n.
The branch of Judaism that allows for modifications in Jewish law when authorized by the Conservative rabbinate.
| Dictionary: Conservative Judaism |
The branch of Judaism that allows for modifications in Jewish law when authorized by the Conservative rabbinate.
| Britannica Concise Encyclopedia: Conservative Judaism |
For more information on Conservative Judaism, visit Britannica.com.
| Encyclopedia of Judaism: Conservative Judaism |
In the United States, this philosophy was carried forward by the Jewish Theological Seminary of America, founded in 1886 by a group of tradition-minded scholars and rabbis. Led by Sabato Morais of Philadelphia, they were opposed to the Reform movement's Pittsburgh Platform (1885), but did not feel part of East European Orthodoxy. Though as yet a minority group, they represented traditional congregations deeply rooted in American society. After the initial attempt to establish the Jewish Theological Seminary and unite all traditionalist elements had failed, the Seminary was reconstituted under the presidency of Solomon Schechter in 1902; it succeeded in halting the growth of Reform and in offering a viable alternative to Orthodoxy. Schechter, who built upon Frankel's work while criticizing its lack of a specific theological basis, shouldered the task of creating institutions that would meet the needs of a rapidly expanding American Jewish community. In 1913, he founded the United Synagogue as the movement's lay organization. Schechter then hoped that "historical Judaism" would encompass the major segments of observant Jewry, including moderate Orthodox groups. His concern was for "catholic Israel," i.e., the general body and "collective conscience" of the Jewish people, and for the retention of Jewish unity. Though impractical and unattainable, this vision did facilitate a wide range of diversity within the Conservative movement, making it less doctrinaire and ideological than the other groups. By bringing such outstanding scholars as Louis Ginzberg to America, Schechter reinforced the Seminary, enabling it to become one of the leading centers of Jewish scholarship in the Western world and the "fountainhead" of the Conservative movement.
For Schechter, the challenges to Judaism lay in the discovery of natural law and in greater scientific knowledge of Jewish texts, both of which undermined simple belief. The intellectual basis for the Conservative movement and its rabbis lay in the scholarly, historical understanding of Judaism as an organic structure capable of absorbing modern knowledge without radically changing its own nature. Where halakhic innovations were contemplated, not only did Conservatism take account of the ways in which the halakhah overtly functioned, it also sought to grasp what had actually happened in halakhic development---making explicit what had always been implicit. Its approach to Judaism might be described as holistic, seeking to preserve and maintain ritual and ethics, law and lore, belief and practice, universalism and nationalism.
This proved most suitable for large numbers of Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe who had abandoned Orthodoxy in the U.S. but who considered Reform Judaism to be alien and bereft of Jewish warmth. They accordingly felt at home in Conservative Judaism and transformed it into the largest American Jewish religious movement. What mattered to them was not so much this movement's intellectual base as its palpable authenticity, its esthetic improvements and moderate approach to religious practice, allowing them to feel comfortable belonging to a Conservative synagogue, regardless of their level of personal observance. The peak of rapid growth was reached after World War II. With Louis Finkelstein heading the Seminary (1940-72), the movement then proceeded to incorporate synagogues in the new suburban communities to which Jews were flocking, also opening a West Coast affiliate of the Seminary---the University of Judaism in Los Angeles (1947).
In this period, the Conservative movement grew rapidly and became the largest trend in American Judaism. Its rabbinical body, the Rabbinical Assembly, by now had rabbis serving on all continents, reflecting the growing international character of the movement. Similar expansion was recorded by its synagogue body, the United Synagogue of America. Innovative programming included the movement's own camping organization, Ramah, its junior affiliate, the United Synagogue Youth, regular radio ("Eternal Light") and TV ("Frontiers of Faith") programs, the Solomon Schechter Day Schools, and New York's Jewish Museum.
Within the movement, various ideological trends could be discerned, ranging from traditional positions that were close to Orthodoxy to radical views that were scarcely distinguishable from Reform. The Rabbinical Assembly's Committee on Jewish Law and Standards grappled with problems of interpretation of Jewish law but their decisions often aroused controversy within the movement, and considerable leeway was left to the individual congregations.
