Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Answers.com

coherence

 
(kō-hîr'əns, -hĕr'-) pronunciation
n.
  1. The quality or state of cohering, especially a logical, orderly, and aesthetically consistent relationship of parts.
  2. Physics. The property of being coherent, as of waves.

Search unanswered questions...
Enter a question here...
Search: All sources Community Q&A Reference topics

The attribute of two or more waves, or parts of a wave, whose relative phase is constant during the resolving time of the observer. The concept has been developed most extensively in optics, but is applicable to all wave phenomena.

Consider two waves, with the same mean angular frequency ω, given by Eqs. (1) and (2). It is convenient, and no restriction,
1. \Psi _{A}(x,\!t) = A\ \exp \ \{i [ k(\omega )x -\omega t-\delta _{A}(t)]\}

2. \Psi _{B}(x,\!t) = B\ \exp \ \{i [ k(\omega )x -\omega t-\delta _{B}(t)]\}
to choose both A and B real. These expressions as they stand could describe de Broglie waves in quantum mechanics. For real waves, such as components of the electric field in light or radio beams, or the pressure oscillations in sound, it is necessary to retain only the real parts of these and subsequent expressions. The frequency spectrum is assumed to be narrow, in the sense that a Fourier analysis of expressions (1) and (2) gives appreciable contributions only for angular frequencies close to ω. This assumption means that, on the average, δA(t) and δB(t) do not change much per period. See also Electromagnetic radiation; Quantum mechanics; Sound.

Suppose that the waves are detected by an apparatus with resolving time T, that is, T is the shortest interval between two events for which the events do not seem to be simultaneous. For the human eye and ear, T is about 0.1 s, while a fast electronic device might have a T of 10−10 s. If the relative phase δ(t), given by Eq. (3), does not, on the average, change noticeably during
3. \delta (t) = \delta _B(t)-\delta _A(t)
T, then the waves are coherent. If during T there are sufficient random fluctuations for all values of δ(t), modulus 2π, to be equally probable, then the waves are incoherent. If during T there are noticeable random fluctuations in δ(t), but not enough to make the waves completely incoherent, then the waves are partially coherent. These distinctions are not useful unless T is specified. On the one hand, only waves that have existed forever and that fill all of space can have absolutely fixed frequency and phase. On the other hand, two independent sound waves in the phases change appreciably in 0.01 s would seem incoherent to the human ear, but would seem highly coherent to a fast electronic device.

The degree of coherence is related to the interference patterns that can be observed when the two beams are combined. See also Interference of waves.

Coherence is also used to describe relations between phases within the same beam. Suppose that a wave represented by Eq. (1) is passing a fixed observer characterized by a resolving time T. The phase δA may fluctuate, perhaps because the source of the wave contains many independent radiators. The coherence time ΔtW of the wave is defined to be the average time required for δA(t) to fluctuate appreciably at the position of the observer. If ΔtW is much greater than T, the wave is coherent; if ΔtW is of the order of T, the wave is partially coherent; and if ΔtW is much less than T, the wave is incoherent. These concepts are very close to those developed above.

Extended sources give partial coherence and produce interference fringes with visibility V less than unity. A. A. Michelson exploited this fact with his stellar interferometer, a modified double-slit arrangement with movable mirrors that permit adjustment of the effective separation D′ of the slits. It can be shown that if the source is a uniform disk of angular diameter θ, then the smallest value of D′ that gives zero V is 1.22λ/θ. The same approach has also been applied in radio astronomy. A different technique, developed by R. Hanbury Brown and R. Q. Twiss, measures the correlation between the intensifies received by separated detectors with fast electronics. See also Interferometry.

Because they are highly coherent sources, lasers and masers provide very large intensities per unit frequency. See also Laser.

Photon statistics is concerned with the probability distribution describing the number of photons incident on a detector, or present in a cavity. By extension, it deals with the correlation properties of beams of light.

