(mathematics) A family of orthogonal polynomials which solve Chebyshev's differential equation.
| Sci-Tech Dictionary: Chebyshev polynomials |
(mathematics) A family of orthogonal polynomials which solve Chebyshev's differential equation.
| 5min Related Video: Chebyshev polynomials |
| Wikipedia: Chebyshev polynomials |
In mathematics the Chebyshev polynomials, named after Pafnuty Chebyshev,[1] are a sequence of orthogonal polynomials which are related to de Moivre's formula and which are easily defined recursively, like Fibonacci or Lucas numbers. One usually distinguishes between Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind which are denoted Tn and Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind which are denoted Un. The letter T is used because of the alternative transliterations of the name Chebyshev as Tchebycheff (French) or Tschebyscheff (German).
The Chebyshev polynomials Tn or Un are polynomials of degree n and the sequence of Chebyshev polynomials of either kind composes a polynomial sequence.
Chebyshev polynomials are important in approximation theory because the roots of the Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind, which are also called Chebyshev nodes, are used as nodes in polynomial interpolation. The resulting interpolation polynomial minimizes the problem of Runge's phenomenon and provides an approximation that is close to the polynomial of best approximation to a continuous function under the maximum norm. This approximation leads directly to the method of Clenshaw–Curtis quadrature.
In the study of differential equations they arise as the solution to the

and

for the polynomials of the first and second kind, respectively. These equations are special cases of the Sturm-Liouville differential equation.
Contents |
The Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind are defined by the recurrence relation

The conventional generating function for Tn is

The exponential generating function is

The Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind are defined by the recurrence relation

One example of a generating function for Un is

The Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind can be defined by the trigonometric identity:

whence:

for n = 0, 1, 2, 3, ..., while the polynomials of the second kind satisfy:

which is structurally quite similar to the Dirichlet kernel.
That cos(nx) is an nth-degree polynomial in cos(x) can be seen by observing that cos(nx) is the real part of one side of de Moivre's formula, and the real part of the other side is a polynomial in cos(x) and sin(x), in which all powers of sin(x) are even and thus replaceable via the identity cos2(x) + sin2(x) = 1.
This identity is extremely useful in conjunction with the recursive generating formula inasmuch as it enables one to calculate the cosine of any integral multiple of an angle solely in terms of the cosine of the base angle. Evaluating the first two Chebyshev polynomials:

and:

one can straightforwardly determine that:


and so forth. To trivially check whether the results seem reasonable, sum the coefficients on both sides of the equals sign (that is, setting
equal to zero, for which the cosine is unity), and one sees that 1 = 2 − 1 in the former expression and 1 = 4 − 3 in the latter.
An immediate corollary is the composition identity (or the "nesting property")

The Chebyshev polynomials can also be defined as the solutions to the Pell equation

in a ring R[x].[2] Thus, they can be generated by the standard technique for Pell equations of taking powers of a fundamental solution:

The Chebyshev polynomials of the first and second kind are closely related by the following equations




The recurrence relationship of the derivative of Chebyshev polynomials can be derived from these relations

This relationship is used in the Chebyshev spectral method of solving differential equations.
Equivalently, the two sequences can also be defined from a pair of mutual recurrence equations:




These can be derived from the trigonometric formulae; for example, if
, then

Note that both these equations and the trigonometric equations take a simpler form if we, like some works, follow the alternate convention of denoting our Un (the polynomial of degree n) with Un+1 instead.
Different approaches to defining Chebyshev polynomials lead to different explicit formulas such as:
![T_n(x) =
\begin{cases}
\cos(n\arccos(x)), & \ x \in [-1,1] \\
\cosh(n \, \mathrm{arccosh}(x)), & \ x \ge 1 \\
(-1)^n \cosh(n \, \mathrm{arccosh}(-x)), & \ x \le -1 \\
\end{cases} \,\!](http://wpcontent.answers.com/math/a/5/b/a5b0de658fd3b77e4bef45998fef84e4.png)


where 2F1 is a hypergeometric function.
Both the Tn and the Un form a sequence of orthogonal polynomials. The polynomials of the first kind are orthogonal with respect to the weight

on the interval [−1,1], i.e. we have:

This can be proven by letting
and using the identity
. Similarly, the polynomials of the second kind are orthogonal with respect to the weight

on the interval [−1,1], i.e. we have:

(Note that the weight
is, to within a normalizing constant, the density of the Wigner semicircle distribution).
The Tn also satisfy a discrete orthogonality condition:

where the xk are the N Gauss–Lobatto zeros of TN(x)

For any given n ≥ 1, among the polynomials of degree n with leading coefficient 1,

is the one of which the maximal absolute value on the interval [−1, 1] is minimal.
This maximal absolute value is

and|ƒ(x)| reaches this maximum exactly n + 1 times: at

The derivatives of the polynomials can be less than straightforward. By differentiating the polynomials in their trigonometric forms, it's easy to show that:



The last two formulas can be numerically troublesome due to the division by zero (0/0 indeterminate form, specifically) at x = 1 and x = −1. It can be shown that:


