Carnivora
(vertebrate zoology) A large order of placental mammals, including dogs, bears, and cats, that is primarily adapted for predation as evidenced by dentition and jaw articulation.
|
Results for Carnivora
|
On this page:
|
(vertebrate zoology) A large order of placental mammals, including dogs, bears, and cats, that is primarily adapted for predation as evidenced by dentition and jaw articulation.
Family: Dogs, Wolves, Coyotes, Jackals, and Foxes
Dogs and Cats
Family: Bears
Family: Raccoons and Relatives
Family: Weasels, Badgers, Skunks, and Otters
Family: Civets, Genets, and Linsangs
Family: Mongooses and Fossa
Family: Aardwolf and Hyenas
Family: Cats
Family: Eared Seals, Fur Seals, and Sea Lions
Family: Walruses
Family: True Seals
(Land and marine carnivores)
Class: Mammalia
Order: Carnivora
Number of families: 12
Number of genera, species: 114 genera; 264 species
Introduction
The order Carnivora is one of the 20 orders of mammals. The Carnivora are a diverse group of animals, living in almost any habitat, including the oceans, with over 260 species. Most carnivores are land animals, some like the otters spend much of their lives in water and about 30 species, the seals and their relatives, are marine, only leaving the sea once a year to breed.
Despite the name, not all Carnivora live exclusively on meat. Bears, jackals, and foxes are omnivorous, surviving on a diet of meat and fruits, the aardwolf eats almost nothing else but termites, and the giant panda lives almost entirely on bamboo shoots. The unifying feature of the Carnivora is a set of scissor-like teeth set back in the mouth and used for shearing through meat, called the carnassials. However, it is not quite as simple as that, as some of the modern day Carnivora like the giant panda and the aardwolf do not possess carnassials. It is sufficient qualification for a species to be included in the Carnivora if its evolutionary ancestors did.
Eating meat has many advantages over a diet of vegetable matter, particularly grass. Meat is easy to digest and rich in protein. On the other hand, meat is more difficult to procure than vegetable matter. Swift-footed and wary prey have to be caught and killed before they can be eaten and "static meat" in the form of carrion is usually widespread and scarce. It is not surprising, therefore, to find that carnivores are often highly intelligent animals with sophisticated social systems.
Evolution and systematics
The evolutionary history and systematics of the Carnivora are clouded in controversy, as the fossil record is patchy and incomplete. In spite of this limitation it is remarkable what paleontologists, evolutionary biologists and geneticists have managed to uncover in the way of the early history of mammals. A major breakthrough has been the development of accurate methods to date fossils.
About 65 million years ago (mya) the dinosaurs, which were the dominant animals on Earth, underwent a rapid and mass extinction. At this time the mammals were small shrew-like creatures. With the extinction of the dinosaurs many ecological vacancies, known as niches, opened up, including that of predator, and the mammals quickly filled many of them. The early mammalian predators were marsupials, mammals whose young develop in a pouch, the ancestor of which was a small, opossum-like creature with a pointed snout and large ears. These early marsupial carnivorous creatures soon evolved into all shapes and sizes and dominated the southern continents for 30 million years.
Meanwhile, placental mammals were evolving in the northern continents. Instead of their young developing in a pouch after being born, placental mammals grow their young inside them, in a womb. One of these placental mammals was a squirrel-sized creature called Cimolestes that lived on insects. A very important feature possessed by Cimolestes was a flattening of the cheek teeth providing the beginning's of a scissor action. Over several millions of years these teeth became refined to slice meat in what became the carnassial shear. This feature was inherited by two separate groups of animals. One gave rise to the modern Carnivora, the other to a group known as the Creodonts. At first the Creodonts dominated as the earth's meat eaters. In the fossil record from 55 to 35 mya a number of cat-, dog-, bear- and hyena-like animals are found, some even with saber teeth, but none of these were true Carnivora. Then the fossil record shows a change; more Carnivora species are found and fewer and fewer Creodonts.
It is not known for sure why this replacement of Creodonts by Carnivora took place. The carnassial shear in the Carnivora was situated more to the front of the mouth than in the Creodonts. This meant that the teeth further back in the mouth could still be used for feeding on other foods, for example on vegetable matter. Perhaps the Carnivora could be more flexible in diet and therefore exploit more ecological niches, both meat eating and vegetable, than the Creodonts, who had no teeth behind their carnassial shear and so could only eat meat. Support for this idea comes from evidence of climatic change during the demise of the Creodonts. The earth became cooler and more seasonal. This may have led to a situation where prey became less available, but fruit crops and insects more abundant due to the seasonal bloom.
The early Carnivora, known as miacids, were small and rather unspectacular, many resembling the genets of today. The major division into dog- and cat-like Carnivora took place some 55 mya and all the modern carnivore families had evolved by 7 mya. Among the cat-like Carnivora were the sabertoothed cats that dominated the carnivore scene from 26 to 2 mya. As the Carnivora moved south, they out-competed the marsupial predators mentioned earlier. Today, only a handful of their descendants such as the Tasmanian devil and quoll survive in Australia. Perhaps the best known was the thylacine or Tasmanian wolf that was exterminated about 70 years ago by bounty hunters.
