Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Answers.com

Crimean War

 
 

Philip Guedalla called it ‘one of the bad jokes of history’, and the war's immediate cause, a dispute between Orthodox and Roman Catholic monks in Jerusalem, part of the Turkish empire, certainly had an element of farce. Wider causes were more serious. Turkey was in decline, and Russian ambitions alarmed both France, whose Napoleon III favoured a forward foreign policy, and Britain, committed to preserving Turkish authority. In March 1853 the Turkish government, its resolve stiffened by the British ambassador, declined an ultimatum demanding that the Orthodox Church in Turkey should be placed under Russian protection. The Russians occupied the Danubian principalities, and when they refused to withdraw Turkey declared war. On 30 November a Turkish squadron was destroyed at Sinope in the Black Sea, and this helped push Britain and France towards war, which was declared in March 1854.

The Crimean war, 1853-6: the overall strategic situation (Click to enlarge)
The Crimean war, 1853-6: the overall strategic situation
(Click to enlarge)


The Crimean war, 1853-6: main theatres. The Baltic (top) ; the Crimea (bottom left) ; the Caucasus (bottom right). (Click to enlarge)
The Crimean war, 1853-6: main theatres. The Baltic (top) ; the Crimea (bottom left) ; the Caucasus (bottom right).
(Click to enlarge)


Britain and France both sent expeditionary forces to the east, the former under FM Lord Raglan, a confidant of the late Duke of Wellington, and the latter under Marshal St Arnaud. It was once argued that the British army had atrophied in the long peace following Waterloo, but Hew Strachan has demonstrated that ‘On many levels the British army was either being reformed or, more pertinently, reforming itself, in the period 1830 to 1854.’ However, there remained areas of weakness. Raglan had some 26, 000 men, many of them raw recruits, and no reserves. Transport and supply were ill-suited to a distant campaign in bleak and unproductive terrain, and army administration was chaotically decentralized. Raglan's force comprised five infantry divisions (four commanded by Peninsular veterans aged between 60 and 70) and Lord Lucan's cavalry division, its light brigade under Lord Cardigan and its heavy brigade under Sir James Scarlett. The French had gained experience during their conquest of Algeria, and their first contingent of four infantry divisions and two cavalry brigades (about 40, 000 men) included many units from North Africa. As the war went the French were to send another seven infantry divisions: 50 of the 100 line infantry regiments served in the east. This imposed a serious strain on the French army, but the French contingent was larger, and in many respects more efficient, than the British. The Russian army loomed large in the mind of Tsar Nicholas I: in the 1820s he spend about three-quarters of his day on military matters. Its hardy but brutalized soldiers had beaten Persians, Turks, and Poles, but it was unimaginatively trained and lacked an experienced general staff. Although it had a total regular and reserve strength of perhaps 1, 400, 000 men, it was wholly unprepared for modern war. When Nicholas ordered it to enter the Danubian principalities on 2 July 1853 he was committing it to a task for which it was unfitted: it made heavy weather against the Turks, and laid siege to the Turkish fortress of Silistria, on the Danube.

As the Allies concentrated, first at Scutari, near Constantinople, and then at Varna, on the western coast of the Black Sea, the war seemed to be going badly for Russia. Silistria, its defence stiffened by some British officers, held out, and the Russians, their ranks thinned by cholera, withdrew from the Danubian principalities, depriving the Allies of a target. The British government believed that the Russian naval base of Sevastopol should now be attacked, and ordered Raglan to take it unless he felt the task to be impossible. Accordingly the Allies sailed for the Crimea, and landed at Calamita Bay, north of Sevastopol, on 14 September. The Russian commander, Prince Menshikov, had not believed that the Allies would invade, and when they did so he prepared to receive them inland, with more than 35, 000 men in a strong position on the river Alma. The British spent two nights without tents, and when they were eventually ready to advance too few wagons had been commandeered for their baggage and the men, many of them sick, were heavily laden.

The Allies set off on 19 September, about 60, 000 strong, with the British on the left and the French on the right. Some men dropped with cholera on the march, and even the fit found the advance exhausting. There was a cavalry skirmish on the little river Bulganak, and the Allies spent the night in the field, aware that Menshikov was in position on the Alma. Raglan and St Arnaud agreed that night that the French would attack the high ground on the Russian left, which St Arnaud believed to be strongly held, while the British swept round the Russian right.

The battle began at about 13.30, and it became clear that the British were facing the main Russian positions, where two redoubts—the Great and the Lesser—covered the slopes leading down to the river. Obedient to the Allied plan the French attacked first, enabling the Russians to shift some of their guns to rake them, provoking demands that the British should attack. The Russians fired the village of Bourliouk as the British advanced, causing some confusion, but the attackers were soon across the Alma and on their way up the slopes behind it. Cannon fire from the Great Redoubt caused casualties, but the guns were withdrawn prematurely, and the Light and 2nd Divisions, drawn up in line, then became involved in a firefight against Russian columns. Some British regiments gave ground against counter-attacks, but the 1st Division came up, and its Guards and Highlanders pushed back the Russians, who withdrew in good order; Raglan declined to unleash his cavalry against them. Some Russian combatants blamed their defeat on lack of orders. One wrote that ‘During the five hours of fighting we neither saw nor heard from our divisional general, our brigade or regimental commanders, nor did we receive any orders to advance or retire.’ Another shrewdly observed that the rifles carried by most Allied infantry were far more effective than the muskets carried by the majority of Russians. The Allies had lost over 3, 000 casualties and the Russians more than 5, 000. The Allies might have mounted an immediate attack on Sevastopol, whose defences were incomplete, but St Arnaud, who was mortally ill, was not enthusiastic. Instead they marched around the city, establishing themselves on the uplands to its south, supplied through the little ports of Kamiech and Balaklava.

