A courtesy title is a form of address in systems of nobility used by children, former
wives and other close relatives of a peer. These styles may mislead those unacquainted with the system into thinking that they have
substantive titles. There are several different kinds of courtesy titles in the
British peerage.
The children of peers
Courtesy peers
If a peer of one of the top three ranks (a duke, marquess or
earl) has more than one title, his eldest son, not himself an actual peer, may use one
of his father's lesser titles 'by courtesy'. However, the father continues to be the substantive holder of the peerage title and
the son using the peerage by courtesy legally remains a commoner. If the eldest son of a duke
or marquess has an eldest son, he may use a still lower title if one exists.
For example, the Duke of Norfolk is also the Earl
of Arundel and the Lord Maltravers. His eldest son is therefore styled Earl of
Arundel. Lord Arundel's eldest son is styled Lord Maltravers. However, only the Duke of Norfolk is actually a peer; his son Lord
Arundel and his grandson Lord Maltravers remain commoners.
Courtesy peerages are only used by the peer's eldest son, and the eldest son's eldest son, and so forth. Other descendants are
not permitted to use the peer's subsidiary titles. Only the Heir
Apparent (and Heir Apparent to the Heir Apparent and so on) can use the titles. An Heir
Presumptive (e.g. a brother, nephew, or cousin) does not use a courtesy title, since there is no absolute certainty that
he will ever actually inherit the substantive title. However, Scottish practice allows the style 'Master/Mistress of X' to an heir presumptive as well as to an heir apparent.
The wives of courtesy peers are also entitled to courtesy titles, which are the female equivalents of their husbands' titles.
Thus, the wife of Earl of Arundel is styled Countess of Arundel. For the British peerage, written references to holders of
courtesy peerages are supposed to be in the form "Marquess of Blandford", "Earl of
Arundel", etc., i.e. without the preceding definite article ("The"); substantive peers are named with the article, e.g. "The
Marquess of Winchester", "The Earl of
Derby".
Choosing a courtesy peer's title
The actual title used is a matter of family tradition. For instance, the eldest son of the Duke of Buccleuch and Queensberry is styled Earl of
Dalkeith, even though the Duke is also the Marquess of Dumfriesshire, a title
which outranks the Earldom. Similarly, the eldest son of the Marquess of
Londonderry is styled Viscount Castlereagh, even though the
Marquess is also the Earl Vane.
Titles with the same name as a peer's main title are also not used as courtesy titles. For instance, the Duke of Westminster is also the Marquess of Westminster
and the Earl Grosvenor (amongst other titles). The Duke's eldest son is not styled
Marquess of Westminster (which would cause confusion between the son and the father), and so is styled Earl Grosvenor instead.
The title used does not have to be exactly equivalent to the actual peerage: the eldest son of the current Duke of Wellington is styled Marquess of
Douro, even though the actual peerage possessed by his father is Marquess Douro.
If a peer of the rank of Earl or above does not have any subsidiary titles of a name different from his main title, his eldest
son usually uses an invented courtesy title of "Lord Surname". For instance, the eldest son of the Earl of Devon is styled Lord Courtenay, even though the Earl has no
barony of that name, and similarly the eldest son of the Earl of Guilford is styled Lord North. The eldest
son of the Earl of Huntingdon, who has no subsidiary titles, is styled Viscount Hastings to avoid confusion with the substantive peer Lord
Hastings. The Earl Castle Stewart's heir uses the style Viscount
Stewart in order to avoid confusion with the Lord Stewart, eldest son of the Viscount Castlereagh, eldest son
of the Marquess of Londonderry. The Earl and the Marquess are both scions of the
House of Stewart.
Courtesy prefix of "Lord"
Another form of courtesy title, is the addition of the honorific prefix of "Lord" before
the name. This is granted to younger sons of Dukes and Marquesses. The courtesy title is added before the person's name, as in
the example of Lord Randolph Churchill. The title persists after the death of
the holder's father, but it may not be inherited by his children. The wife of the holder is entitled to her own courtesy title,
which takes the form of "Lady", followed by her husband's name, as in the example of Lady
Randolph Churchill. The holder is addressed as "Lord Randolph" and his wife as "Lady Randolph".
