COINTELPRO (Counter Intelligence Program) was a program of the United States
Federal Bureau of Investigation aimed at investigating and disrupting
dissident political organizations within the United States. Although covert operations have been employed throughout FBI history,
the formal COINTELPRO operations of 1956-1971 were broadly targeted against organizations that were (at the time) considered to
have politically radical elements, ranging from those whose stated goal was the violent overthrow of the U.S. government (such as
the Weathermen); non-violent civil rights groups such as Martin Luther King Jr.'s Southern
Christian Leadership Conference; and violent groups like the Ku Klux Klan and the
American Nazi Party. The founding document of COINTELPRO directed FBI agents to
"expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, or otherwise neutralize" the activities of these movements and their leaders.
History
COINTELPRO began in 1956 and was designed to "increase factionalism, cause disruption and win defections" inside the
Communist Party U.S.A. (CPUSA). However, the program was soon enlarged to include
disruption of the Socialist Workers Party (1961), the
Ku Klux Klan (1964), African-American nationalist groups (including the Black Panther Party and the Nation of Islam) (1967), the
American Indian Movement, and the entire New
Left socio-political movement, which included antiwar, community, and religious groups (1968). A later investigation by
the Senate's Church Committee (see below) stated that "COINTELPRO began in 1956, in
part because of frustration with Supreme Court rulings limiting the Government's power to proceed overtly against dissident
groups..."[1] Congress and several court
cases[2] later concluded that the COINTELPRO operations
against communist and socialist groups exceeded statutory limits on FBI activity and violated Constitutional guarantees of
freedom of speech and association.
Supporters of the program argue that the project was rooted in the Bureau's knowledge that some domestic left-wing and radical
organizations were manipulated by hostile foreign intelligence agencies. For example, the FBI had access to the Venona decrypts that showed the Soviet Union and its
KGB manipulated and worked under the cover of the CPUSA
for espionage purposes and to incite domestic unrest in the United States.[citation needed]
Some of the largest COINTELPRO campaigns targeted the Socialist
Worker's Party, the Ku Klux Klan[1], the "New Left" (including several anti-war groups such as the
Students for a Democratic Society and the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee), Black nationalist groups (such as the Black Panthers and
the Republic of New Africa), Puerto Rican independence groups, the American Indian Movement and the Weather
Underground.
The program was secret until 1971, when an FBI field office in Media, PA was
burglarized by a group of left-wing radicals calling themselves the Citizens' Commission to Investigate the FBI. Several dossiers of files were
taken and the information passed to news agencies, many of which initially refused to publish the
information. Within the year, Director Hoover declared that the centralized COINTELPRO
was over, and that all future counterintelligence operations would be handled on a case-by-case basis.[3]
Further documents were revealed in the course of separate lawsuits filed against the FBI by NBC correspondent Carl Stern, the
Socialist Workers Party, and a number of other groups. A major
investigation was launched in 1976 by the Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence
Activities of the United States Senate, commonly referred to as the "Church Committee"
for its chairman, Senator Frank Church of Idaho. However,
millions of pages of documents remain unreleased, and many released documents are entirely censored.
In the Final Report of the Select Committee COINTELPRO was castigated in no uncertain terms:
- "Many of the techniques used would be intolerable in a democratic society even if all of the targets had been involved in
violent activity, but COINTELPRO went far beyond that...the Bureau conducted a sophisticated vigilante operation aimed squarely
at preventing the exercise of First Amendment rights of speech and association, on the theory that preventing the growth of
dangerous groups and the propagation of dangerous ideas would protect the national security and deter violence."[1]
The Church Committee documented a history of the FBI being used for purposes of political repression as far back as World War I, through the
1920s, when they were charged with rounding up "anarchists and revolutionaries" for deportation, and then building from 1936
through 1976.
The FBI claims that it no longer undertakes COINTELPRO or COINTELPRO-like operations. However, critics claim that agency
programs in the spirit of COINTELPRO target groups like the Committee in Solidarity with the People of El Salvador,
Earth First! and the Anti-Globalization
Movement.[citation needed]
Methods
According to Brian Glick, in War at Home, COINTELPRO used a broad array of methods, including:
1. "Infiltration: Agents and informers did not merely spy on political activists. Their main purpose was to discredit and disrupt.
Their very presence served to undermine trust and scare off potential supporters. The FBI and police exploited this fear to
smear genuine activists as agents." [4]
2. "Psychological Warfare From the Outside: The FBI and police used myriad other "dirty
tricks" to undermine progressive movements. They planted false media stories and
published bogus leaflets and other publications in the name of targeted groups. They forged correspondence, sent anonymous letters, and made anonymous telephone calls. They spread misinformation about meetings and events,
set up pseudo movement groups run by government agents, and manipulated or strong-armed parents, employers, landlords, school officials and others to cause trouble for
activists." [5]
3. "Harassment Through the Legal System: The FBI and police abused the legal system to harass dissidents and make them appear to be criminals. Officers of the law
gave perjured testimony and presented fabricated evidence as a pretext for false arrests and wrongful imprisonment. They
discriminatorily enforced tax laws and other government regulations and used conspicuous surveillance, 'investigative'
interviews, and grand jury subpoenas in an effort to intimidate activists and silence their supporters."