Raglan and Canrobert, the new French commander, agreed to bombard Sevastopol before mounting an attack. Heavy guns were landed and batteries prepared, and on 17 October the bombardment began. British and French warships, standing inshore to take on the forts, were badly knocked about, and although the land bombardment seemed more promising, it too was strenuously opposed. The defenders, many of them sailors, were inspired by Adm Kornilov, who was mortally wounded on 17 October, and Col Todleben, an engineer officer sent down to assist Menshikov, played a leading part in repairing damaged defences and building new ones. The Allied rear, where the Woronzoff road ran eastwards, was secured by a number of Turkish-manned redoubts. Suspicions that the Menshikov's field army, which had slipped away from Sevastopol and been reinforced by fresh troops marching down from Bessarabia, might approach from this quarter led to frequent alarms. On 25 October about 25, 000 Russians advanced from the east, taking the redoubts and sending a force towards Balaclava, whose capture was probably Menshikov's objective. It was checked by the Thin Red Line of the 93rd Highlanders, and Scarlett's Heavy Brigade successfully charged Russian cavalry north of Balaclava. Raglan's order to the Light Brigade, intended to prevent the Russians from taking guns from the captured redoubts, was misunderstood. Raglan and his QMG Airey, who drew up the loosely worded order, were on high ground with a good view of the field, but failed to appreciate that commanders in the valleys below would see less. Capt Nolan, an impetuous ADC, delivered the order to Lucan, commanding the cavalry division, and the latter sent him on to Cardigan. The personal feud between their lordships and Nolan's provocative insolence did the rest. Cardigan was presented with a formal order to attack the only guns visible to him, a battery at the end of a shallow valley with riflemen around it and cavalry in support. In the ensuing charge the Light Brigade took the battery but could not hold it, and had 247 of its 670 officers and men killed or wounded. French Chasseurs d'Afrique carried out a well-executed charge to help the survivors withdraw. The day after Balaclava the Russians mounted a sortie from Sevastopol against British lines on the complex series of ridges where the river Chernaia entered Sevastopol harbour. ‘Little Inkerman’ failed, but it provided the Russians with useful information, and 5 November they launched a much bigger attack, with 20, 000 men advancing from Sevastopol while 16, 000 from the field army crossed the Chernaia to attack the British from the east and another 22, 000 men swung south to threaten the French. The battle of Inkerman was fought on difficult ground in thick fog. It was decided by the dogged determination of the British defenders, supported, as the day went on, by the French. ‘The French are saving the English at Inkerman, ’ commented a bitter Russian officer, ‘as the Prussians did at Waterloo.’ Its results were terrible: the hardened Gen Bosquet described the much fought-over Sand Bag Battery as an abattoir. The British lost 2, 500 men, the French 1, 700, and the Russians perhaps 12, 000. After Inkerman, Menshikov, deeply unpopular with his subordinates, was replaced by Prince Gorchakov, who struck many of them as scarcely an improvement. Adm Nakhimov was the soul of Sevastopol's defence: morose and fatalistic, alone among the garrison's officers he still wore his gold epaulettes.

The Allies spent an uncomfortable winter before Sevastopol, and growing concerns about the British army's inadequate administration provoked attacks on Raglan in both press and parliament, although opinion in the army was more evenly divided. Keenly sensitive to these insults, Raglan had to grapple with a French command whose sense of purpose seemed infirm. On 16 May Canrobert, exasperated by order and counter-order over the telegraph from Paris, resigned command and was replaced by the hard-driving Pélissier. Things improved at once. Kerch, at the eastern end of the Crimea, was taken by an Allied force which did much damage and opened the way into the Sea of Azov, destroying the Russian naval squadron there: Andrew Lambert calls the episode ‘amongst the finest achievements of the war’.

On land, Raglan and Pélissier agreed to attack two of Sevastopol's outwork, the Quarries, in the British sector, and the Mamelon, in the French, as a prelude to the assault on the Great Redan and the Malakoff. The Quarries and the Mamelon were duly taken on 7 June. However, ten days later the British were repulsed from the Redan with the loss of 1, 500 men. The repulse greatly cheered the Russian defenders, but the gallant Nakhimov was mortally wounded. Raglan died on 28 June: his most recent biographer blames a broken heart. The Russian field army made a last attack at the Chernaia on 16 August. On 8 September Raglan's successor, Gen Simpson, attacked the Redan again, sustaining almost 2, 500 casualties. But the French stormed the Malakoff that morning, and Sevastopol was untenable: the Russians withdrew on the night of 8-9 September.

Although the Crimea was the war's main theatre, the Allies also sent support to Shamyl, whose Muslim zealots were fighting the Russians in the Caucasus, and embarked upon a more ambitious strategy in the Baltic. The French first approached the Swedes, offering an alliance which was rejected, although there were suggestions that a substantial subsidy might draw Sweden into the war. It then seemed likely that Sweden would join the Allies only if Austria did, and in March 1854 the Allies launched a Baltic campaign on their own. After a succession of problems which mirrored, on a smaller scale, those in the Crimea, the Allies attacked the fortress of Bomarsund, on the Aland islands, quickly knocking it into submission. Plans for an attack on Sveaborg, on the Finnish coast, were aborted in a flurry of mutual recrimination, and the main Allied squadrons withdrew, though they maintained a blockade for the remainder of the war. The British commander, the brave but headstrong V Adm Sir Charles Napier, complained bitterly that he had been unfairly treated by Sir James Graham, first Lord of the Admiralty, and post-war bickering reflected the tensions of this ill-starred campaign.

Nicholas I had died early in 1855, leading to hopes that his successor Alexander II would agree to peace terms. The loss of Sevastopol, a renewed demonstration of Allied amphibious strength by the capture of Kinburn on the coast of mainland Russia, and Austria's threat to enter the war eventually proved decisive, and peace was concluded in Paris in 1856. The neutralization of the Black Sea was a blow to Russian expansionism, and the Danubian principalities speedily became the autonomous Romania. Troops from the Italian state of Piedmont had served with the Allies, gaining her a place at the negotiating table and marking the first step towards the Franco-Austrian war of 1859. The war underlined the British army's administrative weaknesses, and accelerated reform.

Bibliography

  • Guedalla, Philip, The Two Marshals: Bazaine, Pétain (London, 1943).
  • Hibbert, Christopher, The Destruction of Lord Raglan (London, 1961).
  • Lambert, Andrew D., The Crimean War: British Grand Strategy against Russia (Manchester, 1990).
  • Seaton, Albert, The Crimean War: A Russian Chronicle (London, 1977).
  • Strachan, Hew, Wellington's Legacy: The Reform of the British Army 1815-1854 (Manchester, 1984).
  • Sweetman, John, Raglan: From the Peninsula to the Crimea (London, 1993)

— Richard Holmes

Search unanswered questions...
Enter a word or phrase...
All Community Q&A Reference topics
 

(October 1853 – February 1856) War fought mainly in the Crimea between the Russians and an alliance consisting of the Ottoman empire, Britain, France, and Sardinia-Piedmont. It arose from the conflict of great powers in the Middle East and was more directly caused by Russian demands to exercise protection over the Orthodox subjects of the Ottoman sultan. The war was managed and commanded poorly by both sides. Battles were fought at the Alma River, Balaklava, and Inkerman, before the besieged Sevastopol was taken by the allies. Disease accounted for many of the approximately 250,000 men lost by each side. After Austria threatened to join the allies, Russia accepted preliminary peace terms, which were formalized at the Congress of Paris. The war did not settle the relations of the powers in Eastern Europe, but it did alert Alexander II to the need to modernize Russia.

For more information on Crimean War, visit Britannica.com.

