n.
The energy per unit volume of a region of space.
| Dictionary: energy density |
The energy per unit volume of a region of space.
| 5min Related Video: energy density |
| Wikipedia: Energy density |
| The examples and perspective in this article may not represent a worldwide view of the subject. Please improve this article or discuss the issue on the talk page. |
| This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding reliable references. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (May 2009) |
Energy density is the amount of energy stored in a given system or region of space per unit volume, or per unit mass, depending on the context, although the latter is more formally specific energy [4].[clarification needed] In some cases it is obvious from context which quantity is most useful: for example, in rocketry, energy per unit mass is the most important parameter, but when studying pressurized gas or magnetohydrodynamics the energy per unit volume is more appropriate. In a few applications (comparing, for example, the effectiveness of hydrogen fuel to gasoline) both figures are appropriate and should be called out explicitly. (Hydrogen has a higher energy density per unit mass than does gasoline, but a much lower energy density per unit volume)
Energy per unit volume has the same physical units as pressure, and in many circumstances is an exact synonym: for example, the energy density of the magnetic field may be expressed as (and behaves as) a physical pressure, and the energy required to compress a gas may be determined by multiplying the pressure of the compressed gas by its change in volume.
Contents |
In energy storage application the energy density relates the mass of an energy store to its stored energy. The higher the energy density, the more energy may be stored or transported for the same amount of mass. In the context of fuel selection, that energy density of a fuel is also called the specific energy of that fuel, though in general an engine using that fuel will yield less energy due to inefficiencies and thermodynamic considerations—hence the specific fuel consumption of an engine will be greater than the reciprocal of the specific energy of the fuel.[clarification needed]
The highest density sources of energy are fusion and fission. Fusion includes energy from the sun which will be available for billions of years (in the form of sunlight) but humans have not learned to make our own sustained fusion power sources. Fission of U-238 in nuclear power plants will be available for billions of years because of the vast supply of the element on earth [5]. Coal and petroleum are the current primary energy sources in the U.S. but have a much lower energy density. Burning local biomass fuels supplies household energy needs (cooking fires, oil lamps, etc.) worldwide.
Energy density (how much energy you can carry) does not tell you about energy conversion efficiency (net output per input) or embodied energy (what the energy output costs to provide, as harvesting, refining, distributing, and dealing with pollution all use energy). Like any process occurring on a large scale, intensive energy use creates environmental impacts: for example, global warming, nuclear waste storage, and deforestation are a few of the consequences of supplying our growing energy demands from fossil fuels, nuclear fission, or biomass.
By dividing by 3.6 the figures for megajoules per kilogram can be converted to kilowatt-hours per kilogram. Unfortunately, the useful energy available by extraction from an energy store is always less than the energy put into the energy store, as explained by the laws of thermodynamics. No single energy storage method boasts the best in specific power, specific energy, and energy density. Peukert's Law describes how the amount of energy we get out depends how quickly we pull it out.
Gravimetric and volumetric energy density of some fuels and storage technologies (modified from the Gasoline article):
| This section may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. Please improve this section if you can. (October 2008) |
| This section called True energy densities is missing citations or needs footnotes. Please help add inline citations to guard against copyright violations and factual inaccuracies. (May 2009) |
This table gives the energy density of a complete system, including all required external components, such as oxidisers or heat sources.
