its usually because they have high hormones which means they have a high level of the need to mate with a female. So i suggest getting them fixed, and trained!
Muscle.
because its dump
On a Bos indicus bovine, yes. On a Bos taurusbovine which would be a bull, no. That hump is of muscle, not fat.
YES. All bulls should have a hump or crest over their shoulders. This is a sign of masculinity and fertility in a bull. If a bull does not have a muscular crest over his shoulders, especially when he's past sexual maturity and adult maturity, he should be culled because he is deemed inferior as a herd bull simply because he lacks the qualities that a great herd bull should have, such as masculinity, fertility, and great conformation.
ALL bulls should have a hump or crest. A muscular hump on their necks is a sign of adequate masculinity and good fertility. They are what cattle producers call "superior quality sires." A bull with no or a very small hump on its neck is a bull that is inferior, with poor fertility, poor muscling, and lacking in masculinity. These kind of bulls shouldn't be used for breeding females, and should be slaughtered for beef or sold as bologna bulls.
It's because their vagina is irritated after having the bull's penis being thrusted up inside her.
Brahman cattle are derived from the species Bos indicus, which is the species of cattle that evolved in the Middle East to tolerate high heat and humidity. The hump assists the animal in dumping excess heat so that the animal doesn't overheat.
That hump over a bull's neck and shoulders is full of nothing but muscle, and lots of it. The crest shows cattle producers a bull's masculinity and his ability to be a good sire, so long as the rest of his tools are functioning properly. The crest is also a way to show other bulls how big and stronger he is in comparison with these other males (as well as the rest of his body).
No, the hump is composed of fat and not water.
Everything.
Killer, Hump Back Killer, Hump Back
Yes