Blue light
has the shortest
wavelength
of the visible spectrum. The shorter the wavelength, the higher the resolution one can achieve with a
light microscope
.
The resolution using only blue light is about 4 times better than with using all the wavelengths of visible light.
compound light microscope
Optical, though to see smaller organelles and structures in higher resolution an electron microscope may be necessary.
When you want to look at things you couldn't with a light microscope.
We would normally use a microscope to do this.
The user would have to adjust the diaphragm to let in more or less light for their needs.
no, because the penny is not see-through. The compound light microscope uses a light and all you would see is a dark spot that used to be the penny.
compound light microscope
Optical, though to see smaller organelles and structures in higher resolution an electron microscope may be necessary.
---- You would use the light microscope. The electron microscope would be unnecessary in this situation, due to its high magnification levels.
A compound light microscope.
electron microscope
Answersimple first one is: their both different in quality. For example, a light microscope would use sunlight as its source of power,and therefore less effective. Compound microscope use electricity as its source of power for the same usage, which would be stronger and better to see the details in the specimen.
a compound light microscope your welcome nope it is transmission electron microscope
Turning the diaphragm will change how much light is let in.
The maximum magnification of a light microscope is 2000x. Anything requiring more than 2000x magnification requires an electron microscope.
yay
You could use a compound light microscope or a stereomicroscope.