on the third. The original of these gospels is now known to have been Mark's Gospel. On the other hand, when John's Gospel is laid alongside the others, its dependence is not immediately apparent. Because John was more loosely based on Luke and, to a lesser extent, Mark, there are few similarities in the text and even the storyline often differs. It is therefore not a synoptic gospel.The Gospel of John is not one of the "synoptic gospels"


What 4 gospels are called synoptic?

Matthew, Mark and Luke. Matthew, Mark, and Luke. These gospels are concidered synoptic because of close relation to eachother. They generally follow the same sequence and recount on similar stories.


What are the common oral traditions between the synoptic gospels?

A:Common oral traditions would be a useful explanation for what is known as the 'Synoptic Problem', a problem of the surprising similarities among the synoptic gospels, if those traditions exist. However, a parallel reading of the three synoptic gospels, in the original Greek language, shows that when they agree, the similarities are too great and they often use exactly the same words in the Greek language. Clearly, there is a literary dependency among the synoptic gospels, and it can not be explained by oral sources. The explanation for this is that Matthewand Luke were actually based on Mark, but also relied on the hypothetical 'Q' document for further sayings material attributed to Jesus. There is no evidence of common oral traditions.


How is Jesus betrayed in the synoptic gospels?

In the Gospels according to Matthew, Mark, and Luke, Judas turned Jesus in to the scribes and high priests in exchange for coins.