|
|
This article or section is in need of attention from an expert on the subject.
WikiProject Biography may be able to help recruit one.
If a more appropriate WikiProject or portal exists, please adjust
this template accordingly.
|
| Adam Sedgwick |

Adam Sedgwick |
| Born |
March 22nd, 1785
Dent, Yorkshire |
| Died |
January 27 1873
Cambridge, England
|
| Residence |
UK |
| Nationality |
British |
| Field |
Geologist |
| Institutions |
University of Cambridge |
| Alma mater |
University of Cambridge |
| Academic advisor |
Thomas Jones and John
Dawson |
| Notable students |
William Hopkins
Charles Darwin |
| Known for |
Classification of Cambrian rocks |
| Notable prizes |
Wollaston Medal (1833)
Copley Medal (1863) |
| Religion |
Anglican |
Adam Sedgwick (March 22nd, 1785–January 27, 1873) was one of the founders of modern geology. He proposed the Devonian period of the geological timescale and later the Cambrian period. The latter
proposal was based on work which he did on Welsh rock strata.
Sedgwick was born in Dent, Yorkshire, the third child
of an Anglican vicar. He was educated at Sedbergh School and Trinity College, Cambridge.
He obtained his BA (5th Wrangler) from the University of Cambridge in 1808 and his MA in 1811. His academic mentors at Cambridge were Thomas Jones and
John Dawson.
Sedwick studied the geology of the British Isles and Europe. He founded the system for the classification of Cambrian rocks
and with Roderick Murchison worked out the order of the carboniferous and underlying
Devonian strata. He investigated the phenomena of metamorphism and concretion, and was the first to distinguish clearly between
stratification, jointing, and
slaty cleavage. He was elected to Fellow of the Royal Society on February 1, 1821.
Opposition to Evolution
While by no means a fundamentalist or evangelical by today’s standards, Sedgwick always maintained a fine line between his science and his
faith. His geological position was catastrophist, and he believed in a succession of
Divine creative acts throughout the long expanse of history. Any form of development that denied a direct creative action smacked
as materialistic and amoral. For Sedgwick, moral truths (the obtainment of which separates man
from beast) were to be distinguished from physical truths, and to combine these or blur them together could only lead to
disastrous consequences. In fact, one’s own hope for immortality may
ultimately rest on it.
So, when Robert Chambers anonymously published his own theory of evolution, or development, in the book Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation (1844), Sedgwick jumped at the chance to attack the book in the July, 1845 edition of
the Edinburgh Review. Vestiges "comes before [its readers] with a bright,
polished, and many-coloured surface, and the serpent coils a false philosophy, and asks them to stretch out their hands and pluck
the forbidden fruit," he wrote in his review. [1] Accepting
the arguments in Vestiges was akin to falling from grace and away from God’s favor.
He lashed out at the book in a letter to Charles Lyell, bemoaning the consequences of
it conclusions. "...If the book be true, the labours of sober induction are in vain; religion is a lie; human law is a mass of
folly, and a base injustice; morality is moonshine; our labours for the black people of Africa were works of madmen; and man and
woman are only better beasts!"[2] Later, Sedgwick would add
a long preface to the 5th edition of his Discourse on the Studies of the University of Cambridge (1850), including a lengthy attack on Vestiges and theories of development in general.
Charles Darwin was one of his geological students and the two kept up a correspondence
while Darwin was aboard the HMS Beagle. However, Sedgwick never
accepted the case for evolution made in the Origin of Species any more than he did in the Vestiges. In response to
receiving and reading Darwin's book, he wrote to Darwin saying:
- "If I did not think you a good tempered and truth-loving man I should not tell you that ... I have read your book with more
pain than pleasure. Parts of it I admired greatly; parts I laughed at till my sides were almost sore; other parts I read with
absolute sorrow; because I think them utterly false and grievously mischievous. You have deserted - after a start in that
tram-road of all solid physical truth - the true method of induction ..."[3]
In the same letter, once again, Sedgwick emphasized his distinction between the moral and physical aspects of life, "There is
a moral or metaphysical part of nature as well as a physical. A man who denies this is deep in the mire of folly." To break this
distinction would be to degrade and brutalize humanity. In a letter to another correspondent, Sedgwick was even harsher on
Darwin's book, calling it "utterly false" and writing that "It repudiates all reasoning from final causes; and seems to
shut the door on any view (however feeble) of the God of Nature as manifested in His works. From first to last it is a dish of
rank materialism cleverly cooked and served up."[4]
Despite this difference of opinion, the two men remained friendly until Sedgwick's death.
Notes
- ^ Quoted in James Secord, Victorian Sensation (2000), pg. 246.
- ^ Letter of Adam Sedgwick to Charles Lyell, April 9th, 1845, in The Life
and Letters of the Rev. Adam Sedgwick vol. 2 (1890), pg. 84.
- ^ Letter to Charles Darwin from Adam Sedgwick, November 24th, 1859, in The
Correspondence of Charles Darwin vol. 7, pg. 396.
- ^ Letter to Miss Gerard from Adam Sedgwick, Jan. 2nd, 1860, in The Life
and Letters of the Rev. Adam Sedgwick vol. 2 (1890), pgs. 359-360.
References
- J.W. Clark and T.M. Hughes, The Life and Letters of the Reverend Adam Sedgwick, Cambridge University Press, 1890,
vols. 1-2.
- Dictionary of Scientific Biography, Charles Scribner's Sons: 1970-1990; vol. 12, pp. 275-279.
- A Biographical Dictionary of Scientists, Williams, T. I., Ed., Wiley, 1969, pp. 467-468.
- Isaac Asimov, I. Asimov's Biographical Encyclopedia of Science and Technology
(2nd Ed.), Doubleday: 1982, p. 299.
- Quart. J. Geol. Soc., 1873, 29, pp. xxx-xxxix.
- Dictionary of National Biography, Smith, Elder & Co., 1908-1986, vol. 17, pp. 1117-1120.
External links
Wikimedia Commons has media related to:
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)