Either could be correct, because the adjectives "most" and "more" may be used differently; more is the comparative form, most is the superlative form for the adjective many.
To say "one of the most" is to indicate that the object or concept is among the top examples within a group, e.g. "one of the most powerful animals."
To say "one of the more" is to indicate that something is within the high end of its class, not necessarily near the top, e.g "one of the more lethal snakes" is one that is in the upper half, rather than the lower. Additionally, "more" can be used as a numerical adjective in a descriptive phrase, e.g. "one of the more than twenty high-rise hotels in the city."
Yes, you can say that in correct English. One of the most cutest is grammatically correct.
Both are grammatically correct, depending on how you prefer your sentence to read. Most two syllable adjectives form two forms of the comparative and superlative. "Narrower" is the germanic-rooted comparative form of the adjective "narrow," while "more narrow" is the French-influenced version. "Narrowest" and "most narrow" are both acceptable superlatives.A few other words that are correct both ways are handsome, clever, and simpler. Some say that "commoner" is an acceptable comparative adjective, but "more common" has become much more, well, common. Prefered forms (like much of English) makes a slow and steady tectonic shift as certain usages fall out of practice.
correct. but one religon seems to have the most terrorists.
The superlative degree of "lively" is "liveliest". This is equivalent to the alternative "most lively". Both are grammatically correct.
No it is redundant. The comparative and superlative of "safe" are "safer" and "safest". The "most" is unneccesary. You would write or say simply "the safest".
No, "most friendly" is not grammatically correct. The correct form would be "friendliest" when comparing three or more things.
Yes, "most preferable" is grammatically correct. It is a comparative form that indicates the highest level of preference in a given context.
Yes, you can say that in correct English. One of the most cutest is grammatically correct.
Yes, the sentence "He is their most targeted receiver" is grammatically correct. It means that he is the receiver who gets the most passes thrown to him by his team.
No. It is my favorite place is the correct spelling. Most is implied in favorite.
No, it is not. It would be either most sweet, or sweetest.
Both are grammatically correct, depending on how you prefer your sentence to read. Most two syllable adjectives form two forms of the comparative and superlative. "Narrower" is the germanic-rooted comparative form of the adjective "narrow," while "more narrow" is the French-influenced version. "Narrowest" and "most narrow" are both acceptable superlatives.A few other words that are correct both ways are handsome, clever, and simpler. Some say that "commoner" is an acceptable comparative adjective, but "more common" has become much more, well, common. Prefered forms (like much of English) makes a slow and steady tectonic shift as certain usages fall out of practice.
It doesn't look grammatically correct, but not everything that is correct looks that way. When you break the sentence apart, there is nothing missing. It has a subject and a predicate. Although "You are the winner" may be more appealing to most people, I do not believe there is anything grammatically incorrect with your example, as ugly as it may sound. It is correct. You can be be a subject or an object pronoun. subject - You are the winner! object - The winner is you!
Both "the most known" and "the most well known" are grammatically correct phrases. However, "the most well known" is more commonly used and often sounds more natural in context.
correct. but one religon seems to have the most terrorists.
Both forms are acceptable. Traditionally, the former has been used in the past, while the latter form is now more grammatically correct, according to most sources.
The green moss was most slippery when it was wet.