Want this question answered?
Diocletian.
He divided Rome into two.
The Roman Empire was divided into eastern and western Rome
Rome was started by Romulus and Remus, it was split into two different empires by Diocletian.
Because of yes
There were no emperors in 382BC. In 382CE(AD) the emperor was Theodosius II on his death in 395 the empire was divided between his sons Arcadius (East) and Honorius (West). The two halves were never to be reunited after this date but this was not necessarily the original intention.
Emperor Diocletian, who created a tetrarchy to more effectively govern the Roman world. It consisted of two senior emperors (augustii) and two junior emperors (caesars), with the western capital based in Rome and the eastern capital in what would be Constantinople.
Diocletian divided Rome because he thought it was too big and it would take months to receive a message and send one back so he divided it into western Rome and eastern Rome after time passed eastern Rome became better because all the money that China was sending eastern Rome received it. Also as time passed western Rome got invaded by the barbarians and the sabotaged all of western Rome. Many people say that Rome fell but other people consider it as it being adapted :)
Diocletian divided the empire
There was no emperor that divided the Roman empire into two. The emperor Diocletian divided the empire into four, which was called a tetrarchy. There were 2 Caesars and 2 Augustii and they were all answerable to Diocletian.There was no emperor that divided the Roman empire into two. The emperor Diocletian divided the empire into four, which was called a tetrarchy. There were 2 Caesars and 2 Augustii and they were all answerable to Diocletian.There was no emperor that divided the Roman empire into two. The emperor Diocletian divided the empire into four, which was called a tetrarchy. There were 2 Caesars and 2 Augustii and they were all answerable to Diocletian.There was no emperor that divided the Roman empire into two. The emperor Diocletian divided the empire into four, which was called a tetrarchy. There were 2 Caesars and 2 Augustii and they were all answerable to Diocletian.There was no emperor that divided the Roman empire into two. The emperor Diocletian divided the empire into four, which was called a tetrarchy. There were 2 Caesars and 2 Augustii and they were all answerable to Diocletian.There was no emperor that divided the Roman empire into two. The emperor Diocletian divided the empire into four, which was called a tetrarchy. There were 2 Caesars and 2 Augustii and they were all answerable to Diocletian.There was no emperor that divided the Roman empire into two. The emperor Diocletian divided the empire into four, which was called a tetrarchy. There were 2 Caesars and 2 Augustii and they were all answerable to Diocletian.There was no emperor that divided the Roman empire into two. The emperor Diocletian divided the empire into four, which was called a tetrarchy. There were 2 Caesars and 2 Augustii and they were all answerable to Diocletian.There was no emperor that divided the Roman empire into two. The emperor Diocletian divided the empire into four, which was called a tetrarchy. There were 2 Caesars and 2 Augustii and they were all answerable to Diocletian.
Emperor Diocletian in CE 285. However, the empire was reunified for short periods of time, like the reign of Emperors Constantine, Julian the Apostate, and Theodosius I. Also, the Eastern Empire had re-invaded the Western Empire during the reign of Justinian I and tried to recreate and rebuild the empire, but with his death the Western part of the Byzantine Empire was retaken by Barbarians.
If you are referring to the Roman Empire, no one split it into two pieces or two parts. The emperor Diocletian divided it into four parts which was called the tetrarchy. It was later historians that gave the false impression that the empire was split.