Finkelstein was succeeded as chancellor by Gerson D. Cohen (1972-85) under whom the more liberal elements grew stronger and far-reaching changes were introduced. Most noteworthy was the question of the role of Women in public worship and ritual. Already from 1955, women could be called to the Reading of the Law and from 1973, counted in a prayer quorum (Minyan). From 1983, women were admitted to rabbinical study and in 1985 the first woman rabbi was ordained. The issue threatened to split the movement and led to the organization of a minority right-wing group of rabbis and laymen. While separatist, they chose at first not to break away and remained active within the movement as the Union for Traditional Conservative Judaism. By 1990, though, this group seceded from the Conservative movement and is now known as the Union for Traditional Judaism, even opening its own rabbinical seminary (the Metivta).
The Rabbinical Assembly grew threefold in membership in the 30 years up to 1985, when it had 1,200 members, including many coming from Orthodox and Reform backgrounds. In an attempt to decentralize the synagogues, a proliferation of subgroups (e.g., the ḥavurah) emerged as an attempt to provide serious alternatives. A series of ambitious liturgical publications was issued including daily, Sabbath, and festival Prayer Books and a Haggadah. The trend continued into the new millennium with the publication in 2001 of the Etz Hayim Torah with essays and commentary by Conservative rabbis and scholars. Another innovative project started in late 1999 is the Perek Yomi, the reading of a daily Bible chapter on the model of the Orthodox
By the mid-1980s, however, a certain concern was felt over the fact that the movement was being overtaken in growth by the Orthodox on the one hand and the Reform on the other. This led to a decline in the percentage of Conservative Jews in the organized synagogue community, which stands in the year 2001 at nearly 40% of America's 2.8 million synagogue-affiliated Jews, worshiping in around 800 synagogues. Various contributory factors have been cited: Orthodoxy is no longer seen as an immigrant "Old World" manifestation and has adapted itself to the American scene, while the general swing towards fundamentalism has strengthened ultra-Orthodoxy. Major changes in Reform ideology---its attitude to Zionism and nationhood, its reassessment of ethnic practices and the restoration of certain rituals and the use of Hebrew---have blurred the lines between it and Conservatism. Already in the 1930s, the
The Conservative movement is the only movement in American Jewry that has maintained a consistently Zionist stand from its very inception. It was, however, slow in finding a place for itself in Israel, and its growth there did not keep pace with its development in the U.S. and Canada or in South America; the establishment by Marshall Meyer of a rabbinical school in Argentina, the Seminario Rabinico Latino-Americano (1962), gave new impetus to the movement's South American branch. Although a few Conservative synagogues and the American Student Center (Neveh Schechter) had existed in Israel prior to that time, it was not until the 1970s that efforts were made to create an actual movement in Israel and not until the 1980s were serious activities undertaken toward that goal. The Mesorati (i.e., Traditional) movement, as Conservatism is styled in Israel, has now established the basic institutions needed for growth, including the Seminary of Judaic Studies, a rabbinical school for Israelis opened in 1984, a youth movement (Noam), summer camps and schools, a kibbutz (Ḥanaton) and a moshav (Shorashim); and some 40 congregations. It was also responsible for the creation of a new traditional (but non-Orthodox) stream of education in Israel (Tali), which reflects the movement's basic ideology. However, despite these achievements, the movement in Israel remains comparatively small (see
In recent years, the Conservative rabbinate has moved further away from Orthodoxy, with a major move toward egalitarianism. This is evinced, for example, by the movement's allowing congregations to decide whether women are to be included in a prayer quorum and/or to be given aliyot, ordained as rabbis and accepted as cantors. Some fringe members of the movement have advocated (and in some cases performed) gay or lesbian marriages. There has also been a certain degree of pressure to follow the lead of the Reform movement and to allow the children of Jewish fathers and non-Jewish mothers (see
Conservative ideology may be summarized as follows:
1. Judaism is an amalgam of religion and ethnic nationhood which has evolved from biblical times down to the present day.
2. It is organized as a system of mitsvot embracing all human conduct and governing relationships between individuals and between individuals and God, whether ethical or ritual.
3. The process through which the ideals of Judaism are interpreted and made relevant to life is known as halakhah.
4. Halakhah is flexible enough to meet the needs of modern people when interpreted creatively by knowledgeable, committed rabbinic authorities.
