Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Answers.com

Dr. Reddy's Laboratories

 
Hoover's Profile: Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd.
(NYSE:RDY)
Company Financials
Income Statement
Balance Sheet
Cash Flow Statement

Contact Information
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd.
7-1-27, Ameerpet
Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh 500 016, India
Tel. +91-40-2373-1946
Fax +91-40-2373-1955

Type: Public
On the web: http://www.drreddys.com
Employees: 11,228
Employee growth: 17.3%

One of India's top drugmakers, Dr. Reddy's Laboratories develops and manufactures branded and unbranded generic pharmaceuticals and bulk pharmaceutical ingredients. Its stable of products includes ulcer medicines (branded product Omez is a leading seller), antibiotics, antidepressants (generic version of Eli Lilly's Prozac), pain relievers, diabetes treatments, and cardiovascular drugs. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories also makes generic biotech products. Its custom pharmaceutical services unit provides contract discovery, development, and manufacturing services to other drugmakers. The firm sells its products in more than 100 countries through direct sales entities and third-party distribution partners.

Key numbers for fiscal year ending March, 2009:
Sales: $1,331.2M
One year growth: 6.2%
Net income: ($99.1)M

Officers:
Chairman: K. Anji Reddy
Vice Chairman and CEO: G. V. Prasad
COO and Director: Satish Reddy

Competitors:
Ranbaxy Laboratories
Sun Pharmaceutical
Teva Pharmaceuticals

Search unanswered questions...
Enter a question here...
Search: All sources Community Q&A Reference topics
Stock Quote: Dr. Reddy's Laboratories
Top
Stock Chart: Dr. Reddy's Laboratories
Top
Company News: Dr. Reddy's Laboratories
Top
Company History: Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd.
Top

Incorporated: 1984
NAIC: 325412 Pharmaceutical Preparation Manufacturing

Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd. is one of India's leading pharmaceutical companies with global ambitions. The company has departed from the Indian pharmaceutical market mainstream of copying patented drugs to pursue the development of its own--patentable--molecules. As such, the company has already achieved success with a number of promising anti-diabetic molecules. At the same time, Dr. Reddy's is pursuing a share of the lucrative, but highly competitive, U.S. generics market, including the higher-margin "branded generic" market. Dr. Reddy's operates through several strategic business units, including: Branded Finished Dosages; Generic Finished Dosages; Bulk Actives; Custom Chemicals; Biotechnology; Diagnostics; Critical Care; and Discovery Research. A leader in its domestic market, the company is also active on the international scene, which accounted for 64 percent of the company's total sales of Rs 18 billion ($392 million) in 2003. North America contributed 32 percent of sales, while Russia added 28 percent. The rest of the company's international revenues were generated through the Asian, African, and South American markets. Dr. Reddy's is led by founder and Chairman Dr. Anji Reddy and CEO (and Reddy's son-in-law) G.V. Prasad. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories was the first Asian pharmaceutical company, excluding Japan, to list on the New York Stock Exchange.

In 1970, the Indian government, then led by Indira Ghandi, abrogated laws respecting international pharmaceutical patents. The move, meant to reduce the cost of providing healthcare to India's large and exceedingly poor population, had the effect of supercharging the country's pharmaceutical sector. With a long history in process chemistry, and a large and highly educated pool of scientists, the sector quickly became experts at reverse-engineering, and then copying, the drugs developed by the world's large multinationals.

The new industry quickly became one of the world's most energetic markets--by the 1990s, there were more than 20,000 companies operating in India's pharmaceuticals industry. Indian producers were able to produce drugs and their components for a fraction of the cost of their Western counterparts, and quickly found an enormous demand throughout the developing world. Yet the highly competitive domestic market, as well as the slender margins available from the copied--many would call them pirated--drugs forced the Indian companies to develop highly cost-effective manufacturing and marketing models.

Dr. Anji Reddy, the son of a well-to-do turmeric farmer in Andra Pradesh in the south of India, was one of the early entrants into the new and fast-growing market. Reddy traveled to Bombay to pursue pharmacology studies, then went on to earn a Ph.D. in chemical engineering. Reddy then went to work for state-owned pharmaceutical company IDPL. At the time IDPL had been reliant on Russian technology; yet the company quickly turned the tables, gaining expertise--and eventually providing that to Russia itself.

