20px
rect 0 0 1000 1000 This page has been temporarily semi-protected from editing due to vandalism.
desc none
</imagemap>
For Hindu, Zoroastrian, and other spiritual interpretations, see
Arya. For the Bollywood film, see
Aryan (film). For the
Indian child actor, see
Aryan Khan.
Aryan is an English language word derived from Sanskrit and Avestan term ārya- meaning "noble" or "spiritual".[1] It is widely held to have been used as an ethnic self-designation of the
Proto-Indo-Iranians. Since, in the 19th century, the
Indo-Iranians were the most ancient known speakers of Indo-European languages, the word Aryan was adopted to refer not only to
the Indo-Iranian people, but also to Indo-European speakers as a whole.
In Europe, the concept of an Aryan race became influential
in the late 19th and early 20th centuries as linguists and ethnologists argued that speakers of these Indo-European
languages constitute a distinctive race, descended from an ancient people, who were referred to as the "primitive Aryans",
but are now known as Proto-Indo-Europeans.
In today's linguistics, Aryan, is merely synonymous to Indo-Iranian, the eastern extant branch of the Indo-European family of languages.[2][3][4][5]
Etymology
Proto-Indo-European (PIE) *ar-yo-, a yo-adjective to a root *ar "to assemble skillfully",
present in Greek harma "chariot", Greek aristos, (as in "aristocracy"), Latin
ars "art", etc. Proto-Indo-Iranian *ar-ta- was a related concept of "properly joined" expressing a religious concept of cosmic order.
The adjective *aryo- was suggested as ascending to Proto-Indo-European times as the self-designation of the speakers of
the Proto-Indo-European language itself. It was suggested that other words
such as Éire, the Irish name of Ireland, and Ehre
(German for "honour") were related to it, but these are now widely regarded as untenable,[6] and while *ar-yo- is certainly a well-formed PIE adjective, there is no evidence that it was
used as an ethnic self-designation outside the Indo-Iranian branch. In the 1850s Max Müller
theorized that the word originated as a denotation of farming populations, since he thought it likely that it was related to the
root *arh3,
meaning "to plough". Other 19th century writers, such as Charles Morris, repeated this idea, linking the expansion of PIE
speakers to the spread of agriculturalists. Most linguists now consider *arh3 to be unrelated.
In ancient and medieval India, the Sanskrit term aryaputra, literally, 'son of nobility' was a title conferred to kings and
princes. In the epic Mahabharata, king Dhritarashtra’s wife, Gandhari addresses her husband as aryaputra more often than she uses
his name, or any other title of respect.
The Old Persian form of *Aryāna- appears as Æryānam Väejāh "Aryan Root-land" in Avestan, in
Middle Persian as Ērān, and in Modern
Persian as Īrān. Similarly, Northern India was referred to by the tatpurusha
Aryavarta "Arya-abode" in ancient times.
Semantics of Sanskrit arya
-
According to Paul Thieme (1938), the Vedic term arya- in its earliest
attestations has a meaning of "stranger", but "stranger" in the sense of "potential guest" as opposed to "barbarian"
(mleccha, dasa), taking this to indicate that arya was
originally the ethnic self-designation of the Indo-Iranians. Arya directly contrasts with Dasa or Dasyu in
the Rigveda (e.g. RV 1.51.8, ví jānīhy
âryān yé ca dásyavaḥ "Discern thou well Aryas and Dasyus"). This situation is directly comparable to the term
Hellene in Ancient Greece. The Middle
Indic interjection arē!, rē! "you there!" is derived from the vocative arí! "stranger!".
The Sanskrit lexicon Amarakosha (c. AD 450) defines Arya as mahākula kulīnārya "being of a noble family",
sabhya "having gentle or refined behavior and demeanor", sajjana "being well-born and respectable", and sādhava "being virtuous, honourable, or righteous". In Hinduism, the
religiously initiated Brahmin, Kshatriya and Vaishyas were arya, a title of honor and respect given to certain people for noble behaviour. This word
is used by Hindus, Buddhists, Jains and Zoroastrians to mean noble or spiritual.[7], for example, Four Noble
Truths (Pali: Cattāri ariyasaccāni, Sanskrit:
Catvāri āryasatyāni), and Noble Eightfold Path (Pāli: Ariyo aṭṭhaṅgiko maggo; Sanskrit: Ārya 'ṣṭāṅga
mārgaḥ).
