(mathematics) An integral over x whose integrand is a rational function of x and the square root of p(x), where p(x) is a third- or fourth-degree polynomial without multiple roots.
| Sci-Tech Dictionary: elliptic integral |
(mathematics) An integral over x whose integrand is a rational function of x and the square root of p(x), where p(x) is a third- or fourth-degree polynomial without multiple roots.
| 5min Related Video: Elliptic integral |
| Wikipedia: Elliptic integral |
| This article includes a list of references or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it has insufficient inline citations. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations where appropriate. (February 2009) |
In integral calculus, elliptic integrals originally arose in connection with the problem of giving the arc length of an ellipse. They were first studied by Giulio Fagnano and Leonhard Euler. Modern mathematics defines an "elliptic integral" as any function f which can be expressed in the form

where R is a rational function of its two arguments, P is the square root of a polynomial of degree 3 or 4 with no repeated roots, and c is a constant.
In general, elliptic integrals cannot be expressed in terms of elementary functions. Exceptions to this general rule are when P has repeated roots, or when R(x,y) contains no odd powers of y. However, with the appropriate reduction formula, every elliptic integral can be brought into a form that involves integrals over rational functions and the three canonical forms (i.e. the elliptic integrals of the first, second and third kind).
Besides the forms given below, the elliptic integrals may also be expressed in Legendre form and Carlson symmetric form. Additional insight into the theory of the elliptic integral may be gained through the study of the Schwarz–Christoffel mapping. Historically, elliptic functions were discovered as inverse functions of elliptic integrals. In particular, we have F (sn(z;k);k) = z, where sn is one of Jacobi's elliptic functions.
Elliptic integrals are a function of two arguments. These arguments are expressed in a variety of different but completely equivalent ways (they give the same elliptic integral). Most texts adhere to a canonical naming scheme, using the following naming conventions.
For expressing one
the modular angle (pronounced “ethyl”);
the elliptic modulus;
the parameter.Each of the above three quantities is completely determined by any of the others (given that they are nonnegative). Thus, they can be used interchangeably.
The other argument can likewise be expressed in a number of different ways:
, the amplitude;
;Specifying the value of any one of these quantities determines the others. Note that u also depends on m. Some additional relationships involving u include

and

The latter is sometimes called the delta amplitude and written as
. Sometimes the literature also refers to the complementary parameter, the complementary modulus, or the complementary modular angle. These are further defined in the article on quarter periods.
The incomplete elliptic integral of the first kind F is defined as

Equivalently, using notation in Jacobi's form, one sets
; then

where it is understood that when there is a vertical bar used, the argument following the vertical bar is the parameter (as defined above); and, when a backslash is used, it is followed by the modular angle. In this sense,
, with the notations directly borrowed from the reference book of standards, Abramowitz and Stegun. The use of the delimiters ; | \ is traditional in elliptic integrals.
However, there remain different conventions for the notation of elliptic integrals! The differences can be very confusing, especially to a novice[citation needed]. The functions that evaluate the elliptic integrals do not have standard and unique names and meanings (like sqrt, sin and erf have). Even the literatures on the subject use differentiated notations. Gradstein, Ryzhik[1] and the Wikipedia article "Legendre form" use
. The notation is equivalent to our
; also
below.
Accordingly, if one translates the code from the Mathematica language into the language used by Maple, one should replace the argument of the EllipticK function with its square root. Correspondingly, in the translation from Maple to Mathematica, the argument should be replaced by its square. EllipticK(x) in Maple is almost equivalent to EllipticK[x^2] in Mathematica; one may expect to get the same result in both systems, at least while 0 < x < 1.
Note that

with u as defined above: thus, the Jacobian elliptic functions are inverses to the elliptic integrals.
The incomplete elliptic integral of the second kind E is

Equivalently, substituting 

Equivalently, using an alternate notation:

Additional relations include

The incomplete elliptic integral of the third kind
is

or

or

The number n is called the characteristic and can take on any value, independently of the other arguments. Note though that the value
is infinite, for any
.
Elliptic Integrals are said to be 'complete' when the amplitude is pi/2 and thus x=1. The complete elliptic integral of the first kind K may be defined as

or

It is a special case of the incomplete elliptic integral of the first kind:

The special case can be expressed as a power series
![K(k) = \frac{\pi}{2} \sum_{n=0}^\infty \left[\frac{(2n)!}{2^{2 n} n!^2}\right]^2 k^{2n}\!](http://wpcontent.answers.com/math/2/e/7/2e782f35e279a32e5a117b744957975c.png)
which is equivalent to
![K(k) = \frac{\pi}{2}\left\{1 + \left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^2 k^{2} + \left(\frac{1 \cdot 3}{2 \cdot 4}\right)^2 k^{4} + \cdots + \left[\frac{\left(2n - 1\right)!!}{\left(2n\right)!!}\right]^2 k^{2n} + \cdots \right\}.\!](http://wpcontent.answers.com/math/5/a/3/5a3f0d2d1e308865af0730f877bd5666.png)
where n!! denotes the double factorial. In terms of the Gauss hypergeometric function, the complete elliptic integral of the first kind can be expressed as

The complete elliptic integral of the first kind is sometimes called the quarter period. It can be computed in terms of the arithmetic-geometric mean.






The complete elliptic integral of the second kind E may be defined as

or

It is a special case of the incomplete elliptic integral of the second kind:

that can be expressed as a power series
![E(k) = \frac{\pi}{2} \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \left[\frac{(2n)!}{2^{2 n} n!^2}\right]^2 \frac{k^{2n}}{1-2 n}\!](http://wpcontent.answers.com/math/8/d/a/8da804c4cce41a5ffe9f83b23b5678b2.png)
which is
![E(k) = \frac{\pi}{2}\left\{1 - \left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^2 \frac{k^2}{1} - \left(\frac{1 \cdot 3}{2 \cdot 4}\right)^2 \frac{k^4}{3} - \cdots - \left[\frac{\left(2n - 1\right)!!}{\left(2n\right)!!}\right]^2 \frac{k^{2n}}{2 n-1} - \cdots \right\}.\,](http://wpcontent.answers.com/math/c/0/4/c0424dbd50e7989f93463678d89f29ee.png)
In terms of the Gauss hypergeometric function, the complete elliptic integral of the second kind can be expressed as







The complete elliptic integral of the third kind Π can be defined as

Note that sometimes the elliptic integral of the third kind is defined with an inverse sign in n, i.e.



This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
| Best of the Web: Elliptic integral |
Some good "Elliptic integral" pages on the web:
Math mathworld.wolfram.com |
| elliptic function (mathematics) | |
| elliptic integral of the third kind (mathematics) | |
| elliptic integral of the first kind (mathematics) |
| What are elliptical galaxy? Read answer... | |
| What does elliptical mean? Read answer... | |
| What is an elliptical clause? Read answer... |
Copyrights:
![]() | Sci-Tech Dictionary. McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms. Copyright © 2003, 1994, 1989, 1984, 1978, 1976, 1974 by McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Elliptic integral". Read more |
Mentioned in