Courtesy prefix of "Lady"
The addition of the honorific prefix of "The Lady" is granted to the daughters of Dukes,
Marquesses and Earls. The courtesy title is added before the person's name, as in the example The Lady Diana Spencer. The title persists after the death of the holder's father but it may
not be inherited by her children. The husband of the holder is not entitled to a courtesy title. The holder is addressed as "The
Lady Diana".
Courtesy prefix of "The Honourable"
The younger sons of earls, along with the sons and daughters of Viscounts and
Barons are granted the courtesy title of "The Honourable"
before their name. This is usually abbreviated to "The Hon." The title persists after the death of the holder's father, but it
may not be inherited by the holder's children.
Married daughters
The daughter of a duke, marquess, or earl who marries a commoner becomes "The Lady first name husband's last name". The
daughter of a viscount or baron who marries a commoner becomes "The Honourable Mrs. husband's last name". If she marries a
peer, she gains the courtesy title as that peer's wife.
If a woman marries an Honourable, and holds no higher title, she will become "The Honourable Mrs. husband's first name
husband's last name." If a woman marries a Lord, she will become "The Lady husband's first name husband's last
name." In case of a divorce, she will keep the same style as during her marriage, or she may choose to assume the style "Mrs.
first name husband's last name." Regardless of what she chooses, she loses all precedence she attained from
marriage. Because of the former option, there can be multiple Lady John Smiths.
Adopted children
Until 2004 adopted children of peers had no right to any courtesy title. However as a result of a Royal Warrant dated
30 April 2004 adopted children are now automatically entitled to
such styles and courtesy titles as their siblings. However, as with illegitimate children where legitimised, such children have
no rights to inheritance of peerages. [Note - Scottish peerages rules of descent differ.]
| Peer |
Wife |
Eldest Son |
Younger Son |
Unmarried Daughter |
| Duke |
Duchess |
Father's Subsidiary Title |
Lord Firstname Lastname |
Lady Firstname Lastname |
| Marquess |
Marchioness |
Father's Subsidiary Title |
Lord Firstname Lastname |
Lady Firstname Lastname |
| Earl |
Countess |
Father's Subsidiary Title |
The Honourable Firstname Lastname |
Lady Firstname Lastname |
| Viscount |
Viscountess |
The Honourable Firstname Lastname |
The Honourable Firstname Lastname |
The Honourable Firstname Lastname |
| Baron |
Baroness |
The Honourable Firstname Lastname |
The Honourable Firstname Lastname |
The Honourable Firstname Lastname |
Indirect inheritance
Occasionally a peer has inherited the title upon the death of a relative who is not one of his parents. (Some say it is
incorrect in this case to say the title is inherited from the relative, merely on the death of the relative - since
when a peer has no direct descendants, the peerage moves to the second heir of the previous holder (or his heirs), failing that
to the second heir of the holder before that (or his heirs), and so in a recursive fashion).
When this happens, the relatives in the direct line to the new peer may be allowed to use courtesy titles appropriate to their
relationship to that peer or prior heirs. For instance, Rupert Charles
Ponsonby, 7th Baron de Mauley inherited the Barony of de Mauley from his uncle in 2002. His
brother Ashley had no title, as their father was only an Honourable and was never actually Baron de Mauley. However, in
2003, Ashley was granted by Warrant of Precedence from
Queen Elizabeth II the style and precedence that would have been his
had his father survived to inherit the barony, becoming The Honourable Ashley Ponsonby. Precedence in such circumstances
is usually granted but is not automatic.
The wives of peers
The wives of courtesy peers hold their titles on the same basis as their husbands, i.e. by courtesy. Thus the wife of Marquess
Douro is known as Marchioness Douro.
In contrast, the wife of a substantive peer is legally entitled to the privileges of peerage: she is said to have a "life
estate" in her husband's dignity. Thus a duke's wife is titled a "duchess", a marquess's wife a
"marchioness", an earl's wife a "countess", a viscount's wife
a "viscountess" and a baron's wife a "baroness". Despite
being referred to as a "peeress", she is not a peer "in her own right": this is a 'style' and not a substantive title. However,
this is considered a legal title, unlike the social titles of a peer's children.
