|
Condom
|
|
|
| A rolled-up condom |
| Background |
| B.C. type |
Barrier |
| First use |
1994 (polyurethane)
1912 (latex)
1855 (rubber)
Ancient (other materials) |
| Pregnancy rates (first year, latex) |
| Perfect use |
2% |
| Typical use |
10–18% |
| Usage |
| User reminders |
Damaged by oil-based lubricants |
| Advantages and Disadvantages |
| STD protection |
Yes |
| Benefits |
No external drugs or clinic visits required |
A condom is a device, usually made of latex, or more recently polyurethane, that is used during sexual intercourse. It is put
on a man's erect penis and physically blocks ejaculated semen from entering the body of a sexual
partner. Condoms are used to prevent pregnancy and transmission of sexually transmitted infections (STIs—such as gonorrhea,
syphilis, and HIV).
Overview
Male condoms are usually packaged inside a foil wrapper, in a rolled-up form, and are designed to be applied to the tip of the
penis and then rolled over the erect penis. They are most commonly made from latex, but are also available in other materials. As a method of contraception, condoms have the advantage of being easy to use, inexpensive, having few side-effects, and
of offering protection against sexually transmitted diseases. With proper knowledge and application technique—and use at every
act of intercourse—condom users experience a 2% per-year pregnancy rate.[1] Condoms may be combined with other forms of contraception (such as spermicide) for greater protection.[2]
Some couples find that putting on a male condom interrupts sex, although others incorporate condom application as part of
their foreplay. Some men and women find the physical barrier of a condom dulls sensation. Advantages of dulled sensation can
include prolonged erection and delayed ejaculation;[3]
disadvantages might include a loss of the erection, or a loss of the pleasure of sexual actions.
Varieties
Most condoms have a reservoir tip, making it easier to leave space for the man's ejaculate. Condoms also come in different
sizes, from oversized to snug. Most condoms are made of latex, but polyurethane and lambskin condoms are also widely available.
Latex
Latex condoms are the most distributed type of condom in the world and there are thousands of variants in regards to size,
thickness, and texture. The most popular variants of the standard condom are condoms with a ribbed or studded texture, those that
come in different colors or scents, and those marketed as larger sized condoms.[4] There are also condoms available that are lubricated with a very small amount of Benzocaine (usually under 4%). The use of Benzocaine with the lubrication on the inside of the condom
produces a slight numbing sensation for the man and is meant to help him prolong sexual activity before climax.[5] Currently the thinnest latex condom stands at 0.03 mm
thick.[6]
Lubricants
Latex condoms used with oil-based lubricants (e.g. vaseline) are likely to slip off
due to loss of elasticity caused by the oils.[7]
Some latex condoms are lubricated at the manufacturer with a small amount of a nonoxynol-9, a spermicidal chemical. According to Consumer Reports, spermicidally lubricated condoms have no additional benefit in preventing pregnancy,
have a shorter shelf life, and may cause urinary-tract infections in women.[8] In contrast, application of separately packaged spermicide is believed to increase the
contraceptive efficacy of condoms.[2]
Nonoxynol-9 was once believed to offer additional protection against STDs (including HIV) but recent studies have shown that,
with frequent use, nonoxynol-9 may increase the risk of HIV transmission.[9] The World Health Organization says that
spermicidally lubricated condoms should no longer be promoted. However, they recommend using a nonoxynol-9 lubricated condom over no condom at all.[10] As of 2005, nine condom manufacturers have stopped manufacturing condoms with nonoxynol-9,
Planned Parenthood has discontinued the distribution of condoms so
lubricated,[11] and the Food and Drug Administration has proposed a warning regarding this issue.[12]
Testing
Latex has outstanding elastic properties. Tensile strength exceeds 30 MPa. Condoms
may be stretched in excess of 800% before breaking.[13]
In 1990 the ISO set standards for production (ISO
4074, Natural latex rubber condoms) and the EU followed suit with its CEN standard (Directive 93/42/EEC concerning medical devices). Latex condoms are
tested for holes with an electrical current. If the condom passes, it is rolled and packaged. Batches of condoms are tested for
breakage with air inflation tests.[14]
Health issues
Dry dusting powders are applied to latex condoms before packaging to prevent the condom from sticking to itself when rolled
up. Previously, talc was used by most manufacturers, however cornstarch is currently the most popular dusting powder.[15] Talc is known to be toxic if it enters the abdominal cavity (i.e. via the vagina). Cornstarch is generally believed to be safe, however some researchers have raised concerns over its
use.[15][16]
Nitrosamines, which are potentially carcinogenic in
humans,[17] are believed to be present in a substance
used to improve elasticity in latex condoms.[18] A 2001
review stated that humans regularly receive 1,000 to 10,000 times greater nitrosamine exposure from food and tobacco than from
condom use and concluded that the risk of cancer from condom use is very low.[19] However, a 2004 study in Germany detected nitrosamines in 29 out of 32 condom brands tested, and
concluded that exposure from condoms might exceed the exposure from food by 1.5- to 3-fold.[18][20]
Other materials
Polyurethane
- See also: AT-10 Resin
Polyurethane condoms can be thinner than latex condoms, with some polyurethane condoms only 0.02 mm thick.[21] Polyurethane is also the material of many female condoms.
Polyurethane can be considered better than latex in several ways: it conducts heat better than latex, is not as sensitive to
temperature and ultraviolet light (and so has less rigid storage requirements and a longer shelf life), can be used with
oil-based lubricants, is less allergenic than latex, and does not have an odor.[22] Polyurethane condoms have gained FDA approval for sale in the United States as an effective method of contraception and HIV
prevention, and under laboratory conditions have been shown to be just as effective as latex for these purposes.[23]
However, polyurethane condoms may be more likely to slip or break than latex,[22][24] and are more expensive.
Lambskin
Condoms made from one of the oldest condom materials, labeled "lambskin" (made from lamb
intestines) are still available. They have a greater ability to transmit body warmth and
tactile sensation, when compared to synthetic condoms, and are less allergenic than
latex. However, conventional wisdom holds that there is an increased risk of transmitting STDs compared to latex because of pores
in the material, which are thought to be large enough to allow infectious agents to pass through, albeit blocking the passage of
sperm. Lambskin condoms are frequently called ineffective with regards to preventing sexually transmitted diseases.[25] Nonetheless, hard data regarding the alleged lack of
efficacy are lacking. Although a search of the PubMed database of medical literature does not
demonstrate any clinical trials demonstrating that lambskin condoms have decreased efficacy, at least one study does suggest that
use of non-latex condoms is associated with higher rates of breakage and slippage. [1]
While it may make sense to portray lambskin condoms as simply "ineffective" for the sake of simplicity in educational
settings, it is more accurate to state that there are solid scientific reasons to expect lambskin condoms will be less effective
in preventing STDs than latex and poluyrethane, though the degree of such presumed decreased efficacy is not known. It is
unlikely that lambskin condoms would be "ineffective" in preventing STDs; for example, the risk of transmitting a disease through
depositing 1.5 to 5 mLs of ejaculate directly into a partner's body cavity without the use of any barrier protection would be
anticipated to be greater than the risk involved in depositing such ejaculate into a lambskin barrier within a body cavity, with
the barrier subsequently removed from the body cavity along with all or virtually all of the ejaculate.
Because the degree of efficacy of lambskin condoms has not been rigorously investigated and because there exists a solid
rationale to expect them to have decreased efficacy, it is prudent to treat them as not effective. If one has concerns about the
possibility of STD transmission, it is prudent to use latex or polyurethane condoms, rather than lambskin condoms.
Experimental
The Invisible Condom, developed at Université Laval in Québec, Canada, is a gel that
hardens upon increased temperature after insertion into the vagina or rectum. In the lab, it has been shown to effectively block
HIV and herpes simplex virus. The barrier breaks down and liquefies after several hours. The invisible condom is in the clinical
trial phase, and has not yet been approved for use.[26]
As reported on Swiss television news Schweizer Fernsehen on November 29, 2006, the German scientist Jan Vinzenz Krause of the Institut für
Kondom-Beratung ("Institute for Condom Consultation") in Germany recently developed a spray-on condom and is test-marketing it.
Krause says that one of the advantages to his spray-on condom, which is reported to dry in about 5 seconds, is that it is
perfectly formed to each penis.[27][28]
Effectiveness
In preventing pregnancy
The effectiveness of condoms, as of most forms of contraception, can be assessed two
ways. Perfect use or method effectiveness rates only include people who use condoms properly and consistently.
Actual use, or typical use effectiveness rates are of all condom users, including those who use condoms improperly,
inconsistently, or both. Rates are generally presented for the first year of use.[1] Most commonly the Pearl Index is used
to calculate effectiveness rates, but some studies use decrement tables.[29]
The typical use pregnancy rate among condom users varies depending on the population being studied, ranging from 10–18% per
year.[30] The perfect use pregnancy rate of condoms is 2%
per year.[1]
Several factors account for typical use effectiveness being lower than perfect use effectiveness:
- mistakes on the part of those providing instructions on how to use the method
- mistakes on the part of the user
- conscious user non-compliance with instructions.
For instance, someone using condoms might be given incorrect information on what lubricants are safe to use with condoms, or
by mistake put the condom on improperly, or simply not bother to use a condom.
In preventing STDs
- See also: HIV#Transmission
Condoms are widely recommended for the prevention of sexually transmitted
diseases (STDs). They have been shown to be effective in reducing infection rates in both men and women. While not
perfect, the condom is effective at reducing the transmission of HIV, genital herpes, genital warts, syphilis, chlamydia,
gonorrhea, and other diseases.[31]
According to a 2000 report by the National Institutes of Health,
correct and consistent use of latex condoms reduces the risk of HIV/AIDS transmission by approximately 85% relative to risk when unprotected. The same review also found condom use
significantly reduces the risk of gonorrhea for men.[32]
A 2006 study reports that proper condom use decreases the risk of transmission for human papilloma virus by approximately 70%.[33] Another study in the same year found consistent condom use was effective at reducing transmission
of herpes simplex virus-2 also known as genital herpes, in both men and women.[34]
Although a condom is effective in limiting exposure, some disease transmission may occur even with a condom. Infectious areas
of the genitals, especially when symptoms are present, may not be covered by a condom, and as a result, some diseases can be
transmitted by direct contact.[35] The primary
effectiveness issue with using condoms to prevent STDs, however, is inconsistent use.[14]
Causes of failure
Wikibooks' [[wikibooks:|]] has more about this subject:
Condom users may experience slipping off the penis after ejaculation,[36] breakage due to faulty methods of application or physical damage (such as tears caused when opening
the package), or breakage or slippage due to latex degradation (typically from being past the expiration date or being stored
improperly). Even if no breakage or slippage is observed, 1–2% of women will test positive for semen residue after intercourse
with a condom.[37][38]
Different modes of condom failure result in different levels of semen exposure. If a failure occurs during application, the
damaged condom may be disposed of and a new condom applied before intercourse begins - such failures generally pose no risk to
the user.[39] One study found that semen exposure from a
broken condom was about half that of unprotected intercourse; semen exposure from a slipped condom was about one-fifth that of
unprotected intercourse.[40]
Standard condoms will fit almost any penis, although many condom manufacturers offer
"snug" or "magnum" sizes. Some studies have associated larger penises and smaller condoms with increased breakage and decreased
slippage rates (and vice versa), but other studies have been inconclusive.[7]
Experienced condom users are significantly less likely to have a condom slip or break compared to first-time users, although
users who experience one slippage or breakage are at increased risk of a second such failure.[41] An article in Population Reports suggests that education on condom use
reduces behaviors that increase the risk of breakage and slippage.[42] A Family Health International publication also
offers the view that education can reduce the risk of breakage and slippage, but emphasizes that more research needs to be done
to determine all of the causes of breakage and slippage.[7]
Among couples that intend condoms to be their form of birth control, pregnancy may occur when the couple does not use a
condom. The couple may have run out of condoms, or be traveling and not have a condom with them, or simply dislike the feel of
condoms and decide to "take a chance." This type of behavior is the primary cause of typical use failure (as opposed to method or
perfect use failure).[43]
Another possible cause of condom failure is sabotage. One motive is to have a child against
a partner's wishes or consent.[44] Some commercial sex
workers report clients sabotaging condoms in retaliation for being coerced into condom use.[45] Placing pinholes in the tip of the condom is believed to significantly impact
their effectiveness.[38][46]
Female condoms
-
Recently "female condoms" or "femidoms" have become available. They are larger and wider than male condoms but
