answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The southern states were opposed to the southern states secession because the South was the North's major source of revenue. in the 1860s, about 30 percent of the population of the United States lived in the South and yet they paid, through an unfair system of tariffs, up to 85% of the federal budget. Almost all of the funds the government collected from the South was spent in the North, because they had the majority of the votes in Congress.

The southern states began to secede when Abraham Lincoln was elected president, without getting a single electoral vote from the South. Lincoln's unpopularity in the south was due largely to the fact he had vowed to increase taxes against the South even more. At the same time, Lincoln pledged he would not interfere with slavery where it already existed, which was in both the North and the South.

Most of Lincoln's advisers and hundreds of northern newspapers felt the South should be allowed to go in peace, as was their constitutional right. Lincoln opposed by saying, "I can't let them go. Who would pay for the government?"

In March 1861, shortly before the outbreak of the War Between the States, the New York Evening Post editorialized on this point: "That either the revenue from duties must be collected in the ports of the rebel states, or the port must be closed to importations from abroad, is generally admitted. If neither of these things be done, our revenue laws are substantially repealed; the sources which supply our treasury will be dried up; we shall have no money to carry on the government; the nation will become bankrupt before the next crop of corn is ripe. There will be nothing to furnish means of subsistence to the army; nothing to keep our navy afloat; nothing to pay the salaries of public officers; the present order of things must come to a dead stop."

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

slaves would gain political standing

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

no

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why were northerners so opposed to popular sovereignty?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Why did southerners support the annexation of Texas?

They thought that granting popular sovereignty would allow slavery


Why popular sovereignty was so controversial?

what is that


Where did many northerners go to after the passage of the Kansas-nebraska act?

To Kansas, to buy cheap properties, so that they could register as voters, and try to get Kansas admitted to the USA as free soil under the Popular Sovereignty (local voting) principle.


What Popular sovereignty requires what?

Those who make laws do so with the approval of the citizens.


Why was popular sovereignty so well-supported as a just and fair way to settle the slavery question?

Popular sovereignty was well supported because it allowed the local citizens of a territory to decide if slavery was to be allowed or illegal. Stephen A. Douglas pushed for popular sovereignty during the 1840's.


Why did Northerners oppose the Fugitive Slave Act?

Northerners opposed the Fugitive Slacve law because they were against slavery, so they didn't want to help capture runaway slaves because they thought that if they had got away, then leave them alone. Besides it would make slavery worse in a way.


What were the northerners fighting for?

so they can be gay


Why did Northerners favor Wilmot Proviso and Southerners did not?

Northerners favored it because it banned slavery in the land obtained from Mexico, aka the Mexican Cession, thus making another step toward abolishing slavery. They supported this so much, that antislavery northerners created a new party, known as the Free- Soil Party, which supported the Wilmot Proviso. Southerners, however, opposed it, and wanted more land that allows slavery.


Why were popular sovereignty and limited government important to the Framers of the Constitution?

Popular sovereignty is the idea that the government is of the people... it means citizens are in power. Limited government stems from this idea... that government is their to protect the people and popular sovereignty (but limited government does not rule over the people like you would see in a dictatorship or a communist state.)


What where the main points of the kansas-nebraska act?

It would allow the people of each new state to vote on whether to be slave or free - so-called Popular Sovereignty.


What was the name of the fraction which opposed ratifying the constitution?

Anti federalists was the name given to the fraction which opposed the ratification of the US Constitution. These were people that were against strengthening government because they felt that by doing so the sovereignty and prestige of the states, individuals, and localities throughout the United States would be jeopardized.


What is internal sovereignty?

"Internal sovereignty" or "state sovereignty" represents the legitimate authority of a state or local government to establish and enforce laws within their jurisdiction. In the US, states retain those prerogatives not expressly granted to the national (Federal) government, so long as they are not exercised in conflict with Federal Laws and regulations. A state that has internal sovereignty is one with a government that has been elected by the people and has the popular legitimacy. (Commentary has been moved to the Discussion pages)