Traditionally Carnivora are divided on the basis of their anatomy and behavior into two suborders, terrestrial carnivores (Fissipedia) and marine carnivores (Pinnipedia). This subdivision is incorrect, for blood serum analyses have shown that the pinnipeds are closely related to bears and evolved from a single bear-like ancestor. Today most scientists involved in the field of carnivore classification recognize 10 families in the two major divisions; the cat-like and the dog-like Carnivora. The former are the Viverridae (civets and genets), Herpestidae (mongooses), Felidae (cats) and Hyaenidae (hyenas). The latter are the Ursidae (bears), Otariidae (eared seals—fur seals and sea lions—although the most recent classification puts the walrus in a separate family, the Odobenidae), Canidae (dogs), Procyonidae (a collection of mainly South American carnivores including the raccoons and coatis and a taxonomic group that is still surrounded by much controversy), Mustelidae (otters, badgers, skunks, weasels and polecats), and Phocidae (true seals—elephant seals, monk seals, leopard seals, etc.).
Physical characteristics
Carnivores come in all shapes and sizes, ranging in size from the 1.76 oz (50 g) least weasel (Mustela nivalis) to the 48,000 times heavier, 5,300 lb (2,400 kg) southern elephant seal (Mirounga leonina). Most are so distinctive that even laypeople can easily distinguish the various families, even though the order has considerable diversity. Bears, dogs, hyenas, mongooses, martens and weasels, cats, and even viverrids are readily recognizable, although the marine families and procyonids are more difficult to tell apart.
The pinnipeds have streamlined, oval-shaped bodies with limbs modified as flippers. Terrestrial carnivores either walk on the soles of their feet (plantigrade) or on their toes (digitigrade). The limbs of evolutionarily ancient carnivores underwent a fusion of bones in the feet that probably originally provided a firm basis for flexion at the midcarpal joint. This gave them the flexibility to climb, grapple with prey, or absorb the shock of running and leaping. Another skeletal characteristic is an undeveloped collar-bone or clavicle. The main function of the well-developed clavicle in primates is to allow attachment of muscles to give the necessary flexibility of lateral movement to the limbs. This is not necessary for the back and forth movement of the limbs needed for a long stride for running as is the case for most carnivores. With the exception of the hyenas, carnivores possess an elongated penis bone known as the baculum to prolong copulation. This is probably especially important in species where ovulation is induced by copulation. Modified skin glands often located in the anal region secrete substances as a means of communication and information exchange between members of the same species.
The typical dental formula for carnivores is (I3/3 C1/1 P4/4 M3/3) × 2 = 44, with variation in the number of molars and premolars. The canines are usually large and the carnassial shear, the modified fourth upper premolar and the lower first molar, with high cusps and sharp tips, is adapted to cutting and slicing meat. The typical carnivore skull shows a powerful jaw for the capture of prey and tearing up of meat, and the skull often has a sagittal and/or occipital crest to enlarge the area for muscle attachment.
Distribution
Carnivores are found throughout the world, although many islands do not have indigenous populations. Antarctica and Australasia have no naturally occurring terrestrial carnivores, although the dingo (Canis familiaris dingo) has lived in Australasia for at least 3,500 years, having been brought there by Asian seafarers. Introduced carnivores, feral cats in particular, occur on many islands and are often a conservation management problem as they prey on indigenous fauna naive to predation.
Habitat
Carnivores have a very wide habitat tolerance and are found in all habitats both on land and sea. Only the tops of the highest mountains, the most extreme deserts and ocean depths are devoid of carnivores. Although terrestrial carnivores spend most of their time on the ground, leopards, (Panthera pardus) and martens (Martes spp.) are adept at climbing trees, otters are at home in rivers and lakes, polar bears (Ursus maritimus) live much of their lives on sea ice, and the least weasel is able to hunt underground or under snow. The marine carnivores breed on land and forage in the sea. The elephant seal can stay under water for up to two hours and dive to a depth of 5,000 ft (1,500 m).
Behavior
The large number of species, wide habitat tolerance, diverse diets and well developed brains of carnivores have combined to lead to the evolution of a wide range of behaviors and social systems. Only the higher primates have more complex behavior patterns and social systems than the social carnivores. This flexibility in behavior within the order can be seen between species and, perhaps most interestingly, within a species as it adapts to different environmental demands.
Many carnivores are solitary in that when they move about looking for food they do so on their own, or at most as a mother with her dependent offspring. However, detailed studies of theses so-called solitary species have revealed that although they may appear to be solitary, they share a territory with others of their kind and cooperate and communicate with their fellow group members.
The civets and genets (Viverridae) are a good example of the solitary template for carnivores from which the array of social systems seen in the order probably evolved. Solitary males live in comparatively large territories that encompass the smaller territories of several females. However, with palm civets, subordinate, usually younger males, occupy small areas within the dominant male's territory, avoiding contact with the dominant male as he moves through the area.
Bears are also mainly solitary, however, flexibility in behavior allows concentrations of brown and polar bears to collect at food sources. For example, brown bears (Ursus arctus) gather during the salmon migration on the northwestern seaboard of North America and polar bears may gather at a whale carcass in the Arctic Circle. Somewhat surprisingly, polar bears also concentrate during times of food shortage. During summer and fall when the ice has broken up, a number of males may fast together in peace at certain preferred sites along the coast. Testosterone levels are low and there is no food to compete for.
