
n.
- The quality or state of cohering, especially a logical, orderly, and aesthetically consistent relationship of parts.
- Physics. The property of being coherent, as of waves.
On this page
American Heritage Dictionary:
co·her·ence |

|
Featured Videos:
|
McGraw-Hill Science & Technology Encyclopedia:
Coherence |
The attribute of two or more waves, or parts of a wave, whose relative phase is constant during the resolving time of the observer. The concept has been developed most extensively in optics, but is applicable to all wave phenomena.
Consider two waves, with the same mean angular frequency ω, given by Eqs. (1) and (2). It is convenient, and no restriction,
1. ![\Psi _{A}(x,\!t) = A\ \exp \ \{i [ k(\omega )x -\omega t-\delta _{A}(t)]\}](http://content.answcdn.com/main/content/img/McGrawHill/Encyclopedia/math/e3b881403a2be8fc447aa03dde135796.png )
2. ![\Psi _{B}(x,\!t) = B\ \exp \ \{i [ k(\omega )x -\omega t-\delta _{B}(t)]\}](http://content.answcdn.com/main/content/img/McGrawHill/Encyclopedia/math/4980023244a40864a852df7a543c6ae2.png )
to choose both A and B real. These expressions as they stand could describe de Broglie waves in quantum mechanics. For real waves, such as components of the electric field in light or radio beams, or the pressure oscillations in sound, it is necessary to retain only the real parts of these and subsequent expressions. The frequency spectrum is assumed to be narrow, in the sense that a Fourier analysis of expressions (1) and (2) gives appreciable contributions only for angular frequencies close to ω. This assumption means that, on the average, δA(t) and δB(t) do not change much per period. See also Electromagnetic radiation; Quantum mechanics; Sound.
Suppose that the waves are detected by an apparatus with resolving time T, that is, T is the shortest interval between two events for which the events do not seem to be simultaneous. For the human eye and ear, T is about 0.1 s, while a fast electronic device might have a T of 10−10 s. If the relative phase δ(t), given by Eq. (3), does not, on the average, change noticeably during
3. 
T, then the waves are coherent. If during T there are sufficient random fluctuations for all values of δ(t), modulus 2π, to be equally probable, then the waves are incoherent. If during T there are noticeable random fluctuations in δ(t), but not enough to make the waves completely incoherent, then the waves are partially coherent. These distinctions are not useful unless T is specified. On the one hand, only waves that have existed forever and that fill all of space can have absolutely fixed frequency and phase. On the other hand, two independent sound waves in the phases change appreciably in 0.01 s would seem incoherent to the human ear, but would seem highly coherent to a fast electronic device.
The degree of coherence is related to the interference patterns that can be observed when the two beams are combined. See also Interference of waves.
Coherence is also used to describe relations between phases within the same beam. Suppose that a wave represented by Eq. (1) is passing a fixed observer characterized by a resolving time T. The phase δA may fluctuate, perhaps because the source of the wave contains many independent radiators. The coherence time ΔtW of the wave is defined to be the average time required for δA(t) to fluctuate appreciably at the position of the observer. If ΔtW is much greater than T, the wave is coherent; if ΔtW is of the order of T, the wave is partially coherent; and if ΔtW is much less than T, the wave is incoherent. These concepts are very close to those developed above.
Extended sources give partial coherence and produce interference fringes with visibility V less than unity. A. A. Michelson exploited this fact with his stellar interferometer, a modified double-slit arrangement with movable mirrors that permit adjustment of the effective separation D′ of the slits. It can be shown that if the source is a uniform disk of angular diameter θ, then the smallest value of D′ that gives zero V is 1.22λ/θ. The same approach has also been applied in radio astronomy. A different technique, developed by R. Hanbury Brown and R. Q. Twiss, measures the correlation between the intensifies received by separated detectors with fast electronics. See also Interferometry.
