Docetism

In Christianity, Docetism (from the Greek δοκέω [dokeō], "to seem") is the belief that Jesus' physical body was an illusion, as was his crucifixion; that is, Jesus only seemed to have a physical body and to physically die, but in reality he was incorporeal, a pure spirit, and hence could not physically die. This belief treats the sentence "the Word was made Flesh" (John 1:14) as merely figurative. Docetism has historically been regarded as heretical by most Christian theologians.^[1][2]

Christology and theological implications

This belief is most commonly attributed to the Gnostics, many of whom believed that matter was evil, and as a result God would not take on a material body. This statement is rooted in the idea that a divine spark is imprisoned within the material body, and that the material body is in itself an obstacle, deliberately created by an evil, lesser god (the demiurge) to prevent man from seeing his divine origin.

Docetism can be further explained as the view that since the human body is temporary and the spirit is eternal, the body of Jesus must have been an illusion and, likewise, his crucifixion. Even so, saying that the human body is temporary has a tendency to undercut the importance of the belief in resurrection of the dead and the goodness of created matter, and is in opposition to this orthodox view.

It should be noted that Docetism was the antithesis of Orthodox Christianity. In other words, it had always been considered heretical (as early as the first Council in Jerusalem) and therefore never really a part of Orthodox Christianity. Docetism was quite a common form of early Christianity, from around 70 AD for about 100 years.^[3] Docetism largely died out during the first millennium AD. Gnostic movements that survived past that time, such as Catharism, incorporated docetism into their beliefs, but such movements were destroyed by the Albigensian Crusade (1209-1229).

Ignatius of Antioch wrote very harshly against docetism around 110 AD in his letter to the Smyrnaeans. In 7:1, he said, "They [the docetists] abstain from the Eucharist and from prayer, because they confess not the Eucharist to be the flesh of our Saviour Jesus Christ, which suffered for our sins, and which the Father, of His goodness, raised up again. They who deny the gift of God are perishing in their disputes". Since one of the main beliefs of docetism was that the body of Jesus was an illusion, docetists could not accept that the bread and wine used in the Eucharist were the actual flesh and blood of Jesus. Other detailed criticisms were given by Irenaeus and Tertullian.

Earl Doherty and Timothy Freke have suggested docetism arose from Christ mythicism.

Islam and docetism

The Qur'an Sura 4:156 reads:

‘Verily, we have killed the Messiah, Jesus the son of Mary, the apostle of God,’...but they did not kill him, and they did not crucify him, but a similitude was made for them...

This passage strongly suggests that the author was familiar with and accepting of docetism. The Qur'an was compiled in the mid-Seventh Century AD (around 650 CE), corresponding to the period when docetism was still commonly accepted and taught among some Christian sects. Thus, at least insofar as the Crucifixion of Jesus is concerned, Islam may be considered the largest modern source for belief in docetism.

While in this sense Islam is undeniably docetic, Muslims reject the divinity of Jesus; thus, unlike traditional docetism, Islam is Ebionitic.

Texts including docetism

Non-canonical Christian texts

• Gospel of Phillip
• Second Treatise of the Great Seth
• Gnostic Apocalypse of Peter
• Gospel of Judas
• Latin Infancy Gospel in the Arundel Manuscript
• In the contra epistulam fundamenti, Augustine of Hippo makes reference to the Manichaeans believing that Jesus was Docetic.
• Gospel of Peter
• Acts of John

See also

• Christology
• Adoptionism
• Adoptivi
• Arianism
• Binitarianism
• Monophysitism
• Avatar
• Christian heresy

References

External links

• Docetae in the Catholic Encyclopedia