Reddy remained with IDPL into the early 1970s. The change of law and the rise of new opportunities in the pharmaceutical industry, however, encouraged him to set up his own business, and in the mid-1970s, Reddy founded a company for producing and selling bulk actives--the basic ingredients of drug compounds--to pharmaceutical manufacturers. Reddy's clientele soon featured a host of national and multinational companies, such as Burroughs Wellcome and others.

In the early 1980s, however, Reddy sought to aim higher and establish himself as a manufacturer of finished products. In 1984, Reddy founded Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, using $40,000 of his own, backed by a bank loan for $120,000. Reddy jumped into the market of producing copies, taking advantage of the 1970 law. As he told Forbes: "We are products of that. But for that, we wouldn't be here. It was good for the people of India, and it was good for this company."

Reddy's grew quickly, adding a large number of formulations, and achieving strong local success with its NISE range of painkillers. The company also had success with its copy of Bayer's antibiotic ciprofloxacin and, especially, with AstraZeneca's omeprazole, which, under the trade name Losec, had become the world's largest-selling drug. That drug provided fortune for Dr. Reddy's as well, as Reddy told the Financial Times: "After Astra, I think I must be the largest producer in the world."

Meanwhile, Reddy's took advantage of India's low wage and production costs to boost its production of bulk actives. By 1986, the company prepared to expand still further, and listed its stock on the Bombay exchange. In that year, also, the company began its first exports of bulk actives, including methyldopa.

The company achieved another crucial milestone in 1987 when it gained U.S. FDA approval for its ibuprofen formulation. That approval, which was coupled with the all-important FDA certification of its factory, marked the start of the company's international formulations exports.

In the meantime, Reddy's continued to develop its bulk actives business, becoming one of India's largest exporters of drug ingredients. In order to support that growth, the company made its first acquisition, of Benzex Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., a bulk actives specialist.

By the early 1990s, Reddy's, like its Indian counterparts, boasted a wide range of "copied" drugs in its portfolio. International sales were also becoming an increasingly important part of the company's total revenues, a trend boosted by the company's entry into the Russian market in 1991. That country later grew into one of the company's primary export markets.

Reddy himself, however, by then joined by son-in-law and future CEO G.V. Prasad, recognized that continued pressure from multinational drug companies, with political backing from their domestic governments, coupled with India's desire to join the World Trade Organization, would eventually lead to the re-imposition of respect for international drug patents. At the same time, competition among Indian manufacturers--with as many as 100 companies producing knockoffs of the same drug preparation--had become increasingly heavy, making it harder to generate profits. Meanwhile, the restriction-free market in India had led to a mass exodus of the country's highly regarded researchers and scientists.

These factors led Dr. Reddy's to a dramatic strategic shift. In 1992, Reddy founded Dr. Reddy's Research Foundation and determined to lead his company through the transition from copier to pharmaceutical innovator. By 1993, the company's new research and development wing was operational, and it set to work performing "drug discovery" work in a variety of fields, including metabolic disorders, such as diabetes, and cancer treatments, among others.

Reddy's shift initially met with skepticism from the Indian community. As Reddy told the Financial Times: "I made a statement in Bangalore in 1993. I said: 'Don't think that because we don't have millions of dollars we cannot invent new drugs. Don't shy away from this.' But nobody had the conviction that an Indian company could discover anything."

Nonetheless, for its research and development effort, Reddy's adopted a standard practice among even the largest multinationals, that of developing "analogue" preparations of existing drugs. By slightly altering the composition of a molecule or preparation, Reddy would be able to present a new drug, which was sufficiently different chemically to achieve a separate patent.

The shift into research represented only one prong of Dr. Reddy's ambitions. In its determination to become a player in the global market, the company moved to end production of illegal copies and instead shift its operations to the manufacture of--legal--generic drugs. In 1994, the company placed a rights issue of $48 million in order to construct a new facility dedicated to producing generic drugs capable of meeting the legislative requirements of Western markets. The company also opened a U.S. subsidiary in New Jersey that year.

