Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Answers.com

era of good feelings

 
Britannica Concise Encyclopedia: Era of Good Feelings

(1815 – 25) Period of U.S. national unity and complacency. A Boston newspaper coined the term in 1817 to describe a nation free from the influence of European political and military events. The good feelings were stimulated by two events of 1816, during James Madison's presidency: enactment of the first U.S. protective tariff, and establishment of the second national bank. The presidency of James Monroe (1817 – 25) was marked by the dominance of the Democratic-Republican Party and the decline of the Federalist Party.

For more information on Era of Good Feelings, visit Britannica.com.

Search unanswered questions...
Enter a question here...
Search: All sources Community Q&A Reference topics
US History Encyclopedia: Era of Good Feeling
Top

Era of Good Feeling (1817–1824), a phrase coined by the Columbian Centinel, a Boston newspaper, to describe the early presidency of James Monroe, whose administration found the country at peace and the economy prosperous. Monroe accepted the National Bank and protective tariff and approved further construction on the National (Cumberland) Road. Despite the economic panic of 1819, Monroe received all but one electoral vote to a second term in 1820. Despite the apparent harmony, renewed sectionalism and factionalism eroded "good feeling" during Monroe's second term and signaled the demise of the (Jeffersonian) Republican Party.

Bibliography

Ammon, Harry. James Monroe: The Quest for National Identity. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.

Cummingham, Noble. The Presidency of James Monroe. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1996.

Wait, Eugene. America and the Monroe Years. Huntington, N.Y.: Kroshka, 2000.

—Philip Coolidge Brooks/H. S.

 
Columbia Encyclopedia: era of good feelings
Top
era of good feelings, period in U.S. history (1817-23) when, the Federalist party having declined, there was little open party feeling. After the War of 1812 all sections were anxious to return to a normal life and to forget political issues. The phrase was coined at the time of President Monroe's good-will tour through the North, including New England, where a President had not been seen since the Virginia "dynasty" came into power. Under the surface, however, vast sectional issues were shaping themselves, and personal rivalries also were gathering strength to break loose in the campaign of 1824.

Bibliography

See G. Dangerfield, The Era of Good Feelings (1952, repr. 1963).


Wikipedia: Era of Good Feelings
Top

The Era of Good Feelings (1817–25)[1] describes a period in United States political history in which partisan bitterness abated. The phrase was coined by Benjamin Russell, in the Boston newspaper, Columbian Centinel, on July 12, 1817, following the good-will visit to Boston of President James Monroe.

Overview

The political bitterness declined because the Federalists had largely dissolved and were no longer attacking the president, then causing an era of good feeling because there was only one political party. The nation was politically united behind the Democratic-Republican Party. The Era of Good Feelings started after the War of 1812. The Hartford Convention of 1814-15 underscored the perceived disloyalty of the Federalists during the war. Nationalism surged even though there was no redress of pre-war grievances at the Treaty of Ghent. These victories instilled pride in the new nation. President Monroe paid little attention to party in dispensing patronage. In the election of 1820, Monroe was re-elected with all but one electoral vote. A myth has arisen that one elector deliberately voted against him so that George Washington would remain the only unanimously elected president. In fact the elector in question disliked Monroe's policies; at the time he cast his vote, he could not have known that his would be the only one to prevent a unanimous election.[citation needed] Slavery had come to the forefront as a national issue, but Henry Clay's negotiation of the Missouri Compromise ameliorated the crisis. The solution was to balance admission of Missouri Territory as a slave state, with the admission of Maine as a free state. The issue of slavery was part of the larger issue between the North and the South of economic and social sectionalism. At this time, local politics were still largely conducted without party labels or party conventions.

The era gave a pause to bitter debates over the protective tariff and the Second National Bank. Florida was acquired from Spain to general acclaim. President Monroe promulgated the Monroe Doctrine, advising European powers against attempts to reassert their control over former colonies in the New World. The Monroe Doctrine boldly asserted the status of the United States as a full-fledged nation, and this gained the administration popular support during a time of increased nationalism.

"…We owe it, therefore, to candor and to the amicable relations existing between the United States and those powers to declare that we should consider any attempt on their part to extend their system to any portion of this hemisphere as dangerous to our peace and safety. With the existing colonies or dependencies of any European power we have not interfered and shall not interfere. But with the Governments who have declared their independence and maintain it, and whose independence we have, on great consideration and on just principles, acknowledged, we could not view any interposition for the purpose of oppressing them, or controlling in any other manner their destiny, by any European power in any other light than as the manifestation of an unfriendly disposition toward the United States…" ―The Monroe Doctrine, December 2, 1823[2]

End of the Era of Good Feelings

After the Panic of 1819 and the Missouri Compromise of 1820, the national mood grew more tense. However, the relentless daily bitter attacks by one party against the other did not resume until about 1828. Before 1820, the Democratic-Republican Party members of Congress had met in caucus and decided on the party's presidential candidate. That system collapsed in 1824 as four men competed: John Quincy Adams, William H. Crawford, Henry Clay and Andrew Jackson.

The four formed regional coalitions with state politicians and pursued the electorate. At the polls, turnout was light because there were no parties to mobilize voters. Then, because no one received a majority in the electoral college, the decision on the presidency went to the House of Representatives. Clay, who was Speaker of the House of Representatives, swung the election to Adams, who then appointed Clay as Secretary of State. The result outraged Jackson and his supporters. They alleged that a "corrupt bargain" had taken place and immediately began their crusade to regain the "stolen" presidency, which Jackson won in 1828.

References

  1. ^ George Dangerfield. The Awakening of American Nationalism: 1815–1828 (1965).
  2. ^ excerpt from President James Monroe's Seventh Annual Message to Congress

 
 

 

Copyrights:

Britannica Concise Encyclopedia. Britannica Concise Encyclopedia. © 2006 Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
US History Encyclopedia. © 2006 through a partnership of Answers Corporation. All rights reserved.  Read more
Columbia Encyclopedia. The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition Copyright © 2003, Columbia University Press. Licensed from Columbia University Press. All rights reserved. www.cc.columbia.edu/cu/cup/ Read more
Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Era of Good Feelings" Read more