 
British History: Crimean War
Top

Crimean War, 1853-6. Known to contemporaries as ‘the Russian War’, this arose from long-term Russian ambitions to expand westward and southward. The immediate cause was a petty struggle between Russia and France over rights in Ottoman Turkey. This produced an ultimatum from Russia to Turkey in March 1853, followed by Russian occupation of the Ottoman Danubian provinces (modern Romania) and a naval victory over Turkey at Sinope on 27 November. Britain and France (later joined by Sardinia as well as Turkey) issued their own ultimatum against Russia on 27 March 1854.

The Black Sea theatre dominated contemporary perspectives of the war. Britain supplied a field army of about 28, 000, which, with a French contingent of equal size, landed in May 1854 at Varna to defend it against Russian forces crossing the Danube. When this threat failed to materialize, the allied armies were transferred to the Crimean peninsula, landing north of the main Russian naval base of Sebastopol on 14 September. Their first victory, at the Alma six days later, enabled them to continue south around Sebastopol to Balaclava, so establishing a partial siege of the base.

Through the autumn the Russians tried to break the siege of Sebastopol, the major attacks being at Balaclava in October and Inkerman in November. After surviving a bad winter, the allies launched naval expeditions against the smaller Russian bases of Kerch in May and Kinburn (near Odessa) in October 1855. Meanwhile, the Russians made one final attempt to relieve Sebastopol in August at the Tchernaya. Repeated British and French attacks on Sebastopol finally led to the base becoming untenable and the Russians abandoned it in October.

Modern historical study pays as much attention to the naval campaign fought in the Baltic as to the Crimean theatre. The end of the war came about not through the fall of Sebastopol but through the British victory in August 1855 in destroying the Russian dockyard at Sweaborg (outside modern Helsinki). Rather than face the loss of Cronstadt as well as Sebastopol, the Russians agreed to moderate peace terms in the treaty of Paris of 30 March 1856, with the Black Sea declared neutral and the Danube an open waterway.

The result of the Crimean War has been much debated. By pursuing a limited aim the allies held Russia in check for a generation, rather than destroying themselves by marching on Moscow. Equally, although British performance in the Crimea was a contemporary byword for incompetence, it is recognized that by the winter of 1855 most of its problems were solved.

 

The Crimean War (1853 - 1856) was Europe's greatest war between 1815 and 1914, pitting first Turkey, then France and England, and finally Piedmont - Sardinia against Russia.

The incautious and miscalculated decision by Nicholas I to activate his southern army corps and Black Sea fleet in late December 1852 can be attributed to several general misperceptions: the official myth that Russia legally protected the Ottoman Orthodox; disinformative claims of Ottoman perfidy regarding the Orthodox - Catholic dispute over Christian Holy Places; and illusions of Austrian loyalty and British friendship. Attempts to interest the British in a partition of the Ottoman Empire failed. Britain followed France in sending a fleet to the Aegean to back Turkey, after Russia's extraordinary ambassador to Istanbul, Alexander Menshikov, acted peremptorily, following the tsar's instructions, in March 1852. Blaming Turkish obstinacy on the British ambassador Stratford de Redcliffe, the Russians refused to accept the Ottoman compromise proposal on the Holy Places on the grounds that it skirted the protection issue. Russia broke relations with Turkey in May and occupied Moldavia and Wallachia in July.

While the Ottomans mobilized, European statesmen sought an exit. Russia's outright rejection in September of another Ottoman compromise finessing the protection issue, one which the British found reasonable, emboldened the Turks to declare war and attack Russian positions in Wallachia and the eastern Black Sea (October). Admiral Pavel

Nakhimov's Black Sea squadron destroyed a Turkish supply convoy off Sinope (November 30), and the combined Anglo - French - Turkish fleet entered the Black Sea on January 1, 1854. Russia refused the humiliating allied demand to keep to port, and by early April, Britain and France were at war with Russia.

Russia's million - man army was larger than that of the allies, but had fewer rifles and deployed 600,000 troops from Finland to Bessarabia as insurance against attacks from the west. Anglo - French fleets and logistics far outclassed Russia's.

The war operated on several fronts. The Russians crossed the Danube in March and besieged Silistra, only to retreat and evacuate Wallachia and Moldavia in June in the face of Austro - German threats. Anglo - French naval squadrons entered the Baltic and destroyed Russia's fortifications at Bomarsund and Sveaborg, but did not harm Kronstadt. In Transcaucasia, Russian counterattacks and superior tactics led to advances into Eastern Anatolia and the eventual investment of Kars in September 1855.

The key theater was Crimea, where the capture of Sevastopol was the chief Allied goal. Both sides made mistakes. The Russians could have mounted a more energetic defense against Allied landings, while the Allies might have taken Sevastopol before the Russians fortified their defenses with sunken ships and naval ordnance under Admiral Vladimir Kornilov and army engineer Adjutant Eduard Totleben. The Allies landed at Evpatoria, defeated the Russians at the Alma River (September 20, 1854), and redeployed south of Sevastopol. The Russian attempt to drive the Allies from Balaklava failed even before the British Light Brigade made its celebrated, ill - fated charge (October 25, 1854). The well - outnumbered allies then tried to besiege Sevastopol and thus exposed themselves to a counterattack at Inkerman on November 5, 1854, which the Russians completely mishandled with their outmoded tactics, negligible staff work, and command rivalries.

Despite a terrible winter, the Allies reinforced and renewed their siege in February 1855. Allied reoccupation of Evpatoria, where the Turks held off a Russian counterattack, and a summer descent on Kerch disrupted the flow of Russian supplies. The death of Nicholas I and accession of Alexander II (March 2) meant little at first. As per imperial wishes, the Russians mounted a hopeless attack on the besiegers' positions on the Chernaya River (August 16). The constant Allied bombardment and French-led assaults on Sevastopol's outer defenses led to an orderly evacuation (September 8 - 9). The Russians in turn captured Kars in Eastern Anatolia (November 26), thereby gaining a bargaining chip. Hostilities soon abated.

Russia lost the war in the Baltic, Crimea, and lower Danube, with the demilitarization of the Åland Islands and the Black Sea and retrocession of southern Bessarabia, but, at the cost of 400,000-500,000 casualties, defended the empire's integrity from maximal Anglo - Ottoman rollback goals and won the war in the Caucasus and Transcaucasia. The evidence of Russia's technological and structural inferiority to the West, as well as the massive turnout of peasant serfs expecting emancipation in return for volunteer service, were major catalysts of the Great Reforms under Alexander II. Russia became more like the other great powers, adhering to the demands of cynical self-interest.

Bibliography

Baumgart, Winfried. (1999). The Crimean War, 1853-1856. London: Arnold.

Goldfrank, David. (1994). The Origins of the Crimean War. London: Longman.

