Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Answers.com

deference

 
(dĕf'ər-əns, dĕf'rəns) pronunciation
n.
  1. Submission or courteous yielding to the opinion, wishes, or judgment of another.
  2. Courteous respect. See synonyms at honor.

Search unanswered questions...
Enter a question here...
Search: All sources Community Q&A Reference topics
Roget's Thesaurus:

deference

Top

noun

  1. The quality or state of willingly carrying out the wishes of others: acquiescence, amenability, amenableness, compliance, compliancy, obedience, submission, submissiveness, tractability, tractableness. See resist/yield.
  2. Great respect or high public esteem accorded as a right or as due: homage, honor, obeisance. See respect/contempt/standing.

Antonyms by Answers.com:

deference

Top

n

Definition: attention
Antonyms: contempt, disrespect

n

Definition: homage
Antonyms: dishonor, disregard, ignorance

n

Definition: obedience, compliance
Antonyms: disobedience, impoliteness, noncompliance

Word Tutor:

deference

Top
pronunciation

IN BRIEF: n. - A courteous expression (by word or deed) of esteem or regard; A disposition or tendency to yield to the will of others; Courteous regard for people's feelings.

Tutor's tip: Students should show "deference" (respect, submission, yielding) to their teachers, even when they have a "difference" (disparity, being unlike) of opinion.

LearnThatWord.com is a free vocabulary and spelling program where you only pay for results!

Random House Word Menu:

categories related to 'deference'

Top
Random House Word Menu by Stephen Glazier
For a list of words related to deference, see:

Deference (also called submission or passivity) is the condition of submitting to the espoused, legitimate influence of one's superior or superiors.[1] Deference implies a yielding or submitting to the judgment of a recognized superior out of respect or reverence. Deference has been studied extensively by political scientists, sociologists, and psychologists.

Contents

Politics

Smolenski (2005) examines deference in colonial Pennsylvania, to see how claims to political authority were made, justified, and accepted or rejected. He focuses on the "colonial speech economy," that is, the implicit rules that determined who was allowed to address whom and under what conditions, and describes how the qualities that inspired deference changed in the province from 1691 to 1764. The Quaker elite initially established a monopoly on political leadership based on what they believed to be their inherent civic virtue grounded in their religious and social class. By 1760, this view had been discredited and replaced with the general consensus that civic virtue was an achieved, not an inherent, attribute and that it should be determined by the display of appropriate manliness and the valor of men who were willing to take up arms for the common defense of the colony. Further, Pennsylvanians came to believe that all white men, not just wealthy property owners, were equally capable of achieving political voice. Martial masculinity, therefore, became the defining characteristic of the ideal citizen and marked a significant transformation in the way individuals justified their right to represent the public interest.[2]

Sociology

Erving Goffman, a Canadian-born sociologist and writer, explored the relationship between deference and demeanor in his 1967 essay "The Nature of Deference and Demeanor".[3] According to Goffman, a person with a poor demeanor will be held in lower esteem in the eyes of society. The same is true for people who behave in a good demeanor, however: society will hold them in a higher esteem. An example of this situation can be seen through the way a person acts in a social setting. i.e. A man pulling out a chair for a woman at a restaurant. On the other end of the spectrum, a person not bathing before they go to a fancy dinner party. These examples can be defined as presentational deference. Demeanor does not only limit itself to the actions of an individual, but also the appearance of an individual. A person offers themselves to a social group through a good appearance or a well demeanored appearance. When an individual has a well demeanored appearance it makes interaction between people easier. After a person is socially accepted to a group, it is expected that they will conform to interactional norms. Through acting on those norms, people receive deference.

Psychology

There is ongoing debate among psychologists as to the extent to which deference in a relationship is determined by a person's innate personality type or is the result of a person's experiences and conditioning. In interpersonal relationships, a partner can assume a submissive role to fit in or to make him or herself acceptable to the other partner,[4] and can be a benign aspect of a relationship. On the other hand, it may be an indication of an interpersonal problem, such as partner abuse. If one or both of the people are experiencing chronic, pervasive emotional distress then the sex partners or individuals may require psychological evaluation.