Because they are highly coherent sources, lasers and masers provide very large intensities per unit frequency. See also Laser.
Photon statistics is concerned with the probability distribution describing the number of photons incident on a detector, or present in a cavity. By extension, it deals with the correlation properties of beams of light.
According to the quantum theory of electromagnetism, quantum electrodynamics, light is made up of particles called photons, each of which possesses an energy E of ℏω, where ℏ is Planck's constant divided by 2π and ω is the angular frequency of the light (the frequency multiplied by 2π). In general, however, the photon number is an intrinsically uncertain quantity. It is impossible to precisely specify both the phase φ = ωt of a wave and the number of photons n ≈ E/(ℏω) that it contains; the uncertainties of these two conjugate variables must satisfy
. For a beam to be coherent in the sense of having a well-defined phase, it must not be describable in terms of a fixed number of particles. (Lacking a fixed phase, a single photon may interfere only with itself, not with other photons.) See also Photon; Quantum electrodynamics.
The most familiar example of this uncertainty is shot noise, the randomness of the arrival times of individual photons. There is no correlation between photons in the coherent state emitted by a classical source such as an ideal laser or radio transmitter, so the number of photons detected obeys Poisson statistics, displaying an uncertainty equal to the square root of the mean. The shot noise constitutes the dominant source of noise at low light levels, and may become an important factor in optical communications as well as in high-precision optical devices (notably those that search for gravitational radiation). See also Distribution (probability); Electrical noise.
Roget's Thesaurus:
coherence |
Antonyms by Answers.com:
coherence |
Definition: agreement
Antonyms: disagreement, incoherence, incongruity, nonsense, unintelligibility
Columbia Encyclopedia:
coherence |
Word Tutor:
coherence |
The speech must improve in its coherence in order to be understood.
LearnThatWord.com is a free vocabulary and spelling program where you only pay for results!
Random House Word Menu:
categories related to 'coherence' |

Rhymes:
coherence |
Wikipedia on Answers.com:
Coherence |
| Look up coherence, coherency, or coherent in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. |
Coherence, coherency, or coherent can refer to:
|
Contents
|
| This disambiguation page lists articles associated with the same title. If an internal link led you here, you may wish to change the link to point directly to the intended article. |
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
| incoherence (medicine) | |
| coherency | |
| adesmy |
| Coherence in a sentence? Read answer... | |
| What does coherence mean? Read answer... | |
| What is the difference between coherence and cohesion? Read answer... |
| What is topical coherence? | |
| What are the example of coherence? | |
| What is coherence markers? |
Copyrights:
![]() |
![]() | American Heritage Dictionary. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright © 2007, 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2009. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Read more |
![]() |
![]() | McGraw-Hill Science & Technology Encyclopedia. McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Science and Technology. Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Read more |
![]() |
![]() | Roget's Thesaurus. Roget's II: The New Thesaurus, Third Edition by the Editors of the American Heritage® Dictionary Copyright © 1995 byHoughton Mifflin Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Read more |
![]() | Antonyms by Answers.com. © 1999-present by Answers Corporation. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() |
![]() | Columbia Encyclopedia. The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition Copyright © 2012, Columbia University Press. Licensed from Columbia University Press. All rights reserved. www.cc.columbia.edu/cu/cup/. Read more |
![]() |
![]() | Word Tutor. Copyright © 2004-present by eSpindle Learning, a 501(c) nonprofit organization. All rights reserved. eSpindle provides personalized spelling and vocabulary tutoring online; sign up free. Read more |
![]() |
![]() | Random House Word Menu. © 2010 Write Brothers Inc. Word Menu is a registered trademark of the Estate of Stephen Glazier. Write Brothers Inc. All rights reserved. Read more |
| Rhymes. Oxford University Press. © 2006, 2007 All rights reserved. Read more | ||
![]() |
![]() | Wikipedia on Answers.com. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article Coherence. Read more |
Mentioned in