—DAVID M. GOLDFRANK

 
Columbia Encyclopedia: Crimean War
Top
Crimean War (krīmē'ən) , 1853–56, war between Russia on the one hand and the Ottoman Empire, Great Britain, France, and Sardinia on the other. The causes of the conflict were inherent in the unsolved Eastern Question. The more immediate occasion was a dispute between Russia and France over the Palestinian holy places. Challenging the claim of Russia to guardianship of the holy places, France in 1852 secured from Sultan Abd al-Majid certain privileges for the Latin churches. Russian counterdemands were turned down (1853) by the Ottoman government. In July, 1853, Russia retorted by occupying the Ottoman vassal states of Moldavia and Walachia, and in October, after futile negotiations, the Ottomans declared war. In Mar., 1854, Britain and France, having already dispatched fleets to the Black Sea, declared war on Russia; Sardinia followed suit in Jan., 1855. Austria remained neutral, but by threatening to enter the war on the Ottoman side forced Russia to evacuate Moldavia and Walachia, which were occupied (Aug., 1854) by Austrian troops. In Sept., 1854, allied troops landed in the Crimea, with the object of capturing Sevastopol. The Russian fortress, defended by Totleben, resisted heroically until Sept., 1855. Allied commanders were Lord Raglan for the British and Marshal Saint-Arnaud, succeeded later by Marshal Canrobert, for the French. Military operations, which were marked on both sides by great stubbornness, gallantry, and disregard for casualties, remained localized. Famous episodes were the battles of Balaklava and Inkerman (1854) and the allied capture (1855) of Malakhov and Redan, which preceded the fall of Sevastopol. On the Asian front the Russians gained advantages and occupied Kars. The accession (1855) of Czar Alexander II and the capture of Sevastopol led to peace negotiations that resulted (Feb., 1856) in the Treaty of Paris (see Paris, Congress of). The Crimean War ended the dominant role of Russia in SE Europe; the cooling of Austro-Russian relations was an important factor in subsequent European history. The scandalous treatment of the troops, particularly the wounded, depicted by war correspondents, prompted the work of Florence Nightingale, which was perhaps the most positive result of the war.

Bibliography

See studies by D. Wetzel (1985), A. Palmer (1987) and T. Royle (2000).


 

The Crimean War developed out of a basic misunderstanding between Great Britain and imperial Russia over fundamental aims regarding the disposition of the territories of the greatly weakened Ottoman Empire.

About 1830, a Russian war against the Ottoman Empire had assured the independence of Greece. Until that time, the British, a close trade partner of Russia, had largely acquiesced to Russian acquisition of protector status over certain of the Ottoman Empire's Orthodox Christian territories, such as Serbia and the Romanian principalities.

There had always been Russophobes among British leaders, including William Pitt, the Younger, and George Canning. But it was only when Lord Palmerston was appointed secretary of state for external affairs that a clear British policy concerning the Middle East was conceived. The Treaty of Hunkar-Iskelesi, following Egypt's invasion of Asia Minor in 1833, appears to have been the catalyst. Apart from awarding to Muhammad Ali Pasha control of Syria and the island of Crete, a secret clause recognized Russia's right to intervene in Turkish affairs to "protect" the interests of Orthodox subjects. Palmerston made it clear to Parliament that this arrangement must be undone. He proposed that, to protect Britain's lifeline to India, Britain must either station soldiers in the Middle East at strategic points or energetically assist the Ottoman leadership to reform its armed forces and liberalize its system of government.

Britain chose the less expensive route of assisting such pro-British viziers as Mustafa Reşid Paşa and their protégés to reform the Ottoman system. Upon the accession of Sultan Abdülmecit I in 1839, the Ottoman government launched the so-called Tanzimat reform, which would culminate in the first Ottoman constitution of 1876. Also in 1839, the combined European powers forced Muhammad Ali, who was on the verge of usurping further powers from the Ottoman sultan, to withdraw his forces from Syria and the Sudan in exchange for the conciliatory gesture of receiving Egypt as his hereditary kingdom.

Despite this heightened British interest in the Mediterranean region, apparently Russia missed the message. When Czar Nicholas I (1825 - 1855) paid a state visit to Britain in 1842, he queried the British about the disposition of "the Sick Man of Europe." In typical British fashion, officials in London failed to give the czar a direct answer; consequently, he and his delegation concluded that if Russia strengthened its hold over Ottoman Turkey, Britain would not be upset.

A clash of interest and a cause célèbre was not long in developing. Sultan Abdülmecit, after consulting the powerful and popular British resident
ambassador, Stratford Canning, decided to award to France the traditional function and title of Protector of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem. Imperial Russia, which annually sent thousands of pilgrims to the Holy Land and had recently invested sizable funds in Jerusalem for churches and pilgrim hostels, took grave offense at not receiving the honored designation. After long drawn-out bickering over the issue, Russia issued an ultimatum. With the Ottomans supported by the British ambassador, who now ordered the British fleet into the Black Sea, Russia declared war and marched on the Balkans, where the Turks put up a stiff resistance. Meanwhile, the British and French landed troops in the Crimea in 1853 and 1854 and besieged Russian fortifications at Inkerman and Sebastapol. Ill-equipped and ravaged by cholera, the Russians capitulated in 1855, and Czar Nicholas abdicated to be replaced by Czar Alexander II.

In the Peace of Paris (1856), Ottoman Turkey, France, Britain, and Austria - the latter not having been an active participant - forced upon Russia a humiliating settlement. Russia was to cease its meddling in Ottoman affairs, including Romania, and it was not permitted to fortify any point on the Black Sea. Her naval vessels also were placed under strict control of the allies.

This embarrassing result was an important factor in forcing Czar Alexander to declare the liberation of the serfs in 1861. Moreover, the heavy commitment by Britain in the war and the great loss of life, in spite of heroic medical assistance by Florence Nightingale's field hospital in Istanbul, played a major role in Britain's decision twenty-five years later to occupy Cyprus and then Egypt to assure its lifeline to India without recourse to Ottoman Turkey.

— C. MAX KORTEPETER

 
History Dictionary: Crimean War
Top
(kreye-mee-uhn)

A war fought in the middle of the nineteenth century between Russia on one side and Turkey, Britain, and France on the other. Russia was defeated, and the independence of Turkey was guaranteed.

  • Florence Nightingale came to prominence through her nursing service during the Crimean War. The poem “The Charge of the Light Brigade,” by Alfred, Lord Tennyson, describes a battle in that war.

