0
The Sulu Sultanate be bring about its return of total sovereignty and independence because of the existence of the true to blood heir of the true and rightful 1839 to 1904 Sultan Pulalun and because of heirs from Usurper-Sultans after Sultan Pulalun, but from Pulalun's Adinda-prince and heir-apparent of the 1859 Maharaa Adinda Taup, the latter who begotted the Arpa Heir.
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
When did Sultanate of Sulu end?
Sultanate of Sulu ended in 1917.
When was Sultanate of Sulu created?
The Sultanate of Sulu was established in 1405 by a Johore-born Arab adventurer named Sharif ul-Hashim. The exact date of its creation is not definitively known, but it was formally recognized by Spain in the mid-19th century.
Is there any other means to return Sabah to the owner?
Under the current political circumstances, there is no way that Malaysia will return Sabah to it's owner the Sultanate of Sulu. However, the emergence of international awareness in human rights sponsored by the UN could find it's way to solve the issue. Hongkong was returned to China which was rented 100 years ago, this is a clear evidence of possible return of Sabah to the Sultanate of Sulu in the same principle. The problem is neither the Sultanate of Sulu has the entity to represent their case to UN due to to their non-existence as political entity that was not supported in the jurisdiction of UN political diplomatic protocol. The only possible means is to proprietarily claim Sabah outside of the political clout to avoid the political sovereign issues involved.
What is the legal basis of sabah claim by the sultanate of sulu?
Malaysia was formed and given independence by the British Government in 1963. The Sultanate of Sulu and North Borneo was also given by the British Government the 'Letter of Administration to Sabah, acknowledging all the property of the Sultanate of Sulu over Sabah in 1939. To the effect that 1939 is earlier than 1963 explicitly telling us which one is genuine and legal.Another striking solid and legal evidence of the Sabah ownership is the case filed by Indonesia to the United Nations to claim part of Sipadan,Sabah against Malaysia . The UN ruling under ICJ explicitly stated that Indonesia has no sovereign rights over Sipadan ,Sabah because it is owned by the Sultanate of Sulu under administration of Malaysia.Therefore, if Malaysia will not acknowledge the ownership by the Sultanate of Sulu over Sabah, Malaysia is directly violating ( for in fact being violated for 47 years) the UN sanctions over Sipadan, Sabah stating that the Sultanate of Sulu is the legitimate owner of Sabah.Moreover , if Malaysia will not acknowledge the 1939 High Court decision and the implementation of the 'Letter of Administration over Sabah that the Sultanate of Sulu is the owner of Sabah , Malaysia has to nullify their Independence given by the British Government in 1963 ,simply because it is the same government , the British Government who gave authority over the ownership of Sabah which is far earlier than their independence in 1963.The continued ignoring of Malaysia to this day of the rights to possessed the ownership, over Sabah by the Sultanate of Sulu Kingdom, creates a continuous anger on the part of the Sultanate people for prohibiting them ti live in their own land and even expulsing the people of the Sultanate living in Sabah today.
Why the Philippines is not helping the Sultanate of Sulu and North Borneo?
The Philippines is said to be reluctant to assist the Sultanate of Sulu and North Borneo for many varied reasons The speculations that Malaysia is paying the administration government of the Philippines in tunes of Millions could be true. Philippines gave more weight to the diplomatic relation with Malaysia rather than to assist the Sultanate of Sulu and North Borneo. The Philippines is exactly on the same situations as Malaysia for the fact that Sulu kingdom was not conquered by the Spanish and therefore it is considered still as a free country with sovereignty, the fear of both Malaysia and the Philippines to the Sultanate of Sulu and North Borneo kingdom to become sovereign power is the top reason why Malaysia and Philippines has to contend to keep the kingdom suppressed. The war in Mindanao is one of the example - Malaysia is supporting MNLF and MILF , the Philippines is seemingly condoning it to keep the Sultanate people busy and at the same time reducing their population by allowing themselves to kill each other by the principle of "Ethnic Cleansing". The proprietary ownership of the Sultanate of Sulu and sabah to both Philippines and Malaysia is being grab by both to keep the kingdom in poverty.
Who is datu hussayin arpa from siasi sulu Sultanate of Sulu?
Datuk Hussayin Arpa is a prominent leader in the Siasi, Sulu region. He is known for his contributions to the local community and his efforts in promoting peace and development in the area. As a Datu, he holds a position of authority and respect within the Sultanate of Sulu.
What has the author Thomas H Haynes written?
Thomas H. Haynes has written: 'The Philippine islands and the Sulu sultanate' -- subject(s): Colonial question, History
Will Malaysia return Sabah to the rightfull owner?
Returning Sabah may not be the issue for Malaysia, but the interest of Malaysia to Profit out of Sabah. It was said that the net profit of Malaysia to Sabah and Sarawak combined could be 40 to 50 % of their GNP . Looking closely , Malaysia will not let Sabah and Sarawak go off their hand without provocation of a probable war. However, the advent of modern advocacy under UN charters may put end to this long and standing problem of Sabah like Hongkong that was returned to China lately, Forfeiting the real owner of their rights as the legitimate and sovereign owner of the land, the Sultanate of Sulu is now at the mercy of the UN or any country that will sponsor the case against Malaysia. Many countries of the world now has managed to get away from their captors through the intervention of UN. The problem today of finding a sponsor country for the Sultanate remains unclear, since the Sultanate of Sulu has been stripped out of her Political power to become a member nation of UN.The only probable solution is to privately lodge a case to ICJ if will be permitted. To return Sabah to the Sultanate of Sulu is almost as impossible task but hope is still and miracle could happen only as an alternative.
