Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Answers.com

embracery

 
Dictionary: em·brac·er·y
(ĕm-brā'sə-rē) pronunciation
n., pl., -ies.
An attempt to corrupt a jury, as with bribery.

[Middle English embracerie, from embracen, to influence a jury by illegal means, to embrace. See embrace.]


Search unanswered questions...
Enter a question here...
Search: All sources Community Q&A Reference topics
Wordsmith Words: embracery
Top
or imbracery

(em-BRAY-suh-ree)

noun
An attempt to influence a jury illegally as by bribery, threats, or promises. One guilty of embracery is known as an embraceor.

Etymology
From Middle English embracerie, ultimately from em- + brace (the two arms).

Usage
"A Columbia County man pleaded guilty Thursday to a charge of embracery, an illegal attempt to influence a juror, in his drunken-driving trial." — Mayor's Bucks Back Skyfest; Augusta Chronicle (Georgia); Sep 27, 2002.

"Further, every night the non-sequestered civil jury went home where they were exposed to the local and nationally syndicated radio and television talk shows and also the Los Angeles Times... is a form of embracery, the act of attempting to influence a juror or jury in its most high-tech form." — Dennis Schatzman; Race, Media, American Law and O.J. Simpson; Sentinel (Los Angeles, California); Apr 30, 1997.


Law Encyclopedia: Embracery
Top
This entry contains information applicable to United States law only.

The crime of attempting to influence a jury corruptly to one side or the other by promises, persuasions, entreaties, entertainments, and the like. The person guilty of it is called an embraceor. This is both a state and federal crime, and is commonly included under the offense of obstructing justice.

In order for the offense of embracery to be committed, it is essential that the accused individual have an improper intent. If an individual makes statements that would be likely to influence the verdict of a juror while the individual is unaware that such juror is present, such conduct is not embracery.

It is not generally a prerequisite for the juror to have been impaneled and sworn, provided the person's name has been drawn and published as a juror or grand juror.

The intent to influence a juror must be coupled with an attempt to use improper influence, which can be through word or conduct and is the only overt act necessary. The juror can either be approached personally by the individual or through an agent. Words intended to influence a juror need not be spoken to the person directly but can be communicated in a manner designed to be overheard by the juror and prejudice his or her decision.

A party to the action, an individual undergoing grand jury investigation, a witness, or an individual who has no connection with the proceeding can be charged with embracery.

Since the crime of embracery itself only constitutes an attempt, there is no such crime as the attempt to commit embracery. It is, however, a crime to solicit another to commit embracery.

Embracery is punishable by a fine, imprisonment, or both, depending upon statute.

Obscure Words: embracery
Top


an attempt to corruptly influence a jury
Wikipedia: Embracery
Top

Embracery is the attempt to influence a juror corruptly to give his verdict in favour of one side or the other in a trial, by promise, persuasions, entreaties, money, entertainments and the like.

In English law, it was an offence both at common law and by statute, punishable by fine and imprisonment. As a statutory offence it dates back to 1360. The offence is complete, whether any verdict has been given or not, and whether the verdict is in accordance with the weight of evidence or otherwise. The person making the attempt, and any juryman who consents, are equally punishable.

The false verdict of a jury, whether occasioned by embracery or otherwise, was formerly considered criminal, and jurors were severely punished, being proceeded against by writ of attaint. The Juries Act 1825, in abolishing writs of attaint, made a special exemption as regards jurors guilty of embracery (s.61). Prosecution for the offence has been so extremely rare that when a case occurred in 1891 (R v Baker 113, Cent. Crim. Ct. Sess. Pap. 374) it was stated that no precedent could be found for the indictment. The defendant was fined £200, afterwards reduced to £100.

As of 2006, the offence is regarded as obsolescent[1] and such misconduct is now more likely to be charged as perverting the course of justice.[2]

The word embracery comes from the Old Fr. embraseour, an embracer, ie one who excites or instigates, literally one who sets on fire, from embraser, to kindle a fire; "embrace," ie to hold or clasp in the arms, is from French embracer, Latin and bracchia, arms.

See also

References

  1. ^ Richardson, P.J. (ed.) (2006). Archbold: Criminal Pleading, Evidence and Practice. London: Sweet & Maxwell. ISBN 0421-909-20X. , 28-47, 28-151
  2. ^ Attorney-General v. Judd [1995] COD 15, DC

Bibliography


 
 
Learn More
jury
verdict
attempt

What is embracery? Read answer...

Post a question - any question - to the WikiAnswers community:

 

Copyrights:

Dictionary. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright © 2007, 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2009. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.  Read more
Wordsmith Words. © 2009 Wordsmith.org. All rights reserved.  Read more
Law Encyclopedia. West's Encyclopedia of American Law. Copyright © 1998 by The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
Obscure Words. © 2008 by Michael A. Fischer http://home.comcast.net/~wwftd Read more
Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Embracery" Read more