By 1995, Reddy's initial research and development efforts had already paid off, as the company filed its first patent application for a new and promising anti-diabetes formulation. The company successfully completed laboratory testing on the drug, an insulin sensitizer dubbed balaglitazone by 1997. Yet, lacking the funds to engage in its own clinical testing, the company placed the patent up for grabs, and licensed it to Novo Nordisk in 1997. This marked a first for an Indian-developed drug. The following year, Novo Nordisk acquired the license for Dr. Reddy's second insulin sensitizer, ragaglitazar.

The year 1997 marked a new era for Dr. Reddy's. In that year, the U.S. FDA adopted new rules, designed to encourage the growth of the generic drugs market in the United States, which provided a six-month exclusivity period for the first company to gain approval to market newly available drugs in a generic form. Dr. Reddy's decided to get in on the action--as an estimated $60 billion of drugs was expected to outgrow their patents over the next ten years--and in 1997 the company filed an abbreviated new drug application (ANDA, used for registering a drug in its generic formula) for a generic version of the popular anti-ulcer medication Zantac.

Buoyed by its early success, Dr. Reddy's moved to expand its operations at the turn of the century. In 1999, the company made a new acquisition, buying up American Remedies Limited, based in Chennai, boosting its formulations capacity. That year, also, the company set up a research and development subsidiary, Reddy US Therapeutics, in Atlanta, Georgia, placing part of its drug discovery effort closer to the U.S. market.

In 2000, the company made another important acquisition, this time of Cheminor Drugs Limited, which enabled Dr. Reddy's to claim the number three spot among Indian pharmaceutical companies. That year, the company launched the commercial distribution of its first generics in the United States. Back home, the company's research efforts had paid off with the filing of an Investigational New Drug Application for an anti-cancer molecule developed in the company's labs.

Dr. Reddy's global ambitions now took it to the New York Stock Exchange, where the company listed its stock in 2001, becoming the first Asian pharmaceutical company outside of Japan to do so. The company clearly revealed its ambitions, as Reddy told Business Week: "We want to be a truly innovative company discovering and marketing drugs the world over." That year, the company scored a new success in its research activities, licensing a second-generation anti-diabetic molecule to Novartis in a deal worth some $55 million. Meanwhile, on the generics front, the company was lifted when its application for a 40mg generic version of the popular anti-depressive Prozac was awarded a 180-day exclusivity period. That period generated some $56 million--nearly all profit--for the company.

By 2002, the Indian government had agreed to re-introduce patent enforcement in the pharmaceutical industry, starting in 2005. Although some observers questioned whether the company would maintain the political will to enforce the new rules, Dr. Reddy's emerged as one of only a handful of Indian companies capable of independent research. Indeed, the company had continued to build up its research capacity. In 2001, it had created a new subsidiary, Aurigene Discovery Technologies, dedicated to the biotechnology sector.

The year 2002 also marked the company's first overseas acquisition, when it paid £9 million to acquire the United Kingdom's BMS Laboratories Ltd. and its marketing and distribution subsidiary Meridian Healthcare Ltd. That purchase enabled the company to expand into the U.K.--and ultimately European--generics market.

At the end of 2002, Dr. Reddy's scored a new victory in the U.S. market, when it successfully defeated lawsuits lobbied by Pfizer to prevent the Indian company's marketing of its own variant of the pharmaceutical giant's Novasc. The company then began preparations to introduce its version of the drug in 2003. Yet the new compound was expected to mark a new step for the company, as it became determined to enter the higher-margin branded generics category.

Dr. Reddy's backed this change in strategy with a new portfolio of drugs, including the filing of an ANDA for fexofenadine HCI (better known as Allegra, from Aventis) in April 2003. In July of that year, the company scored a new victory when it was granted tentative FDA approval to develop and market generic versions of the Bristol Myers Squibb drug Serzone. Dr. Reddy's appeared well on its way to achieving its goal of becoming a global pharmaceutical company.

