Biot–Savart law: Definition from Answers.com

Electromagnetism

Electrostatics
Electric charge · Coulomb's law · Electric field · Electric flux · Gauss's law · Electric potential · Electrostatic induction · Electric dipole moment · Polarization density ·

Magnetostatics
Ampère’s law · Electric current · Magnetic field · Magnetization · Magnetic flux · Biot–Savart law · Magnetic dipole moment · Gauss's law for magnetism ·

Electrodynamics
Free space · Lorentz force law · emf · Electromagnetic induction · Faraday’s law · Lenz's law · Displacement current · Maxwell's equations · EM field · Electromagnetic radiation · Liénard-Wiechert Potential · Maxwell tensor · Eddy current ·

Electrical Network
Electrical conduction · Electrical resistance · Capacitance · Inductance · Impedance · Resonant cavities · Waveguides ·

Covariant formulation
Electromagnetic tensor · EM Stress-energy tensor · Four-current · Electromagnetic four-potential ·

Scientists
Ampère · Coulomb · Faraday · Gauss · Heaviside · Henry · Hertz · Lorentz · Maxwell · Tesla · Weber · Ørsted ·

The Biot–Savart law (pronounced /ˈbiːoʊ səˈvɑr/ or /ˈbjoʊ səˈvɑr/)^[1] is an equation in electromagnetism that describes the magnetic field B generated by an electric current. The vector field B depends on the magnitude, direction, length, and proximity of the electric current, and also on a fundamental constant called the magnetic constant. The law is valid in the magnetostatic approximation, and results in a B field consistent with both Ampère's circuital law and Gauss's law for magnetism.^[2]

1 Introduction
2 Forms
3 Magnetic responses applications
4 Aerodynamics applications
5 The Biot–Savart law, Ampère's circuital law, and Gauss's law for magnetism
6 See also
- 6.1 People
- 6.2 Electromagnetism
7 Notes
8 References
9 External links

Introduction

The Biot–Savart law is used to compute the magnetic field generated by a steady current, i.e. a continual flow of charges, for example through a wire, which is constant in time and in which charge is neither building up nor depleting at any point. The equation is as follows:

$\mathbf{B} = \int\frac{\mu_0}{4\pi} \frac{I d\mathbf{l} \times \mathbf{\hat r}}{r^2},$ or (equivalently), $\mathbf{B} = \int\frac{\mu_0}{4\pi} \frac{I d\mathbf{l} \times \mathbf{r}}{r^3}$

(in SI units), where

I is the current,

dl is a vector, whose magnitude is the length of the differential element of the wire, and whose direction is the direction of conventional current,

B is the net magnetic field,

μ₀ is the magnetic constant,

$\scriptstyle{\hat{\mathbf{r}}}$ is the displacement unit vector in the direction pointing from the wire element towards the point at which the field is being computed,

$\scriptstyle{\mathbf{r}=r\hat{\mathbf{r}}}$ is the full displacement vector from the wire element to the point at which the field is being computed,

the symbols in boldface denote vector quantities.

To apply the equation, you choose a point in space at which you want to compute the magnetic field. Holding that point fixed, you integrate over the path of the current(s) to find the total magnetic field at that point. The application of this law implicitly relies on the superposition principle for magnetic fields, i.e. the fact that the magnetic field is a vector sum of the field created by each infinitesimal section of the wire individually.^[3]

The formulations given above work well when the current can be approximated as running through an infinitely-narrow wire. If the current has some thickness, the proper formulation of the Biot–Savart law (again in SI units) is:

$\mathbf{B} = \int\frac{\mu_0}{4\pi}\ \frac{(\mathbf{J}\, dV) \times \mathbf{\hat r}}{r^2},$ or (equivalently), $\mathbf{B} = \int\frac{\mu_0}{4\pi}\ \frac{(\mathbf{J}\, dV) \times \mathbf{r}}{r^3},$

where

$\scriptstyle{dV}$ is the differential element of volume and

$\scriptstyle{\mathbf{J}}$ is the current density vector in that volume.

The Biot–Savart law is fundamental to magnetostatics, playing a similar role to Coulomb's law in electrostatics. When magnetostatics does not apply, the Biot–Savart law should be replaced by Jefimenko's equations.