5. There is room within halakhah for change and for different opinions.
6. The scientific, historical study of Judaism is a positive development which helps us to understand ourselves and to make Judaism as creative today as it was in the past.
Its commitment to the halakhic process and its affirmation of the importance of ritual distinguishes Conservative Judaism from Reform. Its commitment to the flexible, evolving nature of halakhah, to pluralism, and to open inquiry distinguishes it from Orthodoxy. The first official statement of Conservative principles was issued by the Mesorati movement in Israel (1986), various pamphlets having also been issued to explain the major points. Two years later, in 1988, the Rabbinical Assembly published a far more comprehensive statement on ideology, reflecting the concerns of the American movement and differing significantly from the Israeli document, especially in matters concerning the role of Israel in world Jewry.
| WordNet: Conservative Judaism |
The noun has 2 meanings:
Meaning #1:
Jews who keep some of the requirements of the Mosaic Law but allow for adaptation of other requirements (as some of the dietary laws) to fit modern circumstances
Meaning #2:
beliefs and practices of Conservative Jews
| Wikipedia: Conservative Judaism |
Conservative Judaism (also known as Masorti Judaism in Israel and Europe) is a modern stream of Judaism that arose out of intellectual currents in Germany in the mid-19th century and took institutional form in the United States in the early 1900s.
| Part of a series of articles on |
| Jews and Judaism |
| Who is a Jew? · Etymology · Culture |
|
|
|
Jews by country · Rabbis
Population comparisons Israel · United States · Russia
Lists of JewsIraq · Spain · Portugal · Italy Poland · Germany · Bosnia Latin America · France England · Netherlands · Canada Australia · Hungary · India Turkey · Greece · Africa Iran · China · Pakistan · Romania · |
|
Orthodox · Conservative
Reform · Reconstructionist Liberal · Karaite · Humanistic Renewal · Alternative |
|
Timeline · Leaders
Ancient · Temple Babylonian exile Hasmoneans · Sanhedrin Schisms · Pharisees Jewish-Roman wars Christianity and Judaism Islam and Judaism Diaspora · Middle Ages Sabbateans · Hasidism · Haskalah Emancipation · Holocaust · Aliyah Israel (history) Arab conflict · Land of Israel Baal teshuva · Persecution Antisemitism (history) |
The principles of Conservative Judaism include:[1]
Conservative Judaism has its roots in the school of thought known as Positive-Historical Judaism, developed in 1850s Germany as a reaction to the more liberal religious positions taken by Reform Judaism. The term conservative was meant to signify that Jews should attempt to conserve Jewish tradition, rather than reform or abandon it, and does not imply the movement's adherents are politically conservative. Because of this potential for confusion, a number of Conservative Rabbis have proposed renaming the movement[2], and outside of the United States and Canada, in many countries including Israel[3] and the UK[4], it is today known as Masorti Judaism (Hebrew for "Traditional").
The term Conservative Judaism doesn't refer to a narrowly defined movement or school of thought. Rather, it refers to a broad religious movement with an overlapping range of beliefs and practices that are more liberal than what is affirmed in Orthodoxy, and more traditional than what is affirmed in Reform.
This definition covers a wide range of groups and individual prayer communities outside of the formal Conservative movement.
The Conservative movement, more narrowly defined, refers to a specific religious group with a well-defined organizational structure, specifically the LCCJ, Leadership Council of Conservative Judaism, and any people affiliated with any of these organizations.
Conservative Jewish groups in the broader sense include Traditional-Egalitarian synagogues, and many non-movement affiliated synagogues, kehillot and chavurot, and any people affiliated with any of these organizations. [5], [6], [7]
Like Reform Judaism, the Conservative movement developed in Europe and the United States in the 1800s, as Jews reacted to the changes brought about by the Enlightenment and Jewish emancipation. In Europe the movement was known as Positive-Historical Judaism, and it is still known as "the historical school."
