Albertson v. Subversive Activities Control Board
Oxford Companion to the US Supreme Court:
Top
Albertson v. Subversive Activities Control Board
382 U.S. 70 (1965), argued 18 Oct. 1965, decided 15 Nov. 1965 by vote of 8 to 0; Brennan for the Court, White not participating. The Internal Security Act, passed over President Truman's veto in 1950 and generally known as the McCarran Act, sought to expose the Communist party in the United States by the device of compulsory registration. The statute ordered communist organizations to register with the attorney general; the Subversive Activities Control Board (SACB) was created to administer the registration process. Registered organizations were required to disclose the names of their officers and the source of their funds. Members of registered organizations were subject to various sanctions, including denial of passports and the right to work in defense plants. The Supreme Court upheld the registration requirements in Communist Party v. Subversive Activities Control Board (1961) but postponed any decision on the constitutionality of the sanctions until they were actually enforced.
As anticipated, the Communist party refused to register. The attorney general then asked the SACB to order individual party members to register. Albertson and others refused, claiming that registration, with resulting penalties, amounted to self‐incrimination in violation of the Fifth Amendment. The Supreme Court unanimously agreed. While the statute purportedly granted immunity from prosecution for the act of registration, the Court held that registration could in fact be used as evidence in criminal prosecutions, or to supply investigatory leads.
The SACB was no more successful in other cases. The ban on defense plant employment was struck down in United States v. Robel (1967). With this record of futility, the Nixon administration allowed the SACB to die in 1973.
See also Communism and Cold War; Self‐Incrimination; Subversion.
— C. Herman Pritchett
Wikipedia on Answers.com:
Top
Albertson v. Subversive Activities Control Board
| Albertson v. Subversive Activities Control Board | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Supreme Court of the United States |
||||||
| Argued October 18, 1965 Decided November 15, 1965 |
||||||
| Full case name | Albertson, et al. v. Subversive Activities Control Board | |||||
| Citations | 382 U.S. 70 (more) 86 S. Ct. 194; 15 L. Ed. 2d 165; 1965 U.S. LEXIS 263 |
|||||
| Holding | ||||||
| Persons believed to be members of the Communist Party of the United States of America could not be required to register as party members with the SACB because that would violate their self-incrimination rights under the Fifth Amendment. | ||||||
| Court membership | ||||||
|
||||||
| Case opinions | ||||||
| Majority | Brennan, joined by Warren, Black, Douglas, Clark, Harlan, Stewart, Fortas | |||||
| Concurrence | Black | |||||
| Concurrence | Clark | |||||
| White took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | ||||||
 |
Wikisource has original text related to this article: |
Albertson v. Subversive Activities Control Board, 382 U.S. 70 (1965), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled on November 15, 1965 that persons believed to be members of the Communist Party of the United States of America could not be required to register as party members with the Subversive Activities Control Board because that would violate their self-incrimination rights under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
See also
External links
|
This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
Post a question - any question - to the WikiAnswers community:
Copyrights:
Oxford Companion to the US Supreme Court
The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States. Copyright © 1992, 2005 by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
Read more