It is also possible for a woman to be a substantive peer in her own right, by succession or by first creation (i.e.
ennoblement, most commonly in recent times under the Life Peerages Act 1958). Her
children use courtesy titles according to her rank, as with the children of male peers, but her husband receives no special
distinction. Thus the husband of Baroness Bottomley of Nettlestone is called
Peter Bottomley and has no courtesy title.
Divorced wives
A peeress loses her legal right to the peerage style following divorce. A convention has developed whereby her Christian name
is added in front of her former title to distinguish her from subsequent wives of her husband. Hence, "Her Grace The Duchess of
London" becomes "Mary, Duchess of London,". She is not entitled to the use of the address "Your Grace" (now virtually obsolete)
but again by convention, she may be addresseed as "Duchess" or "Your Grace". "The Rt Hon. The Lady London" becomes "Mary, Lady
London" and may be addressed as "Lady London," or "My Lady". It is a matter of courtesy, and of convention.
Divorced wives who remarry
A divorced peeress's right to the title and dignities of peerage does not end if she subsequently marries a commoner. She may
retain the title by courtesy.[1]
It is customary for women with higher titles from one marriage to retain them even on subsequent remarriage. As Lord
Macnaughten put it in the case of Earl Cowley v Countess Cowley [1901] AC 450: "...everybody knows that it is a very
common practice for peeresses (not being peeresses in their own right) after marrying commoners to retain the title lost by such
marriage. It is not a matter of right. It is merely a matter of courtesy, and allowed by the usages of society." The divorce
court, in the above case, granted the earl an injunction preventing his wife from using his title; however this was overturned by
the Court of Appeal, whose decision was confirmed by the
House of Lords, on the grounds that ordinary courts of law lacked any jurisdiction in
matters of honour.
The same practice was followed by widows who remarried. A prominent example was Catherine
Parr, the last wife of Henry VIII, who continued to be known as Queen even
after her marriage to Lord Seymour of Sudeley (and, indeed, she disputed precedence with the wife of her brother-in-law the Duke
of Somerset on this basis).
This usage died out later in the twentieth century, and women who remarry now ordinarily take a new married name and do not
retain their former title. However, they may choose to continue use of the courtesy title per Cowley v. Cowley.
Widows
If a peer dies, his wife's style does not change unless the new peer is married. If he is married, traditionally the widowed
peeress puts "Dowager" in her style, i.e. "The Most Hon. The Marchioness of London" becomes "The
Most Hon. The Dowager Marchioness of London."
If a widowed peeress's son predeceases her, her daughter-in-law may not use the title of Dowager and must be styled, e.g. "The
Most Hon. Mary, Marchioness of London", until her mother-in-law dies, at which point she may use the title of Dowager. In more
recent times, due to negative connotations of the word "Dowager," many widows choose to be styled with their Christian names,
instead of as Dowager.
Civil partners
If a peer or knight enters into a civil partnership, his or
her partner is not entitled to a courtesy title. [2]
Precedence status of courtesy titles
The courtesy titles of children of peers are social, not legal. For this reason, in official documents, Lord John Smith is
often referred to as John Smith, Esq., commonly called Lord John Smith; The Hon. Mrs. Smith would be called Mary Jane,
Mrs. Smith, commonly called The Hon. Mary Jane Smith. However, there is legal precedence that results from being the wife or child of a peer, even though the
styles of the latter are merely social. The wives of peers are peeresses and rank exactly the same as peeresses in their own
right.
Children of peers can outrank certain actual peers. For instance, the daughter of a Duke outranks a Countess. However, if the
daughter of a Duke marries an Earl, she actually drops to the rank of Countess. But, if that same daughter marries a commoner,
she retains her rank. If that daughter marries the eldest son of an Earl, though he may be a courtesy peer, she may keep her rank
until the son inherits the Earldom, when she must drop to the rank of Countess.
Notes
- ^ Earl of Cowley v. Countess of Cowley [1901] A.C. 450
- ^ "The Queen herself knighted Sir Elton John, so his new bride would normally
be called a lady. Would David Furnish be called Laddie? No chance, says the palace. It called the question "interesting," but
passed the buck to the government."- http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0512/20/sbt.01.html
References
- Montague-Smith, P. (editor). (1979). Debrett's Peerage and Baronetage
See also
External links
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)