Positive-Historical Judaism, the intellectual forerunner to Conservative Judaism, was developed as a school of thought in the 1840s and 1850s in Germany. Its principal founder was Rabbi Zecharias Frankel, who had broken with the German Reform Judaism in 1845 over its rejection of the primacy of the Hebrew language in Jewish prayer and the rejection of the laws of kashrut. In 1854, Frankel became the head of the Jewish Theological Seminary of Breslau, Germany. At the seminary, Frankel taught that Jewish law was not static, but rather has always developed in response to changing conditions. He called his approach towards Judaism "Positive-Historical," which meant that one should have a positive attitude towards accepting Jewish law and tradition as normative, yet one should be open to developing the law in the same fashion that it has always historically developed. Frankel rejected the innovations of Reform Judaism as insufficiently based in Jewish history and communal practice. However, Frankel's use of modern methods of historical scholarship in analyzing Jewish texts and developing Jewish law set him apart from neo-Orthodox Judaism, which was concurrently developing under the leadership of Rabbi Samson Raphael Hirsch.
The Conservative coalition splintered in 1963, when advocates of the Reconstructionist philosophy of Mordecai Kaplan seceded from the movement to form a distinct Reconstructionist Judaism. Kaplan had been a leading figure at JTS for 54 years, and had pressed for liturgical reform and innovations in ritual practice from inside of the framework of Conservative Judaism. Frustrated by the perceived dominance of the more traditionalist voices at JTS, Kaplan's followers decided that the ideas of Reconstructionism would be better served through the creation of separate denomination. In 1968, the split became formalized with the establishment of the Reconstructionist Rabbinical College.
In the latter half of the 19th century, the debates occurring in German Judaism were replicated in America. Conservative Judaism in America similarly began as a reaction to Reform Judaism's rejection of traditional Jewish law and practice. The differences between the more modern and traditional branches of American Judaism came to a head in 1883, at the "Trefa Banquet" at the Highland House entertainment pavilion, which was at the top of the Mount Adams Incline[8][9] - where shellfish and other non-kosher dishes were served at the celebration of the first graduating class of Hebrew Union College in Cincinnati. The adoption of the radical Pittsburgh Platform in 1885, which dismissed observance of the ritual commandments and Jewish peoplehood as "anachronistic", created a permanent wedge between the Reform movement and more traditional American Jews.
Conservative Judaism has had a large impact on education in America. Many Conservative schools dot the United States. The Solomon Schechter day schools, including The Epstein School in Atlanta, Georgia, are an example.
In 1886, prominent Sephardi Rabbis Sabato Morais and H. Pereira Mendes founded the Jewish Theological Seminary (JTS) in New York City as a more traditional alternative to HUC. The Seminary's brief affiliation with the traditional congregations that established the Union of Orthodox Congregations in 1898 was severed due to the Orthodox rejection of the Seminary's academic approach to Jewish learning. At the turn of the century, the Seminary lacked a source of permanent funding and was ordaining on average no more than one rabbi per year.
The fortunes of Conservative Judaism underwent a dramatic turnaround when in 1902, the famed scholar Solomon Schechter accepted the invitation to become president of JTS. Under Schechter's leadership, JTS attracted a distinguished faculty and became a highly regarded center of Jewish learning. In 1913, the Conservative Movement founded its congregational arm, the United Synagogue of America.
Conservative Judaism enjoyed rapid growth in the first half of the 20th century, becoming the largest American Jewish denomination. Its combination of modern innovation (such as mixed gender seating) and traditional practice particularly appealed to first and second-generation Eastern European Jewish immigrants, who found Orthodoxy too restrictive, but Reform Judaism foreign. After World War II, Conservative Judaism continued to thrive. The 1950s and early 1960s featured a boom in synagogue construction as upwardly-mobile American Jews moved to the suburbs. Conservative Judaism occupied an enviable middle position during a period where American society prized consensus.
In the 1990s, the American Jewish University (formerly the University of Judaism) in Los Angeles established the Ziegler School of Rabbinic Studies as an independent rabbinical school.
In the 1970s and early 1980s, Conservative Judaism was divided over issues of gender equality. In 1973, the Committee on Jewish Law and Standards voted, without adopting an explanatory responsum, to permit synagogues to count women toward a minyan, but left the choice to individual congregations. After a further decade of debate, in 1983, JTS voted to admit women for ordination as Conservative rabbis, also without adopting an explanatory responsum. Some opponents of these decisions left the Conservative movement to form the Union for Traditional Judaism.