| Storage type | Energy density by mass (MJ/kg) | Energy density by volume (MJ/L) | Peak recovery efficiency % | Practical recovery efficiency % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mass-energy equivalence[1] | 89,876,000,000 | |||
| Nuclear fusion of hydrogen (energy from the sun) | 645,000,000 | |||
| Deuterium-Tritium fusion | 337,000,000 | |||
| Nuclear fission (of 100% U-235) (Used in nuclear bombs) | 88,250,000 | 1,500,000,000 | ||
| Natural uranium (99.3% U-238, 0.7% U-235) in fast breeder reactor[6] | 24,000,000 | 50% | ||
| Enriched uranium (3.5% U235) in light water reactor | 3,456,000 | 30% | ||
| Hf-178m2 isomer | 1,326,000 | 17,649,060 | ||
| Pu-238 a-decay | 15,500,000 | |||
| Natural uranium (0.7% U235) in light water reactor | 443,000 | 30% | ||
| Ta-180m isomer | 41,340 | 689,964 | ||
| Specific orbital energy of Low Earth orbit (approximate) | 33 | |||
| Cl2O7 + CH4 - computed[citation needed] | 17.4 | |||
| Cl2O7 decomposition - computed[citation needed] | 12.2 | |||
| Nitromethane[citation needed] | 11.3 | 12.9 | ||
| Octanitrocubane explosive - computed[citation needed] | 8.5 | 17 | ||
| Tetranitrotetrahedrane explosive - computed[citation needed] | 8.3 | |||
| Heptanitrocubane explosive - computed[citation needed] | 8.2 | |||
| Dinitroacetylene explosive - computed[citation needed] | 7.9 | |||
| Sodium (reacted with chlorine)[citation needed] | 7.0349 | |||
| Tetranitrocubane explosive - computed[citation needed] | 6.95 | |||
| Ammonal (Al+NH4NO3 oxidizer)[citation needed] | 6.9 | 12.7 | ||
| Tetranitromethane + hydrazine bipropellant - computed[citation needed] | 6.6 | |||
| Hexanitrobenzene explosive - computed[citation needed] | 6.5 | |||
| Octogen explosive - computed[citation needed] | 6.3 | |||
| ANFO-ANNM[citation needed] | 6.26 | |||
| TNT [Kinney, G.F.; K.J. Graham (1985). Explosive shocks in air. Springer-Verlag. ISBN 3-540-15147-8.][citation needed] | 4.610 | 6.92 | ||
| Copper Thermite (Al + CuO as oxidizer)[citation needed] | 4.13 | 20.9 | ||
| Thermite (powder Al + Fe2O3 as oxidizer) | 4.00 | 18.4 | ||
| Hydrogen peroxide decomposition (as monopropellant) | 2.7 | 3.8 | ||
| battery, Lithium ion nanowire | 2.54 | 95%[clarification needed][7] | ||
| battery, Lithium Thionyl Chloride (LiSOCl2) [8] | 2.5 | |||
| Water 220.64 bar, 373.8°C[citation needed][clarification needed] | 1.968 | 0.708 | ||
| Kinetic energy penetrator[clarification needed] | 1.9 | 30 | ||
| battery, Fluoride ion[citation needed] | 1.7 | 2.8 | ||
| battery, Hydrogen closed cycle H fuel cell[9] | 1.62 | |||
| Hydrazine(toxic) decomposition (as monopropellant) | 1.6 | 1.6 | ||
| Ammonium nitrate decomposition (as monopropellant) | 1.4 | 2.5 | ||
| Capacitor by EEStor (claimed prototype capacity) [10] | 1.2 | 5.7 | 99% | 99% |
| Thermal Energy Capacity of Molten Salt | 1[citation needed] | 98%[11] | ||
| Molecular spring approximate[citation needed] | 1 | |||
| battery, Sodium Sulfur | 1.23[citation needed] | 85%[12] | ||
| battery, Lithium-manganese[2][3] | 0.83-1.01 | 1.98-2.09 | ||
| battery, Lithium ion[4][5] | 0.46-0.72 | 0.83-0.9 | 95%[6] | |
| battery, Lithium Sulphur[7] | 1.26 | 1.26 | ||
| battery(Sodium Nickel Chloride)]], High Temperature | 0.56 | |||
| battery, Silver-oxide[2] | 0.47 | 1.8 | ||
| Flywheel | 0.36-0.5[8][9] | |||
| 5.56 × 45 mm NATO bullet[clarification needed] | 0.4 | 3.2 | ||
| battery, Nickel metal hydride (NiMH), low power design as used in consumer batteries[10] | 0.4 | 1.55 | ||
| battery, Zinc-manganese (alkaline), long life design[2][4] | 0.4-0.59 | 1.15-1.43 | ||
| battery, Zinc Bromine flow (ZnBr)[11] | 0.27 | |||
| battery, Nickel metal hydride (NiMH), High Power design as used in cars[12] | 0.250 | 0.493 | ||
| battery, Nickel cadmium (NiCd)[4] | 0.14 | 1.08 | 80%[6] | |
| battery, Zinc-Carbon[4] | 0.13 | 0.331 | ||
| battery, Lead acid[4] | 0.14 | 0.36 | ||
| battery, Vanadium redox | 0.09[citation needed] | 0.1188 | 70-75% | |
| battery, Vanadium Bromide redox | 0.18 | 0.252 | 80%-90%[13] | |
| Capacitor Ultracapacitor | 0.0199 [14] | 0.050[citation needed] | ||
| Capacitor Supercapacitor | 0.01[citation needed] | 80%-98.5%[15] | 39%-70%[16] | |
| Superconducting magnetic energy storage | 0.008 [17] | >95% | ||
| Capacitor | 0.002 [18] | |||
| Spring power (clock spring), torsion spring | 0.0003 [19] | 0.0006 | ||
| Storage type | Energy density by mass (MJ/kg) | Energy density by volume (MJ/L) | Peak recovery efficiency % | Practical recovery efficiency % |
| This section called Energy densities ignoring external components is missing citations or needs footnotes. Please help add inline citations to guard against copyright violations and factual inaccuracies. (May 2009) |
This table lists energy densities of systems that require external components, such as oxidisers or a heat sink or source. These figures do not take into account the mass and volume of the required components as they are assumed to be freely available and present in the atmosphere. Such systems cannot be compared with self-contained systems.
