abstention

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Top
(ăb-stĕn'shən, əb-) pronunciation
n.
  1. The act or habit of deliberate self-denial.
  2. An abstaining vote or voter: 12 ayes, 10 nays, and 8 abstentions.

[Late Latin abstentiō, abstentiōn-, from abstentus, past participle of Latin abstinēre, to hold back. See abstain.]


Act or instance of deliberately refraining from an action or practice. Abstaining from voting generally means a recorded vote, neither for nor against. Abstention from voting is appropriate when one has a conflict of interest, as when a director owns stock in a competing business or one considered as a target for acquisition.

Previous:Absorption Rate, Absorption Costing, Absorb
Next:Abstract of Record, Abstract of Title, Abusive Tax Shelter
Top
A policy adopted by the federal courts whereby the district court may decline to exercise its jurisdiction and defer to a state court the resolution of a federal constitutional question, pending the outcome in a state court proceeding of state law issues that might avoid a serious constitutional question. When the court defers decision in this manner, it retains jurisdiction and may decide the federal constitutional question if the plaintiff is not satisfied with the state court outcome. Where resolution of the federal constitutional question is dependent upon, or may be materially altered by, the determination of an uncertain issue of state law, abstention may be proper in order to avoid unnecessary friction in federal-state relations, interference with important state functions, tentative decisions on questions of state law, and premature constitutional adjudication. 380 U.S.
528, 534.
A second variant of abstention (and a form of abstention required by some statutes) occurs when the federal court refuses to exercise jurisdiction altogether because the issues presented seem to the court more appropriate for state court resolution. In these instances the abstaining federal court actually “relinquishes” its jurisdiction to the state courts and the doctrine is more appropriately termed relinquishment.
An example of this form of abstention is the refusal of the federal courts in the interests of comity to enjoin state court criminal proceedings. See 401 U.S. 37.
See federalism.
Top

Abstention is a term in election procedure for when a participant in a vote either does not go to vote (on election day) or, in parliamentary procedure, is present during the vote, but does not cast a ballot. Abstention must be contrasted with "blank vote", in which a voter casts a ballot willfully made invalid by marking it wrongly or by not marking anything at all. A "blank (or white) voter" has voted, although his vote may be considered a spoilt vote, depending on each legislation, while an abstaining voter hasn't voted. Both forms (abstention and blank vote) may or may not, depending on the circumstances, be considered as protest vote.

An abstention may be used to indicate the voting individual's ambivalence about the measure, or mild disapproval that does not rise to the level of active opposition. Abstention can also be used when someone has a certain position about an issue, but since the popular sentiment supports the opposite, it might be not be politically expedient to vote according to his or her conscience. A person may also abstain when they do not feel adequately informed about the issue at hand, or has not participated in relevant discussion. In parliamentary procedure, a member may be required to abstain in the case of a real or perceived conflict of interest.[1]

Abstentions do not count in tallying the vote negatively or positively; when members abstain, they are in effect attending only to contribute to a quorum. White votes, however, may be counted in the total of votes, depending on the legislation.

Contents

Active abstention

An active abstention can occur where a voter votes in a way that balances out their vote as if they had never voted. This has occurred many times in the House of Commons of the United Kingdom. During a division (a process where a yes/no vote occurs to agree or disagree to a motion), a Member of Parliament may actively abstain by voting both "yes" and "no". This is effectively the same as not voting at all, as the outcome will not be changed by the active abstention.[2] However in the House of Lords of the United Kingdom, active abstention is not possible as a Lord voting both ways will be removed from the list of votes.[3]

In another manner, an intentionally spoilt vote could be interpreted as an active abstention. This is where a voter turns up to an election and invalidates the ballot paper in some way. Because of the nature of an abstention, only intentionally spoiled ballots could be counted as an active abstention.

International and national procedures

Comparative results of Canadian federal election with or without abstention

In the United Nations Security Council, representatives of the five countries holding a veto power (the United States, United Kingdom, France, Russia and the People's Republic of China) sometimes abstain rather than vetoing a measure about which they are less than enthusiastic, particularly if the measure otherwise has broad support. By convention, their abstention does not block the measure, despite the wording of Article 27.3 of the United Nations Charter. If a majority of members of the United Nations General Assembly or one of its committees abstain on a measure, then the measure fails.

In the Council of the European Union, an abstention on a matter decided by unanimity has the effect of a yes vote; on matters decided by qualified majority it has an effect of a no vote.

In the United States House of Representatives and many other legislatures, members may vote "present" rather than for or against a bill or resolution, which has the effect of an abstention.