In 2002, the Committee adopted a responsum that provides an official religious-law foundation for its past actions and articulates the current Conservative approach to the role of women in Judaism.[10]
In December 2006, a responsum was adopted by the Committee that approved the ordination of gay and lesbian rabbis and permitted commitment ceremonies for lesbian and gay Jews (but not same-sex marriage), while maintaining the traditional prohibition against anal sex between men.[11] An opposing responsum, that maintained the traditional prohibitions against ordinations and commitment ceremonies, was also approved. Both responsa were enacted as majority opinions, with some members of the Committee voting for both. This result gives individual synagogues, rabbis, and rabbinical schools discretion to adopt either approach.[12]
Conservative congregations in Israel are increasing in popularity. Attendance has grown by as much as 40 percent over the last decade. In 2008, there are 52 congregations. Despite investing much time and effort the Conservative movement remains tiny, failing to draw Israelis. The members are overwhelmingly American immigrants. [13]
At the time of the 1990 National Jewish Population Survey, Conservative Judaism remained the largest denomination in America, with 43 percent of Jewish households affiliated with a synagogue belonging to Conservative synagogues (compared to 35 percent for Reform and 16 percent for Orthodox). In 2000, the NJPS showed that only 33 percent of synagogue-affiliated American Jews belonged to a Conservative synagogue. For the first time in nearly a century, Conservative Judaism is no longer the largest denomination in America. At the same time, however, certain Conservative institutions, particular day schools, have shown significant growth. Conservative leaders agree that these contrasting trends indicate that the movement has reached a crossroads as it heads into the 21st century.
The Jews leaving the Conservative movement move in three distinct directions. Some are joining Reform Judaism; a smaller but still significant fraction are joining Modern Orthodox congregations. Many people, however, are staying theologically and halakhically within Conservative Judaism, but have moved outside of the Conservative movement, creating their own traditional-egalitarian synagogues, and non-movement affiliated kehillot and chavurot.
It is precisely this last phenomenon which has led to the development of groups designed to address this issue: [14], [15],[16], [17]
| This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding reliable references. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (November 2008) |
In 1988, the Leadership Council of Conservative Judaism issued an official statement of belief, Emet Ve-Emunah: Statement of Principles of Conservative Judaism. Emet Ve-Emunah affirms belief in God and in the divine inspiration of the Torah; however, it also affirms the legitimacy of multiple interpretations of these issues. Atheism, Trinitarian views of God, and polytheism are ruled out. Conservative Judaism rejects both relativism and fundamentalism.
Conservative Judaism affirms monotheism. Its members have varied beliefs about the nature of God, and no one understanding of God is mandated. Among the beliefs affirmed are: Maimonidean rationalism; Kabbalistic mysticism; Hasidic panentheism (neo-Hasidism, Jewish Renewal); limited theism (as in Harold Kushner's When Bad Things Happen to Good People); and organic thinking in the fashion of Alfred North Whitehead and Charles Hartshorne, also known as process theology (such as Rabbis Max Kaddushin and William E. Kaufman).
Mordecai Kaplan's religious naturalism (Reconstructionist Judaism) used to have an influential place in the movement, but since Reconstructionism developed as an independent movement, this influence has waned. Papers from a recent Rabbinical Assembly conference on theology were printed in a special issue of the journal Conservative Judaism (Winter 1999); the editors note that Kaplan's naturalism seems to have dropped from the movement's radar screen.
Conservative Judaism allows its adherents to hold to a wide array of views on the subject of revelation. Many Conservative Jews reject the traditional Jewish idea that God literally dictated the words of the Torah to Moses at Mount Sinai in a verbal revelation, but they hold the traditional Jewish belief that God inspired the later prophets to write the rest of the Tanakh. Many Conservative Jews believe that Moses was inspired by God in the same manner as the later prophets.
Conservative Jews who reject the concept of verbal revelation believe that God revealed his will to Moses and other prophets in a non-verbal form — that is, God's revelation did not include the particular words of the divine texts.[18][19][20]
Conservative Judaism is comfortable with the higher criticism, including the documentary hypothesis, the theory that the Torah was redacted from several earlier sources. The movement's rabbinic authorities and its official Torah commentary (Etz Hayim: A Torah Commentary) affirm that Jews should make use of modern critical literary and historical analysis to understand how the Bible developed.