Forms

General

In the magnetostatic approximation, the magnetic field can be determined if the current density j is known:

$\mathbf{B}= K_m\int{\frac{\mathbf{j} \times \mathbf{\hat r}}{r^2}dV}$

where:

$\ dV$ is the differential element of volume.

$K_m = \frac{\mu_0}{4\pi}$ is the magnetic constant

Constant uniform current

In the special case of a constant, uniform current I, the magnetic field B is

$\mathbf B = K_m I \int \frac{d\mathbf l \times \mathbf{\hat r}}{r^2}$

Point charge at constant velocity

In the case of a charged point particle q moving at a constant velocity v, then Maxwell's equations give the following expression for the electric field and magnetic field:^[4]

$\mathbf{E} = \frac{q}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \frac{1-v^2/c^2}{(1-v^2\sin^2\theta/c^2)^{3/2}}\frac{\mathbf{\hat r}}{r^2}$

$\mathbf{B} = \mathbf{v} \times \frac{1}{c^2} \mathbf{E}$

where $\mathbf{\hat r}$ is the vector pointing from the current (non-retarded) position of the particle to the point at which the field is being measured, and θ is the angle between $\mathbf{v}$ and $\mathbf{r}$ .

When $v^2 \ll c^2$ , the electric field and magnetic field can be approximated as^[4]

$\mathbf{E} =\frac{q}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\ \frac{\mathbf{\hat r}}{r^2}$ 、

$\mathbf{B} =\frac{\mu_0 q \mathbf{v}}{4\pi} \times \frac{\mathbf{\hat r}}{r^2}$

These equations are called the "Biot–Savart law for a point charge"^[5] due to its closely analogous form to the "standard" Biot–Savart law given previously. These equations were first derived by Oliver Heaviside in 1888.

Magnetic responses applications

The Biot–Savart law can be used in the calculation of magnetic responses even at the atomic or molecular level, e.g. chemical shieldings or magnetic susceptibilities, provided that the current density can be obtained from a quantum mechanical calculation or theory.

Aerodynamics applications

The figure shows the velocity induced at a point P (

d V

) by a vortex filament of strength

Γ

The Biot–Savart law is also used to calculate the velocity induced by vortex lines in aerodynamic theory.

In the aerodynamic application, the roles of vorticity and current are reversed as when compared to the magnetic application.

In Maxwell's 1861 paper 'On Physical Lines of Force', magnetic field strength H was directly equated with pure vorticity (spin), whereas B was a weighted vorticity that was weighted for the density of the vortex sea. Maxwell considered magnetic permeability μ to be a measure of the density of the vortex sea. Hence the relationship,

(1) Magnetic Induction Current

$\mathbf{B} = \mu \mathbf{H}$

was essentially a rotational analogy to the linear electric current relationship,

(2) Electric Convection Current

$\mathbf{J} = \rho \mathbf{v}$

where ρ is electric charge density. B was seen as a kind of magnetic current of vortices aligned in their axial planes, with H being the circumferential velocity of the vortices.

The electric current equation can be viewed as a convective current of electric charge that involves linear motion. By analogy, the magnetic equation is an inductive current involving spin. There is no linear motion in the inductive current along the direction of the B vector. The magnetic inductive current represents lines of force. In particular, it represents lines of inverse square law force.

In aerodynamics the induced air currents are forming solenoidal rings around a vortex axis that is playing the role that electric current plays in magnetism. This puts the air currents of aerodynamics into the equivalent role of the magnetic induction vector B in electromagnetism.

In electromagnetism the B lines form solenoidal rings around the source electric current, whereas in aerodynamics, the air currents form solenoidal rings around the source vortex axis.

Hence in electromagnetism, the vortex plays the role of 'effect' whereas in aerodynamics, the vortex plays the role of 'cause'. Yet when we look at the B lines in isolation, we see exactly the aerodynamic scenario in so much as that B is the vortex axis and H is the circumferential velocity as in Maxwell's 1861 paper.

For a vortex line of infinite length, the induced velocity at a point is given by

$v = \frac{\Gamma}{2\pi d}$

where

Γ

is the strength of the vortex

d

is the perpendicular distance between the point and the vortex line.

