Alternative name for variance-covariance matrix.
| Statistics Dictionary: covariance matrix |
| 5min Related Video: Covariance matrix |
| Wikipedia: Covariance matrix |
In statistics and probability theory, the covariance matrix or dispersion matrix is a matrix of covariances between elements of a random vector. It is the natural generalization to higher dimensions of the concept of the variance of a scalar-valued random variable.
Contents |
If entries in the column vector

are random variables, each with finite variance, then the covariance matrix Σ is the matrix whose (i, j) entry is the covariance

where

is the expected value of the ith entry in the vector X. In other words, we have
![\Sigma
= \begin{bmatrix}
\mathrm{E}[(X_1 - \mu_1)(X_1 - \mu_1)] & \mathrm{E}[(X_1 - \mu_1)(X_2 - \mu_2)] & \cdots & \mathrm{E}[(X_1 - \mu_1)(X_n - \mu_n)] \\ \\
\mathrm{E}[(X_2 - \mu_2)(X_1 - \mu_1)] & \mathrm{E}[(X_2 - \mu_2)(X_2 - \mu_2)] & \cdots & \mathrm{E}[(X_2 - \mu_2)(X_n - \mu_n)] \\ \\
\vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ \\
\mathrm{E}[(X_n - \mu_n)(X_1 - \mu_1)] & \mathrm{E}[(X_n - \mu_n)(X_2 - \mu_2)] & \cdots & \mathrm{E}[(X_n - \mu_n)(X_n - \mu_n)]
\end{bmatrix}.](http://wpcontent.answers.com/math/5/8/5/58572fa5b05e778f5a5eff9ec1b3ddb6.png)
The inverse of this matrix, Σ − 1, is called the inverse covariance matrix, concentration matrix or precision matrix.[1] The elements of the precision matrix have an interpretation in terms of partial correlations and partial variances.
The definition above is equivalent to the matrix equality
![\Sigma=\mathrm{E}
\left[
\left(
\textbf{X} - \mathrm{E}[\textbf{X}]
\right)
\left(
\textbf{X} - \mathrm{E}[\textbf{X}]
\right)^\top
\right]](http://wpcontent.answers.com/math/1/8/1/1811f942680a72974597be42c28d31d2.png)
This form can be seen as a generalization of the scalar-valued variance to higher dimensions. Recall that for a scalar-valued random variable X
![\sigma^2 = \mathrm{var}(X)
= \mathrm{E}[(X-\mu)^2], \,](http://wpcontent.answers.com/math/3/c/6/3c62f04e5ee373e5776087205ac06ca9.png)
where

Nomenclatures differ. Some statisticians, following the probabilist William Feller, call this matrix the variance of the random vector X, because it is the natural generalization to higher dimensions of the 1-dimensional variance. Others call it the covariance matrix, because it is the matrix of covariances between the scalar components of the vector X. Thus
![\operatorname{var}(\textbf{X})
=
\operatorname{cov}(\textbf{X})
=
\mathrm{E}
\left[
(\textbf{X} - \mathrm{E} [\textbf{X}])
(\textbf{X} - \mathrm{E} [\textbf{X}])^\top
\right].](http://wpcontent.answers.com/math/f/8/c/f8cb85080acf88e54c194ad48bab8527.png)
However, the notation for the cross-covariance between two vectors is standard:
![\operatorname{cov}(\textbf{X},\textbf{Y})
=
\mathrm{E}
\left[
(\textbf{X} - \mathrm{E}[\textbf{X}])
(\textbf{Y} - \mathrm{E}[\textbf{Y}])^\top
\right].](http://wpcontent.answers.com/math/5/3/9/5393cfe54a257747ea8335e92d4ce5ee.png)
The var notation is found in William Feller's two-volume book An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, but both forms are quite standard and there is no ambiguity between them.
The matrix Σ is also often called the variance-covariance matrix since the diagonal terms are in fact variances.
For
and
, where X is a random p-dimensional variable and Y a random q-dimensional variable, the following basic properties apply:

is positive semi-definite




and
are independent, then 
where
and
are random p×1 vectors,
is a random q×1 vector,
is q×1 vector,
and
are q×p matrices.
This covariance matrix is a useful tool in many different areas. From it a transformation matrix can be derived that allows one to completely decorrelate the data or, from a different point of view, to find an optimal basis for representing the data in a compact way (see Rayleigh quotient for a formal proof and additional properties of covariance matrices). This is called principal components analysis (PCA) and Karhunen-Loève transform (KL-transform).
Applied to one vector, the covariance matrix maps a linear combination, c, of the random variables, X, onto a vector of covariances with those variables:
. Treated as a 2-form, it yields the covariance between the two linear combinations:
. The variance of a linear combination is then
, its covariance with itself.
Similarly, the (pseudo-)inverse covariance matrix provides an inner product,
which induces the Mahalanobis distance, a measure of the "unlikelihood" of c.
From the identity just above (let
be a
real-valued vector)

the fact that the variance of any real-valued random variable is nonnegative, and the symmetry of the covariance matrix's definition it follows that only a positive semi-definite symmetric matrix can be a covariance matrix. The answer to the converse question, whether every positive semi-definite symmetric matrix is a covariance matrix, is "yes." To see this, suppose M is a p×p nonnegative-definite symmetric matrix. From the finite-dimensional case of the spectral theorem, it follows that M has a nonnegative symmetric square root, which let us call M1/2. Let
be any p×1 column vector-valued random variable whose covariance matrix is the p×p identity matrix. Then

In some applications (e.g. building data models from only partially observed data) one wants to find the “nearest” covariance matrix to a given symmetric matrix (e.g. of observed covariances). In 2002, Higham[2] formalized the notion of nearness using a weighted Frobenius norm and provided a method for computing the nearest covariance matrix.
The variance of a complex scalar-valued random variable with expected value μ is conventionally defined using complex conjugation:
![\operatorname{var}(z)
=
\operatorname{E}
\left[
(z-\mu)(z-\mu)^{*}
\right]](http://wpcontent.answers.com/math/4/d/b/4db5552832ee20b19f0ef057887f2162.png)
where the complex conjugate of a complex number z is denoted z * ; thus the variance of a complex number is a real number.
If Z is a column-vector of complex-valued random variables, then we take the conjugate transpose by both transposing and conjugating, getting a square matrix:
![\operatorname{E}
\left[
(Z-\mu)(Z-\mu)^{*}
\right]](http://wpcontent.answers.com/math/f/e/6/fe608f7ac94446dffb6af34289617255.png)
where Z * denotes the conjugate transpose, which is applicable to the scalar case since the transpose of a scalar is still a scalar. The matrix so obtained will be Hermitian positive definite, with real numbers in the main diagonal and complex numbers off-diagonal.
The derivation of the maximum-likelihood estimator of the covariance matrix of a multivariate normal distribution is perhaps surprisingly subtle. See estimation of covariance matrices.
The probability density function of a set of n correlated random variables, the joint probability function of which is a n-order Gaussian vector, is given on the Maximum likelihood page.
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
| Best of the Web: Covariance matrix |
Some good "Covariance matrix" pages on the web:
Math mathworld.wolfram.com |
| Bartlett's test for eigenvalues | |
| Hotelling T2 | |
| Mahalanobis D2 |
Copyrights:
![]() | Statistics Dictionary. A Dictionary of Statistics. Second edition revised. Copyright © Oxford University Press, 2008. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Covariance matrix". Read more |