Because the race of Christ has been a subject of debate between many races since at least the 19th century and still continues. These verses can be seen in different ways; for instance its was written "white like wool", and can be interpreted in favour for poetic imagery to glorify the heavenly body of Christ rather than to provide a strong description of his appearance.
They where in Africa
CAIN
well depends on the parents, if both are black then yes..its pretty obvious
J. F. Black has written: 'The Bible way' -- subject(s): Doctrines, Controversial literature, Disciples of Christ
It comes from a passage in the bible that could be interpreted as black people being cursed by god.
Bible Black happened in 2000.
Solomon was supposably black in the bible.
The bible does not say that Cain was black.
A) God said nothing in the bible which refers to the United States of America - that country wasn't known about when the God of the bible was speaking to his people. B) The God of the bible said nothing to his people about black people. C) God said nothing about Presidents - that political position wasn't known about when the God of the bible was speaking to his people. So, to answer the question - God said nothing about a blackman, the presidency and America. Actually The Bible says: "Can the Ethiopian change his skin?" That refers to black people. No, it refers to Ethiopians - who happen to be black. Other black people were known then - the Nubians, for example - so if God wanted to refer to skin colour, he could have, but he didn't. Not even in the minds of the translators of the middle ages, who would have known "black" in the meaning the question asks of.
There is only one Christ and He was Middle Eastern. The black Christ is probably just an African American image of Jesus.
I doubt that it says so anywhere in the Bible. "Black hole" is a modern term, that arose in the 20th. century; not one that was used thousands of years ago, when the Bible was written.
The duration of Bible Black is 1800.0 seconds.