Principal Subsidiaries

Aurantis Farmaceutica Ltda (Brazil; 50%); Aurigene Discovery Technologies Inc. (U.S.A.); Aurigene Discovery Technologies Limited; Cheminor Drugs Limited; Compact Electric Limited; Dr. Reddy's Exports Limited (22%); Dr. Reddy's Farmaceutica Do Brazil Ltda.; Dr. Reddy's Laboratories (EU) Limited (U.K.); Dr. Reddy's Laboratories (Proprietary) (South Africa); Dr. Reddy's Laboratories (UK) Limited; Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Inc. (U.S.A.); DRL Investments Limited India; Kunshan Rotam Reddy Pharmaceutical Co. Limited (China; 51%); OOO JV Reddy Biomed Limited (Russia); Pathnet India Private Limited (49%); Reddy Antilles N.V. (Antilles); Reddy Cheminor S.A. (France); Reddy Netherlands B.V.; Reddy Pharmaceuticals Hong Kong Limited; Reddy Pharmaceuticals Singapore; Reddy US Therapeutics Inc.; Zenovus Biotech Limited.

Principal Competitors

RPG Enterprises; GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare Ltd.; East India Pharmaceutical Works Ltd.; Cipla Ltd.; Concept Pharmaceuticals Ltd.; Khandelwal Laboratories Ltd.; Dabur India Ltd.

Further Reading

"Coming at You, Merck," Business Week, April 9, 2001, p. 27.

Datta, Mrinalini, "Dr. Reddy Looks to the Next Level," International Herald Tribune, February 11, 2003, p. B4.

"Dr. Reddy's Lab: It's The People, Stupid," Business Today, September 1, 2002.

"Generic Genius," Economist, September 30, 2000, p. 66.

Merchant, Khozem, "Drugs Innovation Is Just What the Doctor Ordered," Financial Times, June 7, 2002, p. 28.

Pilling, David, "Doctor in Search of Patents," Financial Times, September 14, 1999, p. 8.

Slater, Joanna, and Gardiner Harris, "Legal Remedy," Far Eastern Economic Review, April 24, 2003.

Tanzer, Andrew, "Pill Factory to the World," Forbes, December 10, 2001, p. 70.

— M. L. Cohen


Wikipedia: Dr. Reddy's Laboratories
Top
Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd.
Type Public
Founded 1984
Headquarters Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India
Key people Anji Reddy, Chairman
GV Prasad, CEO
Industry Pharmaceuticals
Revenue $1.5 Billion (MAY2007)
Net income $216 Million (MAY2007)
Employees 8,225
Website www.drreddys.com

Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd. trading as Dr. Reddy's, founded in 1984 by Dr. K. Anji Reddy, has become India’s second biggest pharmaceutical company. Dr. Anji Reddy had worked in the publicly-owned Indian Drugs and Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Reddy's manufactures and markets a wide range of pharmaceuticals in India and overseas. The company has more than 190 medications ready for patients to take, 60 active pharmaceutical ingredients for drug manufacture, diagnostic kits, critical care and biotechnology products.

Dr. Reddy’s began as a supplier to Indian drug manufacturers, but it soon started exporting to other less-regulated markets that had the advantage of not having to spend time and money on a manufacturing plant that that would gain approval from a drug licensing body such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Much of Reddy’s early success came in those unregulated markets, where process patents – not product patents – are recognized. With that money in the bank, the company could reverse-engineer patented drugs from more developed countries and sell them royalty-free in India and Russia. By the early 1990s, the expanded scale and profitability from these unregulated markets enabled the company to begin focusing on getting approval from drug regulators for their formulations and bulk drug manufacturing plants in more-developed economies. This allowed their movement into regulated markets such as the US and Europe.

By 2007, Dr. Reddy’s had six FDA-plants producing active pharmaceutical ingredients in India and seven FDA-inspected and ISO 9001 (quality) and ISO 14001 (environmental management) certified plants making patient-ready medications – five of them in India and two in the UK.[1]

Contents

Dr Reddy's and regulations

Generics goldmine

With drug prices high in most OECD member states, health services came to rely on generic versions of drugs rather than the branded ‘originals’ – in the UK this was made the result of advice to National Health Service doctors from the country’s health department and in the US by the 1984 Hatch-Waxman Act or Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act[2] and the financial liberalization of the mid 1990s[3] gave what had been ‘third world’ pharmaceuticals firms a chance of getting into more lucrative markets, using their ability to reverse-engineer. In 1997, the U.S. FDA created an incentive for generics companies to engage branded drug makers in court, with the introduction of the Para 4 filing law, in a bid to generate competition. The law rewarded generic manufacturers for challenging existing patents instead of waiting for them to expire.