4. "Extralegal Force and Violence: The FBI and police threatened, instigated, and themselves conducted break-ins, vandalism,
assaults, and beatings. The object was to frighten
dissidents and disrupt their movements. In the case of radical Black and Puerto Rican
activists (and later Native Americans [citation needed]), these attacks—including political assassinations—were extensive and
calculated.". [6]
The FBI also conducted "black bag jobs", warrantless surreptitious entries,
against the targeted groups and their members.[7]
Supporters of the FBI argue that the Bureau was convinced that there was such a threat of domestic subversion posed by radical
groups that extraordinary efforts were required to forestall violence and revolutionary insurgency. Hoover was willing to use
false claims to attack his political enemies. In one memo he wrote: "Purpose of counterintelligence action is to disrupt the
Black Panther Party and it is immaterial whether facts exist to substantiate the
charge."[citation needed]
In 1969 the FBI special agent in San Francisco wrote Hoover that his investigation of the Black Panther Party revealed that in
his city, at least, the Black nationalists were primarily feeding breakfast to children. Hoover fired back a memo implying the
career ambitions of the agent were directly related to his supplying evidence to support Hoover's view that the BPP was "a
violence prone organization seeking to overthrow the Government by revolutionary means".[citation needed]
In one particularly controversial incident, civil rights worker Viola Liuzzo was killed
in 1965 by a shot from a car in which four Ku Klux Klansmen were riding; one of the Klansmen was an FBI informant. Afterward,
COINTELPRO spread false rumors that Liuzzo was a member of the Communist Party and had abandoned her children in order to have sexual
relationships with African Americans involved in the civil rights movement. [8]
Illegal surveillance
The Final report of the Church Committee concluded:
- "Too many people have been spied upon by too many Government agencies and too much information has been collected. The
Government has often undertaken the secret surveillance of citizens on the basis of their political beliefs, even when those
beliefs posed no threat of violence or illegal acts on behalf of a hostile foreign power. The Government, operating primarily
through secret informants, but also using other intrusive techniques such as wiretaps, microphone "bugs", surreptitious mail
opening, and break-ins, has swept in vast amounts of information about the personal lives, views, and associations of American
citizens. Investigations of groups deemed potentially dangerous -- and even of groups suspected of associating with potentially
dangerous organizations -- have continued for decades, despite the fact that those groups did not engage in unlawful activity.
Groups and individuals have been harassed and disrupted because of their political views and their lifestyles. Investigations
have been based upon vague standards whose breadth made excessive collection inevitable. Unsavory and vicious tactics have been
employed -- including anonymous attempts to break up marriages, disrupt meetings, ostracize persons from their professions, and
provoke target groups into rivalries that might result in deaths. Intelligence agencies have served the political and personal
objectives of presidents and other high officials. While the agencies often committed excesses in response to pressure from high
officials in the Executive branch and Congress, they also occasionally initiated improper activities and then concealed them from
officials whom they had a duty to inform.
- Governmental officials -- including those whose principal duty is to enforce the law --have violated or ignored the law over
long periods of time and have advocated and defended their right to break the law.
- The Constitutional system of checks and balances has not adequately controlled intelligence activities. Until recently the
Executive branch has neither delineated the scope of permissible activities nor established procedures for supervising
intelligence agencies. Congress has failed to exercise sufficient oversight, seldom questioning the use to which its
appropriations were being put. Most domestic intelligence issues have not reached the courts, and in those cases when they have
reached the courts, the judiciary has been reluctant to grapple with them."[9] [10]
Conspiracy theories about COINTELPRO
While the existence of COINTELPRO is well-documented, a number of conspiracy theories have arisen in the wake of the
disclosures about COINTELPRO.[11] Some radical groups
accuse factional opponents of being FBI informants or assume the FBI is infiltrating the movement.[12] Some authors have accused COINTELPRO of undocumented actions. Several authors
have accused the FBI of deploying COINTELPRO tactics against the American Indian
Movement, alleging that the federal government intended to acquire uranium deposits on the Lakota tribe's reservation land, and that this motivated a larger government conspiracy against AIM activists on the Pine Ridge reservation.[13][14][15][16] Others believe COINTELPRO continues and
similar actions are being taken against activist groups.[17][18][16]
Further reading
Books
- Blacstock, Nelson (1988). Cointelpro: The FBI's Secret War on Political
Freedom. Pathfinder Press. ISBN 0-87348-877-6.