This is a limiting case of the formula for vortex segments of finite length:

$v = \frac{\Gamma}{4 \pi d} \left[\cos A + \cos B \right]$

where A and B are the (signed) angles between the line and the two ends of the segment.

The Biot–Savart law, Ampère's circuital law, and Gauss's law for magnetism

Here is a demonstration that the magnetic field B as computed from the Biot–Savart law will always satisfy Ampere's circuital law and Gauss's law for magnetism.^[6] Click "show" in the box below for an outline of the proof.

Outline of proof that a magnetic field calculated by the Biot–Savart law will always satisfy Gauss's law for magnetism and Ampere's law.

We start with the Biot–Savart law:

$\mathbf{B}(\mathbf{r}) = \frac{\mu_0}{4\pi} \int d^3r' \mathbf{J}(\mathbf{r}')\times \frac{\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|^3}$

Plugging in the well-known relation

$\frac{\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|^3} = -\nabla\left(\frac{1}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}\right)$

and using the product rule for curls, as well as the fact that J does not depend on the unprimed coordinates, this equation can be rewritten as

$\mathbf{B}(\mathbf{r}) = \frac{\mu_0}{4\pi} \nabla\times\int d^3r' \frac{\mathbf{J}(\mathbf{r}')}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}$

Since the divergence of a curl is always zero, this establishes Gauss's law for magnetism. Next, taking the curl of both sides, using the formula for the curl of a curl (see the article Curl (mathematics)), and again using the fact that J does not depend on the unprimed coordinates, we eventually get the result

$\nabla\times\mathbf{B} = \frac{\mu_0}{4\pi}\nabla\int d^3r' \mathbf{J}(\mathbf{r}')\cdot\nabla\left(\frac{1}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}\right) - \frac{\mu_0}{4\pi}\int d^3r' \mathbf{J}(\mathbf{r}')\nabla^2\left(\frac{1}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}\right)$

Finally, plugging in the relations

$\nabla\left(\frac{1}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}\right) = -\nabla' \left(\frac{1}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}\right),$

$\nabla^2\left(\frac{1}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}\right) = -4\pi \delta(\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}')$

(where δ is the Dirac delta function), using the fact that the divergence of J is zero (due to the assumption of magnetostatics), and performing an integration by parts, the result turns out to be

$\nabla\times \mathbf{B} = \mu_0 \mathbf{J}$

i.e. Ampere's law.

Notes

^ [1]
^ Jackson, John David (1999). Classical Electrodynamics (3rd ed. ed.). New York: Wiley. Chapter 5. ISBN 0-471-30932-X.
^ The superposition principle holds for the electric and magnetic fields because they are the solution to a set of linear differential equations, namely Maxwell's equations, where the current is one of the "source terms".
^ ^a ^b Griffiths, David J. (1998). Introduction to Electrodynamics (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall. pp. pp. 222-224, 435-440. ISBN 0-13-805326-X.
^ http://maxwell.ucdavis.edu/~electro/magnetic_field/pointcharge.html
^ See Jackson, page 178–9 or Griffiths p. 222–4. The presentation in Griffiths is particularly thorough, with all the details spelled out.

References

Griffiths, David J. (1998). Introduction to Electrodynamics (3rd ed. ed.). Prentice Hall. ISBN 0-13-805326-X.
Feynman, Richard (1966). The Feynman Lectures on Physics. Addison-Wesley. ISBN 0-63-20717.

External links

Electromagnetism, B. Crowell, Fullerton College
MISN-0-125 The Ampère–Laplace–Biot–Savart Law by Orilla McHarris and Peter Signell for Project PHYSNET.

This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)

Donate to Wikimedia

	What is the meaning of Biot-Savar's equation? Read answer...
	Is a copyright law a city law state law or federal law? Read answer...
	What are By-laws? Read answer...

	Similarities and differences between Biot-savart law and coulombs law?
	Biot savart law and its three integral form?
	Magnetic field of solenoid by biot savart law?

		Sci-Tech Dictionary. McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms. Copyright © 2003, 1994, 1989, 1984, 1978, 1976, 1974 by McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Read more
		Sci-Tech Encyclopedia. McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Science and Technology. Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Read more
		Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Biot–Savart law". Read more

Biot–Savart law

Contents