Many of the 37 species of cat are truly solitary and only one, the lion (Panthera leo), is highly social. Lions live in prides of 2–12 related females and their young. The members of a pride do not stay together all the time but they defend a common territory and are friendly towards each other when they meet. Males form coalitions, usually of 2–4, but up to 7. Males join prides, but their tenure is variable and they may be displaced by a stronger coalition, or themselves move on to another pride. Pride and territory size is variable with respect to resources, as is the association between the females and the males. In open areas males spend much time with the pride, probably because the females and their cubs are more detectable by strange males that may kill the cubs. In wooded savannas the males can leave the pride and look for other females to mate with when the cubs are quite small. It is easier to hide them from infanticidal males in the thicker bush. The cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) is the only other cat whose adult individuals form long-lasting relationships, in that cheetah males also form coalitions of 2–3 individuals that cooperatively defend a territory.
The basic social system of dogs is different from the cats and is based on monogamy. However, canids show far more flexibility in their social systems both within and between species than the cats. African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus) and dholes (Cuon alpinus) live in very tight and close knit packs that always hunt together, but where the alpha pair are the breeders. Gray wolves (Canis lupus) may do the same, or go off in pairs. Red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) often forage alone, but may not always maintain a monogamous mating system and sometimes a territory may comprise one adult male and several vixens.
The mustelids, with over 50 species, are the largest carnivore family. They appear to be predominantly solitary, although sea otters may occur in "rafts" of several hundreds. The European badger (Meles meles) is one of the best studied carnivores and illustrates the fact that so many carnivores are "blatantly solitary, but secretly social rafts" and has evolved a tendency to live in groups. Several badgers, mainly close relatives, may share a territory and live together in a large set, but forage on their own. The honey badger (Mellivora capensis) is another species that has been found to have a rather different social system than was thought before a detailed study was conducted. This time what was considered to be social, is in fact a solitary trait. Although sometimes seen traveling in pairs, a larger male and smaller female, these are not mated pairs, but mother and son. The single cub is dependant on its mother until it is larger than her. Males do however sometimes come together in groups of up to six and have very large overlapping home ranges when the solitary living females come on heat.
Mongooses show a very wide diversity of social systems. Most tend to be solitary, but three species, banded mongoose (Mungos mungo), dwarf mongoose (Helogale parvula), and meerkat (Suricata suricatta) have evolved complex and different social systems. In dwarf mongooses the dominant pair are most likely to breed, whereas in the banded and meerkat groups several females do so. One of the larger mongooses, the nocturnal white-tailed (Ichneumia albicauda) is another seemingly solitary species that exhibits a degree of sociality as several females have been found to have overlapping ranges.
The hyenas, with only four species, are the smallest carnivore family. Three species, the brown hyena (Parahyaena brunnea), spotted hyena (Crocuta crocuta), and aardwolf (Proteles cristatus) have been well studied and have shown a remarkable degree of diversity and flexibility in social systems. The spotted hyena is highly social living in female dominated clans of 5–80 individuals, living in fiercely defended clan territories that may be as large as 400 mi2 (1,000 km2), or as small as 16 mi2 (40 km2), depending on resources. In the Serengeti, with its migratory prey system, the clan system is flexible so that the hyenas can commute from their territories through other hyena territories to get to the feeding grounds. The brown hyena always forages on its own yet may share a territory with as many as 14 other hyenas. All clan members carry food to the den to feed cubs, not just the parents.
The aardwolf is monogamous, yet during the mating season some males may be cuckolded by their mates, who may copulate with neighbors.
The procyonids have not been well studied, and although some species like the ringtail appears to be solitary, most appear to move in large groups. It is thought likely that all species maintain complex social relationships within and among the sexes. This is an important family for understanding sociality in carnivores and more studies are needed.
Why these differences in social system, and particularly why do some species form groups? An obvious answer is that carnivores form groups in order to cooperate in hunting. While this may be partly true, it does not explain why, for example, invertebrate-eating meerkats are so social. Even in the case of large prey hunters like lions and spotted hyenas it has been found that hunting group size is not necessarily related to hunting success, nor that this strategy leads to the acquisition of more food than solitary hunting. For the smaller species it has been suggested that being in a group helps prevent predation by increased vigilance and cooperative defense. While this is also sometimes true—meerkat individuals take turns in guarding while the rest of the group is foraging—it does not explain why other species like European badgers, red foxes, and brown hyenas forage solitarily yet sometimes live in groups.
The evidence suggests that these and many other group-living carnivores are influenced by the dispersion pattern of their food. For many carnivores, food is often irregularly dispersed in patches and some patches moreover are richer than others. Territory size is influenced by the distance between the patches, and the number of animals living in the territory by the richness of the patches. This is known as the Resource Dispersion Hypothesis (RDH) and has been found to explain group size and territory size in a number of carnivores. It also explains why group size and territory size are not related. A group of brown hyenas living in an area with a large number of rich food patches close together will have a small territory and contain more members than one living where food patches are poor and widely dispersed. Similarly, in conditions where food patches are poor but close together both group size and territory size will be small. Once there is enough food in a territory to support several individuals it makes sense to share these with close relatives rather than a bunch of strangers. Any coincidental benefits that accrue then will be shared by relatives and also they can assist each other, for example by helping to feed each others young. For lions, the major advantage accruing to females living in the pride is the cooperative defense of their cubs against infanticidal males.
Feeding ecology and diet
Carnivores do not eat only meat. In fact they have a varied diet and comparatively few are exclusively meat eaters. Some, such as the bamboo specialist giant panda (Ailuropoda
melanoleuca), the frugiverous palm civets, kinkajou (Potos flavus), and raccoons, hardly ever eat meat. Mustelids are probably the most exclusively meat eating family, weasels and their allies being known as fierce and combative predators capable of killing prey up to 10 times their body weight and otters living mainly of fish, crayfish, crabs, and frogs. However, European badgers rely mainly on earthworms. Mongooses live mainly off insects, although some species are known as snake killers. Cats too are mainly carnivorous, the large cats are probably the most spectacular of all predators. Bears, viverrids, dogs, and hyenas are more omnivorous, although all, except viverrids, have meat-eating specialists amongst their ranks. Polar bears, African wild dogs, and spotted hyenas rarely divert from a meat diet, but brown bears, brown hyenas, and jackals are all truly omnivorous. The aardwolf is another strict specialist feeding almost exclusively on snouted harvester termites of the genus Trinervitermes. The marine carnivores feed on a variety of marine animals including fish, mollusks, crustaceans, penguins and, particularly in the case of the leopard seal, other seals. The world's most abundant mammal after humans, the crab-eater seal (Lobodon carcinophagus), feeds mainly on krill, and one of the giants, the walrus (Odobenus rosmarus), mainly eats mollusks.
A characteristic of most of the food eaten by carnivores is that it is of high quality, but difficult to obtain, therefore, they have to make full use of their opportunities. Many carnivores live under what has been called a feast or famine regimen. They are able to gorge themselves when the opportunity is presented, a spotted hyena can eat a third of its body weight in one sitting, and are also able to go for long periods without eating. Hibernating bears are the most extreme in this regard and are able to survive for half a year without eating, drawing on fat reserves built up during the bountiful summer. If more food is found than an individual can consume, some species will cache the remains. Brown hyenas will scatter hoard ostrich eggs under bushes and in thick grass clumps should they find an unattended nest. Canids actually bury their excess food and show an uncanny ability for relocating it.
The impact that predators have on their prey is a complicated subject of great controversy and emotion as it often clashes with our own interests. Certain important principles need to be taken into account. Predators do not kill at will, or even the first prey they come across. They have to pit their skills and stamina against formidable opponents. The kill is the culmination of a range of behavioral strategies that may have taken hours or even days to succeed. The relationship between predator and prey is a delicate balance, an evolutionary arms race, where neither has managed to gain the upper hand. Ecologically speaking, predation is an important process that contributes to the dynamic nature of ecosystems. Predators help to keep prey numbers in check and often to dampen drastic fluctuations. They may weed out the less fit members of the prey population by selecting the old and infirm. They also often select males over females from the prey population, thereby lessening their impact as most prey species are polygamous; i.e. one male mates with several females. Furthermore, the impact they have on the prey populations is often mediated by environmental conditions such as droughts in Africa and severe winters in north America and Europe.
Reproductive biology
Mating systems are the most complex and variable aspects of social behavior. Carnivores give birth to altricial young that are dependent on adults for their survival for an extended period. Much of their behavior is therefore centered around not only producing young but also raising them. There are two basic types of mating system in carnivores; monogamy where a male mates with one female, and polygyny where males mate with several females and/or vice versa. Monogamy is the least common of the two systems and is practiced by all canids, and also in the aardwolf and some mongooses, although in most species the rules are broken. Either a male attracts more than one female to the territory, or cuckoldry occurs. Monogamous systems are characterized by both sexes and often older offspring helping to raise young by feeding and guarding, and by a lack of sexual dimorphism. An extreme case is found in pack living animals such as African wild dogs and dwarf mongooses where normally only one pair breeds while the other sexually mature adults abstain and help to raise the young. In polygynous species the males are usually larger than the females and often are equipped with spectacular adornments to attract females, like the lion and elephant seal. Cooperation in raising young is less common but does occur in some social polygynous species, for example female lions suckle each others' cubs.
Many carnivores range widely and spend their time alone and so it is important for the females to advertise when they are ready to mate. Scent marking through urination and anal secretions is widespread in carnivores, and is the obvious mechanism to achieve this. Even then the best male may have difficulty in being at the right place at the right time. One way that a female can ensure that she mates with the best available male is to adopt a reproductive strategy known as induced ovulation. The females come into estrus, but do not shed eggs until stimulated to do so by copulation. The other strategy is called spontaneous ovulation, where the eggs are shed in a cycle that is unaffected by mating. Although there are exceptions, spontaneous ovulators are likely to be more social species than are induced ovulators.
Smaller animals have faster metabolic rates and breed faster than larger animals. The females of the smallest carnivore, the least weasel, are sexually mature at three months. Litter size is usually six, so if she lives long enough—the average life expectancy is less than one year—a female can potentially produce 30 descendants a year. This is achieved by producing six in her first litter, another six in her second, plus six offspring from each of the three daughters she would be expected to produce in her first litter. Males are not sexually mature in their first year. At the other end of the scale, lions may only produce a litter of three or four cubs in three and a half years as the cubs only become independent at about three years of age. If, however, the female loses all her cubs she will quickly come into estrus again. African wild dogs have higher metabolic rates than would be predicted from their size and their populations turn over rapidly. This is reflected in their high reproductive potential. They are seasonal breeders that produce large litters, the record is 21 for a single female.
Pinnipeds, so well adapted to a life in the sea, must come to breeding grounds on land in summer in order to reproduce. The males arrive slightly earlier than the females and set up territories. The females arrive shortly before giving birth to a single pup that was conceived the previous season. The lactation period is very short and intense, not more than six weeks, in the true seals. The pups are weaned and deserted abruptly and the females mate, before going back to sea for another year. In eared seals, the female comes into season and mates about one week after giving birth. Lactation lasts 4–6 months during which time the mother makes periodic feeding forays into the sea.
Conservation
Conservation is the wise use of resources on a sustainable basis. The Species Survival Commission of the World Conservation Union (IUCN) is divided into a number of taxonomic or functional specialist groups. In the case of carnivores these are mainly based on families such as the Canid, Cat, and Hyena Specialist Groups. These groups have produced a series of status surveys and action plans that assess the conservation status of the relevant species and make recommendations for their conservation. The conservation status of each species is assessed and placed into one of a number of categories depending on its status, the most important of which are Extinct, Extinct in the Wild, Critically Endangered, Endangered, and Vulnerable. The 2002 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species lists 120 carnivores of which three, the Falkland Island Wolf (Dusicyon australis), the sea mink (Mustela macrodon), and the Barbados raccoon (Procyon gloveralleni), are classified as Extinct; one, the black-footed ferret (Mustela nigripes), as Extinct in the Wild; and five, the red wolf (Canis rufus), the Ethiopian wolf (Canis simensis), the Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus), the Mediterranean monk seal (Monachus monachus), and the Malabar civet (Viverra civettina), as Critically Endangered. Thirty-two species comprising three viverrids, five mongooses, four cats, one bear, two eared seals, one canid, eight procyonids, seven mustelids, and one true seal are classified as Endangered, and 40 including five viverrids, four mongooses, 12 cats, three bears, five eared seals, two canids, eight mustelids, and one true seal are Vulnerable. The only family with no members classified as Endangered or Vulnerable is the small hyena family. The remaining listed species are classified as either Data Deficient (19), meaning that there is not enough known about them to be sure of their status, or as Near Threatened (20), which is the lowest category of threat. Thus, besides the three recently extinct species, nearly half the living carnivores are under some sort of threat of extinction and 65% are Endangered or Vulnerable. Clearly, the situation is serious. Although protected areas are a vital component of the conservation action plans, many species and populations do not enjoy the security of protected area management and other ways need to be found for humans and wildlife to coexist. Innovative solutions such as protecting livestock from predation, the use of guard dogs to protect livestock, and education of local people have met with limited success.
Significance to humans
Human relationships with carnivores are extreme and of mixed emotions. On the one hand we respect and revere them. Indeed two species, the wolf and the wild cat, have been domesticated and become our closest animal companions. In the case of the domestic dog, we have also developed and trained many breeds to work for us as hunting dogs, herd dogs, and guide dogs. Carnivores are also important to us aesthetically and economically. We admire their hunting ability and their striking beauty. Many symbols of royalty and heraldry are carnivores. They are a prime attraction for ecotourists, especially where they can be viewed in their natural habitat. Through the ages man has also hunted carnivores for food, medicine, and their pelts, and today they are also hunted for recreational purposes as trophies, often at great expense.
On the other hand, humans and carnivores have long been in conflict because of similar ecological interests. Our ancestors on the African plains competed for food with the larger carnivores. With the development of agriculture and animal husbandry this conflict increased as carnivores of all sizes tended to prey on animals that we had domesticated and were important for us economically. In addition, large carnivores sometimes kill people. Animals that compete most with each other display most aggression towards each other. Moreover, the larger and more powerful ones have a negative impact on the smaller and less powerful competitors—lions influence cheetah and wild dog numbers and wolves impact on coyotes. Humans as the supreme carnivorous animal (not carnivore, which is a taxonomic term) have impacted all their competitors and carnivores have suffered from the brutal and efficient actions of humans as much as, if not more than, any other group of animals. With the human population explosion and the development of more efficient mechanisms for killing, this carnage has accelerated: shooting, trapping, poisoning, and over harvesting have taken a very heavy toll on many carnivore species. Even through the domestication of dogs and cats, their wild ancestors are threatened through crossbreeding with them and spreading disease.
In an attempt to redress the imbalance, a network of governmental and nongovernmental organizations have been established throughout the world and millions of dollars have been spent and are being spent on research, protection and management programs, compensation schemes, and education. Although there have been some successes the situation is serious and a major human effort is required if more of these magnificent and important animals are not to go the same way as the Falkland Island wolf, the sea mink, and the Barbados raccoon.
Resources
Books:Ewer, R. F. The Carnivores. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1973.
Gittleman, John, L., ed. Carnivore Behavior, Ecology, and Evolution. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1989. ——, ed. Carnivore Behavior, Ecology, and Evolution. Vol. 2. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1996.
Gittleman, John, L., Stephan M. Funk, David Macdonald, and Robert K. Wayne, eds. Carnivore Conservation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
Macdonald, David. The Velvet Claw: A Natural History of the Carnivores. London: BBC Books, 1992. ——, ed. The New Encyclopedia of Mammals. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
Mills, Gus, and Martin Harvey. African Predators. Cape Town: Struik Publishers, 2001.
[Article by: Gus Mills, PhD]
One of the larger orders of placental mammals, including fossil and living dogs, raccoons, pandas, bears, weasels, skunks, badgers, otters, mongooses, civets, cats, hyenas, seals, walruses, and many extinct groups organized into 12 families, with about 112 living genera and more than twice as many extinct genera. The subdivision of the order into three superfamilies has long been practiced and the following groups seem appropriate: Miacoidea, Canoidea, and Feloidea. The primary adaptation in this order was for predation on other vertebrates and invertebrates. A few carnivorans (for example, bear and panda) have secondarily become largely or entirely herbivorous, but even then the ancestral adaptations for predation are still clearly evident in the structure of the teeth and jaws. The Carnivora have been highly successful animals since their first appearance in the early Paleocene.
Structural adaptations involve the teeth and jaws. The dentition is sharply divided into three functional units. The incisors act as a tool for nipping and delicate prehension, and the large, interlocking upper and lower canines for heavy piercing and tearing during the killing of prey. The cheek teeth are divided into premolars (for heavy prehension) and molars (for slicing and grinding), which may be variously modified depending on the specific adaptation, but there is a constant tendency for the last (fourth) upper premolar and the first lower molar to enlarge and form longtitudinal opposed shearing blades (the carnassials). In all carnivorans the jaw articulation is arranged in such a manner that movement is limited to vertical hinge motions and transverse sliding. The temporal muscle dominates the jaw musculature, forming at least one-half of the total mass of the jaw muscles.
The earliest fossil records are early Paleocene, but the earliest well-represented material comes from the middle Paleocene of North America. During the Paleocene and Eocene the stem-carnivorans or miacoids underwent considerable diversification in both the Old and New World. At the end of Eocene and beginning of Oligocene time throughout the Northern Hemisphere, a dramatic change took place within the Carnivora; this was the appearance of primitive representatives of modern carnivoran families. See also Badger; Bear; Cat; Civet; Coati; Ferret; Fisher; Hyena; Mammalia; Marten; Mink; Mongoose; Otter; Panda; Pinnipeds; Raccoon; Skunk; Weasel; Wolverine.
The noun has one meaning:
Meaning #1:
cats; lions; tigers; panthers; dogs; wolves; jackals; bears; raccoons; skunks; and members of the suborder Pinnipedia
Synonym: order Carnivora
| Carnivora Fossil range: Paleocene to Recent |
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scientific classification | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| Families | ||||||||||||
|
The diverse order Carnivora (IPA: /kɑrˈnɪvərə/ or sometimes /ˌkɑrnɪˈvɔərə/; from Latin carō (stem carn-) "flesh", + vorāre "to devour") includes over 260 species of placental mammals. Members of the order are called carnivorans, while the word "carnivore" can refer to a meat-eating animal of any type. Carnivorans are the most diverse in size of any mammalian order, ranging from the Least Weasel (Mustela nivalis), at as little as 25 grams and 11 cm (4.3 in), to the Polar bear (Ursus maritimus), which can weigh up to 1000 kg (2200 lb), to the Southern Elephant Seal, adult males of which average 2,270 kg (5,000 lb) and measure 4.2 m (13.9 ft) (and may grow considerably larger).
The first carnivoran was a carnivore, and nearly all carnivorans today primarily eat meat. Some, such as cats, pinnipeds, and weasels, are almost completely carnivorous. Others, such as bears, are more omnivorous. The Giant Panda is almost exclusively an herbivore, but it occasionally eats fish, eggs and insects.
Carnivorans have teeth and claws adapted for catching and eating other animals. Their eyes point forward. Many carnivorans hunt in packs and are social.
Carnivorans apparently evolved in North America out of members of the family Miacidae (miacids) c 42 million years ago. They soon split into catlike and doglike forms (feliformia and caniformia).
Carnivorans are primarily terrestrial and usually have strong sharp claws, with never less than four toes to each foot, and well-developed prominent canines and cheek teeth (premolars and molars) that generally have cutting edges. The last premolar of the upper jaw and first molar of the lower are termed the carnassials or sectorial teeth. These are blade-like teeth that occlude (close) with a scissor-like action for shearing and shredding meat. Carnassials are most highly developed in the Felidae and the least developed in the Ursidae. Carnivorans have six incisors and two conical canines in each jaw. The only two exceptions to this are the sea otter (Enhydra lutris), which has four incisors in the lower jaw, and the sloth bear (Melursus ursinus), which has four incisors in the upper jaw. The number of molars and premolars is variable between carnivoran species, but all teeth are deeply rooted and are diphyodont. Incisors are retained by carnivorans and the third incisor is commonly large and sharp (canine-like). Carnivorans have either four or five digits on each foot, with the first digit on the forepaws, also known as the dew claw, being vestigial in most species and absent in some.
The Canoidea superfamily – Canidae (dogs), Mephitidae (skunks and stink badgers) Mustelidae (weasels), Procyonidae (raccoons), Ursidae (bears), Otariidae (eared seals), Odobenidae (walrus), and Phocidae (earless seals) [the last three families formally classified in the suborder Pinnipedia] and the extinct family Amphicyonidae (bear-dogs) - are characterized by having a non-chambered or partially chambered auditory bullae, non-retractable claws, and well-developed baculum. Most species are rather simply colored, lacking the flashy spotted or rosetted coats of like many species of felids and viverrids have. This is because Canoidea tend to range in the temperate and subarctic biomes, although Mustelidae and Procyonidae have a few tropical species. Most are terrestrial, although a few species, like procyonids, are arboreal. All families except the Canidae and a few species of Mustelidae are plantigrade. Diet is varied and most tend to be omnivorous to some degree and thus the carnassial teeth are less specialized. Canoidea have more premolars and molars in an elongated skull.
The Feloidea superfamily – Felidae (cats),
The Pinnipedia superfamily (walruses, seals, and sea lions) are medium to large (to 6.5 m) aquatic mammals. Pinnipeds are marine Carnivora and therefore need to have a relatively large body to retain heat. They need a low surface area to body mass ratio to minimize heat loss due to conduction because water conducts heat well. The body is usually insulated with a thick layer of fat called blubber and usually covered with hair. The digits are not separate, but connected by a thick web that forms flippers for swimming; thus the forelimbs and hindlimbs are transformed into paddles. This enables them to dive at extreme depths (600 meters for the Weddell seal) and they can remain underwater for long periods of time, sometimes over an hour or more, but most dives are usually short. The facial region of skull is relatively small, with pinnae very small or lacking and the vibrissae is well developed. The molariform teeth are mostly homodont and the canines are well developed. The tail is very short or absent, the ears are small or absent as well, and the external genitalia are hidden in slits or depressions in the body.
Members of Carnivora have a characteristic skull shape with relatively large brains encased in a heavy skull. The skull has a highly developed zygomatic arch just behind the maxilla (common to all mammals and their cynodont forebears), and they have ossified external auditory bullae. Feloidea have a two-chambered auditory bullae. In addition to allowing extra room for the passage of muscles to work the lower jaw, the zygomatic arch also allows for differentiation of separate muscle groups to be involved in biting and chewing. Masseters attach from the dentary (specifically, the masseteric fossa) to the zygomatic arch and onto the maxilla in front of the arch, providing crushing force. The temporalis attaches from the dentary (specifically, the coronoid process) to the side of the braincase, providing torque about the axis of jaw articulation. In comparing the skulls of carnivores and herbivores, it can be seen that the shearing force of the temporalis is somewhat more important to carnivores, which have more room on the braincase (this is not unrelated to carnivoran intelligence) and commonly develop a sagittal crest (running from posterior to anterior on the skull) providing yet additional room for temporalis attachment. Carnivoran jaws can only move on a vertical axis, in an up-and-down motion, and cannot move from side-to-side. The jaw joint in carnivores tends to lie within the plane of tooth occlusion; an arrangement that further emphasizes shearing (as in a pair of scissors). In herbivores, the crushing force of the masseters is relatively more important than is shearing. The jaw joint is generally well above the plane of tooth occlusion, allowing extra room for masseteric attachment on the dentary and causing the rotation of the lower jaw to be translated into straight-ahead crushing force between the teeth of the upper and lower jaws.
Carnivora have a simple stomach designed to digest primarily meat, as compared to the elaborate digestive systems of herbivorous animals which are necessary to break down tough, complex plant fibers. The caecum is either absent or short and simple, and the colon is not sacculated or much wider than the small intestine. Most species of Carnivora are, to some degree, omnivorous, except the Felidae, which are obligate carnivores. Most have highly-developed senses, especially vision and hearing, and often a highly acute sense of smell in many species, such as in the Canoidea. They are excellent runners: some long-distance runners, but more commonly sprinters. Even bears and raccoons, although seemingly slow and clumsy, are capable of remarkable bursts of speed.
Carnivorans include carnivores, omnivores, and even a few primarily herbivorous species, such as the giant panda. Important teeth for carnivorans are the large, slightly recurved canines, used to dispatch prey, and the carnassial complex, used to rend meat from bone and slice it into digestible pieces. Dogs have molar teeth behind the carnassials for crushing bones, but cats have only a greatly reduced, functionless molar behind the carnassial in the upper jaw. Cats will strip bones clean but will not crush them to get the marrow inside. Omnivores, such as bears and raccoons, have developed blunt, molar-like carnassials. Carnassials are a key adaptation for terrestrial vertebrate predation; all other placental orders are primarily herbivores, insectivores, or aquatic.
Carnivora tend to produce a single litter annually, but some produce multiple litters a year, and larger carnivores like bears
have gaps of 2-3 years between litters. The average gestation period lies between 50-115 days,
although the ursids and mustelids have delayed implantation, thus extending the gestation period 6-9 months beyond the normal
period. Litter sizes are usually small, ranging from 1-13 young, which are born with underdeveloped eyes and ears. In most
species, the mother has exclusive or at least primary care of the offspring. Many species of carnivores are
Carnivorans evolved out of members of the family Miacidae (miacids). The transition from Miacidae to Carnivora was a general trend in the middle and late Eocene with taxa from both North America and Eurasia involved. The divergence of carnivorans from other miacids, as well as the divergence of the the two clades within Carnivora, Caniformia and Feliformia, is now inferred to have happened in the middle Eocene (ca. 42 million years ago). Traditionally the Viverravidae (viverravids) had been thought to be the earliest carnivorans with fossil records first appearing in the Paleocene of North America about 60 million years ago, but recently described evidence from cranial morphology now places them outside the order Carnivora.[1] Traditionally, some paleontologists considered the viverravids to be ancestral to the aeluroid carnivorans (felids, hyaenids, herpestids and viverrids), but this is now doubted.
The Miacidae is not a monophyletic group, but a paraphyletic array of stem taxa. Traditionally, the Miacidae and the Viverravidae had been classified in a third, extinct paraphyletic superfamily, the Miacoidea, from which the direct ancestors of both Carnivora and Creodonta were thought to have arisen. Today Carnivora is restricted to the crown group, and Carnivora and miacoids are grouped together in the clade Carnivoramorpha, and the miacoids are regarded as basal carnivoramorphs. Based on dental features and braincase sizes, it is now known that Carnivora must have evolved from a form even more primitive than Creodonta and thus these two orders may not even be sister groups.[2] The Carnivora, Creodonta, Pholidota, and a few other extinct orders are informally grouped together in the clade Ferae. Older classification schemes divided the order into two suborders: Fissipedia (which included the families of primarily land Carnivora) and Pinnipedia (which included the true seals, eared seals, and walrus). However, it is now recognized that the Fissipedia is a paraphyletic group and that the pinnipeds were not the sister group to the fissipeds but rather had arisen from among them.
Carnivora are generally divided into the suborders Feliformia (cat-like) and Caniformia (dog-like), the latter of which includes the pinnipeds. The pinnipeds are part of a clade, known as the Arctoidea, which also includes the Ursidae (bears) and the superfamily Musteloidea. The Musteloidea in turn consists of the Mustelidae (mustelids: weasels), Procyonidae (procyonids: raccoons), Mephitidae (skunks) and Ailurus. The oldest caniforms are the Miacis species Miacis cognitus, the Amphicyonidae (Bear-dogs) such as Daphoenus, and Hesperocyon (of the family Canidae, subfamily Hesperocyoninae). Hesperocyonine canids first appeared in North America and the earliest species is currently dated at 39.74 Ma, but they were not represented in Europe until well into the Miocene, and not into Asia and Africa until the Pliocene. Miacis and Amphicyonidae were the first of the caniforms to split from the others and are sometimes considered to be sister groups to Ursidae, but the exact closeness of Amphicyonidae and Ursidae, as well as Arctoidae to Ursidae, is still uncertain. The Canidae (wolves, coyotes, jackals, foxes and dogs) are generally considered to be the sister group to Arctoidea.[2][3][4] The Ursidae first occur in North America in the Late Eocene (ca. 38 million years ago) as the very small and graceful Parictis that had a skull only 7 cm long. Like the canids, this family does not appear in Eurasia and Africa until the Miocene. The other caniform families Amphicyonidae, Mustelidae and Procyonidae occur in both the Old World and the New World by the Late Eocene and Early Oligocene.[2]
The ancestor of all Feliformia evolved from the Caniformia-Feliformia split but the exact position of the Felidae, especially some extinct Felidae, in relation to the other families is somewhat disputed. Nandinia, the African Palm Civet, seems to be the most primitive of all the feliforms and the very first to split from the others. The Asiatic linsangs of the genus Prionodon (traditionally placed in the Viverridae) might form a family of their own as well, as some recent studies indicate that Prionodon is actually the closest living relative to the cats. The Nimravidae are sometimes seen as the most basal of all feliforms and the first to split from the others, but there is a possibility that Nimravidae might not even be Carnivora.[4] Its position as a Carnivora is currently unstable. Other studies indicate that Barbourofelids forms a separate family, which is closely related to the true felids instead of being related to the Nimravids. Recognizable Nimravid fossils date from the late Eocene (37 mya), from the Chadronian White River Carnivora Formation at Flagstaff Rim, Wyoming. Nimravid diversity appears to have peaked about 28 mya. The hypercarnivorous (strictly meat-eating) nimravid feliforms were extinct in North America after 26 mya and felids did not arrive in North America until the early middle Miocene (16 mya).
It has been suggested that canids evolved hypercarnivorous morphologies because feliforms were absent during this period (the "cat-gap," 26-16 mya), however recent data does not support this hypothesis. Hypercarnivore feliforms (felids and nimravids) occupied an area that canids did not and where felids, nimravids, and hypercarnivorous creodonts are found. Hypercarnivorous canids were present before the disappearance of the nimravids, and all went extinct before the appearance of felids. Following the extinction of nimravids, only three taxa originated, two of which were relatively small in body size. Disparity increased during the "cat-gap" even with the extinction of the hypercarnivorous extremes. This was due to the extinction of morphological intermediates, and because carnivorans began to occupy hypocarnivorous (non-meat-specialist) morphospace for the first time in North America. Procyonids did not arrive in North America until the early Miocene, and "modern" ursids (e.g., Ursinae), did not arrive until the late Miocene. Extinct lineages of Ursidae were present in North America from the late Eocene through the Miocene and Amphicyonid (Bear-dogs) were present during this period as well but occupied a morphospace generally shared with canids and not in close proximity to ursids. A large question remains as to why there was a progressive decline in hypercarnivorous carnivoramorphans during the late Oligocene/early Miocene. During this period all hypercarnivorous forms disappeared from the fossil record, including hypercarnivorous feliforms, canids, and mustelids. One possible explanation is climate change. Earth was gradually cooling after the late Paleocene, and over a period spanning the Eocene/Oligocene boundary there was a dramatic climatic cooling event occurred.[5]
A recent study finally resolves the exact position of Ailurus: the Red Panda is neither a procyonid nor an ursid, but
forms a monotypic family with the other musteloids as its closest living relatives. The same study also shows that the mustelids
are not a primitive family, as was once thought. Their small body size is a secondary trait — the primitive body form of the
arctoids was large, not small.[3] Recent molecular
studies also suggest that the endemic Carnivora of Madagascar, including three genera usually
classed with the civets and four genera of
| Carnivora |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Extant carnivore families by suborder | |
|---|---|