  •  
    Wikipedia: Crimean War
    Top
    Crimean War

    Detail of Franz Roubaud's panoramic painting The Siege of Sevastopol (1904).
    Date 1853–1856
    Location Crimean Peninsula,
    Caucasus,
    Balkans,
    Black Sea,
    Baltic Sea,
    Pacific Ocean
    Result Allied victory, Treaty of Paris
    Belligerents
    Flag of France French Empire
    Ottoman flag Ottoman Empire
    Flag of the United Kingdom British Empire
    Flag of Italy Kingdom of Sardinia
    Flag of Russia Russian Empire
    Flag of Bulgaria Bulgarian Legion
    Strength
    300,000 Turks
    400,000 French
    250,000 British
    18,000 Sardinians
    700,000[1] Russians
    4,000 Bulgarians
    Casualties and losses
    374,600 total dead[2] French: 100,000[2]
    of which 10,240 killed in action; 20,000 died of wounds; ca 70,000 died of disease
    British: 2,755 killed in action; 2,019 died of wounds; 16,323 died of disease
    Sardinians: 36 casualties
    Italians: 2,050 died from all causes[3]
    Turks: total dead and wounded 200,000 est.[4]
    total dead est. 50,000[5]
    ca 522,000[6][7] killed, wounded and died of disease [8]
    of which dead 60,000[9] to 110,000[3][10]

    Other estimates:
    ca 143,000 dead and 81,000 injured of which 25,000 killed in action; 16,000 died of wounds; 89,000 died of disease[11][12]

    The Crimean War, also known in Russia as the Oriental War (Russian: Восточная война, Vostochnaya Voina) (October 1853[13][14]–February 1856) was fought between the Russian Empire on one side and an alliance of France, the United Kingdom, the Kingdom of Sardinia, and the Ottoman Empire on the other. The war was part of a long-running contest between the major European powers for influence over territories of the declining Ottoman Empire. Most of the conflict took place on the Crimean Peninsula, with additional actions occurring in western Turkey and the Baltic Sea region.

    The Crimean War is sometimes considered to be the first "modern" conflict and "introduced technical changes which affected the future course of warfare".[15]

    Contents

    Pre-battle tensions

    Conflict over the Holy Land

    The chain of events leading to France's and Britain's declaring war on Russia on 27 March and 28 March 1854[13] can be traced to the coup d'état of 1851 in France. Napoleon III had his ambassador go to the Ottoman Empire to force the Ottomans to recognize France as the "sovereign authority" in the Holy Land.[16]

    Russia disputed this newest change in "authority" in the Holy Land. Pointing to two more treaties, one in 1757 and the other in 1774, the Ottomans reversed their earlier decision, renouncing the French treaty and insisting that Russia was the protector of the Orthodox Christians in the Ottoman Empire.

    Napoleon III responded with a show of force, sending the ship of the line Charlemagne to the Black Sea, a violation of the London Straits Convention.[16] France's show of force, combined with aggressive diplomacy and money, induced Sultan Abdülmecid I to accept a new treaty, confirming France and the Roman Catholic Church as the supreme Christian authority in the Holy Land with control over the Christian holy places and possession of the keys to the Church of the Nativity, previously held by the Greek Orthodox Church.[17]

    Tsar Nicholas I then deployed his 4th and 5th Army Corps along the River Danube, and had Count Karl Nesselrode, his foreign minister, undertake talks with the Ottomans. Nesselrode confided to Sir George Hamilton Seymour, the British ambassador in St. Petersburg:

    [The dispute over the holy places] had assumed a new character - that the acts of injustice towards the Greek church which it had been desired to prevent had been perpetrated and consequently that now the object must be to find a remedy for these wrongs. The success of French negotiations at Constantinople was to be ascribed solely to intrigue and violence - violence which had been supposed to be the ultima ratio of kings, being, it had been seen, the means which the present ruler of France was in the habit of employing in the first instance.[18]

    As conflict loomed over the question of the holy places, Nicholas I and Nesselrode began a diplomatic offensive which they hoped would prevent either Britain's or France's interfering in any conflict between Russia and the Ottomans, as well as to prevent their allying together.

    Cornet Henry Wilkin, 11th Hussars, British Army. Photo by Roger Fenton

    Nicholas began courting Britain through Seymour. Nicholas insisted that he no longer wished to expand Imperial Russia, but that he had an obligation to Christian communities in the Ottoman Empire.

    The Tsar next dispatched a diplomat, Prince Menshikov, on a special mission to the Ottoman Sublime Porte. By previous treaties, the Sultan was committed "to protect the Christian religion and its churches". Menshikov attempted to negotiate a new treaty, under which Russia would be allowed to interfere whenever it deemed the Sultan's protection inadequate. Further, this new synod, a religious convention, would allow Russia to control the Orthodox Church's hierarchy in the Ottoman Empire. Menshikov arrived at Constantinople on 16 February 1853 on the steam-powered warship Gromovnik. Menshikov broke protocol at the Porte when, at his first meeting with the Sultan, he condemned the Ottomans' concessions to the French. Menshikov also began demanding the replacement of highly-placed Ottoman civil servants.

    The British embassy at Constantinople at the time was being run by Hugh Rose, chargé d'affaires for the British. Using his considerable resources within the Ottoman Empire, Rose gathered intelligence on Russian troop movements along the Danube frontier, and became concerned about the extent of Menshikov's mission to the Porte. Rose, using his authority as the British representative to the Ottomans, ordered a British squadron of warships to depart early for an eastern Mediterranean cruise and head for Constantinople. However, Rose's actions were not backed up by Whitley Dundas, the British admiral in command of the squadron, who resented the diplomat for believing he could interfere in the Admiralty's business. Within a week, Rose's actions were cancelled. Only the French sent a naval task force to support the Ottomans.

    First hostilities

    At the same time, however, the British government of Prime Minister Lord Aberdeen sent Lord Stratford. Lord Stratford convinced the Sultan to reject the treaty, which compromised the independence of the Turks. Benjamin Disraeli blamed Aberdeen and Stratford's actions for making war inevitable, thus starting the process by which Aberdeen would be forced to resign for his role in starting the war. Shortly after he learned of the failure of Menshikov's diplomacy, the Tsar marched his armies into Moldavia and Wallachia (principalities along the Danube, under Ottoman suzerainty, in which Russia was acknowledged as a special guardian of the Orthodox Church), using the Sultan's failure to resolve the issue of the Holy Places as a pretext. Nicholas believed that the European powers, especially Austria, would not object strongly to the annexation of a few neighbouring Ottoman provinces, especially given Russian involvement in suppressing the Revolutions of 1848.

    When on 2 July 1853[19] the Tsar sent his troops into the "Danubian Principalities", Britain, seeking to maintain the security of the Ottoman Empire, sent a fleet to the Dardanelles, where it joined another fleet sent by France. At the same time, however, the European powers hoped for a diplomatic compromise. The representatives of the four neutral Great Powers — Britain, France, Austria and Prussia — met in Vienna, where they drafted a note which they hoped would be acceptable to the Russians and Ottomans. The note met with the approval of Nicholas I; it was, however, rejected by Abdülmecid, who felt that the document's poor phrasing left it open to many different interpretations. Britain, France and Austria were united in proposing amendments to mollify the Sultan, but their suggestions were ignored in the court of St Petersburg.

