Results for Cantwell v. Connecticut
On this page:
 
US Supreme Court:

Cantwell v. Connecticut

310 U.S. 296 (1940), argued 29 Mar. 1940, decided 30 May 1940, by vote of 9 to 0; Roberts for the Court. In Lovell v. City of Griffin (1938), the Supreme Court sustained the free speech rights of Jehovah's Witnesses without discussing the claim of free exercise of religion. In Cantwell v. Connecticut, however, the Court relied on that clause to uphold the Witnesses' practices.

Cantwell dealt with a Witness who went from door to door asking the resident if he or she would like to hear a record or accept a pamphlet. Both materials included an attack on the Catholic religion—and this in an overwhelmingly Catholic neighborhood. The Jehovah's Witness was convicted for failing to obtain the required approval by the secretary of public welfare.

The Court adjudged the conviction invalid, expressing what would become a universal rule of law. A state may regulate the times, the places, and the manner of soliciting contributions and holding meetings on its streets, but cannot forbid them altogether. The First Amendment provided for both a freedom to believe and to act.

See also Assembly and Association, Citizenship, Freedom of; Religion; Speech and the Press; Time, Place, and Manner Rule.

— Leo Pfeffer

 
 
Wikipedia: Cantwell v. Connecticut
Cantwell v. Connecticut
Seal_of_the_United_States_Supreme_Court.png
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued March 29, 1940
Decided May 20, 1940
Full case name: Cantwell et al. v. State of Connecticut
Citations: 310 U.S. 296; 60 S. Ct. 900; 84 L. Ed. 1213; 1940 U.S. LEXIS 591; 128 A.L.R. 1352
Prior history: 126 Conn. 1, 8 A.2d 533; Appeal from and certiorari from the Supreme Court of Errors of Connecticut
Subsequent history: None
Holding
The Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment is incorporated against the states by the Fourteenth Amendment.
Court membership
Chief Justice: Charles Evans Hughes
Associate Justices: James Clark McReynolds, Harlan Fiske Stone, Owen Josephus Roberts, Hugo Black, Stanley Forman Reed, Felix Frankfurter, William O. Douglas, Frank Murphy
Case opinions
Majority by: Roberts
Joined by: unanimous
Laws applied
U.S. Const., amends. I and XIV

Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296 (1940)[1], was a United States Supreme Court decision holding that incorporated (enforced) the First Amendment's protection of religious free exercise against individual states (as opposed to federal actions).

Facts

Newton Cantwell and his two sons, Jesse and Russel, were Jehovah's Witnesses who were proselytizing in a heavily-Roman Catholic neighborhood in New Haven, Connecticut. The Cantwells were going door to door, each with books and pamphlets and a portable phonograph with sets of records. Each record contained a description of one of the books. One such phonograph, called "Enemies", attacked the Catholic religion. When Jesse Cantwell played this phonograph for two men, they became angry. The Cantwells were arrested and charged with inciting a common-law breach of the peace and violating a statute requiring registration of religious solicitors.

Issue

The issue presented before the court was whether the state's action in convicting the Cantwells with inciting a breach of the peace and violating the solicitation statute violated their First Amendment right to free exercise of religion.

Result

The Court found that the Cantwell's action was protected by the First and Fourteenth Amendments.

Analysis

This case incorporated (enforced) the First Amendment's Free Exercise Clause against the states, thereby protecting free exercise of religion from intrusive state action. The Establishment Clause was incorporated seven years later in Everson v. Board of Education (1947).

See also

External links


 
 

Join the WikiAnswers Q&A community. Post a question or answer questions about "Cantwell v. Connecticut" at WikiAnswers.

 

Copyrights:

US Supreme Court. The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States. Copyright © 1992, 2005 by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.  Read more
Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Cantwell v. Connecticut" Read more

Search for answers directly from your browser with the FREE Answers.com Toolbar!  
Click here to download now. 

Get Answers your way! Check out all our free tools and products.

On this page:   E-mail   print Print  Link  

 

Keep Reading

Mentioned In:

Related Topics