Banality of evil

Banality of evil is a phrase coined by Hannah Arendt in the title of her 1963 work Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil.^[1] Her thesis is that the great evils in history generally, and the Holocaust in particular, were not executed by fanatics or sociopaths, but by ordinary people who accepted the premises of their state and therefore participated with the view that their actions were normal.

Explaining this phenomenon, Edward S. Herman has emphasized the importance of "normalizing the unthinkable." According to him, "doing terrible things in an organized and systematic way rests on 'normalization.' This is the process whereby ugly, degrading, murderous, and unspeakable acts become routine and are accepted as 'the way things are done.'"^[2]

Criticism

Reicher and Haslam have challenged Arendt's idea of the banality of evil. They agree that ordinary people can commit evil actions, but they assert that it is not simply a matter of “blind people following orders.” They point to historical and psychological evidence that suggests that ordinary people become evil when they identify with evil ideology.^[3]

They cite Cesarani's Eichmann: His Life and Crimes, as “suggesting that Arendt’s analysis was, at best, naive.” In his work, Cesarani claims Arendt attended only the beginning of Eichmann’s trial and missed the defendant’s more revealing admissions. The author recalls that Eichmann spoke proudly of the creative measures with which he executed Hitler’s policy. To Cesarani, this was indicative of an active involvement in evil, not just a passive following of orders.^[3]

Reicher and Haslam have also reinterpreted the findings of a number of landmark psychological cases, including Milgram's obedience studies and Zimbardo's Stanford prison experiment to conclude that people follow ideology, not just orders.^[3] They have proposed a number of factors that can be used to explain how people become swayed by evil ideology, including:

• individual differences (not everyone will choose to commit evil)
• crisis or group failures (people are most vulnerable in a crisis or when a social group they belong to falls apart)
• leadership (people require a strong leader to encourage them to commit evil).^[3]

Reicher and Haslam say these are just some of the factors involved and that more research needs to be done. In part, they blame the popularity of Arendt’s concept of the banality of evil for handcuffing research for so long.^[3]

See also

• Milgram experiment
• Stanford prison experiment
• Little Eichmanns

References

External links

• Lisa Peattie "Normalizing the unthinkable," Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, March 1984, pp. 32-36.
• The Banality of Evil entry in the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy