According to many followers of the theories of Karl Marx (or Marxists), dialectical materialism is the philosophical basis of Marxism. The name, which was never used
by Marx himself, refers to the notion that Marxism is a synthesis of philosophical dialectics and materialism.
It is sometimes seen as the complement of historical materialism (or the
"materialist conception of history") which is the name given to Marx's methodology in the study of society, economics and
history.
Dialectical materialism is often defined by reference to two claims by Marx: first that he "put Hegel's dialectics back on its feet" and second, that "the history of all hitherto
existing society is the history of class struggles." (The Communist Manifesto, 1848). Dialectical materialism is
essentially characterized by the belief that history is the product of class struggle and obeys
the general Hegelian principle of philosophy of history, that is the development
of the thesis into its antithesis which is sublated by the
"Aufhebung" (~ synthesis, a word that Hegel didn't like to
use) — which conserves the thesis and the antithesis while at the same time abolishing it (Aufheben — this contradiction
explains the difficulties of Hegel's thought). [1]
Hegel's dialectics aims at explaining the growth and development of human history. He considered that truth was the product of history and passed through various moments, including the moment of error — error, or
also negativity, is part of the development of truth — Marx's dialectical materialism considers, against Hegel's idealism, that history is not the product of the Spirit (Geist or also
Zeitgeist — the "Spirit of the Time") but the effect of material class struggle in society.
Theory thus has its roots in the materiality of social existence. However, "dialectical materialism" also refers to diamat
(an abbreviation for "dialectical materialism"), imposed by Stalin on the
Comintern and on Communist states.
The term dialectical materialism was probably invented in 1887 by Joseph Dietzgen, a
socialist tanner who corresponded with Marx. Casual mention of the term is also found in Kautsky's Frederick Engels,
written in the same year, 1887. Georgi Plekhanov, the father of Russian socialism,
later used it and it thus entered Marxist theory[2]. Marx
had talked about the "materialist conception of history", which was later shortened to "historical materialism" by Engels. Engels
exposed the "materialist dialectic" — not "dialectical materialism" — in his Dialectics
of Nature (1883). Diamat was debated and criticized by many Marxist philosophers, which led to various political and philosophical struggles in the Marxist
movement in general and in the Comintern in particular.
A brief history of dialectical materialist thought
Lenin's Materialism and Empiriocriticism (1908) and the 1917 October Revolution
Dialectical materialism was first elaborated by Lenin in Materialism and Empiriocriticism (1908) around three
axes: the "materialist inversion" of Hegelian dialectics, the historicity of ethical
principles ordered to class struggle and the convergence of "laws of evolution" in physics (Helmholtz), biology
(Darwin) and in political economics (Marx). Lenin hence took position between a
historicist Marxism (Labriola) and a determinist
Marxism, close to "social Darwinism" (Kautsky).
New discoveries in physics (including x-rays, electrons, and the
beginnings of quantum mechanics) challenged previous conceptions of matter and
materialism. Matter seemed to be disappearing. Lenin disagreed:
'Matter disappears' means that the limit within which we have hitherto known matter disappears and that our knowledge is
penetrating deeper; properties of matter are disappearing that formerly seemed absolute, immutable and primary, and which are now
revealed to be relative and characteristic only of certain states of matter. For the sole 'property' of matter with whose
recognition philosophical materialism is bound up is the property of being an objective reality, of existing outside of
the mind.
Lenin was following on from the work of Friedrich Engels, who had noted that "with
each epoch-making discovery even in the sphere of natural science, materialism has to change
its form." (Ludwig Feuerbach and the End of Classical German Philosophy.) One of Lenin's challenges was distancing
materialism as a viable philosophical outlook from what he referred to as the "vulgar materialism" expressed in statements like
"the brain secretes thought in the same way as the liver secretes bile" (attributed to 18th century physician Pierre Jean Georges Cabanis, 1757-1808); "metaphysical materialism" (matter is composed of
immutable, unchanging particles); and 19th-century "mechanical materialism" (matter was like little molecular billiard balls
interacting according to simple laws of mechanics). Lenin's (and Engels') solution to this challenge was "dialectical
materialism", where matter was understood in the broader sense of "objective reality" and consistent with new developments in
science.
Following the 1917 October Revolution,
Soviet philosophy divided itself between "dialecticians" (Deborin) and "mechanists" (Bukharin).
Georg Lukács' History and Class Consciousness (1921-23) and the Vth Comintern Congress (1924)
Georg Lukács, who had been minister of Culture in Béla
Kun's short-lived Hungarian Soviet Republic (1919), published
History and
Class Consciousness in 1923, in which he defined dialectical materialism as the knowledge of society as a whole,
knowledge which in itself was immediately the class consciousness of the
proletariat. In the first chapter, "What is Orthodox Marxism?", Lukács defined orthodoxy as the fidelity to the "Marxist method",
and not to the "dogmas":
"Orthodox Marxism, therefore, does not imply the uncritical acceptance of the results of Marx’s investigations. It is not the
‘belief’ in this or that thesis, nor the exegesis of a ‘sacred’ book. On the contrary,
orthodoxy refers exclusively to method. It is the scientific conviction that dialectical materialism is the road to truth and
that its methods can be developed, expanded and deepened only along the lines laid down by its founders." (§1)
Lukács criticized revisionist attempts by calling for the return to this Marxist
method. In much the same way that Althusser would latter define Marxism and
psychoanalysis as "conflictual sciences",[3] Lukács conceives "revisionism" and political splits as inherent to Marxist theory and praxis, insofar
as dialectical materialism is, according to him, the product of class struggle:
"For this reason the task of orthodox Marxism, its victory over Revisionism and utopianism can never mean the defeat, once and for all, of false tendencies. It is an ever-renewed
struggle against the insidious effects of bourgeois ideology on the thought of the proletariat. Marxist orthodoxy is no guardian
of traditions, it is the eternally vigilant prophet proclaiming the relation between the tasks of the immediate present and the
totality of the historical process." (end of §5)
Furthermore, he stated that "The premise of dialectical materialism is, we recall: 'It is not men’s consciousness that
determines their existence, but on the contrary, their social existence that determines their consciousness.'... Only when the
core of existence stands revealed as a social process can existence be seen as the product, albeit the hitherto unconscious
product, of human activity." (§5) In line with Marx's thought, he thus criticized the individualist bourgeois philosophy of the subject, which founds itself on the voluntary and conscious
subject. Against this ideology, he asserts the primacy of social relations. Existence —
and thus the world — is the product of human activity; but this can be seen only if the primacy of social process on individual
consciousness, which is but the effect of ideological mystification, is accepted. This doesn't entail that Lukács restrains human
liberty on behalf of some kind of sociological determinism: to the contrary, this production of existence is the possibility of praxis.
This heterodox definition, however, which he maintained by asserting that "orthodox Marxism" is fidelity to the Marxist
"method", and not to "dogmas", was condemned, along with Karl Korsch's work, in July
1924, during the Vth Comintern Congress, by Grigory Zinoviev.
Stalin's codification of diamat
In 1931, Stalin decided the issue of the debate between
dialecticians and mechanists by publishing a decree which identified dialectical materialism as
pertaining solely to Marxism-Leninism. He then codified it in Dialectical and
Historical Materialism (1938) by enumerating the "laws of dialectics", which are the
grounds of particular disciplines and in particular of the science of history, and which guarantees their conformity to the
"proletarian conception of the world". Thus, diamat was imposed on most Communist
parties affiliated to the Third International.
Marxist criticisms of dialectical materialism
However, the doctrine of dialectical materialism has been criticized by many Marxist theorists, including Marxist philosophers such as Antonio Gramsci, who proposed a
Marxist "philosophy of praxis" in its stead, or Louis
Althusser. Other thinkers in Marxist philosophy have had recourse to the
original texts of Marx and Engels and have created other Marxist philosophical projects and concepts which present alternatives
to dialectical materialism. As early as 1937, Mao Zedong
proposed another interpretation, in his essay On
Contradiction, in which he rejected the "laws of dialectics" and insisted on the complexity of the contradiction. Mao's text inspired Althusser's work on the contradiction, which was a driving theme in his
well-known essay For Marx
(1965). Althusser attempted to nuance the Marxist concept of "contradiction" by borrowing the concept of "overdetermination"
from psychoanalysis. He criticized the teleological
reading of Marx as a return to Hegel's idealism. Althusser developed the concept of "random materialism" (matérialisme
aléatoire) in contrast to dialectical materialism, a move which grew out of Althusser's project of 'anti-humanism,' or the
"philosophy of the subject." Another school of thought, led by Italian philosopher Ludovico
Geymonat, constructed a historical epistemology from dialectical materialism.