According to the quantum theory of electromagnetism, quantum electrodynamics, light is made up of particles called photons, each of which possesses an energy E of ℏω, where ℏ is Planck's constant divided by 2π and ω is the angular frequency of the light (the frequency multiplied by 2π). In general, however, the photon number is an intrinsically uncertain quantity. It is impossible to precisely specify both the phase φ = ωt of a wave and the number of photons nE/(ℏω) that it contains; the uncertainties of these two conjugate variables must satisfy $\Delta{n}\Delta\phi \ge {1\over 2}$. For a beam to be coherent in the sense of having a well-defined phase, it must not be describable in terms of a fixed number of particles. (Lacking a fixed phase, a single photon may interfere only with itself, not with other photons.) See also Photon; Quantum electrodynamics.

The most familiar example of this uncertainty is shot noise, the randomness of the arrival times of individual photons. There is no correlation between photons in the coherent state emitted by a classical source such as an ideal laser or radio transmitter, so the number of photons detected obeys Poisson statistics, displaying an uncertainty equal to the square root of the mean. The shot noise constitutes the dominant source of noise at low light levels, and may become an important factor in optical communications as well as in high-precision optical devices (notably those that search for gravitational radiation). See also Distribution (probability); Electrical noise.


Roget's Thesaurus:

coherence

Top

noun

    Logical agreement among parts: congruity, consistence, consistency. See agree/disagree.

Antonyms by Answers.com:

coherence

Top

n

Definition: agreement
Antonyms: disagreement, incoherence, incongruity, nonsense, unintelligibility

Columbia Encyclopedia:

coherence

Top
coherence, constant phase difference in two or more Waves over time. Two waves are said to be in phase if their crests and troughs meet at the same place at the same time, and the waves are out of phase if the crests of one meet the troughs of another. The waves are incoherent if the crests and troughs meet randomly. Coherence underlies a variety of physical phenomena, such as interference and diffraction. Coherence is also responsible for many of the remarkable properties of laser radiation; laser light is coherent, which is to say that the light waves from a laser are all in phase.


Word Tutor:

coherence

Top
pronunciation

IN BRIEF: To have all parts connected in a proper way.

pronunciation The speech must improve in its coherence in order to be understood.

LearnThatWord.com is a free vocabulary and spelling program where you only pay for results!

Random House Word Menu:

categories related to 'coherence'

Top
Random House Word Menu by Stephen Glazier
For a list of words related to coherence, see:

Coherence, coherency, or coherent can refer to:

Contents

In physics

In mathematics

In financial economics

In philosophy

In computational science

As name of IT products

Other uses

See also


 
 
Related topics:
incoherence (medicine)
coherency
adesmy

Related answers:
Coherence in a sentence? Read answer...
What does coherence mean? Read answer...
What is the difference between coherence and cohesion? Read answer...

Help us answer these:
What is topical coherence?
What are the example of coherence?
What is coherence markers?

Post a question - any question - to the WikiAnswers community:

 

Copyrights:

American Heritage Dictionary. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright © 2007, 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2009. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.  Read more
McGraw-Hill Science & Technology Encyclopedia. McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Science and Technology. Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
Roget's Thesaurus. Roget's II: The New Thesaurus, Third Edition by the Editors of the American Heritage® Dictionary Copyright © 1995 byHoughton Mifflin Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.  Read more
Answers Corporation Antonyms by Answers.com. © 1999-present by Answers Corporation. All rights reserved.  Read more
Columbia Encyclopedia. The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition Copyright © 2012, Columbia University Press. Licensed from Columbia University Press. All rights reserved. www.cc.columbia.edu/cu/cup/ Read more
Word Tutor. Copyright © 2004-present by eSpindle Learning, a 501(c) nonprofit organization. All rights reserved.
eSpindle provides personalized spelling and vocabulary tutoring online; sign up free Read more
Random House Word Menu. © 2010 Write Brothers Inc. Word Menu is a registered trademark of the Estate of Stephen Glazier. Write Brothers Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
 Rhymes. Oxford University Press. © 2006, 2007 All rights reserved.  Read more
Wikipedia on Answers.com. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article Coherence Read more

Follow us
Facebook Twitter
YouTube