In the United States Senate, the Presiding Officer calls each Senator's name alphabetically, and, if abstaining, the Senator must give a reason for the abstention. Members may decline to vote, in committee or on the floor, on any matter which he or she believes would be a conflict of interest.[4]

Abstention campaigns

There have been a number of instances around the world where popular movements have boycotted elections.

In South Africa, there is a strong presence of abstention campaigns that make the structural argument that no political party truly represents the poor. The "No Land! No House! No Vote!" Campaign which was started by the Landless Peoples Movement in 2004, is the largest of such campaigns.[5][6] These campaigns have been met with significant repression.[7]

In 1999, a human rights activist was convicted in Belarus for calling not to participate in the local elections he considered to be undemocratic. In 2004, UN Human Rights Committee has found the conviction to violate freedom of expression.[8]

Other social movements and civil society organisations in other parts of the world also have similar campaigns or non-voting preferences. These include the Naxalites in India, the Zapatista Army of National Liberation in Mexico and various anarchist oriented movements. In Mexico's mid term 2009 elections there was strong support for 'Nulo' - a campaign to vote for no one.[9][10][11] In India poor people's in movements Singur, Nandigram and Lalgarh have rejected parliamentary politics (as well as the NGO and Maoist alternatives).[12]

There have also been no vote campaigns in Canada[13] and Spain.

In September 2011, the New York Times argued that there was a growing "scorn for voting" around the world.[14]

See also

References

  1. ^ Hernandez, Raymond and Christopher Drew (2007-12-07). "It’s Not Just ‘Ayes’ and ‘Nays’: Obama’s Votes in Illinois Echo". New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/20/us/politics/20obama.html?pagewanted=1. 
  2. ^ Voted both aye and no - from The Public Whip. Published 24 April 2012 and retrieved 4 May 2012.
  3. ^ Recording Abstentions by Lord Norton, from lordsoftheblog.net. Published 20 February 2011 and retrieved 4 May 2011.
  4. ^ "Voting Procedure". Rules of the United States Senate. http://rules.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?p=RuleXII. Retrieved 2011-07-25. 
  5. ^ "The 'No Land, No House, No Vote' campaign still on for 2009". Abahlali baseMjondolo. 5 May 2005. http://libcom.org/library/the-no-land-no-house-no-vote-campaign-still-2009. 
  6. ^ "IndyMedia Presents: No Land! No House! No Vote!". Anti-Eviction Campaign. 2005-12-12. http://antieviction.org.za/2005/12/12/indymedia-presents-no-land-no-house-no-vote/. 
  7. ^ ""No Vote" Campaigns are not a Rejection of Democracy". Mail and Guardian. http://www.abahlali.org/node/865. 
  8. ^ UN HRC views in case Svetik v. Belarus, CCPR/C/81/D/927/2000, 2004
  9. ^ 'New York Times' Disgruntled Mexicans Plan an Election Message to Politicians: We Prefer Nobody
  10. ^ Vota en Blanco
  11. ^ 'Representative Democracy versus Participatory Democracy' by Nancy Davis, Narco News, 21 June 2009
  12. ^ No revolution for old radicals, 'Times of India', 21 June 2009
  13. ^ Why I Don't Endorse Voting in the May 2nd Elections, by Rowland Túpac Keshena, 2011
  14. ^ /As Scorn for Vote Grows, Protests Surge Around Globe, NICHOLAS KULISH, September 27, 2011

External links


Translations:

Abstention

Top

Dansk (Danish)
n. - afholdenhed, ædruelighed

Nederlands (Dutch)
(stem)onthouding

Français (French)
n. - abstention, abstinence

Deutsch (German)
n. - Enthaltung, Stimmenthaltung

Ελληνική (Greek)
n. - αποχή (από εκλογές κ.λπ.), εγκράτεια, αποχή, αποφυγή κατάχρησης ποτών, λιτότητα

Italiano (Italian)
astensione, astensionismo, scheda bianca

Português (Portuguese)
n. - abstenção (f)

Русский (Russian)
воздержание, воздержание от голосования

Español (Spanish)
n. - abstención de voto

Svenska (Swedish)
n. - abstinens, återhållsamhet

中文(简体)(Chinese (Simplified))
戒绝, 弃权, 节制

中文(繁體)(Chinese (Traditional))
n. - 戒絕, 棄權, 節制

한국어 (Korean)
n. - 자제, 회피

日本語 (Japanese)
n. - 慎むこと, 控えること, 回避, 棄権

العربيه (Arabic)
‏(الاسم) إمتناع عن عن التصويت, إمساك‏

עברית (Hebrew)
n. - ‮הימנעות‬


Post a question - any question - to the WikiAnswers community:

Copyrights:

Mentioned in

try