There are many arguments for and against DNA evidence. One argument is that it cannot be disproved as deciding evidence.

Do you think DNA fingerprinting is good evidence for solving crimes. why or why not?Do you think DNA fingerprinting is good evidence for solving crimes. why or why not?

what does molecular evidence mean

There are a few downsides to DNA evidence:

It has been suggested that the prominence of DNA evidence on TV shows has caused juries to expect irrefutable DNA evidence before convicting someone. This may be a problem if other forms of evidence are ignored.

DNA evidence can only be obtained in instances where biological substances are left behind or exchanged. This only occurs in a minority of cases.

DNA evidence sometimes only proves that the person was present at the scene - it does not always prove guilt. However, if a person's DNA is found at the scene, this may be perceived as proof that they committed the crime.

The amino acids of humans and apes differ by 1 percent