equivalent in length. They have a flexible ring-shaped opening, and are designed to be inserted into the vagina. They also contain an inner ring which aids insertion and helps keep the condom from sliding out of the
vagina during coitus. The condom is made from polyurethane or nitrile polymer. An
experimental version is made of latex. In 2001, the city of Toronto, Ontario, Canada, conducted the "Toronto Public Health Female
Condom Study" which resulted in the "The Female Condom Teaching and Counseling Guide."[47]
Role in sex education
Condoms are often used in sexual education programs, because they have the capability
to reduce the chances of pregnancy and the spread of some sexually transmitted diseases when used correctly. A recent
American Psychological Association (APA) press release supported the
inclusion of information about condoms in sex education, saying "comprehensive sexuality education programs... discuss the
appropriate use of condoms", and "promote condom use for those who are sexually active."[48]
In the United States, teaching about condoms in public schools is opposed by some religious organizations.[49] Planned Parenthood, which
advocates family planning and sexual education,
argues that no studies have shown abstinence-only programs to result in delayed intercourse, and cites surveys showing that 75%
of American parents want their children to receive comprehensive sexuality education including condom use.[50]
Position of the Roman Catholic Church
The Catholic Church directly condemns only artificial birth control, and sexual acts aside from intercourse between married
heterosexual partners. The use of condoms to combat STDs is not specifically addressed by Catholic doctrine, and is currently a
topic of debate among high-ranking Catholic authorities. A few, such as Belgian Cardinal Godfried Danneels, believe the Catholic Church should actively support condoms used to prevent
disease, especially serious diseases such as AIDS. However, to date statements from the Vatican
have argued that condom-promotion programs encourage promiscuity, thereby actually increasing STD transmission.[51] Papal study of the issue is ongoing, and in 2006 a study on
the use of condoms to combat AIDS was prepared for review by Pope Benedict
XVI.[52]
Use in infertility treatment
Common procedures in infertility treatment such as semen
analysis and intrauterine insemination (IUI) require collection of semen
samples. These are most commonly obtained through masturbation, but an alternative to
masturbation is use of a special collection condom to collect sperm emissions during sexual intercourse.
Collection condoms are made from silicone or polyurethane, as latex is somewhat harmful to sperm. Many men prefer collection
condoms to masturbation. Also, compared to samples obtained from masturbation, semen samples from collection condoms have higher
total sperm counts, sperm motility, and percentage of sperm with normal morphology. For this reason, they are believed to give
more accurate results when used for semen analysis, and to improve the chances of pregnancy when used in procedures such as
IUI.[53]
The Catholic Church teaches that masturbation is immoral. For observant
Catholics, collection condoms are the only morally permissible way to obtain semen samples. Some devout Catholics put two or
three pinholes in the collection condom to avoid violating the Catholic prohibition on artificial birth control.[46]
Condom therapy is sometimes prescribed to infertile couples when the female has high levels of antisperm antibodies.
The theory is that preventing exposure to her partner's semen will lower her level of antisperm antibodies, and thus increase her
chances of pregnancy when condom therapy is discontinued. However, condom therapy has not been shown to increase subsequent
pregnancy rates.[54]
Prevalence
Open sales are encouraged in some jurisdictions
Condoms are more accessible in developed countries. In various cultures, a number
of social or economic factors make access to condoms prohibitive. In some cases, cultural beliefs may cause some persons to shun
condoms deliberately even when they are available.[55]
Furthermore, regardless of culture and availability, many men shun condoms simply because they dislike using them. This
dislike may be due to reduced sexual pleasure or to practical problems, e.g. difficulty in sustaining an erection hard enough for
effective condom use.
Because they are generally available without a prescription, and because they are very effective in reducing the spread of
sexually transmitted disease, condoms tend to be especially popular among
younger men, those who are not in exclusive partnerships, and newly-formed monogamous couples. Often, once a steady relationship
has deepened, the woman may begin to use hormonal or some other type of highly
effective contraceptive, at which time condom use typically (though not always) comes to
an end. Ideally, however, this should not occur until blood tests have shown both partners to be free of infection.
