Battle of Chaldiran

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Wikipedia on Answers.com:

Battle of Chaldiran

Top

Coordinates: 39°05′19.87″N 44°19′37.19″E / 39.0888528°N 44.3269972°E / 39.0888528; 44.3269972

Battle of Chaldiran
Part of the Ottoman–Persian Wars
Chaldiran Battlefield Site in 2004.JPG
Monument commemorating the Battle of Chaldiran built on the site of battlefield
Date 23 August 1514
Location North-West Iran
Result Decisive Ottoman victory[1]
Belligerents
Ottoman Empire Ottoman Empire Safavid dynasty
Commanders and leaders
Ottoman Empire Sultan Selim I Shah Ismail I
Strength
60,000[2] 100,000[3] 212,000,[4] artillery and janissary musketeer[5] 55,000[6] 12,000[4] 40,000[5] 80,000[3]
Casualties and losses
less than 2,000 approximately 5,000 [7]

The Battle of Chaldiran or Chaldoran (Persian: چالدران ‎, Turkish: Çaldıran) occurred on 23 August 1514 and ended with a victory for the Ottoman Empire over the Safavid Empire of Persia (Iran). As a result, the Ottomans gained immediate control over eastern Anatolia and northern Iraq. The battle, however, was just the beginning of 41 years of destructive war between the two Islamic empires that only ended in 1555 with the Treaty of Amasya. While the Ottomans often had the upper hand, the Persians for the most part held their ground. All Safavid losses in Shia-dominated metropolitan regions of Persia, such as Azerbaijan, Luristan and Kirmanshahan, proved temporary, being recovered from the Ottomans soon after each battle. The loss of Iraq, as well as Kurdish and Armenian eastern Anatolia, however, became permanent.

At Chaldiran, the Ottomans had a larger, better equipped army numbering 60,000 to 200,000, while the Iranians numbered some 40,000. Shah Ismail I, who was wounded and almost captured in the battle, retired to his palace and withdrew from government administration[8] after his wives were captured by Selim I,[9] with at least one married off to one of Selim's statesmen.[10] The battle is one of major historical importance because it not only negated the idea that the Murshid of the Shia-Qizilbash was infallible,[11] but it also fully defined the Ottoman-Safavid borders and led Kurdish chiefs to assert their authority and switch their allegiance from the Safavids to the Ottomans.[12]

Contents

Background

After Selim I's successful struggle against his brothers for the throne of the Ottoman Empire, he was free to turn his attention to the internal unrest he believed was stirred up by the Shia Kizilbash, who had sided with other members of the Dynasty against him and had been semi-officially supported by Bayezid II. Selim now feared that they would incite the population against his rule in favor of Shah Isma'il leader of the Shia Safavids, and by some of his supporters believed to be family of the Prophet. Selim secured a jurist opinion that described Isma'il and the Kizilbash as "unbelievers and heretics" enabling him to undertake extreme measures on his way eastward to pacify the country.[13] In response, Shah Isma'il accused Sultan Selim of aggression against fellow Muslims, violating religious sexual rules and shedding innocent blood.[14]

When Selim started his march east, the Safavids were invaded in the east by the Uzbek state recently brought to prominence by Abu 'I-Fath Muhammad, who had fallen in battle against Isma'il only a few years before. To avoid the prospect of fighting a war on two fronts, Isma'il employed a scorched earth policy against Selim in the west.[15]

The terrain of eastern Anatolia and the Caucuses is extremely rough and combined with the difficulty in supplying the army in light of Isma'il's scorched earth campaign while marching against Muslims, Selim's army was discontented. The Janissaries even fired their muskets at the Sultan's tent in protest at one point. When Selim learned of the Safavid army forming at Chaldiran, he quickly moved to engage Isma'il in part to stifle the discontent of his army.[16]

Battle

Battle of Chaldiran
Persian manuscript showing Shah Isma'il and Sultan Selim I in the battle

The Ottomans deployed heavy artillery and thousands of Janissaries equipped with gunpowder weapons behind a barrier of carts. The Safavids used cavalry to engage the Ottoman forces. The Safavids attacked the Ottoman wings in an effort to avoid the Ottoman artillery positioned at the center. However, the Ottoman artillery was highly maneuverable and the Safavids suffered disastrous losses.[17] The advanced Ottoman weaponry was the deciding factor of the battle as the Safavid forces, who only had traditional weaponry, were decimated. The Safavids also suffered from poor planning and ill-disciplined troops unlike the Ottomans.[18]

Aftermath

Following their victory the Ottomans temporarily captured the Safavid capital of Tabriz, which they evacuated quickly. The Shia defeat at Chaldiran brought an end to the Shia uprisings in Ottoman Empire. After two of his wives were captured by Selim[19] Ismail was heartbroken and resorted to drinking alcohol.[20] Ismail did not participate in government affairs,[21] as his aura of invincibility was shattered.

