Air traffic control (ATC) is a service provided by ground-based controllers who direct aircraft on the ground and in the air. A
controller's primary task is to separate certain aircraft — to
prevent them from coming too close to each other by use of lateral, vertical and longitudinal separation. Secondary tasks include
ensuring safe, orderly and expeditious flow of traffic and providing information to pilots, such as weather, navigation
information and NOTAMs (Notices to Airmen).
In many countries, ATC services are provided throughout the majority of airspace, and its services are available to all users
(private, military, and commercial). When controllers are responsible for separating some or all aircraft, such airspace is
called "controlled airspace" in contrast to "uncontrolled airspace" where aircraft may fly without the use of the air traffic control system.
Depending on the type of flight and the class of airspace, ATC may issue instructions that pilots are required to follow, or merely flight information (in some countries known as
advisories) to assist pilots operating in the airspace. In all cases, however, the pilot in command has final
responsibility for the safety of the flight, and may deviate from ATC instructions in an emergency. To ensure communication, all
pilots and all controllers everywhere are required to be able to speak and understand English, although they may use any compatible language.
Airport control
The primary method of controlling the immediate airport environment is visual observation from the control tower. The tower is
a tall, windowed structure located on the airport grounds. Aerodrome or Tower controllers are responsible for the
separation and efficient movement of aircraft and vehicles operating on the taxiways and runways of the airport itself, and
aircraft in the air near the airport, generally 2 to 5 nautical miles (4 to 9 km) depending on the airport procedures.
Radar displays are also available to controllers at some airports. Controllers may use a radar
system called Secondary Surveillance Radar also known as Airport
Surveillance Radar for airborne traffic approaching and departing. These displays include a map of the area, the position of
various aircraft, and data tags that include aircraft identification, speed, heading, and other information described in local
procedures.
The areas of responsibility for tower controllers fall into three general operational disciplines; Ground Control, Local or
Air Control, and Clearance Delivery -- other categories, such as Apron Control or Ground Movement Planner, may exist at extremely
busy airports. While each tower's procedures will vary and while there may be multiple teams in larger towers that control
multiple runways, the following provides a general concept of the delegation of responsibilities within the tower
environment.
Ground Control
New Control Tower (right) at Chicago's
O'hare.
Ground Control (sometimes known as Ground Movement Control abbreviated to GMC or Surface Movement Control abbreviated to SMC)
is responsible for the airport "maneuvering" areas, or areas not released to the airlines or other users. This generally includes
all taxiways, holding areas, and some transitional aprons or intersections where aircraft arrive having vacated the runway and
departure gates. Exact areas and control responsibilities are clearly defined in local documents and agreements at each airport.
Any aircraft, vehicle, or person walking or working in these areas is required to have clearance from the ground controller. This
is normally done via VHF radio, but there may be special cases where other processes are used. Most aircraft and airside vehicles
have radios. Aircraft or vehicles without radios will communicate with the tower via aviation light signals or will be led by vehicles with radios. People working on the airport
surface normally have a communications link through which they can reach or be reached by ground control, commonly either by
handheld radio or even cell phone. Ground control is vital to the smooth operation of the
airport because this position might constrain the order in which the aircraft will be sequenced to depart, which can affect the
safety and efficiency of the airport's operation.
Some busier airports have Surface Movement Radar (SMR), such as, ASDE-3, AMASS or ASDE-X,
designed to display aircraft and vehicles on the ground. These are used by the ground controller as an additional tool to control
ground traffic, particularly at night or in poor visibility. There are a wide range of capabilities on these systems as they are
being modernized. Older systems will display a map of the airport and the target. Newer systems include the capability to display
higher quality mapping, radar target, data blocks, and safety alerts.
Local or Air Control
Local or Air Control (most often referred to as the generic "Tower" control, although Tower control can also refer to a
combination of the local, ground and clearance delivery positions) is responsible for the active runway surfaces. The Air Traffic
Control Tower clears aircraft for take off or landing and ensures the runway is clear for these aircraft. If the tower controller
detects any unsafe condition, a landing aircraft may be told to "go-around" and be
re-sequenced into the landing pattern by the approach or terminal area controller.
Within the tower, a highly disciplined communications process between tower and ground control is an absolute necessity.