India: patents and profits

In the 60 years since India’s independence, the domestic pharmaceutical industry has been shaped primarily by regulation. Initially, multinationals had a near monopoly on pharmaceuticals. They imported and marketed complete formulations in India, mainly low-cost generics along with a few highly priced speciality drugs. When the government increased pressure to deter the import of finished products, multinationals set up formulating units and continued importing bulk drugs.

In the 1960s, the Indian government laid the foundation for a domestic pharmaceuticals industry by promoting the state-owned Hindustan Antibiotics Ltd. and Indian Drugs and Pharmaceuticals Ltd. for the manufacture of bulk drugs. However, the multinationals maintained their lead because of their technical expertise, financial muscle, and ability to move innovations from one market to another. The high cost of original research, the sophisticated scientific knowledge needed and a lack of financing options worked against the private-sector Indian companies.

This state of affairs changed with the 1970 Indian Patent Act, whereby substances used in foods and pharmaceuticals were not granted product patents. Process patents were granted for a period of five years from the date of grant or seven years from the date of filing, whichever was earlier. Process modifications were easier to accomplish, and there was a rapid influx of domestic manufacturers. These companies generally started with bulk drugs and gradually progressed into complete medications. The multinationals were constrained by their parent companies’ product ranges but the Indian producers could make almost anything. Not paying product patent royalties cut the cost of local manufacture and helped Indian producers thrive.

Shortly thereafter, the Drugs Price Control Order put a ceiling on prices of certain mass-usage formulations. Since selling at such low prices could cause discontent in their home markets, multinationals dramatically curtailed new product launches, further boosting India's domestic players.

Under the Foreign Exchange Regulations Act in the late 1970s, the multinationals had to reduce their stakes in Indian ventures to 40%, or comply with certain export obligations and keep their equity stake at 51%. Many multinationals preferred not to do business in that climate – another shot in the arm for India's pharmaceutical industry.

In 1986, Reddy’s started operations on branded formulations. Within a year Reddy’s had launched Norilet, Reddy’s first recognized brand in India. But, thanks to its superior process technology, Reddy’s scored a big success with Omez, its branded omezaprole – ulcer and reflux oesophagitis medication – launched at half the price of other brands on the Indian market at that time.

Within a year, Reddy’s became the first Indian company to export the active ingredients for pharmaceuticals to Europe. In 1987, Reddy's started to transform itself from a supplier of pharmaceutical ingredients to other manufacturers into a manufacturer of pharmaceutical products.

The passage from India

First it moved into Russia, forming a joint venture with the country’s biggest pharmaceuticals producer Biomed in 1992, pulling out in 1995 amid accusations of scandal, involving 'a significant material loss due to the activities of Moscow's branch of Reddy's Labs with the help of Biomed’s chief executive[4] selling the joint venture to the Kremlin-friendly Sistema group and buying the whole company in 2002.

In 1993, Reddy’s entered into a joint venture in the Middle East and created two formulation units there and in Russia. Reddy’s exported bulk drugs to these formulation units, which then converted them into finished products. In 1994, Reddy’s started targeting the US generic market by building state of art manufacturing facility.

Reddy’s path into new drug discovery involved targeting speciality generics products in western markets to gain drug discovery abilities. The reason why development of speciality drugs was an important link to the development of new chemical entities is that all the elements that are involved in an NCE effort, such as innovation in the laboratory, developing the compound, sending the sales team to the market etc. are also stages in the development of a specialty drug. Reddy’s also invested heavily in building R&D labs and is the only Indian company to have significant R&D being undertaken overseas. Dr. Reddy’s Research Foundation was established in 1992 and dedicated to research in area of new drug discovery. At first, the foundation’s drug research strategy revolved around searching for analogues but its changed focus to innovative R&D, hiring new scientists – especially Indian students studying abroad on doctoral and post-doctoral courses. In 2000, foundation set up a US lab in Atlanta, dedicated to discovery and design of novel therapeutics. The lab is called Reddy US Therapeutics Inc (RUSTI) and its main aim is the discovery of next-generation drugs using genomics and proteomics. Reddy’s research thrust focused on large niche areas in western markets – anti-cancer, anti-diabetes, cardiovascular and anti-infection drugs.

