
[French biais, slant, from Provençal, perhaps ultimately from Greek epikarsios, slanted.]
SYNONYMS bias, color, jaundice, prejudice, warp. These verbs mean to influence unfavorably or detrimentally: His experiences biased his outlook. Your misbehavior has colored my opinion of you. Dishonest leaders have jaundiced her view of politics. Lying has prejudiced the public against them. Bitterness has warped your judgment. See also synonyms at incline, predilection.
In general: outlook or point of view.
Consumer research: systematic error that comes about because the wording of a questionnaire or the attitude of the interviewer or leader appears to encourage one answer over other possible answers.
Federal Reserve's view concerning interest rates. A bias toward higher rates means the Federal Open Market Committee the Fed's rate-setting committee, may raise the federal funds target rate at its next meeting.
noun
adjective
verb
Definition: belief in one way; partiality
Antonyms: fairness, impartiality, justness
v
Definition: cause to favor
Antonyms: be fair, be impartial, be just
The validity or capacity of scientific or medical studies to generalize is often put at risk through the introduction of bias. Such bias results from systematic, nonrandom effects that, even in a large study, produce an incorrect answer or result by weakening, distorting, or spuriously creating a relation between a risk factor or intervention and the observed outcome. It might be caused by a reference population different from the intended group. Therefore, bias has the potential to jeopardize study validity. Researchers must recognize this potential, and reduce its effects through study design, analysis, and interpretation. Controlled laboratory experiments and randomized clinical trials are less prone to bias than are observational studies such as cohort or case-control studies, but this protection is only available for a limited set of conclusions, and bias must be addressed in all studies.
There are many types of bias, which can be intentional or unintentional, and events or features that bias one study may have no biasing effect on another. Biases can result from selection effects (e.g., the sampling plan leaves out a sub-group, over represents a subgroup, or has more complete follow-up for a subgroup [the healthy worker effect]); differential measurement (e.g., cancer cases provide a more accurate family history or exposure history than do controls), measurement error (e.g., the recorded and actual exposures to cigarette smoke differ), and a host of other factors.
Bias is a loaded term in that not all bias is bad. For example, in small studies use of a statistically biased estimate (an estimate that on average does not equal the population valve) can have substantially lower variance than the unbiased estimate and thus be preferred. Regression techniques rely on this trade-off between variance and bias to decide on the valve of entering additional explanatory variables.
Additional examples of bias include the following:
Other types of bias typically encountered in epidemiologic research, particularly those employing observational designs, include recall and observer bias. Recall bias arises if one group systematically over- or underreports information about an exposure or risk factor in comparison to the other group. Observer bias occurs if one group is systematically "observed" and reported to behave in a manner that is different from the other group.
Careful design and conduct of studies and careful interpretation of results are necessary to reduce or eliminate bias. Minimizing bias in design and conduct is preferable to relying on post hoc statistical "cures" such as covariance of adjustment and causal modeling. These powerful techniques are absolutely necessary in analyzing observational studies and can be used to "mop up" some bias in designed experiments, but their effectiveness depends on model validity and expert tuning to the specific study.
(SEE ALSOCase-Control Study; Causality, Causes, and Causal Inference; Cohort Studies; Observational Studies)
Bibliography
Last, J. M. (1998). A Dictionary of Epidemiology, 2nd edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rothman, K. J., and Greenland, S. (1998). Modern Epidemiology, 2nd edition. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven.
— GERMAINE M. BUCK; THOMAS A. LOUIS
1. In research, the distortion of data or findings by the research method employed or by the researcher's suppositions. Bias results in a loss of accuracy, reliability, and validity of the research.
2. In statistics, a difference between the hypothetical ‘true value’ of a variable in a population and that obtained in a particular sample.
A predisposition or a preconceived opinion that prevents a person from impartially evaluating facts that have been presented for determination; a prejudice.
A judge who demonstrates bias in a hearing over which he or she presides has a mental attitude toward a party to the litigation that hinders the judge from supervising fairly the course of the trial, thereby depriving the party of the right to a fair trial. A judge may recuse himself or herself to avoid the appearance of bias.
If, during the voir dire, a prospective juror indicates bias toward either party in a lawsuit, the juror can be successfully challenged for cause and denied a seat on the jury.
Any systematic error in the design, conduct or analysis of a study which results in estimates which depart from true values. An unbiased study is free from systematic error. Many types of bias have been named, but three general types can be identified, selection bias, information bias and confounding. Selection bias is a systematic error in a study caused by the individuals selected into the study being different from the entire target population in an important way. See also berkson's bias. Information bias is a systematic error in a study caused by errors in the data which are collected in the study, or in the analysis of the data.
1. a prejudiced or subjective attitude. n 2. in statistics, the systematic distortion of a statistic caused by a particular sampling process.