Ground control must request and gain approval from tower control to cross any runway with any aircraft or vehicle. Likewise,
tower control must ensure ground control is aware of any operations that impact the taxiways and must work with the approach
radar controllers to ensure "holes" or "gaps" in the arrival traffic are created (where necessary) to allow taxiing traffic to
cross runways and to allow departing aircraft to take off. Crew Resource
Management (CRM) procedures are often used to ensure this communication process is efficient and clear, although this is
not as prevalent as CRM for pilots.
Clearance delivery
Clearance delivery is the position that issues route clearances to aircraft before they commence taxiing. These contain
details of the route that the aircraft is expected to fly after departure. This position will, if necessary, coordinate with the
en-route center and national command center or flow control to obtain releases for aircraft. Often however such releases are
given automatically or are controlled by local agreements allowing "free-flow" departures. When weather or extremely high demand
for a certain airport or airspace becomes a factor, there may be ground "stops" (or "slot delays") or re-routes may be necessary
to ensure the system does not get overloaded. The primary responsibility of the clearance delivery position is to ensure that the
aircraft have the proper route and slot time. This information is also coordinated with the en-route center and the ground
controller in order to ensure the aircraft reaches the runway in time to meet the slot time provided by the command center. At
some airports the clearance delivery controller also plans aircraft pushbacks and engine starts and is known as Ground Movement
Planner (GMP): this position is particularly important at heavily congested airports to prevent taxiway and apron gridlock.
Approach and terminal control
Inside the Potomac TRACON
-
Many airports have a radar control facility that is associated with the airport. In most countries, this is referred to as
Approach or Terminal Control; in the U.S., it is often still referred to as a TRACON (Terminal Radar Approach CONtrol) facility. While every airport varies, terminal
controllers usually handle traffic in a 30 to 50 nautical mile (56 to 93 km) radius from the airport. Where there are many busy
airports in close proximity, one single terminal control may service all the airports. The actual airspace boundaries and
altitudes assigned to a terminal control are based on factors such as traffic flows, neighboring airports and terrain, and vary
widely from airport to airport: a large and complex example is the London
Terminal Control Centre which controls traffic for five main London airports up to 20,000 feet and out to 100+ nautical
miles.
Terminal controllers are responsible for providing all ATC services within their airspace. Traffic flow is broadly divided
into departures, arrivals, and overflights. As aircraft move in and out of the terminal airspace, they are handed off to the next
appropriate control facility (a control tower, an en-route control facility, or a bordering terminal or approach control).
Terminal control is responsible for ensuring that aircraft are at an appropriate altitude when they are handed off, and that
aircraft arrive at a suitable rate for landing.
Not all airports have a radar approach or terminal control available. In this case, the en-route center or a neighboring
terminal or approach control may co-ordinate directly with the tower on the airport and vector inbound aircraft to a position
from where they can land visually. At some of these airports, the tower may provide a non-radar procedural approach service to arriving aircraft handed over from a radar unit before they are visual
to land. Some units also have a dedicated approach unit which can provide the procedural
approach service either all the time or for any periods of radar outage for any reason.
En-route, center, or area control
Controllers at work at the Washington Air Route Traffic Control Center.
-
ATC provides services to aircraft in flight between airports as well. Pilots fly under one of two sets of rules for
separation: Visual Flight Rules (VFR) or Instrument Flight Rules (IFR). Air traffic controllers have different responsibilities to
aircraft operating under the different sets of rules. While IFR flights are under positive control, in the US VFR pilots can
request flight following, which provides traffic advisory services on a time permitting basis and may also provide assistance in
avoiding areas of weather and flight restrictions.
En-route air traffic controllers issue clearances and instructions for airborne aircraft, and pilots are required to comply
with these instructions. En-route controllers also provide air traffic control services to many smaller airports around the
country, including clearance off of the ground and clearance for approach to an airport. Controllers adhere to a set of
separation standards that define the minimum distance allowed between aircraft. These distances vary depending on the equipment
and procedures used in providing ATC services.