- Carson, Clayborne; Gallen, David, editors (1991). Malcolm X: The FBI
File. Carroll & Graf Publishers. ISBN 0-88184-758-5.
- Churchill, Ward; Vander Wall, Jim.
(2002). The Cointelpro Papers: Documents from the FBI's Secret Wars Against Dissent in the United States (2nd ed.). South
End Press. ISBN 0-89608-648-8.
- Churchill, Ward; Vander Wall, Jim.
(2002). Agents of Repression: The FBI's Secret Wars Against the Black Panther Party and the American Indian Movement (2nd
ed.). South End Press. ISBN 0-89608-646-1.
- Cunningham, David (2004). There’s Something Happening Here: The New Left, The
Klan, and FBI Counterintelligence. University of California Press. ISBN 0-520-23997-0.
- Davis, James Kirkpatrick (1997). Assault on the Left. Praeger Trade. ISBN
0-275-95455-2.
- Garrow, David (2006). The FBI and Martin Luther King, Jr. (Revised ed.).
Yale University Press. ISBN 0-300-08731-4.
- Glick, Brian (1989). War at Home: Covert Action Against U.S. Activists and
What We Can Do About It. South End Press. ISBN 0-89608-349-7.
- Halperin, Morton; Berman, Jerry;
Borosage Robert; Marwick, Christine (1976). The Lawless State: The Crimes Of The U.S. Intelligence Agencies. ISBN
0-14-004386-1.
- Olsen, Jack (2000). Last Man Standing:
The Tragedy and Triumph of Geronimo Pratt. Doubleday. ISBN 0-38549-367-3.
- Perkus, Cathy (1976). Cointelpro. Vintage.
Theoharis, Athan, Spying on Americans: Political Surveillance from Hoover to the Huston Plan (Temple University Press,
1978).
Articles
- John Drabble, "The FBI, COINTELPRO-WHITE HATE and the Decline of Ku Klux Klan Organizations in Mississippi, 1964-1971,"
Journal of Mississippi History, 66:4, (Winter 2004).
- John Drabble, "To Preserve the Domestic Tranquility:” The FBI, COINTELPRO-WHITE HATE, and Political Discourse, 1964-1971,"
Journal of American Studies, 38:3 (August 2004): 297-328
U.S. Government reports
- U.S. Congress. House. Committee on Internal Security. Hearings on Domestic Intelligence Operations for Internal Security
Purposes. 93rd Cong., 2d sess, 1974.
- U.S. Congress. House. Select Committee on Intelligence. Hearings on Domestic Intelligence Programs. 94th Cong., 1st
sess, 1975.
- U.S. Congress. Senate. Committee on Government Operations. Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. Hearings on Riots,
Civil and Criminal Disorders. 90th Cong., 1st sess. - 91st Cong. , 2d sess, 1967-1970.
- U.S. Congress. Senate. Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities. Hearings
— The National Security Agency and Fourth Amendment Rights. Vol. 6. 94th Cong., 1st sess, 1975.
- U.S. Congress. Senate. Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities. Hearings
— Federal Bureau of Investigation. Vol. 6. 94th Cong., 1st sess, 1975.
- U.S. Congress. Senate. Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities. Final
Report — Book II, Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans. 94th Cong., 2d sess, 1976.
- U.S. Congress. Senate. Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities. Final
Report — Book III , Supplementary Detailed Staff Reports on Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans. 94th Cong.,
2d sess, 1976.
See also
- Category:COINTELPRO targets
- Police Brutality
- Agent provocateur
- Franklin, H. Bruce, targeted by COINTELPRO
- Brown, H. Rap, targeted by COINTELPRO
- Hampton, Fred, targeted by COINTELPRO
- Viola Liuzzo, murdered by a shot from a car used by four Ku Klux Klansmen, one of whom
was a COINTELPRO informant
- NSA call database
- Operation Mockingbird
- Gary Rowe, COINTELPRO informant accused (and acquitted) of involvement in the murder of civil rights activist
Viola Liuzzo
- Starsky, Morris , early target of COINTELPRO
- THERMCON
- Weather Underground
- The COINTELPRO Papers
- Security culture
References
- ^ a b SUPPLEMENTARY DETAILED STAFF REPORTS ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES AND THE RIGHTS OF
AMERICANS. United States Senate. Retrieved on 2006-08-14.
- ^ See, for example, Hobson v. Wilson, 737 F.2d 1 (1984); Rugiero v.
U.S. Dept. of Justice, 257 F.3d 534, 546 (2001).
- ^ A Short History of FBI COINTELPRO, retrieved July 13
2007.
- ^ As an example of infiltration of organizations, Bill Wilkinson, the leader
of the Invisible Empire, Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, was an FBI informant.