Reddy’s international marketing successes were built on a strong manufacturing base which itself was a result of inorganic growth through acquisition of international and national facilities. Reddy’s merged Cheminor Drug Limited (CDL) with primary aim of supplying APIs to the technically demanding markets of North America and Europe. This merger also gave Reddy’s entry into value added generics business in the regulated markets of APIs.

By 1997, Reddy’s was ready for the next major step. From being an API and bulk drug supplier to regulated markets like the USA and the UK, and a branded formulations supplier in unregulated markets like India and Russia, Reddy’s made the transition into generics by filing an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) in the USA. The same year, Reddy’s out-licensed a molecule for clinical trials to Novo Nordisk, a Danish pharmaceutical company.

It strengthened its Indian manufacturing operations by acquiring American Remedies Ltd. in 1999. This acquisition made Reddy’s the third largest pharmaceutical company in India, after Ranbaxy and Glaxo (I) Ltd., with a full spectrum of pharmaceutical products, which included bulk drugs, intermediates, finished dosages, chemical synthesis, diagnostics and biotechnology.

Reddy’s started exploiting Para 4 filing as a strategy in bringing new drugs to the market at a faster pace. In 1999 it submitted a Para 4 application for Omeprazole- the drug it had so successfully marketed in India. In December 2000, Reddy’s had undertaken its first commercial launch of a generic product in the USA., and its first product with market exclusivity was launched there in August 2001. The same year, it also became the first non-Japanese pharmaceutical company from the Asia-Pacific region to obtain a New York Stock Exchange listing. Each of these achievements was path breaking for the Indian pharmaceutical industry.

In 2001 when Reddy’s became the first Indian company to launch the generic drug, fluoxetine (a generic version of Eli Lilly’s Prozac) with 180 day market exclusivity in the USA. Eli Lilly's antidepressant drug Prozac had sales in excess of $1 billion per year in the late nineties. Barr Laboratories of the U.S. obtained exclusivity for all of the approved dosage forms (10mg, 20mg) except one (40mg), which was obtained by Reddy’s. Lilly had numerous other patents surrounding the drug compound and had already enjoyed a long period of patent protection. The case was heard twice by the Federal Circuit court, and Reddy’s won both hearings. The importance of market exclusivity is illustrated by the fact that. Reddy’s generated nearly $70 million in revenue during the six-month period. With such phenomenal returns at stake, Reddy’s was beginning to gamble on litigation that could cost millions of dollars, depending on the length of the trial.

The fluoxetine marketing success was followed by the launch of ibuprofen tablets 400, 600 and 800 mg in the US under its own brand name, in January 2003. Direct marketing under the Reddy’s brand name represented a significant step in the company’s efforts to build a strong and sustainable US generic business. It was the first step in building Reddy’s fully fledged distribution network in the US market. This was much on the lines of the Indian software majors who have marketing professionals in the US.

In 2001 Reddy’s completed its US initial public offering of $132.8 million American Depositary Receipts issue and also listed on the New York Stock exchange. Funds raised from the US initial public offering helped Reddy’s move into international production – and take over technology-based companies.

In 2002, Reddy’s started its European operations by acquiring two pharmaceutical firms in the UK. The acquisition of BMS Laboratories and its wholly owned subsidiary, Meridian UK allowed Reddy’s to expand geographically and gave company an opportunity to enter the European market. In 2003 Reddy’s also invested US$. 5.25 million in equity capital of Bio Sciences ltd.