Concerning the degree of revelation of Torah, Conservative Judaism rejects the Orthodox position of a direct verbal revelation of the Torah. However, Conservative Judaism also rejects the Reform view, that the Torah was not revealed but divinely inspired.[citation needed] In contrast to both, most Conservative positions affirm the divine but nonverbal revelation of written Torah as the authentic, historically correct Jewish view. In this view, Oral Torah is considered inspired by Torah, but not necessarily of a straightforward divine origin.
Conservative Judaism views halakha (Jewish religious law) as normative and binding. Examining Jewish history and rabbinic literature through the lens of academic criticism, Conservative Judaism believes that halakha has always evolved to meet the changing realities of Jewish life, and that it must continue to do so in the modern age.
This view, together with Conservative Judaism's diversity of opinion concerning divine revelation, accounts for some of the diversity and disagreement in the Conservative movement's halakha. When considering changes to halakha, Conservative Judaism's rabbinical authorities may rely on historical analysis as well as religious considerations. As Solomon Schechter noted, "however great the literary value of a code may be, it does not invest it with infallibility, nor does it exempt it from the student or the Rabbi who makes use of it from the duty of examining each paragraph on its own merits, and subjecting it to the same rules of interpretation that were always applied to Tradition".[21]
Concerning interpretation of Halakha (or Jewish law): because of Judaism's legal tradition, the fundamental differences between modern Jewish denominations also involve the relevance, interpretation, and application of Jewish law and tradition. Conservative Judaism believes that its approach is the most authentic expression of Judaism as it was traditionally practiced. Conservative Jews believe that movements to its left, such as Reform and Reconstructionist Judaism, have erred by rejecting the traditional authority of Jewish law and tradition. They believe that the Orthodox Jewish movements, on the theological right, have erred by slowing down, or stopping, the historical development of Jewish law: "Conservative Judaism believes that scholarly study of Jewish texts indicates that Judaism has constantly been evolving to meet the needs of the Jewish people in varying circumstances, and that a central halakhic authority can continue the halakhic evolution today." (Soc. Culture. Jewish Usenet Newsgroup FAQ) The Conservative movement makes a conscious effort to use historical sources to determine what kind of changes to Jewish tradition have occurred, how and why they occurred, and in what historical context. With this information they believe that can better understand the proper way for rabbis to interpret and apply Jewish law to our conditions today. See also under Modern Orthodox Judaism.
Mordecai Waxman, a leading figure in the Rabbinical Assembly, writes that "Reform has asserted the right of interpretation but it rejected the authority of legal tradition. Orthodoxy has clung fast to the principle of authority, but has in our own and recent generations rejected the right to any but minor interpretations. The Conservative view is that both are necessary for a living Judaism. Accordingly, Conservative Judaism holds itself bound by the Jewish legal tradition, but asserts the right of its rabbinical body, acting as a whole, to interpret and to apply Jewish law." (Mordecai Waxman Tradition and Change: The Development of Conservative Judaism)
Conservative Judaism views the process by which Reform and Reconstructionist Judaism make changes to Jewish tradition as potentially invalid[citation needed]. Thus, Conservative Judaism rejects patrilineal descent and would hold that a child of a non-Jewish mother who was raised as a Reform or Reconstructionist Jew is not legally Jewish and would have to undergo conversion to become a Jew. The Conservative movement is committed to Jewish pluralism and respects the religious practices of Reform and Reconstructionist Jews. For example, the Conservative movement recognizes their clergy as rabbis, even if it does not necessarily accept their specific decisions.[citation needed]
Conservative Judaism accepts that the Orthodox approach to halakhah is generally valid. Accordingly, a Conservative Jew could usually satisfy their halakhic obligations by participation in Orthodox rituals. Occasionally, however, they may come into conflict. For instance, if two men and a woman were to eat a meal together, a Conservative Jew would believe that the presence of three adult Jews would obligate the group to say a communal form of the Grace After Meals, while an Orthodox Jew would believe that, lacking three adult Jewish males, the group would be forbidden to do such. Thus, though often de facto the case, Conservative Judaism's halakhic system does not inherently see Orthodox halakhic practice as acceptable and legitimate halakhic practice for a Conservative Jew.
