- For the movie, see Dirty Tricks (film).
In politics and business, dirty tricks refers to unethical, duplicitous, slanderous
or illegal tactics employed to destroy or diminish the effectiveness of opponents. The term "dirty trick" can also be used to
refer to an underhanded technique to get ahead of an opponent (such as sabotage or disregarding
terms of engagement).
Electoral dirty tricks
Leaking secret information, digging into a candidate's past (opposition research)
or exposing real conflicts between the image presented and the person behind the image are always subject to argument as to
whether they are dirty tricks or truth-telling. When a candidate runs into trouble or roadblocks in his or her campaign that are
traceable to the other side, he/she can easily charge their opponent with dirty tricks. Often, the candidate is right in this
accusation, but one candidate's "dirty trick" is another's "political strategy." The distinction changes with the times. Of
course imputing the discovery of a past misdemeanor to the other side can be considered a "dirty trick" in its own right.
However, manufactured, irrelevant, cruel and incorrect rumors or outright falsehoods designed to damage or destroy an opponent
are easily described as dirty tricks. They serve to tie up the opponent into defending against and answering false charges rather
than explaining their policies and platform.
Sometimes dirty tricks are not only aimed at slandering the opponent. Dishing the dirt against your candidate's opponent can
be effective at alienating voters in order to turn them off from the entire project. These tactics may reduce turnout in order to
assure your candidate gains by having his/her core voters show up at the polls; thus, an operative molds the outcome by angering
everyone.
Political speech is protected by the
Constitution in the United States and it is rare that a wronged candidate sues
for slander after an election season is concluded.
Political candidates have been accused by their opponents of every sin and crime ever described, from graft and vice to bribery and
communism, polygamy, drug
use, spousal abuse, fascism, pedophilia, miscegenation, cannibalism, adultery, stupidity,
demagoguery, mental illness and support for
nudism.
The story of dirty tricks in American politics begins with the first campaign for President of the United States, in the 1790s.
Thomas Jefferson hired journalist and pamphleteer James Thomas Callender to slander his opponent, Alexander
Hamilton. After a falling out, Callender turned on Jefferson and published attacks on his previous employer.
Watergate era dirty tricks
For a full history see: Watergate scandal
The Nixon Committee to Re-elect the President (CRP), a private
non-governmental campaign entity, used funds from its coffers to pay for, and later cover up, "dirty tricks' performed against
opponents by Nixon's employee, Donald Segretti. Nixon's use of the FBI to investigate,
slander and abuse opponents goes beyond simple pranks or dirty tricks into the realm of government initiated crime.
As a result of post-Watergate reform legislation, such activities are strictly regulated, though other private entities still
may practice what has become commonly referred to as questionable or unethical dirty tricks.
Recent nomenclature equates a Dirty Tricks Squad to any organized, covert attempt to besmirch the credibility or reputation of
a candidate, individual or organization so as to render them ineffective.
Non-electoral political dirty tricks
In the United Kingdom the term "dirty tricks" became, for a while, synonymous with the
British Airways campaign against rival Virgin
Atlantic and the wider business interest of the airline's chairman Richard
Branson. British Airways, faced with likely defeat, apologised "unreservedly" in court and settled the case, giving
£500,000 to Branson and a further £110,000 to his airline; further, BA was to pay the legal fees of up to £3 million. Branson
divided his compensation among his staff, calling it the "BA bonus".
See also
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)