Auriegene Discovery Technologies, a contract research company was established as a fully owned subsidiary of Reddy’s in 2002, to gain experience of drug discovery through contract research for other Pharma companies. Reddy’s entered into a venture investment type of agreement with the Indian bank, ICICI. Under the terms of the agreement, ICICI Venture funds the development, registration and legal costs related to the commercialization of ANDAs on a pre-determined basis. On commercialization of these products, Dr. Reddy's pays ICICI Venture royalty on net sales for a period of 5 years. Reddy’s successful growth into a fully integrated pharmaceutical company in less than a decade was founded on a successful and targeted program of inorganic growth and investments in process R&D. It had chosen a high risk-high gain strategy to growth by going into direct competition with existing patent holders. A major challenge for Reddy’s is to find ways to de-risk its overall strategy. One way may lie in managing the cash flows from the ‘safer’ API and formulations businesses. Another way may be to seek out more experienced partners for the R&D business or use acquisitions to boost R&D resources and revenues. It has chosen the global route and went on an acquiring spree.

In March 2002, Dr. Reddy’s acquired BMS Laboratories, Beverley, and it is wholly owned subsidiary Meridian Healthcare, for EUR 14.81 million. These companies deal in oral solids, liquids and packaging, with manufacturing facilities in London and Beverley in the UK. Recently, Dr. Reddy’s entered into an R&D and commercialization agreement with Argenta Discovery Ltd., a private drug development company based in the UK, for the treatment of COPD.

With growing success in the generics market, Reddy’s also came to realize the need for developing marketing and distribution capabilities in the USA Reddy’s was considering several options for marketing the hypertension product in 2003. The company already had one tie-up with Pharmaceutical Resources, Inc. to market Fluoxentine 40 mg tablets. It also had a tie-up with Par Pharmaceuticals Inc., to produce and market over-the-counter drugs in the U.S. In addition to the United States, Reddy’s generics business had established a presence in the UK, is a platform for expansion into other countries in Europe. Reddy’s also plans to expand its presence in Canada and South Africa. Its API business had sales in over 60 countries, with the US and India being the most significant revenue contributors. The branded formulations business was active in over 30 countries and Reddy’s was a significant player in the Indian and Russian markets. The business planned to significantly increase its presence in China, Brazil and Mexico in the near future.

Dr. Reddy’s entered into a 10-year agreement with Rheoscience A/S of Denmark for the joint development and commercialization of Balaglitazone (DRF-2593), a molecule for the treatment of type-2 diabetes. Rheoscience holds this product’s marketing rights for the European Union and China, while the rights for the US and the rest of the world will be held by Dr. Reddy’s. Dr. Reddy’s conducted clinical trials of its cardiovascular drug RUS 3108 in Belfast, Northern Ireland, in 2005.The trials were conducted to study the safety and the pharmacokinetic profiles of the drug, which is intended for the treatment of atherosclerosis, a major cause of cardiovascular disorders.

Dr. Reddy’s entered into a marketing agreement with Eurodrug Laboratories, a pharmaceutical company based in Netherlands, for improving its product portfolio for respiratory diseases. It introduced a second-generation xanthine bronchodilator, Doxofylline, which is used for the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients.

In 2004, Reddy’s acquired Trigenesis Therapeutics Inc; the US based private dermatology company. This acquisition gave Reddy’s access to certain products and proprietary technologies in dermatology segment. Dr. Reddy’s Para 4 application strategy for generic business received a severe set back when Reddy’s lost the patent challenge in case of Pfizer’s drug Norvasc (amlodipine maleate). Amlodipine maleate, the generic version of Pfizer's Norvasc, is indicated for the treatment of hypertension and angina. The cost involved in patent litigation as well as the strategic reversal affected Reddy’s plans to start speciality business in the US generic markets.

In March 2006, Dr. Reddy’s acquired Betapharm Arzneimittel GmbH from 3i for EUR 480 million. This is one of the largest-ever foreign acquisitions by an Indian pharmaceutical company. Betapharm is Germany’s fourth-largest generics pharmaceuticals covering 3.5% market share including 150 active pharmaceutical ingredients.

Reddy’s has promoted India’s first integrated drug development company Perlecan Pharma Pvt Ltd together with ICICI ventures capital fund management company Ltd and Citigroup Venture Capital International growth partnership Mauritius Ltd. The combined entity will undertake clinical development and out-licensing of New Chemical Entity Assets.