Conservative Judaism maintains the Rabbinic understanding of Jewish identity: A Jew is someone who was born to a Jewish mother, or who converts to Judaism in accordance with Jewish law and tradition. Conservatism thus rejects patrilineal descent, which is accepted by the Reform movement. Conservative Rabbis are not allowed to perform intermarriages (marriages between Jews and non-Jews). However, the Leadership Council of Conservative Judaism has a different sociological approach to this issue than does Orthodoxy, although agreeing religiously. In a press release it has stated:[citation needed]
In the more limited sense of the term, Conservative Judaism is a unified movement; the international body of Conservative rabbis is the Rabbinical Assembly (RA), the organization of synagogues is the United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism (USCJ), and the primary seminaries are the Jewish Theological Seminary of America (JTS) in New York City and the Ziegler School of Rabbinic Studies at the American Jewish University (formerly the University of Judaism) in Los Angeles. Conservative Judaism outside the USA is often called Masorti Judaism; Masorti rabbis belong to the Rabbinical Assembly.[22]
Affiliated seminaries outside the USA include the Marshall Meyer Seminario Rabínico Latinoamericano in Argentina, and Machon Schechter (in Jerusalem.)
Many Jews both inside and outside of this formal Conservative movement identify Conservative Judaism as a worldview which is significantly larger than the USCJ and RA. Sociologically and religiously, there is social and religious overlap between the USCJ, the Union for Traditional Judaism, and much of the Chavurah movement.[citation needed] A growing number of congregations which are not affiliated, but which identify themselves as "post-denominational," practice traditional Judaism while emphasizing equal roles for women, for example as prayer leaders.[23] Rabbis trained at JTS and the Ziegler School often serve these synagogues and chavurot, and members of these synagogues and chavurot often pray at, or are members of, USCJ synagogues[citation needed].
Conservative Judaism has come under criticism from a variety of sources such as:
Orthodox Jewish leaders vary considerably in their dealings with the Conservative movement and with individual Conservative Jews. Some Modern Orthodox leaders cooperate and work with the Conservative movement, while haredi ("ultra-Orthodox") Jews often eschew formal contact with Conservative Judaism, or at least its rabbinate.[24] From the Orthodox perspective, Conservative Jews are considered just as Jewish as Orthodox Jews, but they are viewed as misguided, consistent violators of halakha.[25]
Over the years, Conservative Judaism has experienced internal criticism. Due to halakhic disputes, such as the controversies over the role of women and
In matters of marriage and divorce, the State of Israel relies on its Chief Rabbinate to determine who is Jewish; the Chief Rabbinate, following Orthodox practice, does not recognize the validity of conversions performed by Conservative rabbis and will require a Jew who was converted by a Conservative rabbi to undergo a second, Orthodox conversion to be regarded as a Jew for marriage and other purposes.
|
|||||||||||
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
| yarmulke | |
| Zecharias Frankel (Czech theologian) | |
| Rabbi Louis Finkelstein |
| What are differences between Conservative Judaism and Orthodox Judaism? Read answer... | |
| What are differences between Orthodox Hasidic Conservative Reconstructionist Reform and Humanistic Judaism? Read answer... | |
| Is DNA complementary base pairing are conservative semi conservative or un conservative? Read answer... |
| What event spurred the division of judaism into orthodox conservative and reform? | |
| What is the purpose of knowing whether DNA replication is conservative or semi-conservative? | |
| Is it true that people who are conservative on one issue are conservative on all other issues as well? |
Copyrights:
![]() | Dictionary. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright © 2007, 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2007. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Britannica Concise Encyclopedia. Britannica Concise Encyclopedia. © 2006 Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Encyclopedia of Judaism. The New Encyclopedia of Judaism. Copyright © 1989, 2002 by G.G. The Jerusalem Publishing House, Ltd. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | WordNet. WordNet 1.7.1 Copyright © 2001 by Princeton University. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Conservative Judaism". Read more |
Mentioned in