Indo-European
Map showing the distribution of Indo-European peoples.
Max Müller and other 19th century linguists
theorized that the term *arya was used as the self-description of the Proto-Indo-Europeans, who were often referred to at this time as the "primitive Aryans". By
extension, the word came to be used in the West for the Indo-European speaking
peoples as a whole. Besides Müller for example H. Chavée in 1867 uses the term in this sense (aryaque), but this
never saw frequent use in linguistics, precisely for being reserved for "Indo-Iranian" already. G. I. Ascoli in 1854 used
arioeuropeo, viz. a compound "Aryo-European" with the same rationale as "Indo-European", the term now current, which has
been in frequent use since the 1830s. Nevertheless, the use of Aryan as a synonym for Indo-European became widespread in
non-linguistic and popular usage by the end of the nineteenth century.
Use of "Aryan" for "Indo-European" in academia was obsolete by the 1910s: B. W. Leist in 1888 still titles Alt-Arisches Jus
Gentium ("Old Aryan [meaning Indo-European, not Indo-Iranian] Ius Gentium"). P. v.
Bradke in 1890 titles Methode und Ergebnisse der arischen (indogermanischen) Altterthumswissenschaft, still using "Aryan",
but inserting an explanatory bracket. Otto Schrader in 1918 in his Reallexikon der indogermanischen Altertumskunde under
the entry Arier matter-of-factly discusses the Indo-Iranians, without any reference to a possible wider meaning of the
term.
According to Michael Witzel in his paper Autochthonous Aryans? The Evidence
from Old Indian and Iranian Texts, "the use of the word Arya or Aryan to designate the speakers of all Indo-European (IE)
languages or as the designation of a particular race is an aberration of many writers of the late 19th and early 20th
centuries and should be avoided."[8]
Indo-Iranian
-
The most probable date for Proto-Indo-Iranian unity is roughly around 2500 BC. In
this sense of the word Aryan, the Aryans were an ancient culture preceding both the Vedic and Avestan cultures. Candidates
for an archeological identification of this Indo-Iranian culture are the Andronovo
and/or Srubnaya Archeological Complexes. India, Anatolia and Central Asia have also been suggested as possible homelands for this
culture.
In linguistics, the term Aryan currently may be used to refer to the Indo-Iranian language family. To prevent confusion because of its several meanings, the
linguistic term is often avoided today. It has been replaced by the unambiguous terms Proto-Indo-European,
Proto-Indo-Iranian, Indo-Iranian, Iranian and Indo-Aryan.
The Proto-Indo-Iranian language evolved into the family of
Indo-Iranian languages, of which the oldest-known members are Vedic Sanskrit, Avestan and another Indo-Iranian language,
known only from loan-words found in the Mitanni language.
Indo-Aryan
-
- See also: Arya#Hinduism
Indus Valley Seals. The first one appears to show a
Swastika.
There is evidence of speakers of Indo-Aryan in Mesopotamia around 1500 BC in the form of loanwords in the Mitanni dialect of Hurrian, the
speakers of which, it is speculated, may have once had an Indo-Aryan ruling class. At around the same time, the Indo-Aryans
associated with the Vedic civilization, which dates back to the same period. They are
sometimes called Vedic Aryans because it is believed that they brought Vedas to the
Indian Subcontinent after the Aryans migrated into that region (this theory is
countered by the Out of India Theory). In ancient
India, the term Aryavarta, meaning "abode of the Aryans", was used to refer to
the northern Indian subcontinent.
Contemporary speakers of Indo-Aryan languages are spread over most of the northern Indian Subcontinent. Indo-Aryan speakers
exist outside the Indian Subcontinent including Romani, the language of the
Roma people, often known as "Gypsies". In addition to Romani, Parya is spoken in Tajikistan, Jataki in
Ukraine, and Domari throughout the Middle East.
Iranian
-
Since ancient times, Persians have used the term Aryan as a racial designation
in an ethnic sense to describe their lineage and their language, and this tradition has continued into the present day amongst
modern Iranians (Encyclopedia Iranica, p.
