blood sport

A sport involving bloodshed, such as cockfighting.

Many of the traditional sports and pastimes of England were what would now be classed as ‘blood sports’ and have long since been outlawed and suppressed. Badger-baiting, bear-baiting, bull-baiting, bull-running, dog-fighting, cock-fighting, and throwing at cocks are the best known, but there were many more obscure ones such as goose-riding, where a goose with a greased neck was hung up by its feet and horse riders tried to pull its head off as they galloped past, and sparrow-mumbling, where men tried either to remove the feathers or to bite the head off a live sparrow, using only their lips and teeth. As opposed to fox/hare/stag-hunting, angling, and grouse shooting, the historical pattern for each of the popular sports is broadly similar. From the earliest records to about the middle of the 18th century, they were an accepted part of English life, both rural and urban. Admittedly, the Puritans had tried to ban some of them, and there were individual voices speaking out against cruelty, but on the whole Church, State, local authority, and the social élite either supported or at least accepted them, and the general people revelled in them.

The baiting of animals with dogs was very popular, with bull-baiting being the most common and taking place at any time, but particularly popular at wakes, fairs, elections, and other gatherings. It involved tying a bull to a permanent ring, or stake driven securely into the ground, with about fifteen feet of rope secured to the base of its horns. Dogs were then let loose, one or several at a time, and encouraged to attack or ‘bait’ the bull. Any dog could be used, but in most places people bred and trained animals for the ‘sport’—bulldogs, mastiffs, and so on. As its horns had been blunted, the bull's main defence was to toss the dogs into the air, and the dog-owners were adept at catching them on sloping poles to break their fall. This was clearly popular with the audience—many pictures of the custom choose this part to illustrate. The sport was given legitimacy by the belief that beef from baited bulls was much more tender than from normally slaughtered animals, and in some places local regulations insisted that bulls be baited before being killed (N&Q 9s:9 (1902), 255).

Bear-baiting was just as popular but less common. In its heyday, it had attracted royal support, and had reputedly been introduced to England, from Italy, in the 12th century, and to have been first seen in this country at Ashby-de-la-Zouche in Leicestershire. William Fitz Stephen mentions it in London, c.1183: ‘… or huge bears, do combat to the death against hounds let loose upon them’ (Fitz Stephen, c.1180: 58). An illustration of c.1340, from the Bodleian Library, is given by Armitage.

In urban areas, blood sports were indeed big business. Institutions like the Bear Garden at Bankside, Southwark, were famous for their spectacles, and its successor at Hockley-in-the-Hole, Clerkenwell, became a popular byword for animal sports. At Hockley they offered a twice-weekly programme, throughout the year. Bear-baiting, bull-baiting, dog-fighting, were regular fare, but on other occasions one could witness whipping a blindfolded bear, and the baiting of other animals including a leopard, an African Tyger, and a mad ass. On more than one occasion, horse-baiting is mentioned, and Strutt includes a 14th-century illustration of the ‘sport’ (p. 333). The advertisements often proclaim a forthcoming event as TO THE DEATH! which was clearly far more attractive than just an ordinary baiting. Both John Evelyn (16 June 1670) and Samuel Pepys (14 August 1666) recorded visits to Bankside, although Evelyn did not like it: ‘I most heartily weary, of the rude & dirty passetime …’ Evelyn's distaste seems to be at the start of a new sensibility, but the consensus over blood-sports began to crumble seriously in the mid-18th century as the isolated voices gradually coalesced into a unified, vociferous, and passionate movement for reform. The reformers attacked the traditional sports on two moral fronts: first was the genuine outrage against cruelty to animals, often set in a Christian context, and second was the concern with the effect that such pastimes would have on the moral character of the working classes. William Hogarth's popular engravings of Four Stages of Cruelty (1751) are good examples of the changing moral climate. They show, in succession, boys torturing small animals, adults mistreating horses and donkeys while, in the background, a bull-running is in progress. This callousness leads to murder and an end on the dissection table. Similarly, a schoolteacher writing in 1833 characterized the workers of Staffordshire, with their penchant for blood sports, as ‘ignorant, vulgar, and wicked to excess (Malcolmson, 1973: 119).

The opposition to blood sports comprised only part of the drive against the leisure pursuits of the working classes in the 18th and 19th centuries. Street football and mass November the Fifth celebrations, for example, were also under attack from the new moralists, on the basis that they were violent, drunken, degrading, brutish, and potentially dangerous to respectable people and their property. There was naturally resistance from participants, and these sports became a major moral battleground between the traditionalists and the reformers from the mid-18th to the early 19th centuries, with successes and setbacks on both sides. The reformers won in the end, of course, and major breakthroughs were the formation of the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals in June 1824 (it added the ‘Royal’ part in 1840), the Cruelty to Animals Act of 1835, and the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act of 1849. It is clear, also, that there were overt class aspects to the reform movements. Sports which had widespread upper- or middle-class support, such as fox-hunting, were either ignored or expressly excluded from the campaigns, and in a case such as cock-fighting it was only when the gentry had largely forsaken the sport that real action was taken against it. Those which can take place in private, such as cock-fighting, dog-fighting, and badger-baiting, still persist.

See also BULL-RUNNING, COCK-FIGHTING, throwing at COCKS.

Bibliography
The full bibliography list is available here.

• Malcolmson, 1973
• Hutton, 1994
• Boulton, 1901: i. 1-34
• Edward G. Fairholme and Wellesley Pain, A Century of Work for Animals: The History of the RSPCA (1924)
• Strutt, 1801 (1876 edn.)
• John Armitage, Man at Play (1977)

For other uses, see Blood sport (disambiguation).

