A blacklist is a list or register of entities who, for one reason or another, are being denied a particular privilege,
service, or mobility. As a verb, blacklist can mean to deny someone work in a particular field, or
to ostracize them from a certain social circle.
Political context
The term blacklisting is generally used in a pejorative context, as it implies that someone has been prevented from
having legitimate access to something due to the whims or judgments of another. For example, a person being served with a
restraining order for having threatened another person would not be considered a case of
blacklisting. However, somebody who is fired for exposing poor working conditions in a particular company, and is subsequently
blocked from finding work in that industry, may be considered to have been blacklisted. Blacklisting can and has been
accomplished informally and by consensus of authority figures, and does not necessarily require a physical list or overt written
record.
Hollywood blacklist
-
In American history, one of the most famous examples of blacklisting stemmed from an investigation launched in 1947 by the
House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) into
Communist influence on the motion picture industry. The first in the industry to be
blacklisted, as a result of their refusal to provide evidence to HUAC, were a group known as the Hollywood Ten, most of them screenwriters, who had at one time
or another been members of the American Communist Party. Today, the best known of
the Hollywood Ten is writer Dalton Trumbo, who was barred from openly working in
Hollywood for over a dozen years as a result of his defiance of HUAC. (He
continued to work under pseudonyms and "fronts" until the revelation in 1960 that he had
written the script for Spartacus.) Actor John
Garfield was one of the more famous Hollywood performers to have been blacklisted by major American film studios as a
direct result of HUAC investigations and hearings.
Blacklisting may sometimes result in a domino effect, as in the case of radio actress
Madeline Lee. Both Lee and her husband, actor Jack Gilford,
were blacklisted during the McCarthy era after it was revealed that Lee had given a party in
her house to raise funds for a group later labeled as a Communist front. Though there
was no suspicion that she had ever been involved in any putatively "subversive" political causes (and though her real name was
spelled differently), Lee became the target of thousands of protest phone calls to her network. Another actress, Camilla Ashland, who appeared on the television show Danger, physically resembled Madeline Lee; though
she had no political past, her network too became the target of protest phone calls. Madeline Pierce, a 20-year veteran of radio,
who again had no political past, was also ultimately blacklisted.[citation needed]
Computing
In computing, a blacklist is an access
control mechanism that means, allow everybody, except members of the blacklist. The opposite is a whitelist, which means, allow nobody, except members of the white list. As a sort of middle ground, a
greylist serves as a temporary blacklist that could be used, for example, to block
poorly-configured electronic mail clients that may be used to send undesirable electronic mail.
An organization may keep a blacklist of software or websites in its computer system. Titles on the list would be banned and
everything else would be allowed. For example, a school might blacklist KaZaA and ICQ; other Internet services would still be
allowed.
Content-control software such as DansGuardian and SquidGuard may work with a blacklist in order to block
URLs of sites deemed inappropriate for a work or educational environment.
An e-mail spam filter may keep a blacklist of
addresses, any mail from which would be prevented from reaching its intended destination. A popular technique for implementing
blacklists is DNS blacklisting (DNSBL).
Many copy prevention schemes include software
blacklisting.
Members of online auction sites may add other members to a personal
blacklist. This means that they cannot bid on or ask questions about your auctions, nor can they use a "buy now" function on your
items.
Medical context
Blacklisting is multiple providers denying care to a certain patient or patients with a connotation of volition or
willfulness. It is done in various ways for various reasons and is not new. In 1907 the Transvaal Medical Union in South Africa
blacklisted patients if they could not pay cash in advance.[1] That was a physical list kept by the community of physicians. A physical list is not necessary
to blacklist patients, but there have been other efforts to do that. For instance, in the United States the web site http://www.doctorsknow.us was set up to blacklist any
patient who had filed a suit against a physician. That effort was extended off shore to a site at http://www.litipages.com, a site that encourages doctors to
consider avoiding patients who are listed in their database [1]. Those both are physical lists that blacklist patients who have complained or sued
their healthcare providers.
There are less formal and less visible blacklists as well. For instance, an organization called "Sufferers of Iatrogenic
Neglect [2]" knows of 40 cases where
patients claim they have suffered on two counts: one, from the original human medical error, and two, because they complained
about it and as a result got blacklisted. In West London, Rafat Saeed had difficulty finding a GP and says, “… it is very easy
for a doctor to blacklist a patient through the Family Health Services Authority” [3]. Angelique
Omega wrote in her blog, "I was once told in a phone call by a Renown E.R. nurse, after she very quickly looked up my name in
their computer, that I'd better not ever show my face there ever again. This was after I had filed complaints …"[4]
Data sharing also can cause patients to become blacklisted. Data sharing makes it easy to get labeled as a "problem patient"
without anyone adding a name to a list. Repeat patients who are misdiagnosed or undiagnosed, or patients with chronic conditions
or mental illness, can get labeled as "problem patients" in computer systems such as HealthConnect or Epic that hold the records
of patients and can make it increasingly difficult, if not impossible, to get appointments for care. Such systems have no borders
making this a global problem [5].
Even without data sharing, collegial loyalty, watching each other's backs, can be enough to result in the denial of care to
certain patients. Consider the patient who has been injured by a healthcare provider. Patients with iatrogenic illnesses often
cannot get a record made of their injuries and often cannot get treatment. Trudy Newman in her article "Deadly Medical
Practices"[6]
described the cause as being physicians having a stronger allegiance to each other than to their patients. They are reluctant to
acknowledge the existence of iatrogenic injuries by diagnosing or treating them. A patient with iatrogenic injuries can go from
doctor to doctor to doctor without getting diagnosed or treated and never know why. Without a list or any communication between
physicians, collegial loyalty by itself results in patients with certain kinds of problems being blacklisted.
However, the term blacklist does connote volition or willfulness. A new and unrecognized disease resulting in patients being
unable to find treatment might not be considered blacklisting unless inclination or personal belief or the equivalent had to do
with why treatment either was not found or was unreasonably difficult to find.
In the UK the term blacklisted also is used in the NHS to denote blacklisted medicines that are not
allowed to be prescribed on NHS prescriptions.
An episode of Seinfeld, "The
Package", shows Elaine as being listed as "difficult" on her chart, causing her to have trouble finding a doctor who will
see her, eventually ending up in a rural doctor's office, only to be rejected once more.
See also
References
- James J. Lorence. The Suppression of Salt of the Earth. How Hollywood, Big Labor, and Politicians Blacklisted a Movie in
Cold War America. University of New Mexico Press: 1999. ISBN 0-8263-2027-9 (cloth) ISBN 0-8263-2028-7 (paper)
- ^ The Cape Doctor in the Nineteenth Century: A Social History
(Clio Medica, 74) by Harriet Deacon, H., Ph.D. Phillips, E. Van Heyningen.
External links
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)