Materialism in dialectical materialism
Marx's thesis concerned Epicurus and Democritus'
atomism, considered as the founder, along with stoicism, of
materialist philosophy. He was thus familiar with Lucretius' theory of clinamen, etc. Materialism asserts the primacy of the
material world: in short, matter precedes thought. Additionally, materialism holds that the world is material; that all phenomena
in the universe consist of "matter in motion", wherein all things are interdependent and interconnected and develop in accordance
with natural law; that the world exists outside us and independently of our perception of it; that thought is a reflection of the
material world in the brain, and that the world is in principle knowable.
"The ideal is nothing else than the material world reflected by the human mind, and translated into forms of thought." --Karl
Marx, Das Kapital, Vol. 1.
Marx thus endorsed a materialist philosophy against Hegel's idealism; he "turned Hegel's dialectics upside down". However,
Marx's materialist position is not to be confused with simple materialism: in fact, he criticized classic materialism as another
idealist philosophy. According to the famous Theses on Feuerbach (1845),
philosophy had to stop "interpreting" the world in endless metaphysical debates, in order to start "transforming" the world.
Which the rising workers' movement, observed by Engels in England (Chartist movement) and by Marx in France and Germany, was precisely doing. Historical materialism is therefore
the primacy accorded to class struggle. The ultimate sense of Marx's materialism
philosophy is that philosophy itself must take position in the class struggle, if it is not to be reduced to spiritualist Idealism (such as Kant or Hegel's philosophies) which are, in fact,
only ideologies, that is the material product of social existence. Marx's materialism thus
later opened up the way for Frankfurt School's critical theory, which combined philosophy with the social sciences in an attempt to diagnose the ailments of society. Dialectical materialism itself would
however be reduced to the diamat orthodox theory.
Dialectics in dialectical materialism
For formal approaches, the main predication of 'dialectical opposition or contradiction' must be understood as 'some sense'
opposition between the objects involved in a directly associated context. 'Dialectical contradiction' is not reducible to simple
'opposites' or 'negation'.
Dialectics is the science of the general and abstract laws of the development of nature, society, and thought. Its principal
features are:
1) The universe is not a disconnected mix of things isolated from each other, but an integral whole, with the result that
things are interdependent.
2) Nature - the natural world or cosmos - is in a state of constant motion:
- "All nature, from the smallest thing to the biggest, from a grain of sand to the sun, from the protista to man, is in a
constant state of coming into being and going out of being, in a constant flux, in a ceaseless state of movement and change."
--Friedrich Engels, Dialectics of Nature.
3) Development is a process whereby insignificant and imperceptible quantitative changes lead to fundamental, qualitative
changes. The latter occur not gradually, but rapidly and abruptly, in the form of a leap from one state to another. A simple
example from the physical world might be the heating of water: a one degree increase in temperature is a quantitive change, but
at 100 degrees there is a qualitative change - water to steam.
- "Merely quantitative differences, beyond a certain point, pass into qualitative changes." --Karl Marx, Capital, Vol.
1.
4) All things contain within themselves internal dialectical contradictions, which are the primary cause of motion, change,
and development in the world.
Engels' laws of dialectics
Engels determines three laws of dialectics from his reading of Hegel's Science of Logic[4]. They are:
- The law of the unity and conflict of opposites;
- The law of the passage of quantitative changes into qualitative changes;
- The law of the negation of the negation
The first of Engel's laws or expressions was seen by both Hegel and Lenin as the central feature of a dialectical
understanding of things[5] [6] and originates with the ancient Ionian philosopher Heraclitus. [7]
The second is taken by Hegel from Aristotle, and is equated with what scientists call "phase transitions". It may be traced to
the ancient Ionian philosophers (particularly Anaximenes), from whom Aristotle inherited the concept, as well as by Hegel and
Engels, and in each case the phase transitions of water is one of the main expositions of quantity into quality and vice
versa.
The third, the negation of the negation, is Hegel's distinct expression. It was the expression through which (amongst other
things) Hegel's dialectic became fashionable during his life-time.