| Storage type | Energy density by mass (MJ/kg) | Energy density by volume (MJ/L) | Peak recovery efficiency % | Practical recovery efficiency % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hydrogen, liquid (burned in air) | 143 | 10.1 | ||
| Hydrogen, compressed at 700 bar (burned in air) [20] | 143 | 5.6 | ||
| Hydrogen, gas (burned in air) | 143 | 0.01079 | ||
| Beryllium (toxic) (burned in air) | 67.6 | 125.1 | ||
| Lithium borohydride (burned in air) | 65.2 | 43.4 | ||
| Boron [21] (burned in air) | 58.9 | 137.8 | ||
| Methane (1.013bar, 15°C) (burned in air) | 55.6 | 0.0378 | ||
| Natural gas (burned in air) | 53.6[13] | 0.0364 | ||
| CNG (NG compressed to 25 GPa ~ 3600 psi) | 53.6[13] | 9 | ||
| LPG propane (burned in air)[14] | 49.6 | 25.3 | ||
| LPG butane (burned in air)[14] | 49.1 | 27.7 | ||
| Gasoline[14] | 46.4 | 34.2 | ||
| Diesel fuel/residential heating oil (burned in air)[14] | 46.2 | 37.3 | ||
| Polyethylene plastic | 46.3[15] | 42.6 | ||
| Polypropylene plastic | 46.4[15] | 41.7 | ||
| Gasohol E10 (10% ethanol 90% gasoline by volume) | 43.54 | 33.72 | ||
| Gasohol E85 (85% ethanol 10% gasoline by volume) | 33.1 | 25.65 | ||
| Lithium (burned in air) | 43.1 | 23.0 | ||
| Jet A aviation fuel [22] / kerosene | 42.8 | 33 | ||
| Biodiesel oil (vegetable oil) | 42.20 | 33 | ||
| DMF (2,5-dimethylfuran)[clarification needed] | 42 [23] | 37.8 | ||
| Crude oil (according to the definition of ton of oil equivalent)[clarification needed] | 46.3 | 37[13] | ||
| Polystyrene plastic | 41.4[15] | 43.5 | ||
| Body fat metabolism | 38 | 35 | 22[16] | |
| Butanol | 36.6 | 29.2 | ||
| Graphite (burned in air) | 32.7 | 72.9 | ||
| coal, Anthracite[citation needed] | 32.5 | 72.4 | 36 | |
| Silicon (burned in air)[24] | 32.2 | 75.1 | ||
| Aluminum (burned in air) | 31.0 | 83.8 | ||
| Ethanol | 30 | 24 | ||
| Polyester plastic | 26.0 [15] | 35.6 | ||
| Magnesium (burned in air) | 24.7 | 43.0 | ||
| coal, Bituminous [25] | 24 | 20 | ||
| PET plastic | 23.5 (impure) [26] | |||
| Methanol | 19.7 | 15.6 | ||
| Hydrazine (toxic) combusted to N2+H2O | 19.5 | 19.3 | ||
| Liquid ammonia (combusted to N2+H2O) | 18.6 | 11.5 | ||
| PVC plastic (improper combustion toxic)[clarification needed] | 18.0[15] | 25.2 | ||
| Peat briquette [17] | 17.7 | |||
| Sugars, carbohydrates & protein metabolism[citation needed] | 17 | 26.2(dextrose) | 22 [27] | |
| coal, Lignite[citation needed] | 14.0 | |||
| Calcium (burned in air)[citation needed] | 15.9 | 24.6 | ||
| Glucose | 15.55 | 23.9 | ||
| Dry cowdung and cameldung | 15.5 [28] | |||
| Wood[citation needed] | 6.0 | |||
| Sodium (burned to wet sodium hydroxide) | 13.3 | 12.8 | ||
| Household waste | 8.0[18] | |||
| Sod peat | 12.8 | |||
| Sodium (burned to dry sodium oxide) | 9.1 | 8.8 | ||
| Zinc (burned in air) | 5.3 | 38.0 | ||
| Teflon plastic (combustion toxic, but flame retardant) | 5.1 | 11.2 | ||
| iron (burned to iron(III) oxide) | 5.2 | 40.68 | ||
| iron (burned to iron(II) oxide) | 4.9 | 38.2 | ||
| battery, Zinc air[19] | 1.59 | 6.02 | ||
| Liquid nitrogen[clarification needed] | 0.77[20] | 0.62 | ||
| Latent heat of fusion of Ice[citation needed] | 0.335 | 0.335 | ||
| Water at 100 m dam height[clarification needed] | 0.001 | 0.001 | 85-90%[citation needed] | |
| Storage type | Energy density by mass (MJ/kg) | Energy density by volume (MJ/L) | Peak recovery efficiency % | Practical recovery efficiency % |
Electric and magnetic fields store energy. In a vacuum, the (volumetric) energy density (in SI units) is given by
,where E is the electric field and B is the magnetic field. In the context of magnetohydrodynamics, the physics of conductive fluids, the magnetic energy density behaves like an additional pressure that adds to the gas pressure of a plasma.