Most research has revealed, through survey, four factors which establish the minimal use of condoms: various encumbering
beliefs, reduced sexual pleasure, adverse experiences, and fears related to gender and tensions. New technology and beneficial
studies have come forth that combat these various factors, however only a small proportion of individuals world-wide actually
practice safe sex[2]. This noticeable gap has led several investigators to analyze whether
social factors might be involved such as a residual social
stigma attached to condoms.
In broad detail, social factors range from geographical location to race, and become as specified as methamphetamine versus
non-drug users, so correlations within this research are not always strong and accurate, but
it does establish that correlations do exist.
Geographic location
Several regions provide examples of social factors influencing the use of condoms within their populace. Two examples which
contrast the effects of similar problems are South Africa and rural Lebanon.
South Africa has some of the highest HIV rates in the world, so there the statistics on condom
use are being studied heavily. As of 2001, the 21-25 year age group has the peak rate of infection at 43.1%.[56] These studies became more specified
and it was discovered that despite all the information known today about HIV and the spread of infection, many young people of the study did not feel that they were in danger of contracting this disease. In fact, only 30% of
people, males and females, felt they had any risk of contracting HIV at all. Of those that said they felt there was any chance of
contracting HIV, only 12.9% thought there was a moderate chance, and 17.6% thought they had a good chance of infection. It seems that even though the youth of South Africa do have a relatively high level of knowledge
concerning the risk factors of getting HIV, many feel that it simply won't happen to them.
Many of the factors found in South Africa apply to well developed countries of the
world and these new findings hopefully will help shape future campaigns against decreased condom use in the future.
Another end of the spectrum are the rural areas of Lebanon in the Middle East. Generally,
the use of condoms and other forms of contraceptives in the Middle East is low even though
there is a growing awareness of sexually transmitted diseases and
HIV/AIDS.[57] A study revealed that only
twenty-four percent of the women in the regions ever used a condom. A household survey was also done on condom use which found
that ninety-eight percent of women had indeed heard of contraceptive methods, but only eighty-five percent of the women had heard
of condoms. Some things to keep in mind also are that women in this culture are not expected to have knowledge or express openly
knowledge of contraceptives or even sexuality. Also some background that is needed on the group surveyed is that the marital
fertility rate of the surveyed women were about five children per woman, and each
of the women had a different level of education. About sixty-one percent had intermediate-level education, twenty percent had a
primary education, and eighteen percent had trouble reading or could not read at all. This provides evidence that condom use
varies dependent on social factors like the area’s cultural background and education.
It should be noted that largely the variances in geographical location are highly affected by culture and cultural beliefs, as
well as class and race, but also have dynamic influences resounding from economic yield for the
area, use and expansion of communication, and other criteria. These social factors can
again be examined in South Africa and rural Lebanon:
An example is that in South Africa, it was discovered that condom availability is a problem for young adults.[56] Although condoms are given away by
local clinics, many participants stated that there are instances when they found themselves without condoms because they never
know when they are going to need one. Thus, this higher economic region has properly developed health services; they are just not
being properly utilized by the public.
Opposing in the lower economic region of rural Lebanon, another reason for the lack of condom use is that public health
services and family planning services are very inadequately developed. A health service that is trying to help is the Lebanese
Family Planning Association but their funding is very limited and recently they have not been able to increase its budget to
promote more complete reproductive health service.
Despite these specific social factors contributing to the differences between these regions and others, most research has
identified issues such as trust and gender power in relationships and others as socially relevant to almost all countries
worldwide.
Anti-condom trends
The analogy of "wearing a raincoat in a shower"[58]
describes, what is for many men, its anesthetic effect. A method to reduce this effect is to retract the foreskin as much as
possible while putting it on. Afterward, the condom will have wrinkles that allow the foreskin to move more during
intercourse.
Many have been married, and separated, and now have multiple sexual partners.[59] Several reasons for this choice are given. Since the women are no longer capable of conceiving
children, they do not see the large risk in not protecting themselves, and thus the importance of a condom becomes minimal. Also,
since many of them have just come out of a long term relationship, they are
starting over and they are too uncomfortable with their new partner to ask them to use a condom.
The practice of barebacking in Western gay culture is another example of a trend away from condoms. Barebacking
partners often know that they could reduce their risk of sexually transmitted infection by using a condom, but choose not to do
so.[60]
Laws and policies restricting condoms