    Britain and France set aside the idea of continuing negotiations, but Austria and Prussia did not believe that the rejection of the proposed amendments justified the abandonment of the diplomatic process. The Sultan formally declared war on 23 October 1853[13] and proceeded to the attack, his armies moving on the Russian army near the Danube later that month.[20] Nicholas responded by dispatching warships, which in the Battle of Sinop on 30 November 1853 destroyed a patrol squadron of Ottoman frigates and corvettes while they were anchored at the port of Sinop, northern Turkey. The destruction of the Turkish ships provided Britain and France the casus belli for declaring war against Russia, on the side of the Ottoman Empire. By 28 March 1854, after Russia ignored an Anglo-French ultimatum to withdraw from the Danubian Principalities, Britain and France had formally declared war.[14][21][22]

    Mahmudiye (1829), ordered by the Ottoman Sultan Mahmud II and built by the Imperial Naval Arsenal on the Golden Horn in Istanbul, was for many years the largest warship in the world. The 62x17x7 m ship-of-the-line was armed with 128 cannons on 3 decks. She participated in many important naval battles, including the Siege of Sevastopol (1854-1855) during the Crimean War (1854-1856). She was decommissioned in 1875

    Peace attempts

    Nicholas felt that because of Russian assistance in suppressing the Hungarian revolt of 1848, Austria would side with him, or at the very least remain neutral. Austria, however, felt threatened by the Russian troops. When Britain and France demanded the withdrawal of Russian forces from the principalities, Austria supported them and, though it did not immediately declare war on Russia, it refused to guarantee its neutrality.

    Though the original grounds for war were lost when Russia withdrew its troops, Britain and France continued with hostilities. Determined to address the Eastern Question by putting an end to the Russian threat to the Ottoman Empire, the allies proposed several conditions for a peaceful resolution, including:

    1. Russia was to give up its protectorate over the Danubian Principalities;
    2. It was to abandon any claim granting it the right to interfere in Ottoman affairs on behalf of Orthodox Christians;
    3. The Straits Convention of 1841 was to be revised;
    4. All nations were to be granted access to the River Danube.

    When the Tsar refused to comply with these Four Points, the Crimean War commenced.

    Battles

    French zouaves and Russian soldiers engaged in hand-to-hand combat at Malakhov Kurgan

    Siege of Sevastopol

    During the following month, though the immediate cause of war was withdrawn, allied troops landed in the Crimea and besieged the city of Sevastopol, home of the Tsar's Black Sea Fleet and the associated threat of potential Russian penetration into the Mediterranean.

    The Russians had to scuttle their ships, and used the naval cannons as additional artillery and the ships' crews as marines. During the siege, the Russians lost four 110- or 120-gun 3-decker ships of the line, twelve 84-gun 2-deckers and four 60-gun frigates in the Black Sea, plus a large number of smaller vessels. Admiral Nakhimov suffered a fatal bullet wound to the head and died on 30 June 1855. The city was captured in September 9, 1855, after about a year-long siege.

    In the same year, the Russians besieged and occupied the Turkish fortress of Kars (the Battle of Kurekdere had been fought between the two in the same general area the year before).

    Azov Campaign

    In spring 1855, the allied British-French commanders decided to send an Anglo-French naval squadron into the Azov Sea to undermine Russian communications and supplies to besieged Sevastopol. On May 12, 1855 British-French war ships entered the Kerch Strait and destroyed the coast battery of the Kamishevaya Bay. On 21 May 1855 the gunboats and armed steamers attacked the seaport of Taganrog, the most important hub in terms of its proximity to Rostov on Don and due to the vast amounts of food, especially bread, wheat, barley and rye that were amassed in the city after the outbreak of war prevented its exportation.

    Bombardment of Taganrog from a British raft during the first siege attempt

    The Governor of Taganrog, Yegor Tolstoy and lieutenant-general Ivan Krasnov refused the ultimatum, responding that "Russians never surrender their cities". The British-French squadron bombarded Taganrog for 6 1/2 hours and landed 300 troops near the Old Stairway in the downtown Taganrog, but they were thrown back by Don Cossacks and a volunteer corps.

    In July 1855, the allied squadron tried to go past Taganrog to Rostov on Don, entering the Don River through the Mius River. On 12 July 1855 H.M.S. Jasper grounded near Taganrog thanks to a fisherman, who repositioned the buoys into shallow waters. The Cossacks captured the gunboat with all of its guns and blew it up. The third siege attempt was made August 19-31, 1855, but the city was already fortified and the squadron could not approach close enough for landing operations. The allied fleet left the Gulf of Taganrog on September 2, 1855, with minor military operations along the Azov Sea coast continuing until late autumn 1855.

    Baltic theatre

    The Baltic was a forgotten theatre of the war. The popularisation of events elsewhere had overshadowed the significance of this theatre, which was close to Saint Petersburg, the Russian capital. From the beginning, the Baltic campaign was a stalemate. The outnumbered Russian Baltic Fleet confined its movements to the areas around fortifications. At the same time, British and French commanders Sir Charles Napier and Alexandre Ferdinand Parseval-Deschenes – although they led the largest fleet assembled since the Napoleonic Wars – considered Russian coastal fortifications, especially the Sveaborg fortress, too well-defended to engage and they limited their actions to blockading Russian trade and conducting raids on less fortified sections of the Finnish coast.

    Bombardment of Bomarsund during the Crimean War

    Russia was dependent on imports for both the domestic economy and the supply of her military forces and the blockade seriously undermined the Russian economy. Raiding by allied British and French fleets destroyed forts on the Finnish coast including Bomarsund on the Åland Islands and Fort Slava. Other such attacks were not so successful, and the poorly planned attempts to take Hanko, Ekenäs, Kokkola and Turku were repulsed.

    The burning of tar warehouses and ships in Oulu and Raahe led to international criticism, and in Britain, MP Thomas Gibson demanded in the House of Commons that the First Lord of the Admiralty explain "a system which carried on a great war by plundering and destroying the property of defenceless villagers". In the autumn, a squadron of three British warships led by HMS Miranda left the Baltic for the White Sea, where they shelled Kola (which was utterly destroyed) and the Solovki. Their attempt to storm Arkhangelsk proved abortive, as was the siege of Petropavlovsk in Kamchatka. Here, an Anglo-French naval squadron successfully shelled the town but a naval brigade of 800 sailors and marines landed the next day was repulsed.

    In 1855, the Western Allied Baltic Fleet tried to destroy heavily defended Russian dockyards at Sveaborg outside Helsinki. More than 1,000 enemy guns tested the strength of the fortress for two days. Despite the shelling, the sailors of the 120-gun ship Rossiya, led by Captain Viktor Poplonsky, defended the entrance to the harbour. The Allies fired over twenty thousand shells but were unable to defeat the Russian batteries. A massive new fleet of more than 350 gunboats and mortar vessels was prepared, but before the attack was launched, the war ended.

