You do not give anything to compare the maltose to, but I assume you mean 'longer than glucose'.
Glucose is a monosaccharide, that is it consists of a single ring of carbon and oxygen atoms. Maltose is a disaccharide, that is two glucose rings joined together. That makes it almost twice as big as glucose. If the particles of the two sugars are at the same temperature, they have the same average kinetic energy, so the more massive ones move more slowly. The slower movement means maltose diffuses more slowly out of the tubing.
Cannot pass through visking tubing: sugar starch lactose sucrose Can pass through visking tubing: Iodine Glucose Maltose
yes it can
visking tubing
it needs to dry
capillaries in the villi
Because it has starch in it.
Visking tubing contains millions of tiny holes which only let small molecules, like water, diffuse through. Large molecules, such as starch, cannot cross the membrane. We say it is partially permeable (permeable means a substance is able to pass through). This is similar to a cell membrane. Visking tubing can therefore be used as a model of a cell.
Visking tubing is a kind of seamless semi permeable tubing, a cellulose tubing, that is made of regenerated cellophane. It is used as an edible casing for sausages or as a membrane in dialysis.
We supply Visking tubing and offer the following information: The molecular weight cut-off of this product is 12000 - 14000 daltons. This means in theory that molecules larger in MW than this will not pass through the membranes and ones smaller will. Starch has a very high molecular weight and the tubing is often used to illustrate the effect of enzymes breaking starch down into to simple sugars. Starch therefore should not pass through the membrane wall. The user of this product should be aware that this is a nominal cut-off and long thin molecules above the 14kd cut-off may go through and globular molecules below may be retained. In addition the charge on a molecule may effect the rate of transfer across the membrane.
You may be thinking of the blood capillaries. Like visking tubing, their walls are able to let substances diffuse in and out. This is also true of the cell membranes. However both of these are much more permeable than visking tubing. The kidney contains semi-permeable membranes which allow urea to pass through but not other substances such as proteins.
so as to prevent contamination. that should be one point.
the visking tubing is useless and we need an alternative. can u helpful human beings help please? we are in the middle of a chaotic crisis trying to find the reason for osmosis. please help you kind human beings :) i hate you bye -from the scientists of Mars :