681, Arya). In fact, the name Iran is a cognate of Aryan and means "Land of the Aryans." [9] [10]
[11] However, many of these usages are also intelligible
if we understand the word Aryan in its sense of "noble" or "Spiritual".
Darius the Great, King of Persia
(521–486 BC), in an inscription in Naqsh-e Rustam (near Shiraz in present-day Iran), proclaims: "I am Darius the great King… A Persian, son of a Persian, an Aryan, having Aryan lineage...". He also calls his language the "Aryan
language," commonly known today as Old Persian. According to the Encyclopedia Iranica, "the
same ethnic concept was held in the later centuries" and was associated with "nobility and lordship." (p. 681)
The word has become a technical term in the theologies of Zoroastrianism, but has always been used by
Iranians in the ethnic sense as well. In 1967, Iran's Pahlavi
dynasty (overthrown in the 1979 Iranian revolution) added the title Āryāmehr "Light of the Aryans" to those of the monarch, known at the
time as the Shahanshah (King of Kings).
The term "Airya-shayana" (abode of the Aryans) has also been used in the Avesta referring to all the lands where the
Aryans dwell.
"Iranian Glory" (Airyana Khvarenah) occurs in the Avesta 23 times.
The term also remains a frequent element in modern Persian personal names, including Arya and Aryan (boy's and
girl's name), Aryana (a common surname), Iran-Dokht (Aryan daughter, a girl's name),Aryanpour (or
Aryanpur, a surname), Aryamane, Ary among many others. The terms "Aryan" and "Iranian" are sometimes used
interchangeably, as in the Iranian bank chain, Aryan Bank.
Racial connotations
-
Because of ethnolinguistic arguments about connections between peoples and cultural
values, "Aryan" peoples were often considered to be distinct from Semitic peoples. By the end of
the nineteenth century this usage was so common that "Aryan" was often used as a synonym for
"gentile", and this popular usage persisted even after academic authors had ceased to use the
term in any other meaning than "Indo-Iranian". Among White supremacists the term still
sometimes functions as a synonym for "non-Jewish white person."
The Aryan race was a term used in the early 20th century by European racial theorists who believed strongly in the
division of humanity into biologically distinct races with differing characteristics. Such writers believed that the
Proto-Indo-Europeans constituted a specific race that had expanded across Europe, Iran and India. This meaning was, and still is,
common in theories of racial superiority which were embraced by Nazi Germany. This usage tends to
merge the Sanskrit meaning of "noble" or "elevated" with the idea of distinctive behavioral and ancestral ethnicity marked by
language distribution. In this interpretation, the Aryan Race is both the highest representative of mankind and the purest
descendent of the Proto-Indo-European population.
From the late 19th century, a number of writers had argued that the Proto-Indo-Europeans had originated in Europe. Their
opinion was received critically at first, but was widely accepted by the end of the nineteenth century. By 1905 Hermann Hirt in his Die Indogermanen (incidentally consistently using Indogermanen, not
Arier to refer to the Indo-Europeans) claimed that the scales had tilted in favour of the hypothesis, in particular
claiming the plains of northern Germany as the Urheimat (p. 197) and connecting the
"blond type" (p. 192) with the core population of the early, "pure" Indo-Europeans. This argument developed in tandem with
Nordicism, the theory that the "Nordic race" of fair-haired north Europeans were innately
superior to other peoples. The identification of the Proto-Indo-Europeans with the north German Corded Ware culture bolstered this position. This was first proposed by Gustaf Kossinna in 1902, and gained in currency over the following two decades, until V. Gordon Childe who in his 1926 The Aryans: a study of Indo-European origins concluded that
"the Nordics' superiority in physique fitted them to be the vehicles of a superior language" (a belief which he later regretted
having expressed).