    "Bombardment of the Solovetsky Monastery in the White Sea by the Royal Navy". A lubok (popular print) from 1868

    Part of the Russian resistance was credited to the deployment of newly created blockade mines. Perhaps the most influential contributor to the development of naval mining was inventor and civil engineer Immanuel Nobel, the father of Alfred Nobel. Immanuel helped the war effort for Russia by applying his knowledge of industrial explosives such as nitroglycerin and gunpowder. Modern naval mining is said to date from the Crimean War: "Torpedo mines, if I may use this name given by Fulton to self-acting mines underwater, were among the novelties attempted by the Russians in their defenses about Cronstadt and Sevastopol", as one American officer put it in 1860.[23]

    Genitchi Strait

    The Russians had built a large floating pontoon bridge across the Genitchi Strait, Sea of Azov, to connect the town of Genitchi to the Arabat Spit, and it served as the main supply route to reinforce their troops at Sevastopol. The destruction of the bridge would force the Russians to travel an extra 192 km (120 miles) to deliver supplies, and it therefore became a strategic objective for British forces. Two attacks to cut the floating bridge's hawsers had proved unsuccessful and alerted the Russian garrison. The British made a third attempt on 3 July 1855 using HMS Beagle's four-oared gig, commanded by Gunner John Hayles, and a small paddle-box steamer with one gun, under Midshipman Martin Tracy. The paddle-box steamer moored where the crew could see Russian soldiers marching about on shore and fired the first round in the breech, which drew the gun's securing bolts and made it useless. That left six men in a four-oared boat (including Joseph Trewavas), one rifle, ten rounds of ammunition, and a cutlass apiece to face two hundred enemy on shore behind heaps of coal.

    The French ironclad floating battery Lave destroyed Russian batteries at the Battle of Kinburn (1855).

    In Trewavas's own words, "As we paddled out of sight of our ship, on a little mound we could see the Russians motioning the soldiers on shore to keep down and our man in the bow with a loaded rifle wanted to have a 'go' at them but the gunner gave him orders not to do so. I was pulling the bow oar and when we were near the floating bridge, I leapt onto it, cut the hawsers and jumped back in the boat again and shoved off. During this time the Russians, who were only 80 metres off, had not fired a shot, and our man in the bow fired his rifle at them swearing he hit his man. The Russians then let fly. For some time we could not get away as the water was so shallow, and the shot came at us like hailstones, wounding three men and riddling the boat with shot. Reaching safety and the protection of our ship, our boat was sinking and full of water".

    (Trewavas wondered why the Russians had not fired upon the British as they approached the pontoon bridge at Genitchi, but later a Russian officer explained that they had no idea the sailors planned to destroy the bridge, believing rather that they intended to destroy shipping, and therefore held fire with the intention of taking them prisoner.)

    Pacific

    Minor naval skirmishes also occurred in the Far East, where a strong British and French Allied squadron (including [ Pique (1834]]) under Rear Admiral David Price and Contre-admiral Febrier-Despointes besieged a smaller Russian force under Rear Admiral Yevfimy Putyatin at Petropavlovsk on the Kamchatka Peninsula. An Allied landing force was beaten back with heavy casualties in September 1854, and the Allies withdrew. The Russians escaped under snow in early 1855 after Allied reinforcements arrived in the region.

    The Anglo-French forces also made several small landings on Sakhalin and Urup (one of the Kuril Islands). [24]

    Italian involvement

    With the Italian Unification campaign going on at the time in the Italian states, Camillo di Cavour, under orders by Victor Emmanuel II of the Kingdom of Sardinia, sent troops to side with French and British forces during the war. This was an attempt at gaining the favour of the French especially when the issue of uniting Italy under the Sardinian throne would become an important matter. The deployment of Italian troops to the Crimea allowed Piedmont to be represented at the peace conference at the end of the war, where it could address the issue of the Risorgimento to other European powers.

    End of the war

    Peace negotiations began in 1856 under Nicholas I's son and successor, Alexander II, through the Congress of Paris. Furthermore, the Tsar and the Sultan agreed not to establish any naval or military arsenal on the Black Sea coast. The Black Sea clauses came at a tremendous disadvantage to Russia, for it greatly diminished the naval threat it posed to the Turks. Moreover, all the Great Powers pledged to respect the independence and territorial integrity of the Ottoman Empire.

    The Treaty of Paris stood until 1871, when France was defeated by Prussia in the Franco-Prussian War of 1870–1871. Whilst Prussia and several other German states united to form a powerful German Empire, the Emperor of the French, Napoleon III, was deposed to permit the formation of a Third French Republic. During his reign Napoleon III, eager for the support of Great Britain, had opposed Russia over the Eastern Question. Russian interference in the Ottoman Empire, however, did not in any significant manner threaten the interests of France. Thus, France abandoned its opposition to Russia after the establishment of a Republic. Encouraged by the decision of the French, and supported by the German minister Otto Fürst von Bismarck, Russia denounced the Black Sea clauses of the treaty agreed to in 1856. As Great Britain alone could not enforce the clauses, Russia once again established a fleet in the Black Sea.

    Having abandoned its alliance with Russia, Austria was diplomatically isolated following the war. This led to its defeat in the 1866 Austro-Prussian War and loss of influence in most German-speaking lands. Soon after, Austria would ally with Prussia as it became the new state of Germany. With France, now hostile to Germany, allied with Russia, and Russia competing with the newly re-named Austro-Hungarian Empire for an increased role in the Balkans at the expense of the Turks, the foundations were in place for creating the diplomatic alliances that would lead to World War I.

    Notwithstanding the guarantees to preserve Ottoman territories specified in the Treaty of Paris, Russia, exploiting nationalist unrest in the Ottoman states in the Balkans and seeking to regain lost prestige, once again declared war on the Ottoman Empire on 24 April 1877. In this later Russo-Turkish War the states of Bulgaria, Romania, Serbia and Montenegro achieved independence.

    Criticisms and reform

    Photograph of the British army camp at Balaklava during the Crimean War. Albumen silver print by "Robertson & Beato", 1855

    The Crimean War was notorious for military and logistical immaturity by the British army. However, it highlighted the work of women who served as army nurses. War correspondents for newspapers reported the scandalous treatment of wounded soldiers in the desperate winter that followed and prompted the work of Florence Nightingale, Mary Seacole, and others and led to the introduction of modern nursing methods.

    The Crimean War also saw the first tactical use of railways and other modern inventions such as the telegraph. The war also employed modern military tactics, such as trenches and blind artillery fire. The use of the Minié ball for shot, coupled with the rifling of barrels, greatly increased Allied rifle range and damage.