Who owns Sabah Island?
The owner of Sabah is the Royal Sultanate of Sulu and North Borneo Kingdom. It was been rented to the British North Borneo Company ,a private charter company in 1878. When the private charter company has dissolved , the lease was absorbed by the British Government which later transfer to Malaysia in 1963 when they got their independence.Sabah did not join Malaysia according to Yong Teck Lee in his statement , it was included without the consent of the owner , the Royal Sultanate of Sulu and North Borneo Kingdom. Sabah is now being administered by Malaysia since the Royal Sultanate of Sulu and North Borneo kingdom is now only a traditional government not political.In 1939 the High Court of North Borneo has come out of the ruling to implement the proprietary audit and inventory of Sabah property of the Royal Sultanate of Sulu and North Borneo but did not materialized due to the coming of Second World War. After the war comes the turmoils in the hierarchy, Dayang Dayang Hadji Piandao, the sister of Princess Tarhata assume the throne and illegally passed on to her husband Ombra Amilbangsa which was not entitled to the throne, then Abraham Rasul ,the adviser of President Marcos misled the president by electing Mahakutta Kiram , the son of Sultan Esmail Kiram I as Sultan while Punjungan Kiram , the successor to his brother Esmail Kiram I was in Sabah. This was corrected when Punjungan return to Sulu and installed by President Marcos. Punjungan Kiram is the administrator of Sabah as per 1939 McKaskie ruling, the father of the current Sultan HRH Esmail D. Kiram IIThe reigning and legitimate Sultan of Royal Sultanate of Sulu and North Borneo, (www.sulu.gov.pH) is his Royal highness HRH Sultan Esmail D. Kiram II, he has decided and signed a "Royal Decree' and 'Royal Authority ' to the "Sultanate of Sulu and North Borneo Company Limited",a Hongkong registered Company to undertake the total development and management of Sabah property of the Kingdom.There were claiming sultans of Sulu and North Borneo in the relative lineage, but failed to justify themselves holding the positions of Maharajah Adinda and Rajah Muda, prior to their supposed claim as Sultan.The unbroken hierarchy of Maharajah Adinda ,Rajah Muda and Sultan proper must be undergone by the legitimate and reigning Sultan of Royal Sultanate of Sulu and North Borneo Kingdom. None so far among claimant Sultans has gone through the Maharajah Adinda and Rajah Muda prior to their claim except his HRH Sultan Esmail D. Kiram II. ( www.sultanatesulu.org )
Why Malaysia insist the ownership of sabah?
Sabah or North Borneo is owned by the Sultanate of Sulu. Sabah was rented by BNBC in 1878 from the Sultan of Sulu and later turned to British Government for administration. when the company ceased to exist, respectively the political power of the Sultanate of Sulu was diminished by U. S government when they sponsored an independence on part of the Sulu archipelago islands bought from the Spanish in 1898. This create a misunderstanding when Manuel Quezon declared not to recognized the political power of the Sultanate of Sulu and it''s heirs for the fear that a similar case will be filed against other part of Sulu archipelago which also own by the Sultanate of Sulu in the Philippines. The case filed by the heirs against Malaysia won on 1939 in the High Court of North Borneo under Mckaskie judgment declaring the ownership of Sabah by the Sultanate of Sulu heirs and the continuance of rental. Malaysia continue the administration of Sabah upon their independence in 1963 to this day as per legal and historical facts serving as evidence. Malaysia is continually trying to deviate that political control and ownership of the land is the same. political sovereignty and proprietary sovereignty is being mix up until today , no clear indication that this issue will be settled between Malaysia and the leadership of the Sultanbate of Sulu standing now as ecclesiastical government.
What is the Sabah issue?
The issue is whether or not Malaysia has legitimate rights to control the province of Sabah on the island of Borneo. Please see the Related Links below for arguments from both the Sulu Sultanate and Malaysia on the matter.
Why the Sultanate of Sulu and North Borneo Kingdom was diminished?
Looking back in the history, quest for dominion and power in Europe is in close rivalry, almost all country in Europe at the start of 15th century wants to rule the world. Spain is one contender under the Catholic banner and the religious quest has become the most viable reason to colonize the Sulu and North Borneo archipelago islands. When Spanish saw the tribal stage govermental system of the scattered islands of the Archipelago , they start to used many ploy to convinced the wholly Muslim population of Sulu archipelago. They succeeded in Cebu and Luzon but never Mindanao specially Sulu and neighboring islands. When America join the power race , Spain sold the Philippines which was basically Luzon and Visayas island only but the 'Treaty of Paris" used technical descriptions that encompass the whole of Sulu archipelago islands. Later , America sponsored a Philippine Republic that denounce the existence of the Sultanate of Sulu and North Borneo under Manauel L. Quezon as president of the Republic. All the ploy are initiated by Catholic based country from Europe. England is the mother country of America , The Sultanate of Sulu and North Borneo is run by Islamic Faith and this could be the reason it was diminished on the ground that Muslim and Catholics are fighting under religious war for many years. Today , the people of the Sultanate of Sulu and North Borneo under the reigning Sultan Esmail D. Kiram II want to emphasize their rights to live peacefully in their own land, but the territory that belongs to them were grabbed by both Malaysia and the Philippines. We can see the Asian version of Palestine here who own the land and was grabbed from them by another country.The Sultanate and North borneo Kingdom is unique because two country has grabbed their land Malaysia and Philippines. Malaysia is in shame position noting that they are also a Muslim country aggravating the Muslim people of Sulu and North Borneo comparing to a catholic Philippines.