- ^ An example of COINTELPRO's work in the media is a series of articles run in
the San Francisco Examiner purporting to be interviews with radical Marxist H. Bruce
Franklin. A subsequent libel suit showed that right-wing columnist Ed Montgomery had cooperated closely with the FBI in
writing the story, and that J. Edgar Hoover had signed off on the articles before publication. http://www.sfbg.com/39/03/cover_anniversary_intro.html, retrieved August 14
2005. In another example, the FBI also carried out a smear campaign against civil rights activist
Viola Liuzzo after she was murdered by four Ku Klux
Klan members, of whom one was a paid FBI informant. http://www.detnews.com/2004/metro/0409/30/c01-289311.htm, retrieved August 14 2005.
- ^ An example of a burglary is discussed at http://www.sfbg.com/39/03/cover_anniversary_intro.html, retrieved August 14
2005. An example of involvement in violent acts is the 1965 murder of civil rights activist
Viola Liuzzo by four Klansmen, of whom one was FBI informant Gary Rowe. The Church
Committee also found that, "while performing duties paid for by the Government, [Rowe] had ... 'beaten people severely, had
boarded buses and kicked people, had [gone] into restaurants and beaten them [blacks] with blackjacks, chains, pistols.'"
http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/cointelpro/churchfinalreportIIa.htm, retrieved August
14 2005. Another example noted by the Church Committee was "Sending an anonymous letter to
the leader of a Chicago street gang (described as 'violence-prone') stating that the Black Panthers were supposed to have 'a hit
out for you'. The letter was suggested because it 'may intensify . . . animosity' and cause the street gang leader to 'take
retaliatory action'" http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/cointelpro/churchfinalreportIIa.htm, retrieved August
14 2005.
- ^ http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/cointelpro/churchfinalreportIIIf.htm, retrieved August
14 2005.
- ^ http://www.uua.org/uuhs/duub/articles/violaliuzzo.html; Detroit News, April 9 2004; http://tom.digitalelite.com/2006_03_30_07_30_00.html
- ^ INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES
AND THE RIGHTS OF AMERICANS BOOK II, FINAL REPORT OF THE SELECT COMMITTEE TO STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS WITH RESPECT TO
INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES UNITED STATES SENATE (Church Committee). United States Senate. Retrieved on May 11, 2006.
- ^ Tapped Out Why Congress won't get through to the NSA.. Slate.com. Retrieved on May 11, 2006.
- ^ Chip Berlet, “The X-Files Movie: Facilitating Fanciful Fun, or Fueling Fear
and Fascism? Conspiracy Theories for Fun, Not for False Prophets,” 1998. Political Research Associates, http://www.publiceye.org/conspire/x-files.html; Conspiracy Culture: from Kennedy to the X Files, Peter Knight,
Routledge, 2001; Hobson v. Brennan, 646 F.Supp. 884 (D.D.C.,1986)
- ^ Mike Mosedale, "Bury My Heart," City Pages, Volume 21 - Issue 1002 - Cover
Story - February 16, 2000
- ^ Weyler, Rex. Blood of the Land: The Government and Corporate War Against
First Nations.
- ^ Ward Churchill and James Vander Wall. Agents of Repression: The FBI's Secret Wars against the Black Panther Party and the
American Indian Movement, 1988, 1990.
- ^ Matthiessen, Peter. In the Spirit of Crazy Horse, 1980.
Viking.
- ^ a b Woidat, Caroline M. The Truth Is on the Reservation: American Indians
and Conspiracy Culture, The Journal of American Culture 29 (4), 2006. Pages 454–467
- ^ McQuinn, Jason. Conspiracy Theory vs Alternative Journalism,
Alternative Press Review, Vol. 2, No. 3, Winter 1996
- ^ Horowitz, David. Johnnie's Other O.J., September 1, 1997.
FrontPageMagazine.com.
External links
Documentary
Websites
Articles
Cynthia McKinney regarding COINTELPRO on CounterPunch [2]
U.S. Government reports
Final Report of the Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities. United
States Senate, 94th Congress, 2nd Session, April 26 (legislative day, April 14), 1976. [AKA "Church Committee Report"]. Archived on COINTELPRO sources website. Transcription and html by Paul Wolf. Retrieved April 19 2005.
- Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans, Book II
- I. Introduction and Summary
- II. The
Growth of Domestic Intelligence: 1936 to 1976
- III. Findings
- (A) Violating and Ignoring the Law
- (B) Overbreadth of Domestic Intelligence Activity
- (C) Excessive Use of Intrusive Techniques
- (D) Using
Covert Action to Disrupt and Discredit Domestic Groups
- (E) Political Abuse of Intelligence Information
- (F) Inadequate Controls on Dissemination and Retention
- (G) Deficiencies in Control and Accountability
- IV. Conclusions and Recommendations
- Supplementary Detailed Staff Reports, Book III
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)