| Battle of Carrhae |
| Part of the Roman-Persian Wars |

A Parthian returning Legio X standard captured at Carrhae, on a Roman coin struck in
19 BC |
|
|
| Combatants |
| Roman Republic |
Parthia |
| Commanders |
| Marcus Licinius Crassus
†, Publius Crassus † |
Surena |
| Strength |
35,000 Roman legionaries,
4,000 cavalry,
4,000 light infantry |
10,000 cavalry |
| Casualties |
20,000 dead,
10,000 captured,
4,000 wounded |
Reportedly very light |
|
|
|
The Battle of Carrhae was a decisive battle fought in 53 BC near the town of Carrhae
(now the present-day ruins of Harran, Turkey) between the
Roman Republic under the Roman general Crassus and the Parthian Empire under the Parthian
Spahbod Surena. The result of the battle was an overwhelming
victory for the Parthian Empire.
Background
In 55 BC, Marcus Licinius Crassus had just finished serving his
joint-consul year with Pompey. At the time, Crassus, Pompey, and
Julius Caesar formed a powerful and secret triumvirate that all but controlled Rome. As a part of this élite group, Crassus felt a great desire
to add new glory to his name. He had seen no action since his defeat of Spartacus nearly 20
years earlier.[1] Crassus drew out the maps of the Roman
Imperium looking for a target to attack, and decided that the most glorious one would be the Parthian Empire. Many members of the Roman Senate tried to dissuade him from this course of action, but Caesar
and Pompey stood firmly behind him and the senate relented.
Crassus arrived in Syria in late 55 BC. With the aid of Hellenic settlements in Syria and support from Artavasdes, the Armenian king, Crassus marched directly to the
Parthian mainland instead of attacking from the mountains of Armenia. In response, the Parthian king Orodes II divided his army and sent half, which were infantry
troops, to punish the Armenians and sent the other half, which were cavalry units, to combat
Crassus. The enemy armies subsequently encountered each other near the town of Carrhae.
| “ |
Eager to match the military achievements of his two illustrious rivals, Marcus
Licinius Crassus led an army into Parthia. Instead of glory, all he found was death. [2] |
” |
The Battle
The Parthian army, under the leadership of General Surena, was outnumbered but used 1,000
heavily armed and armoured horsemen, called "cataphracts", in conjunction with 9,000
horse archers to defeat the Roman legions. The Roman legionaries eventually broke formation
and were routed. A major factor in the Roman defeat can be attributed to their legionaries heavy armour. The horse archers fired repeated volleys of arrows into the densely packed formation of
the Romans that caused major casualties to the legionaries. To sustain their barrage, the
Parthians employed camels to carry additional arrow loads. The result was the complete
annihilation of Crassus' legions, and his eventual capture and demise.
Prior to battle, Crassus sent his cavalry to scout the area ahead, but they were ambushed and easily routed by the
cataphracts, who had the element of surprise.[3] This allowed the Parthian horse archers to harass the Roman infantry freely. The Romans attempted to
charge the horse archers, but the Parthians would feign retreat, while firing arrows at their pursuers. (a custom known as the
"Parthian shot"). Appropriate to the situation, The Romans formed their ranks into the
protective testudo. However, the Cataphracts then charged the formation while
supported by suppressive fire, smashing into the Roman lines.[4] The legionaries were unable to fight effectively in their tight formation, despite the large
scuta that gave them some measure of protection against the volleys of arrows. Many
Roman soldiers eventually collapsed from thirst and heat
exhaustion from the exertion of defending themselves from the seemingly endless barrages, in addition to the devastating
Cataphract charge, despite being otherwise unwounded. "When Publius urged them to charge the enemy's mail-clad horsemen, they
showed him that their hands were riveted to their shields and their feet nailed through and through to the ground, so that they
were helpless either for flight or for self-defence."[5]
Parthia employed the use of Perso-Parthian composite bows at this time, which were
more powerful than traditional bows. Arrows fired from these bows were able to penetrate the legionnaires' thick armour, to the horror of the heavy Roman infantry.
Aftermath
The result was one of the worst defeats suffered by the Roman Republic in its entire history. During the battle, Crassus' son
Publius was slain and his head was put on a pike for the legionaries to see.[6] Crassus himself was killed and decapitated after the battle; legend has it that he was tortured by
having molten gold poured down his throat (an ironic jest at his notorious wealth), though this
is possibly a rumor spread by his many Roman enemies after the fact. His head was sent to the Parthian king,[7] Orodes II (who allegedly
permitted its use as a stage prop). It is also mentioned by Plutarch that the Parthians found the Roman prisoner of war that
resembled Crassus the most, dressed him as a woman and paraded him through Parthia for all to see. The other half of the Parthian
army defeated the Armenians and captured their country. However, these victories made the Parthian king suspicious and jealous of
Surena, and he ordered his execution. Following Surena's death, Orodes II himself took command of the Parthian army and led an
unsuccessful military campaign into Syria.
Gaius Cassius Longinus, a legatus under Crassus, led approximately 10,000
surviving soldiers from the battlefield back to Syria, where he governed as a proquaestor for two years, defending Syria from
Orodes II's further attacks. He would eventually defeat the Parthians and receive praise from Cicero for his victory. Cassius later played a key role in the conspiracy to assassinate Julius Caesar in 44 B.C.
Legacy
The capture of the golden Aquilae (legionary battle standards) by the Parthians was
considered a grave moral defeat and evil omen for the Romans. It required a generation of diplomacy before the Parthians returned
them. Their return was considered a great triumph by Augustus, and celebrated like a military victory.
An important and unexpected implication of this battle was that it opened up the European continent to a new and beautiful
material: silk. The Romans who managed to survive the battle reported seeing brilliant, shimmering
banners (apparently made of silk) used by the Parthians as they slaughtered the fleeing legions.[8] Subsequently, interest in Europe grew for this
material and trade routes were extended from China to Western Europe. This effectively marked the
beginnings of the Silk Road, one of the greatest and
richest trade routes in history.[9]
The battle is also believed to have eventually led to the first Sino-Roman
relations. According to Pliny, in 53 BC, after losing at the battle of Carrhae, 10,000 Roman prisoners were sent by the
Parthians to Margiana to help guard the eastern frontier of the Parthian Empire. The
Han Chinese later captured this area and the Roman prisoners were likely among the first
westerners to meet the Chinese directly.[10]
However, the most immediate effect of the battle was that Carrhae was an indirect cause for the fall of the Republic, and the
rise of the Empire.[citation needed] At this point it is also worth noting that the Republic as an institution
had really ceased functioning with Sulla's first march on Rome in 88 BC, though the loss of Crassus and his legions at Carrhae
certainly sped the final collapse of the Republic.[11]
Along with the death of Pompey's wife and Caesar's daughter Julia,
Crassus' death left the relationship between Caesar and Pompey as distant and unstable; the first Triumvirate no longer existed.
The triumvirate's balanced structure had helped to prevent a power struggle; but with only two of the generals still alive,
conflict was now inevitable. As a result, civil war broke out, Caesar won, and the Republic was permanently tainted, quickly and
uncontrollably becoming an autocratic dictatorship.
References
External links
The only two ancient records of the battle:
An in-depth description:
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)