General characteristics
En-route air traffic controllers work in facilities called Area Control Centers, each of which is commonly referred to as a
"Center". The United States uses the equivalent term Air Route Traffic Control Center (ARTCC). Each center is responsible for
many thousands of square miles of airspace (known as a Flight Information
Region) and for the airports within that airspace. Centers control IFR aircraft from the time they depart an airport or
terminal area's airspace to the time they arrive at another airport or terminal area's airspace. Centers may also "pick up" VFR
aircraft that are already airborne and integrate them into the IFR system. These aircraft must, however, remain VFR until the
Center provides a clearance.
Center controllers are responsible for climbing the aircraft to their requested altitude while, at the same time, ensuring
that the aircraft is properly separated from all other aircraft in the immediate area. Additionally, the aircraft must be placed
in a flow consistent with the aircraft's route of flight. This effort is complicated by crossing traffic, severe weather, special
missions that require large airspace allocations, and traffic density. When the aircraft approaches its destination, the center
is responsible for meeting altitude restrictions by specific points, as well as providing many destination airports with a
traffic flow, which prohibits all of the arrivals being "bunched together". These "flow restrictions" often begin in the middle
of the route, as controllers will position aircraft landing in the same destination so that when the aircraft are close to their
destination they are sequenced.
As an aircraft reaches the boundary of a Center's control area it is "handed off" or "handed over" to the next Area Control
Center. In some cases this "hand-off" process involves a transfer of identification and details between controllers so that air
traffic control services can be provided in a seamless manner; in other cases local agreements may allow "silent handovers" such
that the receiving center does not require any co-ordination if traffic is presented in an agreed manner. After the hand-off, the
aircraft is given a frequency change and begins talking to the next controller. This process continues until the aircraft is
handed off to a terminal controller ("approach").
Radar coverage
Since centers control a large airspace area, they will typically use long range radar that has the capability, at higher
altitudes, to see aircraft within 200 nautical miles (360 km) of the radar antenna. They may also use TRACON radar data to control when it provides a better "picture" of the traffic or when it can
fill in a portion of the area not covered by the long range radar.
In the U.S. system, at higher altitudes, over 90% of the U.S. airspace is covered by radar and often by multiple radar
systems; however, coverage may be inconsistent at lower altitudes used by unpressurized aircraft due to high terrain or distance
from radar facilities. A center may require numerous radar systems to cover the airspace assigned to them, and may also rely on
pilot position reports from aircraft flying below the floor of radar coverage. This results in a large amount of data being
available to the controller. To address this, automation systems have been designed that consolidate the radar data for the
controller. This consolidation includes eliminating duplicate radar returns, ensuring the best radar for each geographical area
is providing the data, and displaying the data in an effective format.
Centers also exercise control over traffic travelling over the world's ocean areas. These areas are also FIRs. Due to the fact that there are no radar systems available for oceanic control, oceanic
controllers provide ATC services using procedural control. These procedures use
aircraft position reports, time, altitude, distance, and speed to ensure separation. Controllers record information on
flight progress strips and in specially developed oceanic computer systems as
aircraft report positions. This process requires that aircraft be separated by greater distances, which reduces the overall
capacity for any given route.
Some Air Navigation Service Providers (e.g Airservices Australia, Alaska Center, etc.) are implementing Automatic Dependent
Surveillance - Broadcast (ADS-B) as part of their
surveillance capability. This new technology reverses the radar concept. Instead of radar "finding" a target by interrogating the
transponder, ADS transmits the aircraft's position several times a second. ADS also has other modes such as the "contract" mode
where the aircraft reports a position based on a predetermined time interval. This is significant because it can be used where it
is not possible to locate the infrastructure for a radar system (e.g. over water). Computerized radar displays are now being
designed to accept ADS inputs as part of the display. As this technology develops, oceanic ATC procedures will be modernized to
take advantage of the benefits this technology provides.
Flight traffic mapping
The mapping of flights in real-time is based on the air traffic control system. In 1991, data on the location of aircraft was
made available by the Federal Aviation Administration to the airline industry. The National Business Aviation Association
(NBAA), the General Aviation Manufacturers Association, the
Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association, the Helicopter Association International, and the National Air Transportation
Association petitioned the FAA to make ASDI information available
on a "need-to-know" basis. Subsequently, NBAA advocated the
broad-scale dissemination of air traffic data. The Aircraft Situational Display to Industry (ASDI) system now conveys up-to-date flight information to the airline industry
and the public. Three companies distribute ASDI information,
FlightExplorer, FlightView, and FlyteComm. Each company maintains a website that provides
free updated information to the public on flight status. Stand-alone programs are also available for displaying the geographic
location of airborne IFR (Instrument Flight Rules) air traffic anywhere in the
FAA air traffic system. Positions are reported for both commercial and general aviation traffic. The programs can overlay air
traffic with a wide selection of maps such as, geo-political boundaries, air traffic control center boundaries, high altitude jet
routes, satellite cloud and radar imagery.
Problems
Traffic
- For more information see Air traffic flow management.
The day-to-day problems faced by the air traffic control system are primarily related to the volume of air traffic demand
placed on the system, and weather. Several factors dictate the amount of traffic that can land
at an airport in a given amount of time. Each landing aircraft must touch down, slow, and exit the runway before the next crosses the end of the runway. This process requires at least one and up to four minutes
for each aircraft. Allowing for departures between arrivals, each runway can thus handle about 30 arrivals per hour. A large
airport with two arrival runways can handle about 60 arrivals per hour in good weather. Problems begin when airlines schedule more arrivals into an airport than can be physically handled, or when delays elsewhere cause
groups of aircraft that would otherwise be separated in time to arrive simultaneously. Aircraft must then be delayed in the air
by holding over specified locations until they may be safely sequenced to the runway.
Up until the 1990s, holding, which has significant environmental and cost implications, was a
routine occurrence at many airports. Advances in computers now allow the sequencing of planes hours in advance. Thus, planes may
be delayed before they even take off (by being given a "slot"), or may reduce power in flight and proceed more slowly thus
significantly reducing the amount of holding.
Weather
Beyond runway capacity issues, weather is a major factor in traffic capacity. Rain or ice and snow on the runway
cause landing aircraft to take longer to slow and exit, thus reducing the safe arrival rate and requiring more space between
landing aircraft. Fog also requires a decrease in the landing rate. These, in turn, increase
airborne delay for holding aircraft. If more aircraft are scheduled than can be safely and efficiently held in the air, a ground
delay program may be established, delaying aircraft on the ground before departure due to conditions at the arrival airport.
In Area Control Centers, a major weather problem is thunderstorms, which present a
variety of hazards to aircraft. Aircraft will deviate around storms, reducing the capacity of the en-route system by requiring
more space per aircraft, or causing congestion as many aircraft try to move through a single hole in a line of thunderstorms.
Occasionally weather considerations cause delays to aircraft prior to their departure as routes are closed by thunderstorms.
Much money has been spent on creating software to streamline this process. However,
at some ACCs, air traffic controllers still record data for each flight on strips of paper and personally coordinate their paths.
In newer sites, these flight progress strips have been replaced by electronic data
presented on computer screens. As new equipment is brought in, more and more sites are upgrading away from paper flight
strips.
Call signs
A prerequisite to safe air traffic separation is the assignment and use of distinctive call
signs. These are permanently allocated by ICAO on
request usually to scheduled flights and some air forces for military flights. They are written callsigns with 3-letter combination like KLM, AAL, SWA , BAW , DLH
followed by the flight number, like AAL872, BAW018. As such they appear on flight plans and ATC radar labels. There are also the
audio or Radio-telephony callsigns used on the radio contact between pilots and Air Traffic Control not always
identical with the written ones. For example BAW stands for British Airways but on the radio you will only hear the word
Speedbird instead. By default, the callsign for any other flight is the registration number (tail number) of the aircraft, such as "N12345" or "C-GABC". The term tail
number is due to the fact that a registration number is usually painted somewhere on the tail of a plane, yet this is not a
rule. Registration numbers may appear on the engines, anywhere on the fuselage, and often on
the wings. The short Radio-telephony callsigns for these tail numbers is the first letter followed by the last two, like
C-BC spoken as Charlie-Bravo-Charlie for C-GABC or the last 3 letters only like ABC spoken Alpha-Bravo-Charlie for C-GABC or the
last 3 numbers like 345 spoken as tree-fower-fife for N12345.
The flight number part is decided by the aircraft operator. In this arrangement, an identical call sign might well be used for
the same scheduled journey each day it is operated, even if the departure time varies a little across different days of the week.