Bias is an inclination to present or hold a partial perspective at the expense of (possibly equally valid) alternatives. Anything biased generally is one-sided, and therefore lacks a neutral point of view. Bias can come in many forms.
|
Contents
|
A cognitive bias is the human tendency to make systematic decisions in certain circumstances based on cognitive factors rather than evidence. Bias arises from various processes that are sometimes difficult to distinguish. These processes include information-processing shortcuts, motivational factors, and social influence. [1] Such biases can result from information-processing shortcuts called heuristics. They include errors in judgment, social attribution, and memory. Cognitive biases are a common outcome of human thought, and often drastically skew the reliability of anecdotal and legal evidence. It is a phenomenon studied in cognitive science and social psychology.
Media bias is the bias of journalists and news producers within the mass media, in the selection of which events and stories are reported and how they are covered. The term "media bias" implies a pervasive or widespread bias contravening the standards of journalism, rather than the perspective of an individual journalist or article. The direction and degree of media bias in various countries is widely disputed.
Practical limitations to media neutrality include the inability of journalists to report all available stories and facts, and the requirement that selected facts be linked into a coherent narrative (Newton 1989). Since it is impossible to report everything, selectivity is inevitable. Government influence, including overt and covert censorship, biases the media in some countries. Market forces that result in a biased presentation include the ownership of the news source, concentration of media ownership, the selection of staff, the preferences of an intended audience, and pressure from advertisers.
Political bias has been a feature of the mass media since its birth with the invention of the printing press. The expense of early printing equipment restricted media production to a limited number of people. Historians have found that publishers often served the interests of powerful social groups.[2]
| Wikiquote has a collection of quotations related to: Bias |
| Look up bias in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. |
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
Dansk (Danish)
n. - bias, skævvridning, skævhed
v. tr. - påvirke til forudindtagethed, gøre forudindtaget
adj. - forudindtaget, skævvride
adv. - skrå, skråtskåret
idioms:
Nederlands (Dutch)
vooringenomenheid, neiging (richting), vertekening (statistiek), diagonaal (stof), voltage/magnetisch veld (elektronica), beïnvloeden, doen afwijken, schuin (knippen)
Français (French)
n. - tendance, inclination, penchant, préjugé, parti pris, prévention, (Jur) distorsion, (Cout) biais, (Sport) poids placé à l'intérieur d'une boule, déviation
v. tr. - influencer en faveur de/contre, prévenir en faveur de/contre
adj. - partial, subjectif, déformé, tendancieux
adv. - en diagonale, obliquement
idioms:
Deutsch (German)
n. - Neigung, Voreingenommenheit, (Statistik) Systematik, (Tech.) konstante Stromzufuhr
v. - auf eine Seite lenken, beeinflussen, (übertr.) hinlenken
adj. - diagonal, schräg
adv. - diagonal, schräg
idioms:
Ελληνική (Greek)
n. - προκατάληψη, μεροληψία, ιδιαίτερη συμπάθεια, λοξή ραφή, λοξότητα, διαγώνιος, φάλτσο (σφαίρας κ.λπ.), (Η/Υ) παραμόρφωση, (τεχν.) πόλωση
adj. - λοξός, διαγώνιος
adv. - λοξά, διαγωνίως
idioms:
Italiano (Italian)
pregiudizio, intenzione, preconcetto, prevenzione
idioms:
Português (Portuguese)
n. - linha (f) oblíqua, tendência (f), propensão (f)
adj. - diagonal
adv. - diagonalmente
idioms:
Русский (Russian)
предвзятое отношение, предрассудок, пристрастие, предубеждение, резать по косой материала
idioms:
Español (Spanish)
n. - tendencia, prejuicio, predisposición, sesgo, tensión
v. tr. - torcer, influir, predisponer, inclinar
adj. - sesgado, parcial, diagonal
adv. - tendenciosamente, prejuiciosamente, parcialmente, oblicuamente, en diagonal
idioms:
Svenska (Swedish)
n. - förutfattad mening, fördom
adj. - fördomsfull, partisk
adv. - partiskt
中文(简体)(Chinese (Simplified))
偏见, 成见, 倾向, 趋势, 偏心, 偏爱, 使存偏见, 斜的, 斜纹的
idioms:
中文(繁體)(Chinese (Traditional))
n. - 偏見, 成見, 傾向, 趨勢, 偏心, 偏愛
v. tr. - 使存偏見
adj. - 斜的, 斜紋的
idioms:
한국어 (Korean)
n. - 사선, 바이어스, 선입관
v. tr. - 편견을 갖게 하다, 한쪽으로 치우치게 하다
adj. - 비스듬히 자른, 바이어스의
adv. - 대각선으로, 비스듬히
日本語 (Japanese)
n. - 心理的傾向, 先入観, 斜線, バイアス, 傾向, えこひいき
adj. - 斜めの
v. - 偏らせる, 偏見を抱かせる
idioms:
العربيه (Arabic)
(الاسم) تحيز, انحراف, ميل (صفه) مائل, منحرف (ظرف) مائلا
עברית (Hebrew)
n. - נטייה, דעה קדומה, נטאי, סטייה (סטטיסטיקה), מתח חשמלי קבוע
v. tr. - שיחד, הטה דעה, השפיע
adj. - נוטה בדעותיו לצד אחד
If you are unable to view some languages clearly, click here.