The idea became a matter of national pride in learned circles of Germany, and was taken up by the Nazis. According to
Alfred Rosenberg's ideology the "Aryan-Nordic" (arisch-nordisch) or
"Nordic-Atlantean" (nordisch-atlantisch) race was thus a master race, at the top of a
racial hierarchy, pitted against a "Jewish-Semitic"
(jüdisch-semitisch) race, deemed to be a racial threat to Germany's homogeneous Aryan civilization, thus rationalizing
Nazi anti-Semitism. Nazism portrayed their interpretation of an "Aryan race" as the only
race capable of, or with an interest in, creating and maintaining culture and civilizations, while other races are merely capable
of conversion, or destruction of culture. These arguments derived from late nineteenth century racial hierarchies. Some Nazis
were also influenced by Helena Petrovna Blavatsky's The Secret Doctrine (1888) where she postulates "Aryans" as the
fifth of her "Root Races", dating them to about a million years ago, tracing them to
Atlantis, an idea also repeated by Rosenberg, and held as doctrine by the
Thule Society. Such theories were used to justify the introduction of the so-called
"Aryan laws" by the Nazis, depriving "non-Aryans" of citizenship and employment rights,
and prohibiting marriage between Aryans and non-Aryans. Though Mussolini's
fascism was not originally characterised by explicit anti-Semitism, he too eventually introduced
laws pressed upon him by Hitler, prohibiting mixed-race marriages between "Aryans" and Jews.
Nazi use of the term "Aryan" was wildly inconsistent with the claimed meaning. Roma, of
Indian descent and language, were classified non-Aryan, while the Japanese were made
honorary Aryans during World War II. In effect,
"non-Aryan" ended up very nearly meaning, "insufficiently nationalistic".
Because of historical racist use of Aryan, and especially use of Aryan race in
connection with the propaganda of Nazism, the word is
sometimes avoided in the West as being tainted, in the same manner as the swastika symbol. In
the English language, the word "Aryan" is no longer in technical use to refer to an ethnic group or race, and the popular use of
the term to mean "white person" fell out of favour during the 1930s when the obvious obsession of the Nazis with the word became
a matter of ridicule in Britain and North America. In the USA, the established and less contentious term "Caucasian" became dominant in official usage. Currently, India and Iran are the only countries to use the
word Aryan in a demographic denomination. This usage, however, carries no racist connotations. Aryan is also a common male
name in India, Afghanistan, and Iran.
The word Aryan is still used to refer to race within white power and white nationalist circles.
See also
Notes
- ^ for the Sanskrit term, Monier-Williams has: "a respectable or honourable or faithful man, an inhabitant of Âryâvarta;
one who is faithful to the religion of his country; name of the race which immigrated from Central Asia into Âryâvarta (opposed
to an-arya, dasyu, daasa); in later times name of the first three castes (opposed to
shudra); a man highly esteemed; a master; Âryan, favourable to the Âryan people; behaving
like an Âryan, worthy of one, honourable, respectable, noble; of a good family; excellent; wise; suitable"
- ^ http://www.geocities.com/Paris/LeftBank/6507/chronicle120.html
- ^ http://www.bookrags.com/Indo-European_languages
- ^ http://wapedia.mobi/en/Indo-Iranian_languages http://kpearson.faculty.tcnj.edu/Dictionary/aryan.htm
- ^ http://www.nvtc.gov/lotw/months/february/IranianBranch.html
- ^ Encyclopaedia Iranica - Aryans
- ^ [1]
- ^ Electronic Journal of Vedic Studies
- ^ The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition, 2000
- ^ http://www.nvtc.gov/lotw/months/february/indoIranianBranch.html
- ^ http://imp.lss.wisc.edu/~aoliai/languagepage/iranianlanguages.htm
References
- Paul Thieme, Der Fremdling im Rigveda. Eine Studie über die Bedeutung der Worte ari,
arya, aryaman und aarya, Leipzig (1938).
- Vyacheslav V. Ivanov and Thomas Gamkrelidze, The Early History of Indo-European Languages, Scientific American, vol. 262,
N3, 110116, March, 1990
- A. Kammenhuber, "Aryans in the Near East," Haidelberg, 1968
Further reading
- Vyacheslav V. Ivanov and Thomas Gamkrelidze, The Early History of Indo-European Languages, Scientific American, vol. 262,
N3, 110116, March, 1990
- A. Kammenhuber, "Aryans in the Near East," Haidelberg, 1968
- Arvidsson, Stefan (2006), Aryan Idols: Indo-European Mythology as Ideology and Science, translated by Sonia Wichmann,
Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
- Poliakov, Leon (1974). The Aryan Myth: A History of Racist and Nationalistic Ideas In Europe. Translation of Le
mythe aryen, 1971.
External links
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)