The call sign of the return flight often differs only by the final digit from the outbound flight. Generally, airline flight
numbers are even if eastbound, and odd if westbound. In order to reduce the possibility of two callsigns on one frequency at any
time sounding too similar, a number of airlines, particularly in Europe, have started using alphanumeric callsigns that are not based on flight numbers. For example DLH23LG, spoken as
lufthansa-two-tree-lima-golf. Additionally it is the right of the air traffic controller to
change the 'audio' callsign for the period the flight is in his sector if there is a risk of confusion, usually choosing the tail
number instead.
Before around 1980 IATA and ICAO were using the same 2-letter callsigns. Due to the larger number of new
airlines after deregulation ICAO established the 3-letter
callsigns as mentioned above. The IATA callsigns are currently
used in aerodromes on the announcement tables but never used any longer in Air Traffic Control. For example, AA is the
IATA callsign for the ICAO - ATC equivalent AAL. Other examples include LY/ELY for El Al, DL/DAL for Delta Air Lines, LH/DLH for Lufthansa
etc.
Technology
Many technologies are used in air traffic control systems. Primary and secondary radar are used
to enhance a controller's "situational awareness" within his assigned airspace — all types of aircraft send back primary echoes
of varying sizes to controllers' screens as radar energy is bounced off their skins, and transponder-equipped aircraft reply to secondary radar interrogations by giving an ID (Mode A), an altitude
(Mode C) and/or a unique callsign (Mode S). Certain types of weather may also register on the radar screen.
These inputs, added to data from other radars, are correlated to build the air situation. Some basic processing occurs on the
radar tracks, such as calculating ground speed and magnetic headings.
Other correlations with electronic flight plans are also available to controllers on
modern operational display systems.
Some tools are available in different domains to help the controller further:
- Conflict Alert (CA): a tool that checks possible conflicting trajectories and alerts the controller. The most common used is
the STCA (Short Term CA) that is activated about 2 minutes prior the loss of separation. The algorithms used may also provide in
some systems a possible vectoring solution, that is, the way to turn or descend/climb the aircraft in order to avoid infringing
the minimum safety distance or altitude clearance.
- Minimum Safe Altitude Warning (MSAW): a tool that alerts the controller if an aircraft appears to be flying too low to the
ground or will impact terrain based on its current altitude and heading.
- System Coordination (SYSCO) to enable controller to negotiate the release of flights from one sector to another.
- Area Penetration Warning (APW) to inform a controller that a flight will penetrate a restricted area.
- Arrival and Departure manager to help sequence the takeoff and landing of aircraft.
- Converging Runway Display Aid (CRDA) enables Approach controllers to run two final approaches that intersect and make sure
that go arounds are minimized
- Final Approach Spacing Tool (FAST) gives aircraft a runway assignment that the Approach Controller will give to the aircraft.
FAST can also suggest vectors for downwind and base with the correct timing. In Europe the equivalent system is known under the
term metering system and predicts the future spacing of approaching aircraft on the runway
- User Request Evaluation Tool (URET) takes paper strips out of the equation for En Route controllers at ARTCCs By providing a
display that shows all aircraft that are either in or currently routed into the sector. URET provides conflict advisories up to
30 minutes in advance and has a suite of assistance tools that assist in evaluating resolution options and pilot requests.
- Mode S: provides a data downlink of flight parameters via Secondary
Surveillance Radars allowing radar processing systems and therefore controllers to see various data on a flight, including
airframe unique id, indicated airspeed and flight director selected level, amongst others.
- CPDLC: Controller Pilot Data Link Communications - allows
digital messages to be sent between controllers and pilots, avoiding the need to use radiotelephony. It is especially useful in
areas where difficult-to-use HF radiotelephony was previously used for communication with
aircraft, e.g oceans. This is currently in use in various parts of the world including the Atlantic and Pacific oceans.
- ADS-B: Automatic Dependent Surveillance Broadcast -
provides a data downlink of various flight parameters to air traffic control systems via the Transponder (1090 MHz) and reception
of those data by other aircraft in the vicinity. The most important is the aircraft's latitude, longitude and level: such data
can be utilized to create a radar-like display of aircraft for controllers and thus allows a form of pseudo-radar control to be
done in areas where the installation of radar is either prohibitive on the grounds of low traffic levels, or technically not
feasible (e.g. oceans). This is currently in use in Australia and parts of the Pacific Ocean and Alaska.
- The Extended Computer Display System (EXCDS): A system of electronic flight strips replacing the old paper strips developed
by NAV CANADA. EXCDS allows controllers to manage electronic flight data online using touch-sensitive display screens resulting
in fewer manual functions and a greater focus on safety. The system has also been sold to the Air Navigation Services Providers
in the United Kingdom and Denmark.
Major accidents
Failures in the system have caused delays or even, in rare cases, crashes. On July 1,
2002 a Tupolev Tu-154 and Boeing 757 collided above Überlingen near the boundary between
German and Swiss-controlled airspace when a Skyguide-employed controller apparently gave instructions to
the southbound Tupolev to descend despite an instruction from the on-board automatic Traffic Collision Avoidance System software to climb. The northbound Boeing, equipped
with similar avionics, was already descending due to a software prompt. All passengers and crew
died in the resultant collision. Skyguide company publicity had previously acknowledged that the relatively small size of Swiss
airspace makes real-time cross-boundary liaison with adjoining authorities particularly important. See Bashkirian Airlines Flight 2937 for more on this accident. It is worth noting that
currently air traffic controllers have no way of knowing if or when the TCAS system is issuing resolution advisories to pilots.
They also do not know what the advisory is telling the pilots. Therefore, pilots are supposed to immediately follow TCAS
resolution advisories and report them as soon as possible. Consequently, they should ignore ATC instructions until they have
reported to the ground that they are clear of the conflict.
Other fatal collisions between airliners have occurred over India and Yugoslavia. When a risk of collision is identified by aircrew or ground controllers an "air miss" or "air
prox" (air proximity) report can be filed with the air traffic control authority concerned. The worst fatal collision between
airliners actually took place on the ground, on March 27, 1977,
in what is known as the Tenerife disaster.
The FAA has spent over USD$3 billion on software, but a
fully-automated system is still over the horizon. In 2002 the UK brought a new area control centre into service at
Swanwick, in Hampshire, relieving a busy suburban
centre at West Drayton in Middlesex, north of
London Heathrow Airport. Software from Lockheed-Martin predominates at Swanwick. The Swanwick facility, however, was initially been troubled by
software and communications problems causing delays and occasional shutdowns.
Air navigation service providers (ANSPs) and traffic service providers (ATSPs)
An Air Navigation Service Provider - The air navigation service provider is the authority directly responsible for providing
both visual and non-visual aids to navigation within a specific airspace in compliance with, but not limited to, International
Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Annexes 2, 6, 10 and 11; ICAO Documents 4444 and 9426; and, other international,
multi-national, and national policy, agreements or regulations.
An Air Traffic Service Provider is the relevant authority designated by the State responsible for providing air traffic
services in the airspace concerned - where airspace is classified as Type A through G airspace. Air traffic service is a generic
term meaning variously, flight information service, alerting service, air traffic advisory service, air traffic control service
(area control service, approach control service or aerodrome control service).
Both ANSPs and ATSPs can be public, private or corporatized organisations and examples of the different legal models exist
throughout the world today. The world's ANSPs are united in and represented by the Civil Air Navigation Services Organisation based at Amsterdam Airport
Schiphol in the Netherlands.
The regulatory function remains the responsibility of the State and can be exercised by Government and/or independent Safety,
Airspace and Economic Regulators depending on the national institutional arrangements.
In the United States, the Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA) provides this service to all aircraft in the National Airspace
System (NAS). With the exception of facilities operated by the Department of Defense (DoD), the FAA is responsible for all aspects of U.S. Air
Traffic Control including hiring and training controllers, although there are contract towers located in many parts of the
country. DoD facilities are generally staffed by military personnel and operate separately but concurrently with FAA facilities,
under similar rules and procedures. A contract tower is an Airport Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) that performs the same function
as an FAA-run ATCT but is staffed by employees of a private company (Martin State
Airport in Maryland is an example). In Canada, Air
Traffic Control is provided by NAV CANADA, a private, non-share capital corporation that
operates Canada's civil air navigation service.
See also
References
External links
History
Internet services
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
