n.
A monarchy in which the powers of the ruler are restricted to those granted under the constitution and laws of the nation.
| Dictionary: constitutional monarchy |
A monarchy in which the powers of the ruler are restricted to those granted under the constitution and laws of the nation.
| 5min Related Video: constitutional monarchy |
| Britannica Concise Encyclopedia: constitutional monarchy |
For more information on constitutional monarchy, visit Britannica.com.
| Politics: constitutional monarchy |
A form of national government in which the power of the monarch (the king or queen) is restrained by a parliament, by law, or by custom. Several nations, especially in modern times, have passed from absolute monarchy to a constitutional monarchy, including Belgium, Britain, Denmark, The Netherlands, Norway, Spain, and Sweden.
| Wikipedia: Constitutional monarchy |
A constitutional monarchy is a form of government in which a monarch acts as head of state within the parameters of a written or unwritten constitution. It differs from absolute monarchy in that an absolute monarch serves as the sole source of political power in the state and is not legally bound by any constitution.
Most constitutional monarchies employ a parliamentary system in which the monarch is the ceremonial head of state and a directly- or indirectly-elected prime minister is the head of government and exercises effective political power. In the past, constitutional monarchs have co-existed with fascist and quasi-fascist constitutions (Fascist Italy, Francoist Spain) and with military dictatorships.
Contemporary constitutional monarchies include Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Japan, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Norway, Spain, Sweden, Thailand and the United Kingdom.
Contents |
In Britain, the Glorious Revolution of 1688 led to a constitutional monarchy restricted by laws such as the Bill of Rights 1689 and the Act of Settlement 1701, although limits on the power of the monarch ('A Limited Monarchy') are much older than that.
Constitutional monarchy occurred in continental Europe after the French revolution. General Napoleon Bonaparte is considered the first monarch proclaiming himself as embodiment of the nation, rather than as a divinely-appointed ruler; this interpretation of monarchy is basic to continental constitutional monarchies. G.W.F. Hegel, in Philosophy of Right (1820) justified it philosophically, according well with evolving contemporary political theory and with the Protestant Christian view of Natural Law. Hegel forecast a constitutional monarch of limited powers, whose function is embodying the national character and constitutional continuity in emergencies, per the development of constitutional monarchy in Europe and Japan. Moreover, the ceremonial office of president (e.g. European and Israeli parliamentary democracies), is a contemporary type of Hegel's constitutional monarch (whether elected or appointed), yet, his forecast of the form of government suitable to the modern world might be perceived as prophetic. The Russian and French presidents, with their stronger powers, might be Hegelian, wielding power suited to the national will embodied.
As originally conceived, a constitutional monarch was quite a powerful figure, head of the executive branch even though his or her power was limited by the constitution and the elected parliament. Some of the framers of the US Constitution may have conceived of the president as being an elected constitutional monarch, as the term was understood in their time, following Montesquieu's account of the separation of powers in the United Kingdom[1], it was the democratically elected parliaments, and their leader, the prime minister, who had become those who exercised power. In many cases even the monarchs themselves, while still at the very top of the political and social hierarchy, were given the status of "servants of the people" to reflect the new, egalitarian view.
In present terms, the difference between a parliamentary democracy that is a constitutional monarchy, and one that is a republic, is considered more a difference of detail than of substance, particularly in the common case in which the head of state serves the traditional role of embodying and representing the nation. This is reflected, for example, in all but the most die-hard Spanish Republicans accepting their country's returning to constitutional monarchy after the death of Francisco Franco.
Today constitutional monarchies are mostly associated with Western European countries such as the United Kingdom, The Netherlands, Belgium, Norway, Denmark, Spain, Luxembourg, Monaco, Liechtenstein, and Sweden. In such cases it is the prime minister who holds the day-to-day powers of governance, while the King or Queen (or other monarch, such as a Grand Duke, in the case of Luxembourg, or Prince in the case of Monaco and Liechtenstein) retains only minor to no powers. Different nations grant different powers to their monarchs. In the Netherlands, Denmark and in Belgium, for example, the Monarch formally appoints a representative to preside over the creation of a coalition government following a parliamentary election, while in Norway the King chairs special meetings of the cabinet. In nearly all cases, the monarch is still the nominal chief executive, but is bound by constitutional convention to act on the advice of the Cabinet. Only a few monarchies (most notably Japan and Sweden) have amended their constitutions so that the monarch is no longer even the nominal chief executive.
