Emergency Navigation
Finding your way to land after an emergency at sea
Statistically, you’re never likely to have to use emergency navigation. It’s needed only by sailors who survive shipwrecks and find themselves cast away at sea with little or nothing in the way of navigational equipment.Nevertheless, if you know anything at all about navigation, you will find the theory of emergency navigation quite fascinating. Entire books have been written on the subject, so probably the best advice is: read about it now; worry about it when it happens.Much of the theory of finding your way to land without instruments, or with few instruments, is common sense based on natural phenomena every sailor experiences and understands; some of it depends entirely on luck (which instruments and tables are available to you); and the rest is deeply rooted in mathematical and celestial esoterica so profound that only a professional navigator could love it.Deep-sea voyaging involves so many different disciplines, from aerodynamics through culinary arts to mechanical engineering, that there just isn’t time in one human lifespan to plunge into all of it to any great depth. Emergency navigation is not near the top of most sailors’ priorities. Even David Burch, author of the well-respected Emergency Navigation, admits: “This book does cover the best possible ways to find your position from scratch, but, realistically, this is not a challenge we are likely to face.”If you’ve done a reasonable amount of reading, have a broad-based education in the arts and sciences, and have enough experience to attempt an ocean crossing, you should be able to find your way back to land. It might not be the nearest land if it’s a tiny coral island, but as long as you can keep going, you can hardly miss the continents.Given the options, most sailors would rather devote their time to studying deep-sea survival techniques than emergency navigation. The ability to catch fish and plankton and gather fresh water is probably at least as important as knowing your position, if not more so.This in no way diminishes the
![]() |






