Completeness

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Top

n.

The state of being complete.



Concept of the adequacy of a formal system that is employed both in proof theory and in model theory ( logic). In proof theory, a formal system is said to be syntactically complete if and only if every closed sentence in the system is such that either it or its negation is provable in the system. In model theory, a formal system is said to be semantically complete if and only if every theorem of the system is provable in the system.

For more information on completeness, visit Britannica.com.

Roget's Thesaurus:

completeness

Top

noun

    The state of being entirely whole: entirety, integrity, oneness, totality, wholeness. See part/whole.

Intuitively, a logical system is complete if everything that we want can be derived in it. Thus a formalization of logic is complete if all logically valid forms of argument are derivable in the system; a system designed to codify mathematical reasoning is complete if all mathematical truths can be derived in it, and so on. Although put like this the notion seems to be entirely informal, more precise definitions can be given. A logical system is complete in the sense introduced by Gödel if and only if all valid well-formed formulae are theorems of the system. In a stronger sense a system is complete if for any well-formed formula A, either A is a theorem, or the system would become inconsistent if A were added as an axiom. See Gödel's theorem(s), model theory.

Top

In general, an object is complete if nothing needs to be added to it. This notion is made more specific in various fields.

Contents

Logical completeness

In logic, semantic completeness is the converse of soundness for formal systems. A formal system is "semantically complete" when all its tautologies are theorems, whereas a formal system is "sound" when all theorems are tautologies (that is, they are semantically valid formulas: formulas that are true under every interpretation of the language of the system that is consistent with the rules of the system). Kurt Gödel, Leon Henkin, and Emil Post all published proofs of completeness. (See History of the Church–Turing thesis.) A formal system is consistent if for all formulas φ of the system, the formulas φ and ¬φ (the negation of φ) are not both theorems of the system (that is, they cannot be both proved with the rules of the system).

  • A formal system S is semantically complete or simply complete, if and only if every tautology of S is a theorem of S. That is,  \models_{\mathcal S} \varphi\ \to\ \vdash_{\mathcal S} \varphi.[1]
  • A formal system S is strongly complete or complete in the strong sense if and only if for every set of premises Γ, any formula which semantically follows from Γ is derivable from Γ. That is,  \Gamma\models_{\mathcal S} \varphi \ \to\ \Gamma \vdash_{\mathcal S} \varphi.
  • A formal system S is syntactically complete or deductively complete or maximally complete or simply complete if and only if for each formula φ of the language of the system either φ or ¬φ is a theorem of S. This is also called negation completeness. In another sense, a formal system is syntactically complete if and only if no unprovable axiom can be added to it as an axiom without introducing an inconsistency. Truth-functional propositional logic and first-order predicate logic are semantically complete, but not syntactically complete (for example, the propositional logic statement consisting of a single variable "a" is not a theorem, and neither is its negation, but these are not tautologies). Gödel's incompleteness theorem shows that any recursive system that is sufficiently powerful, such as Peano arithmetic, cannot be both consistent and complete.
  • A formal system is inconsistent if and only if every sentence is a theorem.[2]
  • A language is expressively complete if it can express the subject matter for which it is intended.[citation needed]
  • A formal system is complete with respect to a property if and only if every sentence that has the property is a theorem.[citation needed]

Mathematical completeness

In mathematics, "complete" is a term that takes on specific meanings in specific situations, and not every situation in which a type of "completion" occurs is called a "completion". See, for example, algebraically closed field or compactification.

  • The completeness of the real numbers is one of the defining properties of the real number system. It may be described equivalently as either the completeness of R as metric space or as a partially ordered set (see below).
  • More generally, any topological group can be completed at a decreasing sequence of open subgroups.

Computing

  • In algorithms, the notion of completeness refers to the ability of the algorithm to find a solution if one exists, and if not, to report that no solution is possible.
  • In computational complexity theory, a problem P is complete for a complexity class C, under a given type of reduction, if P is in C, and every problem in C reduces to P using that reduction.
    For example, each problem in the class NP-complete is complete for the class NP, under polynomial-time, many-one reduction.
  • In computing, a data-entry field can autocomplete the entered data based on the prefix typed into the field; that capability is known as autocompletion.
  • In software testing, completeness has for goal the functional verification of call graph (between software item) and control graph (inside each software item).
  • The concept of completeness is found in knowledge base theory.

Economics, finance, and industry

  • Complete markets versus incomplete markets
  • In auditing, completeness is one of the financial statement assertions that have to be ensured. For example, auditing classes of transactions. Rental expense which includes 12-month or 52-week payments should be all booked according to the terms agreed in the tenancy agreement.
  • Oil or gas well completion, the process of making a well ready for production.

Botany

  • A complete flower is a flower with both male and female reproductive structures as well as petals and sepals. See Sexual reproduction in plants.

References

  1. ^ Hunter, Geoffrey, Metalogic: An Introduction to the Metatheory of Standard First-Order Logic, University of California Pres, 1971
  2. ^ Alfred Tarski, Über einige fundamentale Begriffe der Mathematik, Comptes Rendus des séances de la Société des Sciences et des Lettres de Varsovie 23 (1930), Cl. III, pp. 22–29. English translation in: Alfred Tarski, Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, Claredon Press, Oxford, 1956, pp. 30–37.

Post a question - any question - to the WikiAnswers community:

Copyrights:

Mentioned in

invasion efficiency (petroleum engineering)