The most significant family of constitutional monarchies in the world today are the sixteen Commonwealth realms under Elizabeth II[2] . Unlike some of their continental European counterparts, the Monarch and her Governors-General in the Commonwealth Realms hold significant "reserve" or "prerogative" powers, to be wielded in times of extreme emergency or constitutional crises usually to uphold parliamentary government. An instance of a Governor General exercising his power was during the 1975 Australian constitutional crisis, when the Australian Prime Minister of the time, Gough Whitlam, was effectively fired from his position. This led to much speculation as to whether this use of the Governor General's reserve powers was appropriate, and whether Australia should become a republic.
In Thailand's constitutional monarchy, the monarch is recognized as the Head of State, Head of the Armed Forces, Upholder of the Buddhist Religion, and Defender of the Faith. The current King (King Bhumibol Adulyadej) is the longest reigning current monarch in the world and in all of Thailand's history.[3] King Bhumibol Adulyadej has reigned through several political changes in the Thai government. He has played an influential role in each incident, often times acting as mediator between disputing political opponents. (See King Bhumibol's role in Thai Politics.) While the monarch retains some powers from the constitution, most particular is Lèse majesté which protects the image and ability of the monarch to play a role in politics and carries modest criminal penalties for violators. Generally, the Thai people are reverent of King Bhumibol. Much of his social influence comes from that and the fact that the royal family is often involved in socio-economic improvement efforts.
In both the United Kingdom and elsewhere, a common debate centres around when it is appropriate for a monarch to use his or her political powers. When a monarch does act, political controversy can often ensue, partially because the neutrality of the crown is seen to be compromised in favour of a partisan goal. While political scientists may champion the idea of an "interventionist monarch" as a check against possible illegal action by politicians, the monarchs themselves are often driven by a more pragmatic sense of self-preservation, in which avoiding political controversy can be seen as an important way to retain public legitimacy and popularity.
There also exist today several federal constitutional monarchies. In these countries, each subdivision has a distinct government and head of government, but all subdivisions share a monarch who is head of state of the federation as a united whole. The latest country that was completely transformed from 'an absolute monarchy' to 'a constitutional democratic monarchy' is Bhutan.
NOTE: All the countries listed subsequent the United Kingdom are part of the same monarchy as the aforementioned country.
| State | Last constitution established | Type of monarchy | Monarch selected by |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1993 | Co-Principality | Selection of Bishop of La Seu d'Urgell and election of French President | |
| 2002 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1831 | Kingdom; popular monarchy[4] | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 2007 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession | |
| 1959 | Sultanate; Islamic absolute monarchy | Hereditary succession | |
| 1993 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1953 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1946 | Empire | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1952 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1962 | Emirate | Hereditary succession directed approval of al-Sabah family and majority of National Assembly | |
| 1993 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed approval of College of Chiefs | |
| 1862 | Principality | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1868 | Grand duchy | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1957 | Elective monarchy | Selected from nine hereditary Sultans of the Malay states | |
| 1911 | Principality | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1962 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1815 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1814 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1996 | Sultanate; Islamic absolute monarchy | Hereditary succession | |
| 2003 | Emirate; absolute monarchy | Hereditary succession | |
| 1992 | Kingdom; Islamic absolute monarchy | Hereditary succession | |
| 1978 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1968 | Kingdom; absolute monarchy | Hereditary succession | |
| 1974 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 2007 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1970 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1971 | Elective monarchy | Chosen by Federal Supreme Council from rulers of Abu Dhabi | |
| Theocratic elective monarchy | Chosen by College of Cardinals | ||
| 1688 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1981 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1901 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1973 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1966 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1981 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1982 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1974 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1962 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1907 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1975 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1983 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1979 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1979 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1978 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1978 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution |
Prior to the Korean Empire, several dynastic rulers of Goguryeo, Silla, Baekje, Balhae and Goryeo claimed the right to imperial status and used imperial titles at one time or another.
| This includes a list of references, related reading or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. Please improve this article by introducing more precise citations where appropriate. (August 2007) |
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
| Monaco (Geography) | |
| Grenada | |
| autocracy (Politics) |
Copyrights:
![]() | Dictionary. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright © 2007, 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2007. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Britannica Concise Encyclopedia. Britannica Concise Encyclopedia. © 2006 Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Politics. The New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy, Third Edition Edited by E.D. Hirsch, Jr., Joseph F. Kett, and James Trefil. Copyright © 2002 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Constitutional monarchy". Read more |
Mentioned in