Engels presupposes, in drawing up these laws, a holistic approach outlined in point 1) above, and point 1) of Lenin's three
elements of dialectic below, and emphasises elsewhere point 2) above, that all things are in motion. [8]
Lenin's elements of dialectics
Lenin made some brief notes outlining three "elements" of logic after reading Hegel's Science of Logic in 1914.[1] They
are:
| “ |
1) The determination of the concept out of itself [the thing itself must be considered
in its relations and in its development];
2) the contradictory nature of the thing itself (the other of itself), the contradictory forces and tendencies in each
phenomenon;
3) the union of analysis and synthesis.
Such apparently are the elements of dialectics.
|
” |
| |
— Lenin, Summary of dialectics[9]
|
Lenin develops these in a further series of notes, and appears to argue that "the transition of quantity into quality and vice
versa" is an example of the unity and opposition of opposites expressed tentatively as "not only the unity of opposites, but the
transitions of every determination, quality, feature, side, property into every other [into its opposite?]."
The application of the dialectic to history is covered more in Historical
materialism.
Quotations
- "The question whether objective truth can be attributed to human thinking is not a question of theory but is a
practical question. Man must prove the truth, i.e., the reality and power, the this-worldliness of his thinking in
practice." --Karl Marx, Theses on Feuerbach
Endnotes
- ^ In particular, see Marx, The Poverty of Philosophy, chapter II,
first observation, where he uses this formulation. We should note here that Hegelians tend to attribute this formula to Marx's
teacher - "a certain Heinrich Moritz Chalybäus" - a Kantian who misrepresented Hegel, conflating Hegel's dialectic with the
Fichtean triad thesis, antithesis, synthesis. It is suggested that
subsequent to Marx's use of the phrase, Hegel has always been associated with the triad, which he rejected (cf hegel.net). However, one might cite Marx's
explanation of the development of the dialectic in the cited passage of The Poverty of Philosophy: "This new [synthesis]
unfolds itself again into two contradictory thoughts" which appears to be reaching beyond the limits of this misleading external
triad to an inner inherent unfolding, more along the Hegelian lines.
- ^ For instance, Plekhanov, The development of the monist view of
history, (1895)
- ^ Louis Althusser, "Marx and Freud",
in Writings on Psychoanalysis, Stock/IMEC, 1993 (French edition)
- ^ Engels, Dialectics of nature
- ^ "It is in this dialectic as it is here understood, that is, in the grasping
of oppositions in their unity, or of the positive in the negative, that speculative thought consists. It is the most important
aspect of dialectic." Hegel, Science of Logic, § 69, (p 56 in the Miller edition)
- ^ "The splitting of a single whole and the cognition of its contradictory
parts is the essence (one of the "essentials", one of the principal, if not the principal, characteristics or features) of
dialectics. That is precisely how Hegel, too, puts the matter." Lenin's Collected Works VOLUME 38, p359: On the question of
dialectics.
- ^ cf, for instance. 'The Doctrine of Flux and the Unity of Opposites' in the 'Heraclitus' entry in the Internet
Encyclopedia of Philosophy
- ^ The discovery that heat was actually the movement of atoms or molecules was
the very latest science of the period in which Engels was writing in his late period, in which what today we would express in
terms of "energy" was just beginning to be grasped.
- ^ Lenin's Collected Works Vol. 38 pp 221 - 222, written while reading Book
III, Section 3, Chapter 3 of The Science of Logic — “The Absolute Idea”
Selected readings on dialectical materialism
- Ludwig Feuerbach and the End of Classical German Philosophy, Friedrich Engels
- Anti-Dühring, Friedrich Engels
- Dialectics of
Nature, Friedrich Engels
- Materialism
and Empirio-Criticism, V.I. Lenin
- On the Question of
Dialectics, V.I. Lenin
- Dialectical and Historical
Materialism, Joseph Stalin
- On Contradiction,
Mao Tse-tung
- On the Materialist
Dialectic, Louis Althusser
- Dialectical Materialism, V.G. Afanasyev
- Materialism
And Historical Materialism, Anton Pannekoek
- Reason in Revolt, Marxist Philosophy
and Modern Science, Ted Grant and Alan Woods
- History and
Class Consciousness, Georg Lukacs
- Ioan, Petru "Logic and Dialectics" A.I. Cuza University Press, Iaşi 1998.
- "Dialectical Materialism", Theory
and History, Ludwig von Mises
- The Origins of Dialectical
Materialism, Z.A. Jordan
- Dialectics For Kids
See also
People
Concepts
be-x-old:Дыялектычны матэрыялізм
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)