Animal rights Notable activists Greg Avery · David Barbarash Mel Broughton  · Rod Coronado John Feldmann Barry Horne · Shannon Keith Ronnie Lee · Keith Mann Ingrid Newkirk · Alex Pacheco Jill Phipps · Henry Spira Andrew Tyler · Jerry Vlasak Paul Watson · Robin Webb Notable groups Animal Aid · ALDF · ALF BUAV · Friends of Animals · GAP Hunt Saboteurs · PETA · PCRM Political parties · Primate Freedom Sea Shepherd · SARC  · SPEAK SHAC  · WARN Issues Animal liberation movement Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act Animal law · Animal testing Bile bear · Blood sport Covance · Draize test Factory farming · Fur trade Great Ape research ban · HLS Lab animal sources · LD50 Nafovanny · Open rescue Operation Backfire · Primate trade Seal hunting · Speciesism Cases Britches · Brown Dog affair Cambridge · Pit of despair Silver Spring monkeys Unnecessary Fuss Notable writers Steven Best · Stephen Clark Joan Dunayer · Gary Francione Gill Langley · Tom Regan Bernard Rollin · Richard Ryder Peter Singer · Steven Wise Films, magazines, books Behind the Mask · Earthlings Arkangel · Bite Back No Compromise Animal Liberation Related categories ALF · Animal testing Animal law · Animal rights AR movement Livestock · Meat Poultry Related templates Agriculture · Animal testing Fishing This box: view • talk • edit

Bloodsport or blood sport is any sport or entertainment that involves violence against animals.

Bloodsport includes coursing or beagling, combat sports such as cockfighting, or other activities. These usually involve blood being drawn, and often result in the death of one or more animals.

Contents 1 Etymology 2 Current issues 2.1 Hunting 2.2 Bull fighting and cock fighting 2.3 Online videos 3 List of blood sports 4 Campaigning organizations 5 See also 6 External links 7 References

Etymology

Medieval hunting in the Très Riches Heures

According to the Oxford English Dictionary, the earliest use of the term is in reference to mounted hunting, where the quarry would be actively chased, as in fox hunting or hare coursing. Before firearms a hunter using arrows or a spear might also wound an animal, which would then be chased and perhaps killed at close range, as in medieval boar hunting. The term was popularised by author Henry S. Salt (1851–1939).

Later, the term seems to have been applied to various kinds of baiting and forced combat: bull-baiting, bear-baiting, cockfighting and later developments such as dog fighting and rat-baiting. The animals were specially bred, confined and forced to fight. In the Victorian era, social reformers began a vocal opposition to such activities, claiming grounds of ethics, morality and animal welfare.

Current issues

Changes in usage of the term blood sport illustrate the depth of the linguistic and social complexities of social evolution.

Hunting

Animal rights and some animal welfare activists have sought to extend the term blood sport, especially as a pejorative, to a variety of activities not covered by the original use of the term^[1]. Its usage to describe modern hunting is a matter of dispute.

Bull fighting and cock fighting

Today, under lobbying pressure, limitations on blood sports have been enacted in much of the world. Certain blood sports remain legal under varying degrees of control in certain locations (e.g., bull fighting and cockfighting) but have declined in popularity almost everywhere else.^[2][3] Proponents of blood sports are widely cited to believe that they are traditional within the culture.^[4] Bullfighting aficionados, for example, do not regard bullfighting as a sport but as a cultural activity. It is sometimes called a tragic spectacle, because in many forms of the sport the bull is invariably killed, and the bullfighter is always at risk of death. Both Barnaby Conrad's La Fiesta Brava and Hemingway's Death in the Afternoon offer opinion on this matter.

Online videos

The video-sharing website YouTube has been criticized by the RSPCA and other animal welfare organisations for allowing videos of animal conflict staged specifically to be shown on the site -- especially the feeding of one animal to another -- to remain there.^[5][6]

List of blood sports

Badger-baiting Bear-baiting Betta-fighting Bull-baiting Bullfighting Cockfighting Cock throwing Cricket fighting Dog fighting Fox hunting

Fox tossing Gladiatoral spectacles Hare coursing Hog dogging Human-baiting Hunting Insect fighting Rat baiting Spider fighting Wolf hunting

Campaigning organizations

• Irish Council Against Blood Sports (Ireland)
• League Against Cruel Sports (UK)
• Hunt Saboteurs Association

See also

• Animals in sport
• Baiting (animals)
• Illegal sports

External links

• Irish Council Against Blood Sports
• YouTube footage of a captive deer being pursued by hounds and horsemen

References

1. ^ Greenwood, George (1914). "Bloodsports". Stag Hunting pp. 1–33, in Killing for Sport: Essays by Various Writers, edited by Henry S. Salt. George Bell and Sons, Ltd, London. http://www.henrysalt.co.uk/index_old.html. Retrieved on 2006-12-17. 
2. ^ Lewine, Edward (July 2005). Death and the Sun: A Matador's Season in the Heart of Spain. Houghton Mifflin Company. ISBN 061826325X. http://www.powells.com/biblio?show=061826325x#synopses_and_reviews. 
3. ^ Mitchell, Timothy (July 1991). Blood Sport: a social history of Spanish bullfighting. University of Pennsylvania Press. p. 244. ISBN 0812231295. ISBN 9780812231298. 
4. ^ Cockfighting, Puerto Rico Herald, 2005.
5. ^ Times Online article, August 19, 2007, retrieved August 25, 2007.
6. ^ Practical Fishkeeping article, May 17, 2007, retrieved August 25, 2007.

This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)