The second derivative of the Chebyshev polynomial of the first kind is

which, if evaluated as shown above, poses a problem because it is indeterminate at x = ±1. Since the function is a polynomial, (all of) the derivatives must exist for all real numbers, so the taking to limit on the expression above should yield the desired value:

where only x = 1 is considered for now. Factoring the denominator:

Since the limit as a whole must exist, the limit of the numerator and denominator must independently exist, and

The denominator (still) limits to zero, which implies that the numerator must be limiting to zero, ie Un − 1(1) = nTn(1) = n which will be useful later on. Since the numerator and denominator are both limiting to zero, L'Hôpital's rule applies:

The proof for x = − 1 is similar, with the fact that Tn( − 1) = ( − 1)n being important.
Indeed, the following, more general formula holds:

This latter result is of great use in the numerical solution of eigenvalue problems.
Concerning integration, the first derivative of the Tn implies that

and the recurrence relation for the first kind polynomials involving derivatives establishes that

A Chebyshev polynomial of either kind with degree n has n different simple roots, called Chebyshev roots, in the interval [−1,1]. The roots are sometimes called Chebyshev nodes because they are used as nodes in polynomial interpolation. Using the trigonometric definition and the fact that

one can easily prove that the roots of Tn are

Similarly, the roots of Un are

One unique property of the Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind is that on the interval −1 ≤ x ≤ 1 all of the extrema have values that are either −1 or 1. Thus these polynomials have only two finite critical values, the defining property of Shabat polynomials. Both the first and second kinds of Chebyshev polynomial have extrema at the endpoints, given by:




The Chebyshev polynomials are a special case of the ultraspherical or Gegenbauer polynomials, which themselves are a special case of the Jacobi polynomials.
For every nonnegative integer n, Tn(x) and Un(x) are both polynomials of degree n. They are even or odd functions of x as n is even or odd, so when written as polynomials of x, it only has even or odd degree terms respectively.
The leading coefficient of Tn is 2n − 1 if 1 ≤ n, but 1 if 0 = n.
Tn are a special case of Lissajous curves with frequency ratio equal to n.
Several polynomial sequences like Lucas polynomials (Ln), Dickson polynomials(Dn), Fibonacci polynomials(Fn) are related to Chebyshev polynomials Tn and Un.
The first few Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind are










The first few Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind are










In the appropriate Sobolev space, the set of Chebyshev polynomials form a complete basis set, so that a function in the same space can, on −1 ≤ x ≤ 1 be expressed via the expansion:[3]

Furthermore, as mentioned previously, the Chebyshev polynomials form an orthogonal basis which (among other things) implies that the coefficients an can be determined easily through the application of an inner product. This sum is called a Chebyshev series or a Chebyshev expansion.
Consider the Chebyshev expansion of log(1 + x). One can express

One can find the coefficients an either through the application of an inner product or by the discrete orthogonality condition. For the inner product,

which gives

Alternatively, when you cannot evaluate the inner product of the function you are trying to approximate, the discrete orthogonality condition gives

where δij is the Kronecker delta function and the xk are the N Gauss–Lobatto zeros of TN(x)

This allows us to compute the coefficients an very efficiently through the discrete cosine transform

Since a Chebyshev series is related to a Fourier cosine series through a change of variables, all of the theorems, identities, etc that apply to Fourier series have a Chebyshev counterpart.[3] These attributes include:
The abundance of the theorems and identities inherited from Fourier series make the Chebyshev polynomials important tools in numeric analysis; for example they are the most popular general purpose basis functions used in the spectral method,[3] often in favor of trigonometric series due to generally faster convergence for continuous functions (Gibbs' phenomenon is still a problem).
The partial sums of

are very useful in the approximation of various functions and in the solution of differential equations (see spectral method). Two common methods for determining the coefficients an are through the use of the inner product as in Galerkin's method and through the use of collocation which is related to interpolation.
As an interpolant, the N coefficients of the (N − 1)th partial sum are usually obtained on the Chebyshev–Gauss–Lobatto[4] points (or Lobatto grid), which results in minimum error and avoids Runge's phenomenon associated with a uniform grid. This collection of points corresponds to the extrema of the highest order polynomial in the sum, plus the endpoints and is given by:

An arbitrary polynomial of degree N can be written in terms of the Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind. Such a polynomial p(x) is of the form

Polynomials in Chebyshev form can be evaluated using the Clenshaw algorithm.
The spread polynomials are in a sense equivalent to the Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind, but enable one to avoid square roots and conventional trigonometric functions in certain contexts, notably in rational trigonometry.
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
| Jacobi polynomials (mathematics) | |
| Gram–Charlier expansion | |
| Edgeworth expansion |
| How do you apply chebyshev's therorem on excel? | |
| How do you multiply a polynomial by another polynomial? | |
| Multiplication of polynomial by a polynomial? |
Copyrights:
![]() | Sci-Tech Dictionary. McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms. Copyright © 2003, 1994, 1989, 1984, 1978, 1976, 1974 by McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Chebyshev polynomials". Read more |
Mentioned in