    The British Army system of sale of commissions came under great scrutiny during the war, especially in connection with the Battle of Balaclava, which saw the ill-fated Charge of the Light Brigade. This scrutiny eventually led to the abolition of the sale of commissions.

    The Crimean War was a contributing factor in the Russian abolition of serfdom in 1861: Alexander II saw the military defeat of the Russian serf army by free troops from Britain and France as proof of the need for emancipation.[25] The Crimean War also led to the eventual realisation by the Russian government of its current technological inferiority, namely in its military practices as well as its military weapons.[26]

    Major events of the war

    Crimean War Memorial at Waterloo Place, St James's, London

    Prominent military commanders

    Chapel in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, commemorating the Siege of Petropavlovsk in 1854

    Last veterans

    In fiction

    • Music
      • The song "The Trooper" by heavy metal band Iron Maiden tells a story from the point of view of a British soldier.
      • The song "Abdul Abulbul Amir" by Irish music hall performer Percy French was inspired by the Crimean War and reduces it to two fighters, the Turk Abdul and the Russian soldier Ivan Skavinsky Skivar, who duel over a triviality and both die, accomplishing nothing.
      • The Irish music song "The Kerry Recruit" deals with the experiences of a young man from Kerry who fights in the war.

    See also

    References

    Notes

    1. ^ Военная Энциклопедия, М., Воениздат 1999, т.4, стр.315
    2. ^ a b Napoleon III, Pierre Milza, Perrin edition, 2004
    3. ^ a b John Sweetman, Crimean War, Essential Histories 2, Osprey Publishing, 2001, ISBN 1 84176 186 9, p.89
    4. ^ Военная Энциклопедия, М., Воениздат 1999, т.4, стр.317
    5. ^ Clive Pointing, The Crimean War: The Truth Behind the Myth, Chatto & Windus, London, 2004, ISBN 0 7011 7390 4, p.344
    6. ^ Военная Энциклопедия, М., Воениздат 1999, т.4, стр.317
    7. ^ The Osprey Companion to Military History, R Cowley and G Parker (eds.), Osprey Publishing, 1996, ISBN 1 85532 663 9, p.116
    8. ^ Dupuy and Dupuy The Encyclopedia of Military History, Macdonald and Jane's, 1970, p.829 gives the following figure for the Russian casualties: 256,000 total, of which 128,000 battle casualties
    9. ^ Royle. The Books "Crimea" and The Great crimean war"
    10. ^ Clive Pointing, The Crimean War: The Truth Behind the Myth, Chatto & Windus, London, 2004, ISBN 0 7011 7390 4, p.344 gives the number of Russian dead as 475,000 which is much too high, probably a result of confusing the number of dead and wounded with the number of dead
    11. ^ Зайончковский А. М. Восточная война 1853—1856. СПб:Полигон, 2002
    12. ^ Восточный вопрос. Энциклопедический Словарь Ф. А. Брокгауза и И. А. Ефрона
    13. ^ a b c Kinglake (1863:354)
    14. ^ a b Sweetman (2001:7)
    15. ^ Royle. Preface
    16. ^ a b Royle. Pg 19
    17. ^ Royle. Pg 20
    18. ^ Royle. Pg 21
    19. ^ Kinglake (1863:195)
    20. ^ Encyclopædia Britannica: Crimean War. 1994. 
    21. ^ Correspondent (28 March 1854). "In the House of Lords". The Morning Chronicle: p. 4. 
    22. ^ Kinglake (1863:463–4)
    23. ^ Mining in the Crimean War
    24. ^ Mikhail Vysokov: A Brief History of Sakhalin and the Kurils: [1]
    25. ^ Moon, David (2001). The Abolition of Serfdom in Russia, 1762-1907. Harlow, England: Pearson Education. pp. 49–55. ISBN 058229486X. 
    26. ^ http://www.russianwarrior.com/STMMain.htm

    Bibliography

    • Bridge and Bullen, The Great Powers and the European States System 1814-1914, (Pearson Education: London), 2005
    • Bamgart, Winfried The Crimean War, 1853-1856 (2002) Arnold Publishers ISBN 0-340-61465-X
    • Ponting, Clive The Crimean War (2004) Chatto and Windus ISBN 0-7011-7390-4
    • Pottinger Saab, Anne The Origins of the Crimean Alliance (1977) University of Virginia Press ISBN 0-8139-0699-7
    • Rich, Norman Why the Crimean War: A Cautionary Tale (1985) McGraw-Hill ISBN 0-07-052255-3
    • Royce, Simon The Crimean War and its place in European Economic History (2001) University of London Press ISBN 0-3825-2868-6
    • Royle, Trevor Crimea: The Great Crimean War, 1854-1856 (2000) Palgrave Macmillan ISBN 1-4039-6416-5
    • Schroeder, Paul W. Austria, Great Britain, and the Crimean War: The Destruction of the European Concert (1972) Cornell University Press ISBN 0-8014-0742-7
    • Wetzel, David The Crimean War: A Diplomatic History (1985) Columbia University Press ISBN 0-88033-086-4
    • Russell, William Howard, "The Crimean War: As Seen by Those Who Reported It". Baton Rouge LA. :Louisiana State University Press, 2009 ISBN 978-0-8071-3445-0

    Further reading

    • Hamley, The War in the Crimea, (London, 1891)
    • Kinglake, The Invasion of the Crimea, (nine volumes, London, 1863-87)
    • Kovalevski, Der Krieg Russlands mit der Türkei in den Jahren 1853-54, (Leipzig, 1869)
    • Lodomir, La guerre de 1853-56, (Paris, 1857)
    • Marx, The Eastern Question, 1853-56, (translated by E. M. and E. Aveling, London, 1897)
    • Rein, Die Teilnahme Sardiniens am Krimkrieg und die öffentliche Meinung in Italien, (Leipzig, 1911)
    • Russell, The War in the Crimea, 1854-56, (London, 1855-56)

    External links


     
     

     

    Copyrights:

    Military History Companion. The Oxford Companion to Military History. Copyright © 2001, 2004 by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.  Read more
    Britannica Concise Encyclopedia. Britannica Concise Encyclopedia. © 2006 Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
    British History. A Dictionary of British History. Copyright © 2001, 2004 by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.  Read more
    Russian History Encyclopedia. Encyclopedia of Russian History. Copyright © 2004 by The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
    Columbia Encyclopedia. The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition Copyright © 2003, Columbia University Press. Licensed from Columbia University Press. All rights reserved. www.cc.columbia.edu/cu/cup/  Read more
    Mideast & N. Africa Encyclopedia. Encyclopedia of the Modern Middle East and North Africa. Copyright © 2004 by The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
    History Dictionary. The New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy, Third Edition Edited by E.D. Hirsch, Jr., Joseph F. Kett, and James Trefil. Copyright © 2002 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin. All rights reserved.  Read more
    Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Crimean War" Read more