In interpersonal relationships, some people prefer or are willing to adopt a submissive role in sexual activities or personal matters. The level and type of submission can vary from person to person, and from one context to another; and also is dependent on the other partner being willing to assume control in those situations. Some people can include occasional acts of submission in an otherwise conventional sex life, or adopt a submissive lifestyle.

See also

References

  1. ^ John B. Kirbya, "Early American Politics—The Search for Ideology: An Historiographical Analysis and Critique of the Concept of 'Deference,'" The Journal of Politics, Volume 32, Issue 04, November 1970 pp 808-838
  2. ^ John Smolenski, "From Men of Property to Just Men," Early American Studies, An Interdisciplinary Journal, Fall 2005, Vol. 3 Issue 2, pp 253-285
  3. ^ Erving Goffman (1967). Interaction Ritual. New York, NY: Anchor House. ISBN 0394706315. 
  4. ^ James J. Gross (2006). Handbook of Emotion Regulation. Guilford Publications. ISBN 9781593851484. 

Further reading

  • Foley, Deference and the Presumption of Constitutionality (Dublin: IPA, 2008)
  • Zuckerman, Michael. "Endangered Deference, Imperiled Patriarchy," Early American Studies, An Interdisciplinary Journal, Fall 2005, Vol. 3 Issue 2, pp 232–252; in colonial Virginia
  • Soper, Philip. 2002. The Ethics of Deference. United Kingdom: University Press, Cambridge. ISBN 0521810477
  • Telles, Joel. 1980. The Social Nature of Demeanor. Charlottesville, Virginia: University of Virginia, Cabell Hall.

Translations:

Deference

Top

Dansk (Danish)
n. - respekt, hensyntagen, given efter

Nederlands (Dutch)
eerbied(iging)

Français (French)
n. - déférence, considération

Deutsch (German)
n. - Achtung, Ehrerbietung

Ελληνική (Greek)
n. - συμμόρφωση, συγκατάβαση, σεβασμός, ευλάβεια

Italiano (Italian)
riguardo

Português (Portuguese)
n. - deferência (f)

Русский (Russian)
уступка, почтительность

Español (Spanish)
n. - deferencia, respeto

Svenska (Swedish)
n. - hänsyn, respekt

中文(简体)(Chinese (Simplified))
顺从, 尊重

中文(繁體)(Chinese (Traditional))
n. - 順從, 尊重

한국어 (Korean)
n. - 존경, 복종

日本語 (Japanese)
n. - 服従, 敬意, 尊敬

العربيه (Arabic)
‏(الاسم) مراعاة رغبه شخص كنوع من الاحترام له‏

עברית (Hebrew)
n. - ‮כיבוד, יחס-כבוד‬


 
 
Related topics:
deferential
irony
deferentially

Related answers:
What is sign of deference? Read answer...
What does deference meen? Read answer...
What is the deference between herbivorous and omnivorous? Read answer...

Help us answer these:
What is humility and deference?
What is Vas deference?
What is a sentence for deference?

Post a question - any question - to the WikiAnswers community:

 

Copyrights:

American Heritage Dictionary. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright © 2007, 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2009. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.  Read more
Roget's Thesaurus. Roget's II: The New Thesaurus, Third Edition by the Editors of the American Heritage® Dictionary Copyright © 1995 byHoughton Mifflin Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.  Read more
Answers Corporation Antonyms by Answers.com. © 1999-present by Answers Corporation. All rights reserved.  Read more
Word Tutor. Copyright © 2004-present by eSpindle Learning, a 501(c) nonprofit organization. All rights reserved.
eSpindle provides personalized spelling and vocabulary tutoring online; sign up free Read more
Random House Word Menu. © 2010 Write Brothers Inc. Word Menu is a registered trademark of the Estate of Stephen Glazier. Write Brothers Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
 Rhymes. Oxford University Press. © 2006, 2007 All rights reserved.  Read more
Wikipedia on Answers.com. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article Deference Read more
Translations. Copyright © 2007, WizCom Technologies Ltd. All rights reserved.  Read more

Follow us
Facebook Twitter
YouTube