In normal (linear) substances, the energy density (in SI units) is
,where D is the electric displacement field and H is the magnetizing field.
In physics, "vacuum energy" or "zero-point energy" is the volumetric energy density of empty space. More recent developments have expounded on the concept of energy in empty space.
Modern physics is commonly classified into two fundamental theories: quantum field theory and general relativity. Quantum field theory takes quantum mechanics and special relativity into account, and it's a theory of all the forces and particles except gravity. General relativity is a theory of gravity, but it is incompatible with quantum mechanics. Currently these two theories have not yet been reconciled into one unified description, though research into "quantum gravity" seeks to bridge this divide.
In general relativity, the cosmological constant is proportional to the energy density of empty space, and can be measured by the curvature of space. It is subsequently related to the age of the universe, and as energy expands outwards with time its density changes.
Quantum field theory considers the vacuum ground state not to be completely empty, but to consist of a seething mass of virtual particles and fields. These fields are quantified as probabilities—that is, the likelihood of manifestation based on conditions. Since these fields do not have a permanent existence, they are called vacuum fluctuations. In the Casimir effect, two metal plates can cause a change in the vacuum energy density between them which generates a measurable force.
Some believe that vacuum energy might be the "dark energy" (also called Quintessence) associated with the cosmological constant in general relativity, thought to be similar to a negative force of gravity (or antigravity). Observations that the expanding universe appears to be accelerating seem to support the cosmic inflation theory—first proposed by Alan Guth in 1981—in which the nascent universe passed through a phase of exponential expansion driven by a negative vacuum energy density (positive vacuum pressure).
Energy density is the amount of energy (kilojoules or calories) per amount of food, with food amount being measured in grams or milliliters of food. Energy density is thus expressed in cal/g, kcal/g, J/g, kJ/g, cal/mL, kcal/mL, J/mL, or kJ/mL. What is popularly referred to as the number of "Calories" in a portion of food (invariably spelled with a capital C to show that it is the food Calorie) is therefore the number of kilocalories (thousands of calories with the small c) in the portion.
Energy density measures the energy released when the food is metabolised by a healthy organism when it ingests the food (see food energy for calculation) and the food is metabolized with oxygen, into waste products such as carbon dioxide and water. Carbohydrates, fats, and proteins are the only sources of energy for an individual abstaining from alcohol, and they make up ninety percent of the dry weight of food.[21] Therefore, water content is the most important factor in energy density. Carbohydrates and proteins provide four calories per gram, whereas fat provides nine calories per gram, 2.25 times as much energy. Foods that derive most of their energy from fat have a much higher energy density than those that derive most of their energy from carbohydrates or proteins, even if the water content is the same. Nutrients with a lower absorption, such as fiber or sugar alcohols, lower the energy density of foods as well. A moderate energy density would be 1.6 to 3 calories per gram; salmon, lean meat, and bread would fall in this category. High-energy foods would have more than three calories per gram and include crackers, cheese, dark chocolate, and peanuts.[22] The energy density of a food can be determined from the label by dividing the calories or joules by the weight in grams.
J/kg, where v is the speed in m/s. See also kinetic energy per unit mass of projectiles.This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
| Energy value of coal | |
| Orders of magnitude (specific energy density) | |
| Tonne of oil equivalent |
Copyrights:
![]() | Dictionary. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright © 2007, 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2007. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Energy density". Read more |
Mentioned in