After the defeat at Chaldiran, however, the Safavids made drastic domestic changes. Ismail's son, Tahmasp I deployed cannons in subsequent battles.[22]

After the battle of Chaldiran, Selim I would then throw his forces southward to fight the Mamluk Sultanate in the Ottoman–Mamluk War (1516–1517).

Battlefield

The site of the battle is near Jala Ashaqi village, around 6 km west of the town of Siyah Cheshmeh, south of Maku, north of Qareh Ziyaeddin. A large brick dome was built at the battlefield site in 2003 along with a statue of Seyid Sadraddin, one of the main Safavid commanders.[23]

Quotes

After the battle, Selim referring to Ismail stated that his adversary was:

Always drunk to the point of losing his mind and totally neglectful of the affairs of the state.[24]

See also


References

  1. ^ David Eggenberger, An Encyclopedia of Battles, (Dover Publications, 1985), 85.
  2. ^ Keegan & Wheatcroft, Who's Who in Military History, Routledge, 1996. p. 268 "In 1515 Selim marched east with some 60,000 men; a proportion of these were skilled Janissaries, certainly the best infantry in Asia, and the sipahis, equally well-trained and disciplined cavalry. [...] The Azerbaijanian army, under Shah Ismail, was almost entirely composed of Turcoman tribal levies, a courageous but ill-disciplined cavalry army. Slightly inferior in numbers to the Turks, their charges broke against the Janissaries, who had taken up fixed positions behind rudimentary field works."
  3. ^ a b Encyclopedia of the Ottoman Empire, Gábor Ágoston,Bruce Alan Masters, page 286, 2009
  4. ^ a b Ghulam Sarwar, "History of Shah Isma'il Safawi", AMS, New York, 1975, p. 79
  5. ^ a b Roger M. Savory, Iran under the Safavids, Cambridge, 1980, p. 41
  6. ^ Keegan & Wheatcroft, Who's Who in Military History, Routledge, 1996. p. 268
  7. ^ Serefname II s. 158
  8. ^ An Introduction to Shiʻi Islam: The History and Doctrines of Twelver Shiʻism, By Moojan Momen, pg. 107
  9. ^ The Cambridge history of Iran, By William Bayne Fisher, Peter Jackson, Laurence Lockhart, pg.224
  10. ^ The imperial harem: women and sovereignty in the Ottoman Empire, By Leslie P. Peirce, pg. 37
  11. ^ The Cambridge history of Iran, By William Bayne Fisher, Peter Jackson, Laurence Lockhart, pg. 359
  12. ^ The Islamic world in ascendancy: from the Arab conquests to the siege of Vienna, By Martin Sicker, pg. 197
  13. ^ Finkel, C: "Osman's Dream", page 104. Basic Books, 2006.
  14. ^ Id. at 105.
  15. ^ Id.
  16. ^ Id. at 106,
  17. ^ A military history of modern Egypt: from the Ottoman Conquest to the Ramadan War, By Andrew James McGregor, pg. 17
  18. ^ The Persians, By Gene Ralph Garthwaite, pg. 164
  19. ^ The Cambridge history of Iran, By William Bayne Fisher, Peter Jackson, Laurence Lockhart, pg. 224
  20. ^ The Cambridge history of Islam, Part 1, By Peter Malcolm Holt, Ann K. S. Lambton, Bernard Lewis, pg. 401
  21. ^ The history of Iran, By Elton L. Daniel, pg. 86
  22. ^ The Mamluks in Egyptian and Syrian politics and society, By Michael Winter, Amalia Levanoni, pg. 127
  23. ^ Lonely Planet Iran, 4th edition, p125
  24. ^ The pursuit of pleasure: drugs and stimulants in Iranian history, 1500-1900 By Rudolph P. Matthee, pg. 77


Post a question - any question - to the WikiAnswers community:

Copyrights: