(1863–1945). Formerly a cavalry officer, Spearman studied psychology in Germany, taking his doctorate at Leipzig. Thereafter he worked in London, becoming Grote Professor of mind and logic at University College, where he remained until his retirement in 1931. He was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society in 1924.
Spearman is remembered as a pioneer in statistical psychology and a convinced believer in the two-factor theory of
intelligence, which he advocated in a paper written jointly with Bernard Hart in 1904. Making use of factorial analysis, Spearman claimed that the correlations between the measurement of different abilities in man tended towards a particular arrangement that could be expressed in a definite mathematical formula. This became known as the tetrad equation. Wherever this equation held throughout any table of correlation, every individual measurement of each ability could be divided into two independent parts, one called by Spearman
g — i.e. the
general factor — which, though varying freely from individual to individual, remains the same for any one individual in respect of all the correlated abilities, while the other part — known as the
specific factor — varies not only from individual to individual, but even in any one individual from one ability to another.
Thus arose what soon became known as the 'two-factor' theory which aroused wide interest but sharp controversy in Britain and further afield. Although Spearman tended to interpret
g in terms of a vague and unconvincing concept of 'mental energy', most psychological workers in this field who shared Spearman's views preferred to identify it with 'general intelligence'.
Spearman's work attracted much interest but many critics, among them Godfrey (later Sir Godfrey) Thomson, who advocated instead of a general factor a number of overlapping group factors. Later the interpretation of factorial analysis was extended and discussed with much statistical sophistication by Maxwell Garnett, Cyril Burt, William Stephenson,
L. L. Thurstone, and many others on both sides of the Atlantic.
The outcome appears to be that, whereas factorial analysis has evident value in classifying individuals for educational or occupational purposes, it does not materially contribute to our understanding either of the nature of intelligence or of the rationale of individual differences. It is therefore unlikely to make a decisive contribution to psychological theory.
Spearman wrote two major works:
The Nature of 'Intelligence' and the Principles of Cognition (1923) and
The Abilities of Man (1927).
(Published 1987)— O. L. Zangwill