Dr. Reddy's is presently licensed by Merck & Co. to sell an authorized generic version of the popular drug simvastatin (Zocor) in the USA. Since Dr. Reddy's has a license from Merck, it is not subject to the exclusivity period on generic simvastatin of 180 days from June 23, 2006, which is split between Ranbaxy Laboratories (also from India) and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries.[5]

As on 2006, Dr. Reddy’s Labs crossed US $500 M in revenues flowing from segments such as APIs, Branded Formulations and Generics with the former two segments accounting for almost 75% of revenues. On an overall note, Dr. Reddy’s controls the entire supply chain and offers high-quality products at competitive prices at the opportune time. It deals in and manages all the processes, from the development of the API to the submission of finished dosage dossiers to the regulatory agencies. It has moved from strength to strength and has built a variety of partnerships as well as acquisitions across its key overseas markets, US and Europe and had laid a strong foundation and is well poised to take advantage of opportunities in international markets.

Drug discovery troubles

Dr. Reddy's spun off its drug discovery and research wing into a separate company called Perlecan Pharma Private Limited in September 2005 which was hailed as an innovative move at that time but it had to be wound down in 2008 due to funding constraints.[6] Dr. Reddy's was the first Indian pharma company to attempt such an effort to de-couple risk of drug discovery from the parent company by creating a separate company with external source of funding. Perlecan Pharma was part funded by ICICI Venture Capital and Citigroup Venture International, both of which held a 43% stake in Perlecan for an estimated $22.5 million. However, the company had to buy back the Perlecan shares from ICICI and Citigroup as the venture capitalists wanted out because of their doubts in the commercial viability of the drugs candidates that were in Perlecan's pipeline. Dr. Reddy's bought back the shares in July and Perlecan became a wholly owned subsidiary, however in the board meeting set for 23 October, the company is set to amalgamate/absorb Perlecan, thereby making it an inhouse research facility, like before 2005.[7]

In 2009, the company did a U-turn and has handed over discovery research and related Intellectual property to its Bangalore based subsidiary, with the possibility of spinning it off as a different entity altogether. "The company may be hoping to find a strategic partner in the future to share the risks and research funding."[8]

Diabetes drug trial delayed

Market launch of the company's diabetes drug candidate in third phase clinical trials, Balaglitazone, is expected to be delayed as the Danish research partner that is conducting the clinical trials for Dr. Reddy's is facing financial problems[9] Rheoscience's parent company Nordic Bioscience is believed to have undertaken to provide funds to Rheoscience to continue the trials and thus live up to the contractual obligations to Dr. Reddy's. Some clarity on this is expected to emerge after the second quarter financial results, which is expected to be announced on 23 October 2008.

Key people

On March 31, 2006 board members and senior executives included.

  • Mr. Amit Patel - Vice President, Corporate Development & Strategic Planning
  • Dr. K Anji Reddy, chairman
  • Mr. GV Prasad - vice chairman & chief executive
  • Mr. Satish Reddy - managing director & COO
  • Mr. B.Koteswar rao - independent director
  • Mr. Anupam Puri - independent director
  • Dr. Krishna G Palepu - independent director (Following the Satyam accounting scandal, media has reported that Prof Palepu has been informally asked to quit the Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Board[10].)
  • Dr. Omkar Goswami - independent director
  • Mr. P N Devarajan - independent director
  • Mr. Ravi Bhoothalingam - independent director
  • Dr. V. Mohan - independent director
  • Dr. Rajinder Kumar - president, Research, Development and Commercialization (joined on April 30 2007)[11]

Key products

Top active pharmaceutical ingredients

Top-10 brands in India

  • Omez
  • Nise
  • Stamlo
  • Stamlo Beta
  • Enam
  • Atocor
  • Razo
  • Reclimet
  • Clamp
  • Mintop

Top brand in Middle East

External links

References


 
 

 

Copyrights:

Hoover's Profile. ©2008 Hoover's, Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
Stock Quote. © MarketWatch, Inc. 2008. All rights reserved. Subject to the Terms of Use. Designed and powered by Dow Jones Client Solutions.
MarketWatch, the MarketWatch logo, BigCharts and the BigCharts logo are registered trademarks of MarketWatch, Inc. Dow Jones is the registered trademark of Dow Jones & Company, Inc.  Read more
Company History. International Directory of Company Histories. Copyright © 2006 by The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Dr. Reddy's Laboratories" Read more